文学研究论文参考文献
论文写作中我们需要大量阅读参考文献来丰富我们的知识面，拓展我们的知识深度。下面是我和大家分享的文学研究论文参考文献，更多内容请关注毕业论文网。
篇一：参考文献
[1] 姜晓丽. 女权主义对翻译的影响探析[D]. 西安电子科技大学 2013
[2] 王君. 英语经济类语篇汉译实践报告[D]. 辽宁师范大学 2014
[3] 赵菁婕. 论文学翻译中的创造性叛逆[D]. 青岛大学 2014
[4] 李夏. 女性哥特视角下《简爱》与《呼啸山庄》的对比分析[D]. 中国海洋大学 2013
[5] 阳英. 关联理论视角下《雾都孤儿》荣译本与何译本比较研究[D]. 湖南工业大学 2014
[6] 沈蔼亲. 操纵学派“忠实观”与传统“忠实观”的对比研究[D]. 湖南工业大学 2014
[7] 郭慧. 操纵论视角下理雅各与许渊冲《诗经》英译本的对比研究[D]. 湖南工业大学 2013
[8] 王番. 概念隐喻理论视角下的情感隐喻翻译[D]. 南京工业大学 2013
[9] 姜姗. 语境视域下的英语经济新闻文本汉译实践报告[D]. 辽宁师范大学 2014
[10] 蔡莹莹. 风景抒情唐诗英译的象似性研究[D]. 辽宁师范大学 2014
[11] 王凯华. 帕尔默文化语言学视角下的宋词英译意象传递研究[D]. 辽宁师范大学 2014
[12] 滕娇月. 概念整合理论视阙下唐诗颜色词的英译研究[D]. 辽宁师范大学 2014
[13] 王筱. 默认值图式视域下的《聊斋志异》英译研究[D]. 辽宁师范大学 2014
[14] 支翠霞. 新闻翻译的后殖民视角[D]. 湖南工业大学 2012
[15] 薛颖然. 目的论视野下的英汉字幕翻译[D]. 湖南工业大学 2012
[16] 贺倩. 女性主义翻译理论与小说Jane Eyre的翻译[D]. 新疆师范大学 2012
[17] 何婧舒. 操纵理论视角下《简·爱》两个中译本的文化再现比较研究[D]. 四川师范大学 2012
[18] 吴云云. 《简爱》的女权话语研究[D]. 华北电力大学(北京) 2010
[19] 纪娜. 成长路上的逃离与皈依[D]. 湖南师范大学 2008
[20] 胡娟娟. 《简·爱》在20世纪中国的经典化建构及其女主人公的形象变迁[D]. 上海外国语大学 2012
篇二：参考文献
[1] 刘禾着，宋伟杰等译.跨语际实践[M]. 三联书店， 2002
[2] 胡安江. 文本旅行与翻译研究[J]. 四川外语学院学报. 2007(05)
[3] 郭延礼着.中国近代翻译文学概论[M]. 湖北教育出版社， 1998
[4] 孟昭毅，李载道主编.中国翻译文学史[M]. 北京大学出版社， 2005
[5] 张南峰着.中西译学批评[M]. 清华大学出版社， 2004
[6] 谢天振着.译介学[M]. 上海外语教育出版社， 1999
[7] (美)爱德华·W.赛义德()着，谢少波，韩刚等译.赛义德自选集[M]. 中国社会科学出版社， 1999
[8] 冯庆华，主编.文体翻译论[M]. 上海外语教育出版社， 2002
[9] 陈福康着.中国译学理论史稿[M]. 上海外语教育出版社， 2000
[10] 刘宓庆着.当代翻译理论[M]. 中国对外翻译出版公司， 1999
[11] 冯庆华编着.实用翻译教程[M]. 上海外语教育出版社， 1997
[12] 唐玉娟，谭少青. 译者措辞中的意识形态因素--《简·爱》两个中译本的比较[J]. 成都教育学院学报. 2006(11)
[13] 符白羽. 从旅行理论看文学作品在翻译中的旅行[J]. 长沙大学学报. 2006(04)
[14] 赵俊姝. 文学多元系统理论视角解读胡适翻译思想[J]. 昆明师范高等专科学校学报. 2005(02)
[15] 李坤，贾德江. 《简爱》两个中译本的历时比较[J]. 河北理工学院学报(社会科学版). 2007(01)
[16] 苏留华. 小说对话的翻译--从符号学角度分析《简·爱》[J]. 广州大学学报(社会科学版). 2004(11)
