雾都孤儿人物塑造论文

雾都孤儿人物塑造论文

Good and Evil Described by Dickens: An Analysis of Typical Characters in Oliver Twist
Abstract
Charles Dickens is the greatest representative of English critical realism in the nineteenth century. One of Dickens’ favorite novels Oliver Twist is known all over the world for the well-portrayed characters. In Oliver Twist, dozens of characters are well portrayed, including good and evil. This thesis analyzes some of the typical characters in the novel. First, the child hero of the novel, Oliver Twist, is good incarnation described by Dickens; Oliver possess many precious characteristics. Second, Fagin and Sikes’ evil exposes completely and arouses readers antipathy and wrath. Finally, the complex poor character, Nancy, has conflicts between her inner conscience and her devotion to Sikes. Ultimately, she risks her life to help Oliver, which commits one of the most noble acts of kindness in the story. So the conclusion draws that Dickens believes that most people were good at heart, but at times, their good impulses could be distorted by terrible environments.
Key Words: Charles Dickens; Oliver Twist; goodness; nature; evil; ferocity
摘 要
查尔斯�6�1狄更斯是19世纪英国伟大的批判现实主义作家。《雾都孤儿》是狄更斯最喜欢的作品之一，也由于作者对小说人物的成功刻画而闻名遐迩。在《雾都孤儿》中，许多的人物被成功的塑造，包括善良的和邪恶的。这篇论文分析了小说中的一些典型人物。首先，是儿童主人公奥利佛尔�6�1特维斯特是狄更斯笔下善良的化身，他拥有许多难能可贵的性格特征。其次，费金和塞克斯罪恶形象的充分暴露引起了读者的反感和憎恶。最后，可怜而又性格复杂的南茜陷入良心的发现和对爱人忠诚的两难境地。最终，她冒着生命危险帮助奥利佛尔是小说中最崇高的善行之一。通过对《雾都孤儿》典型人物的分析，可以得出这样的结论：狄更斯相信大多数人的内心是善良的，但有时，一些人的善念也许会因糟糕的外界环境而扭曲。
关键词：查尔斯�6�1狄更斯、奥利佛尔�6�1特维斯特、善良、本性、罪恶、凶残

希望你满意！

费金是《雾都孤儿》中的重要人物，如何分析费金的人物形象和性格特点？

费金是《雾都孤儿》中典型的反派，但他并不总是坏人，小说中的费金是一个面目粗野、性格古怪、自私、邋遢、唯利是图的人。在狄更斯的作品中，费金是一个三观错误、无道德、极端残暴的恶棍。他总是以自我为中心，费金为了达到自己获取非法利益的目的，不断向奥利弗解释偷窃的技巧，费金希望把他训练成一个优秀的小偷。费金还唆使他的一些孩子去偷窃和犯罪，只是为了让奥利弗成为自己的摇钱树，让奥利弗变成一个麻木的、无法辨别是非、缺乏道德、喜欢偷窃的人。

即便如此，我们也不能用人性的善良来判断一个人的一生，因为没有人能够一直坚持做好事。所以在《雾都孤儿》中，狄更斯笔下的费金在奥利弗刚到伦敦时就给了他一个住处，并给了他相应的食物。对于从来没有吃过一顿饱饭的奥利弗来说，费金的“关心”无疑使他感到温暖。虽然费金是十恶不赦的，但他利用奥利弗的时候，还是会给奥利弗吃的，还会在轻松愉快的气氛中教他偷东西。虽然这是不对的，但对于饱受训斥和殴打的奥利弗来说，这是一种难得的“温暖”。单从这个层面来看，费金对奥利弗的成长也是有益的，但这并没有什么错。从其他层面来看，费金给奥利弗带来了严重的负面影响。

狄更斯在《雾都孤儿》中成功塑造了费金的形象。人物一出现，作者就生动地描绘了一是一个典型的邪恶形象，有着凶狠肮脏的脸。当奥利弗带着孩子在街上被人抓住时，费金勃然大怒，咄咄逼人，甚至挨了一拳。直到他最终被抓住，他一直想着来访的奥利弗会帮助他，而他并没有打算回来。作为小说中邪恶势力的代表，费金可以说是最肮脏、最恶心、最可恨的。作者对他的描写从他的外表到他的内心，从他的生活环境到他的生活方式都充满了罪恶。

另一方面，费金也是一个躲在贼窝里的温暖老人，虽然他的笑容下隐藏着阴谋，但不可否认的是，他照顾着这些流浪儿童的日常生活，小偷窝甚至充满了笑声。一点点的温暖和善良，使费金的形象立体而丰富，成为小说中最有趣的人物。

需要一份关于《雾都孤儿》南希 人物性格分析的论文大纲谢谢~

南希是因为贫困而加入贼党的。虽然她在开始随着贼党偷盗，也迫害过奥利弗，但她最后被奥利弗感动，同情他的遭遇，冒着生命危险帮助他，说明她是有良知的，能分清是非，见义勇为的。南希也属于圆形人物，她性格中的善良在最后也体现了出来，作者塑造这个形象主要是为了弘扬人性的美好和爱的主题。

关于雾都孤儿的人物特点和写作手法的论文

Nancy
A major concern of Oliver Twist is the question of whether a bad environment can irrevocably poison someone’s character and soul. As the novel progresses, the character who best illustrates the contradictory issues brought up by that question is Nancy. As a child of the streets, Nancy has been a thief and drinks to excess. The narrator’s reference to her “free and agreeable . . . manners” indicates that she is a prostitute. She is immersed in the vices condemned by her society, but she also commits perhaps the most noble act in the novel when she sacrifices her own life in order to protect Oliver. Nancy’s moral complexity is unique among the major characters in Oliver Twist. The novel is full of characters who are all good and can barely comprehend evil, such as Oliver, Rose, and Brownlow; and characters who are all evil and can barely comprehend good, such as Fagin, Sikes, and Monks. Only Nancy comprehends and is capable of both good and evil. Her ultimate choice to do good at a great personal cost is a strong argument in favor of the incorruptibility of basic goodness, no matter how many environmental obstacles it may face.
Nancy’s love for Sikes exemplifies the moral ambiguity of her character. As she herself points out to Rose, devotion to a man can be “a comfort and a pride” under the right circumstances. But for Nancy, such devotion is “a new means of violence and suffering”—indeed, her relationship with Sikes leads her to criminal acts for his sake and eventually to her own demise. The same behavior, in different circumstances, can have very different consequences and moral significance. In much of Oliver Twist, morality and nobility are black-and-white issues, but Nancy’s character suggests that the boundary between virtue and vice is not always clearly drawn