[17] Clifford,: Travel and Translation in the Late Twentieth Century. . 1997
[18] Andre Source Book. . 2004
[19] Lefevere , Rewriting and the Manipulation of Literary Fame. . 2004
[20] 于德英. 用另一只眼睛看多元系统论--多元系统论的形式主义分析[J]. 中国翻译. 2004(05)
篇三：参考文献
[1] 刘美玲. 操控理论视角下《世界是平的》两中译本的研究[D]. 华中师范大学 2013
[2] 杨晓琳. 从翻译共性的角度探析英译汉中的“翻译文体”[D]. 浙江大学 2013
[3] 伊塔马·埃文-佐哈尔，张南峰. 多元系统论[J]. 中国翻译. 2002(04)
[4] 张书玲. 英国博物馆资料翻译实践报告[D]. 中南大学 2013
[5] 笪鸿安，陈莉. 从《简·爱》两汉译本谈直译与意译的运用[J]. 河海大学学报(社会科学版). 1999(03)
[6] 叶荷. 翻译与改写[D]. 华侨大学 2009
[7] 王晓元. 意识形态与文学翻译的互动关系[J]. 中国翻译. 1999(02)
[8] 廖秋忠. 篇章与语用和句法研究[J]. 语言教学与研究. 1991(04)
[9] 周忠良. 重思抵抗式翻译[D]. 广东外语外贸大学 2009
[10] 张焰明. 剩余信息在翻译中的应用--兼评祝庆英和黄源深的《简·爱》译本[J]. 韩山师范学院学报(社会科学版). 2004(01)
[11] 葛中俊. 翻译文学：目的'语文学的次范畴[J]. 中国比较文学. 1997(03)
[12] 蒋骁华. 意识形态对翻译的影响：阐发与新思考[J]. 中国翻译. 2003(05)
[13] 杨自俭. 语篇和语境--《衔接与连贯理论的发展及应用》序[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报. 2003(02)
[14] 谢世坚. 从中国近代翻译文学看多元系统理论的局限性[J]. 四川外语学院学报. 2002(04)
[15] 郑雪青. 《简·爱》两个译本翻译比较[J]. 齐齐哈尔大学学报(哲学社会科学版). 2001(01)
[16] 潘红. 夹缝里的风景--谈黄源深先生《简爱》译本的审美特点[J]. 福州大学学报(哲学社会科学版). 2002(02)
[17] 颜凡博. 从文化差异角度谈中式菜名的英译[D]. 中北大学 2011
[18] 赵伟. 鲁迅小说两个英译本的对比研究[D]. 上海海运学院 2000
[19] Zhang Haifeng. A Principle with the English Translation of Chinese Classical Poetry[D]. 广东外语外贸大学 2001
[20] 陈王青. 虚构专名英译中的行为常式[D]. 广东外语外贸大学 2007
[21] 杜洪洁. 政治与翻译：西方(后)现代主义小说在中国的译介(1979-1988)[D]. 天津理工大学 2008
《雾都孤儿》是著名英国现实主义作家狄更斯的长篇小说。 它描写了19世纪英国底层人民的悲惨生活，揭露了当时社会的黑暗，批判了社会中的丑陋现象。 19世纪40年代，小奥立弗出生在了一个济贫院。在他出生时，母亲就不幸死去，从此奥立弗成为了一个孤儿，开始了在济贫院的生活。 济贫院是什么？ 简单地来说，就是福利院。 然而这个福利院又和我们平时知道的充满关爱和温暖的福利院不同，它更为严苛和吝啬。 尤其是在奥立弗9岁这年，济贫院转型成为了那个年代的特殊产物，要求受救济者必须要在其中从事苦役劳动。无论是谁也不能例外。 而小小的奥立弗自然也成为了其中的一员。他和许多孤儿一起，为了讨要一口稀饭，卑躬屈膝，甚至被诅咒、被关小黑屋。 他讨要那口稀饭的举动甚至被视为“造反”，为此理事会倒贴钱将他卖给棺材铺老板当学徒。 在棺材铺里，他被苛刻对待，因为他人侮辱自己的母亲打架、被惩罚。 终于，不甘心这样过的奥立弗在一个寒冷的夜晚逃往了伦敦。 在路上他遇到了小扒手杰克·达金斯，并在杰克的极力邀请下来到了窃贼首领费金的面前。 从此他留在了贼窟。 一次，他和伙伴上街时，无意中被误会是他偷了布朗罗先生的手绢而被逮捕。 虽布朗罗先生极力想要解救他。但推事范昂先生却一心想为他定罪。 幸亏书店老板及时出面证明他的无辜。 布朗洛先生将生病的奥利弗带回了家。在布朗洛先生及其管家的无微不至的关怀下，奥利弗第一次感受到了人间的温暖。 然而好景不长，奥利弗在外出帮布朗洛先生还书和付钱的路上，被盗窃团伙的南希发现。 南希将百般不愿的他带回了贼首费金的新住处。自此奥利弗失去了自由，重新进入了盗窃团伙。 费金花言巧语软硬兼施想让奥立弗同流合污，强迫他参与盗窃，却一一失败。 后来在一次中行动中，将想警告主人而受伤的奥立弗扔下后扬长而去。 好在此后奥立弗的运气否极泰来，一切开始逆转。 他因伤遇到了姨妈罗斯小姐。 虽差点被自己同父异母的兄长因为争夺家产而陷害，幸亏得到了南希见义勇为的帮助，最后一切真相大白，坏人得到了惩罚，奥立弗被收养结束了自己苦难的童年生活。马克思曾经写道： 而在其《英国资产阶级》一文中，他列举的英国小说家中， 狄更斯 就居榜首。 《雾都孤儿》作为狄更斯第一部伟大的社会小说，在世界文学史上占有重要位置。 他以高度的艺术概括，生动的细节描写，妙趣横生的幽默和细致入微的心理分析，塑造了文中许多令人难忘的形象，真实地反映了英国十九世纪初的社会面貌。 从出版至今，已翻译成多国语言，在世界流行。并拍摄了多部电影、动画片等。 奥立弗—— 单纯而善良的孩子，虽身在最黑暗的地方，却坚守心灵的净土。 他成长在苦难中，去一直保持着自己的纯真和善良。他出逃前会想到先看望自己在济贫院的旧友。 在第一次被费金等人重新带回贼窟时，担心的是自己拂了布朗洛先生的好意，不能完成他的任务。 更是在身陷贼窟的时候，面对费金和周围人的洗脑，坚守着自己的善良的底线。 他的天真与善良限于淤泥中而不染，让人在看书时，随着书中的情节，对他的遭遇产生了深深的同情。 南希—— 矛盾的个性体。 她的身上善与恶同步体现，而那恶是因为社会的不公，老费金的熏染。她有自己的爱与坚持，却在生活的磨难中化为了枯萎的花瓣。 她冒充奥立弗的姐姐，将奥立弗带回贼窟。却又在下一秒挺身而出制止老费金殴打，护住即将被狗咬的奥立弗。 她与强盗赛克斯、贼首费金朋比为奸。 但得知奥立弗悲惨的身世以及蒙克斯等人针对奥立弗的阴谋时，冒着危险，将一切告之了罗斯小姐，才让奥利佛的生活有了走向光明的可能。 我们甚至可以说，没有她就没有奥立弗后来的故事。 她作恶却又善良，怯懦而又勇敢。她是那种向往光明却不得不身处黑暗，那种如在蛛网上一般挣脱不出的矛盾与纠结。1.作者善用幽默的语气说着讽刺的话语，让读者在笑过后产生不一样的思索。 如： 济贫院要奥立弗做拆旧麻绳的简单工作，却恩赐一样告诉他是“受教育，学一门有用的手艺。” 奥立弗被苛待后抽泣着睡着是“活现了仁慈为怀的英国法律，毕竟法律是允许穷人睡觉的。” 奥立弗因为要求都一点粥成了一名重要的犯人，被单独关在黑房子。 …… 诸如此类的表达方式还有很多。细品中我们能咂摸出不一样的滋味。 2.作者善于玩弄人心，在温情中给予希望，却又用冲突让希望依附在毁灭上，最后又在毁灭中求得新生。 奥立弗第一次遇到布朗罗先生时，先生表示： 正是他的这份信任，让奥立弗对生活有了希望。 然而，布朗罗先生在将奥立弗的事情告诉朋友后，朋友不信。 两人让奥立弗将书和钱送还给书店老板，这也是导致后来奥利弗被抓回盗贼团伙的事件之一。 并且在原审理奥利弗的干事来后，布朗罗先生表示： 除此处情节外，文中还有多个地方都是运用同样的方法，希望到失望之间巧妙地设置情节，构建框架，让读者在欲罢不能的猜测中有往下继续阅读的冲动。 奥利弗是可怜的，从小失去了母亲，得自己照顾自己。 奥利弗又是幸运的，在他的身旁，总有一两个”小人物“给他生的希望，美好的力量。书中有一部分让我有一点别捏：关于费金的描写是以一个犹太人的形象出现。这让我多少有点不可思议。 但细细一想似乎又释然，外国文学作品中，犹太人的身上已经被钉上了某种标签，作品中的他们似乎都与贫穷、邪恶联系在了一起，这算不算刻板印象了呢？ 书中故事主线情节不算复杂，但作者描写出彩，反转多，能以小见大。 故事的背后蕴藏的道理、反应的社会状态很有品读和研究的价值，是人们深入了解19世纪英国社会现实的一个好途径。齐帆齐写作训练营第八期
品味完一本名著后，大家心中一定是萌生了不少心得，是时候写一篇读后感好好记录一下了。你想好怎么写读后感了吗？下面是我收集整理的《雾都孤儿》读后感，希望对大家有所帮助。
狄更斯是童话吗，是的，狄更斯是现实吗，是的。
没想到结局会如此圆满，这两个孤儿都在好心人的帮助下逃离悲惨的命运，也都因为自己的善良本性而得到命运的眷顾，最终揭开身世之谜，获得了亲情、爱情、财富。
这本书可以说是一大爽文，在众多巧合之下走向圆满结局，我愿意称之为狄更斯的童话。
奥利弗第一次行窃遇得到的先生正好就是父亲的好友，因为父亲偶然留下的画把他留下，后来奥利弗被费金带走，再次被迫参与盗窃的人家正好就是梅里家，再后来奥利弗从水沟里起来求救的人家正好还是梅里家，以及后面曼恩太太听到老莎莉遗言那天班布尔先生正好对她求婚因此记得这件事后来告诉了蒙克斯，蒙克斯找费金正好被南茜碰到并偷听了，蒙克斯正好没脑子的把地址和事实真相都说出来了……
这一连串的组合发生概率几乎为零的巧合才有了真相大白的圆满结局，可如果是现实社会，会有这么巧吗？那么这两个孤儿是否要不明不白地忍辱负重地度过这一生呢？
从这个角度看，这依旧是现实主义作品，巧合到不可思议，即几乎不可能发生，童话只是童话。
19世纪举世闻名的英国大作家狄更斯，一生写了不计其数的批判现实社会的著名小说，《雾都孤儿》更是他的代表作。
这本书描述了奥利弗出生在济贫院，自幼丧母，处处受挤压，不仅每天吃不饱还受到同伴欺负。后来，他被当作一件物品送来送去，先后进过殡仪馆、贼窝，也被富人家收养过，身世十分坎坷，令人同情。后来，又被强盗绑架，幸好绑架奥利弗的南茜从他那里看到了往日清白的自己，同情心油然而生，送走了他，自己却被贼首处死。最终，贼窝被围剿，贼首费金受到了法律的制裁，奥利弗也与家人团聚了。
书中最令我感动的是奥利弗遇到强盗集团的经历，他走了7天7夜，饥饿难耐，被杰克带到强盗窝后，他们想把奥利弗训练成一名小偷，可是这个年仅10岁的孩子虽出身贫苦，经历坎坷却有一颗正直善良的心，宁可流浪也不愿意当小偷。
现在，我们的生活比奥利弗不知要好了多少倍，可却不满足，抱怨这抱怨那的。做事情只要遇到一点点小困难就打退堂鼓，没有吃苦精神。所以，在现代社会幸福生活的我们，应该好好学习奥利弗，乐观向上，不怕困难勇于攀登，创造更美好的明天。同时，我们也应该多去关心帮助社会上的孤苦儿童，让他们也拥有阳光般的童年。
今晚我有幸在上海话剧中心观看了经典剧目《雾都孤儿》首演。这个舞台版的《雾都孤儿》是世界知名的巡演剧团英国TNT剧团继去年来沪演出《麦克白》之后，在沪上是眉开二度的演出；他们的演出恢复英国戏剧的传统——性别转换，男主角奥利弗和小扒手道奇是由女演员扮演；而且是全剧由5位演员，每人分饰2——3个角色而完成；演技十分精湛！
感觉TNT剧团的演出风格就是简约、质朴，演员是全方位的。《雾都孤儿》的特点也在于加入了由英国皇家剧院作曲家托马斯·约翰逊创作的音乐和合唱；剧中盗窃团伙头目费金的老婆是由男演员来扮演，由此带来的黑色幽默效果也是TNT和狄更斯的风格体现。
我非常喜欢舞台剧包括话剧，音乐剧；感觉是一种很富有感染力的艺术表现方式；让观众可以面对面的直观感受到演员们的表演；每每欣赏舞台剧时总能给我带来一种心灵的震撼和对艺术的新认识！舞台剧不同于电影及电视作品，必须是一遍呈现；没有N机也不允许重复！对演员的演技要求非常高！希望有机会可以欣赏到更多舞台剧的佳作！
《雾都孤儿（Oliver Twist）》这本小说主要描述了英国伦敦的一个孤儿悲惨的身世及遭遇，主人公奥立弗在孤儿院长大，从小受到刻薄不公的待遇。年少时经历备受折磨的学徒生涯，艰苦逃难，却不幸误入贼窝。后来他又被迫与狠毒的凶徒为伍，历尽无数辛酸，最后终于在善良人的帮助下，查明身世并获得了幸福。
这是英国著名小说家查尔斯·狄更斯（Charles Dickens）创作的一本写实小说，描写了资本主义社会穷苦儿童的悲惨生活，揭露了贫民救济所和学校教育的黑暗，鞭挞了当时资本主义社会的'黑暗和虚伪。
看完《雾都孤儿》让我了解到那个时代的资本主义社会的阴暗面，对当时以奥立弗为代表的深受社会迫害的穷苦儿童感到万分同情与怜惜，同时也对我们今天能在如此优越的物质条件中成长生活感到庆幸，深感我们这些90后们应该好好珍惜今天来之不易的安定幸福的生活，对身边关心与爱护我们的人心存感激。常怀一颗感恩与敬畏之心对待身边的人和事，生活便会变得更加宽容，顺利。
暑假期间，我读了一本名叫《雾都孤儿》的书，内容使我深受感动。
书里讲的是一个名叫奥立弗。退斯特的小男孩，他本是一个有钱人的私生子，可因出生就没有父母而得不到遗产。
小奥立弗在济贫院过着地狱般的生活，终于在一天晚上逃到了伦敦可却又不幸身陷贼窝，幸亏一位叫布朗罗的先生将他搭救回家，可小奥立弗不小心又被贼窝里的师傅赛克斯抓回贼窝，经过重重苦难，小奥立弗终又回到布朗罗先生的家，并得到了他该得的遗产，过着幸福的生活。
读过此书，我对小奥立弗不幸的遭遇深表同情，更对当时黑暗的社会人与人之间的不公平感到痛恨，还有我最恨的是贼窝里那帮野兽，他们为什么要加害一个瘦弱的孤儿，为什么把他带回贼窝，让他过着狗一样的生活，为什么妄想有一天把可怜小奥立弗送上绞刑架，而真正该绞死的正是那帮强盗。小奥立弗在恶劣的生活环境中还能保持一棵纯洁善良的心，他顽强不屈的追寻美好生活。
他能够得到那笔遗产绝不是偶然，而是靠自己的力量，我十分佩服他那股顽强拼搏、不怕困难、不屈服、聪明、勇敢的精神。
《雾都孤儿》是狄更斯第二部长篇小说，在世界文学史上占有十分重要的地位。
小说围绕着孤儿奥立佛。退斯特的身世之迷及其生长展开，刻画了一个又一个生动的人物形象，诉说了一个又一个感人的故事，向人们展示了十九世纪前期刚刚通过济贫法的英国社会的最底层的生活。
小说主要讲述了这样一个故事：一个不知来历的年轻孕妇昏倒在大街上人们把她送到了贫民习艺所，她生下一个男孩后死去了，这个孤儿被取名为奥立佛。退斯特。十年后，他成了棺材店的学徒。他不堪被欺负逃走了，逃到了伦敦。不幸落到了贼帮的手中。小小的孤儿在逆境中挣扎，幸而他由于本性善良而得到了好心人的帮助。他一次次化险为夷，终于和他的亲人团聚了，他的身世之迷也真相大白了。
这部小说的人物众多，多以残忍狡猾的教官，富人，当然也有好多善良朴实的平民，据我所知，有的人名已经根据同义词出现在英语教科书上了，如班布鲁泛指骄横的小官吏，费根代表幕后的教唆犯等。
可以说，《雾都孤儿》丰富了世界文学宝库的人物画廊，经历了岁月的沧桑，他仍然是一代又一代人极其熟悉的经典世界名著。
开学第一周，妈妈推荐给我的书目是19世纪英国最杰出的批判现实主义作家狄更斯的第二部作品《雾都孤儿》（第一部作品是《大卫科波菲尔》）。
本文的主人公奥利弗是一位孤儿，在不幸的学徒经历后，他跑到了伦敦，谁知却落入了一伙盗贼之手。他们用尽一切手段要把奥利弗打造成一个扒手。他曾经短暂地被善良的布朗劳先生救出，却又被匪徒诱拐。奥利弗在陪伴一位盗贼偷盗时中了枪伤后落入了梅里太太和露梓的家里。在这里，他受到了友好的对待和教育，并发现露梓就是他的姨妈。最后，奥利弗被布朗劳先生收养，盗贼们也得到了应有的下场。
读完这个故事，我不禁深深地佩服奥利弗。他在邪恶势力的重重包围下，没有屈服，而是出淤泥而不染，始终保持着善良的本性。邪恶是永远战胜不了正义的，罪犯们的落网让我们大快人心。正如作者对此书的自我评价：“在任何逆境中，善的原则都将存在并最终获胜。”
《雾都孤儿》为我们谱写了一曲“善”的赞歌。让我们扬善惩恶，打造一个和平友爱、充满温暖的和谐社会。
这本书主要是关于一个感人的故事。
主人公奥利弗是个孤儿。他出生在济贫院。奥利弗的母亲在生下他后不久就去世了。他像礼物一样被送走了，最后进了贼窝。后来，在许多朋友的帮助下，警察包围了贼窝，查明了奥利弗的来历，并帮助他拿到了遗产，回到了亲戚的怀抱。
看完这本书，我的心情久久不能平静。可怜的奥利弗过着地狱般的生活，在饥饿、寒冷、孤独和悲伤中一步步向前。触动我的是奥利弗做贼生涯的篇章。虽然小偷想把他训练成小偷，但无论他如何折磨他或攻击他，他都不理他。他宁愿在外面游荡，也不愿与坏人为伍，最终逃出了贼窝。想想奥利弗，想想我自己。虽然我比他幸福多了，但我和他一样坚强吗？虽然我现在不会流浪，但我没有他那么机智、公正、勇敢。
书中另一个打动我的人是南希。虽然她是个小偷，但为了帮助奥利弗，她宁愿背叛自己爱的人，冒着被处死的风险。最后，她惨死在拳头下。南希的所作所为让我感受到了她内心的矛盾、善良和正义。
看完这本书，我明白了一个道理。每个人都有自己的经历，但无论遇到什么困难和挫折，都要有自信，通过自己的努力实现人生目标。
今年暑假，我看了狄更斯写的世界名著《雾都孤儿》。雾都指的是伦敦，19世纪黑暗的伦敦。狄更斯是19世纪英国著名作家，一生创作了很多作品，代表作有《大卫·科波菲尔》、《匹克威克外传》等。
故事讲述了主人公奥立弗出生在济贫院，之后又被送往寄养所，悲惨地过了9年，又被棺材铺老板收下当学徒，与其说是学徒不如说是奴隶，奥立弗不堪忍受虐待，逃了出来，却又误入贼窝，经历重重艰难困苦，最终在善良人的帮忙下，查明身世获得了幸福。
在书本里，除了奥立弗，有个不起眼的小人物—见义勇为的南茜，让我感触颇深。南茜在贼窝里给坏蛋赛克斯当帮手，可是她看到可怜的奥立弗，同情他的遭遇，便决定帮忙他，所以冒着生命危险，在伦敦桥下向露丝小姐和罗布郎先生透露费金的长相、住处，想让警察抓住费金，帮奥立弗逃出贼窝。可惜她还没来得及看到奥立弗逃出，就被残忍粗暴的赛克斯给打死了，因为赛克斯认为南茜背叛了他。可怜的南茜，她是多么地善良和勇敢呀！
在书本里，奥立弗、南茜、露丝小姐都是善良的代表，他们出生于苦难，在黑暗罪恶的世界中成长，可是并没有堕落，他们都有一颗纯洁善良的心，都有一种正义的力量支撑着，最终，邪不胜正，恶人的代表—费金和赛克斯他们无一例外落得悲惨下场。
看完之后，我觉得19世纪的伦敦真是黑暗，而21世纪的今日却是多么的完美，我们要珍惜这来之不易的幸福！
孤儿，一个一提起就让人心酸的话题。他们没有做错任何事情，一生下来就无父无母，累了只能露宿街头，靠富人施舍为生。英国著名的文学家狄更斯就巧妙的通过孤儿写了著名的喜剧小说《雾都孤儿》。
《雾都孤儿》以孤儿奥利费为主要人物，又以雾都伦敦为背景。描写了孤儿奥利费从小在孤儿院受尽欺凌，逃到伦敦后又不幸陷入贼窟的坎坷经历。反应了19世纪英国正是资本主义经济蓬勃发展、社会矛盾非常尖锐复杂的时代。
小说里一个个栩栩如生的人物也给我留下了深刻的印象：傲慢无礼的曼太太、凶残暴力的赛克斯、温文尔雅的布朗罗老先生、多才多艺善良如天使的露丝小姐、高傲自大的警察局局长兼法官方先生，等等。其中，我最喜欢的是外科医生格林威格先生，特别是他说的一句话〝如若不是我愿意吃了我的脑子〞这句话让我看出格林威格先生是个憨厚善良、幽默风趣的人。
同时，奥利弗的真诚勇敢也让我十分感动。在奥利费逃到伦敦又不幸陷入贼窟后他没有选择当小偷也没有陷入金钱的诱惑而是在思想上与他们作斗争。在这件事中我看出了奥利费的善良和内心的纯洁，使我更加喜欢这位勇往直前、坚持不懈的主人公。
好人终究能得到回报，傲慢无礼的曼太太被剥夺了权势与地位，凶残暴力的赛克斯成了人人喊打的过街老鼠……而善良的奥利费最终知道了自己的身世。
尽管希望在奥利弗的眼里是那么的渺茫，可凭着他的坚持不懈还是获得了幸福。奥利弗这种坚持不懈的品质是值得我们学习的。
5月1日晚，小孩因为白天忙了一整天，那晚我照常让小孩看电影。我挑了一部《雾都孤儿》给她看。主人公奥立弗在孤儿院长大，经历学徒生涯，艰苦逃难，误入贼窝，又被迫与狠毒的凶徒为伍，历尽无数辛酸，最后在善良人的帮助下，查明身世并获得了幸福。
主人公的年龄跟小孩一样大，也是10岁。我想要给小孩了解的是世上还有一大批像奥立弗一样的小孩，正过着水深火热的生活。
小孩看得很紧张，因为整部片奥立弗受尽苦难。
当晚看到十点没有看完，片比较长，小孩是读完英语八点才开始看的。所以十点照常去睡觉，2号晚继续把片看完。
没有时间写观后感，没有办法知道小孩是怎么想的。但是感觉到小孩应该是看完感受颇多！
有时间、有机会、有好片的情况下，还是希望小孩多看看这些有益的片子。
所以，我告诉你，如果你有不快，如果你又痛，请推开看得见风景的窗户，请到田野中来。乡村和自然景色会治愈我们，会教会我们如何生活。
对孩子们而言，奥列佛的故事要了解，但不要经历。还有好多其他人的故事还没展开，这要靠阅读，要读懂。阅读还能让孩子们看见一路好景色，而他们自己故事和人生也会慢慢展开的。辽阔的人生都有个好的起点，而老师就站在孩子们出发地方。
奥立费是一个被济贫院收养的孤儿，9岁时被送到棺材铺当学徒。棺材铺的老板，老板娘以及棺材铺的伙计，都欺负他。一次，奥立费因伙计侮辱他的母亲而大打出手，结果被老板误解后遭毒打。奥立费只身逃往伦敦。路上，他遇见一个外号叫逮不找的机灵鬼''的人，这个人把奥立费带到了他那里并待他很好，而奥立费却不知道自己进了贼窝。
一天，奥立费和自己的同伙一起上街，同伙行窃时败露，奥立费被当做小偷抓进警局。幸亏一位书店的老板证明了奥立费的无辜，而被偷的富翁布郎娄心生爱怜，收养了奥立费。
此人正是奥立费亡父的好友。但是他们并没有善罢甘休，奥立费被他们绑架了又中了子弹，警方很快对赛克肆和费根展开抓捕，在逃跑中，赛克斯丧命，费根最终被绳之以法。最后。奥立费终于和自己的亲人团聚了。
看完这本书，我的心情久久不能平静，奥立弗从小受尽了折磨，经历了很多苦痛，但他很坚强，一直向往着美好的生活。我觉得他很勇敢，想想我们自己，生活得多么美好，多么幸福，还不满足，还经常跟自己的父母发脾气，想想还真是不应该呀。遇到一点小小的困难就想放弃，怕吃苦，贪图享受。我觉得我们要向他学习。还有就是，现在世上还有许多象奥立弗一样的孤儿，他们很可怜，需要大家的帮助，我们要珍惜现在的生活和学习条件，刻苦学习，让自己长大了成为一名对社会有用的人，这样我们才有能力去帮助他们，让他们的生活也一样充满阳光。
这次的作文是写外国名著的读后感，我刚好看了雾都孤儿，对于里面的事情，我真的很感动：
我前几天看了一本书，叫《雾都孤儿》，《雾都孤儿》这本书试一个大作家创作的，这个作家名叫狄更斯，《雾都孤儿》是他的第二部长篇小说，又名《奥利弗·退斯特》这本书的作者在书中写到：本书的一个目的，就是追求无情的真实，这本书我反复的读了很多遍，才真正理解他。
这本书讲述了一个动人的故事，书中的主人公叫奥利弗特维斯特。他出生在于济贫院，刚出生不久，他妈妈就去世了，他过着艰苦的生活，他知道什么是正义，什么是邪恶，他被当作一个物品似的，被人抛来抛去的，送来送去，但是他并没有想自杀，而是坚强的，勇敢的活了下来，有一次，他误入了强盗公司，小偷们想把他训练成一个小偷，但他不愿意作小偷，就逃了出来，这集的他才10岁，他宁愿逃出，也不愿意做一名小偷，他是一个多么正义的孩子呀，面对生死关头，他最终还是选择了正义，他的正义和勇敢，恐怕我们谁也比不上他，他一个人经历着这么多的折磨，这么多的这么巨大的痛苦，但他还是坚持的追求美好的生活，他的生活那么苦，那么我们这些生活在蜜罐里的人抐？我们总是不满足，总是在抱怨，可是他没有来抱怨，我们有父母在，有健健康康的父母，但是我还一天跟我的爸妈吵架，有些失去双亲的人，就连跟自己的爸妈说一句话的机会还没有，我想我应该好好反省下自己…
看了这本书，我深深的体会到：我真的很幸福。
狄更斯写了世界名著《雾都孤儿》，雾都指的是伦敦，19世纪黑暗的伦敦。狄更斯是19世纪英国著名作家，一生创作了大量作品，代表作有《大卫·科波菲尔》、《匹克威克外传》等。
故事讲述了主人公奥立弗出生在济贫院，后来又被送往寄养所，悲惨地过了9年，又被棺材铺老板收下当学徒，与其说是学徒不如说是奴隶，奥立弗不堪忍受虐待，逃了出来，却又误入贼窝，经历重重艰难困苦，最后在善良人的帮助下，查明身世获得了幸福。
在书本里，除了奥立弗，有个不起眼的小人物—见义勇为的南茜，让我感触颇深。南茜在贼窝里给坏蛋赛克斯当帮手，但是她看到可怜的奥立弗，同情他的遭遇，便决定帮助他，因此冒着生命危险，在伦敦桥下向露丝小姐和罗布郎先生透露费金的长相、住处，想让警察抓住费金，帮奥立弗逃出贼窝。可惜她还没来得及看到奥立弗逃出，就被残忍粗暴的赛克斯给打死了，因为赛克斯认为南茜背叛了他。可怜的南茜，她是多么地善良和勇敢呀！
在书本里，奥立弗、南茜、露丝小姐都是善良的代表，他们出生于苦难，在黑暗罪恶的世界中成长，但是并没有堕落，他们都有一颗纯洁善良的心，都有一种正义的力量支撑着，最后，邪不胜正，恶人的代表—费金和赛克斯他们无一例外落得悲惨下场。
看完之后，我觉得19世纪的伦敦真是黑暗，而21世纪的今天却是多么的美好，我们要珍惜这来之不易的幸福！
在孤独中成长，在痛苦中挣扎，这就是英国作家查尔斯狄更斯笔下的雾都孤儿——奥立弗特维斯特。
奥立弗从小在济贫院长大，他从未感受过母爱和家庭的温暖，一直过着地狱一般的生活。到了九岁，被邦布尔先生送到了一个名叫苏尔伯雷的殡仪员的家里当助手，可是这里并没有比济贫院好一点，甚至更差，于是奥立弗不堪忍受非人般的生活，逃离了这里，准备到达“雾都”——伦敦去闯。
到了伦敦，他遇到了两个作恶多端的人，一个是抢劫犯塞克斯，一个是小偷费金，后来费金想将他培养成一个小偷，也是因为他当了小偷，他的身世之谜也随之被揭开了。
奥利弗来到伦敦不一定是好事，但一定不是坏事。因为他虽然遇到了无恶不作的费金，但是他遇到的好人也很多：亦正亦邪的南希、心地善良的布朗洛先生……
这本书描述了一个乐观向上的奥立弗，无论是孤儿的身世，还是孤独、痛苦的童年都未使他抱怨。而我们从出生到现在都有一个温暖的家庭，却每天都充斥着各种抱怨，我们应该像他一样“不怨天，不尤人”。
品味完一本名著后，你心中有什么感想呢？记录下来很重要哦，一起来写一篇读后感吧。你想好怎么写读后感了吗？下面是我整理的《雾都孤儿》读后感范文精选，希望能够帮助到大家。
《雾都孤儿》这部长篇小说是英国作家狄更斯所著。故事的主人公奥利弗是个孤儿，他出生在一个济贫院里，他的母亲刚生下他就去世了。长大后的奥利弗因为受不了郊区干事邦布尔的折磨，逃到了伦敦。在哪里，奥利弗落到了坏人的手里。经过多次的磨难，善良的奥利弗得到了布朗罗的帮助，并帮奥利弗查明了他那段神秘的'身世。奥利弗的经历给了我很大的启示。他身处逆境，遭受了种种磨难，但他并不自暴自弃，仍对生活充满了向往。他勇敢的面对恶人给予的压力。
在他的人生字典里“善”和“恶”是分明的。每当想起奥利弗的精神时，我十分佩服，《雾都孤儿》中的奥利弗让我明白了人应该善恶分明，心里放着一把衡量道德的尺子。不能因为利益的诱惑放弃做个好人的原则，向隐藏于人内心深处的“恶”屈服。同学们，让我们都去做像奥利弗那样的人吧!将“善”永远放在自己的心中。
秋末冬初，儿子从学校图书馆借回《雾都孤儿》，是译林出版社1997年出版的何文安的译本。书薄而轻盈，书窄小巧，排版紧凑，字小无插图，封面色彩简单庄重，给人袖珍书在手，经典在握的厚重感，是那个年代最流行的书貌。不像现在的流行书式，书阔精致，排版松散，留白充足，包装精巧。有意思的是，这本书每章章首有本章故事概要，短短三四句，像现在时兴的微博，三言两语道明此章作者的思想轨迹，也如推荐时的编者按，直接向读者标明本章的闪光点——就我有限的阅读经历，这种书式不多见。
《雾都孤儿》是狄更斯25岁时写的一部长篇小说。他在这部小说里，着力刻画了当时伦敦贫民窟的悲惨生活，小说以生动的细节描写，妙趣横生的幽默和细致入微的心理分析抗议社会的不公。
我怀着好奇的心情，用空闲的时间迫不及待的看完狄更斯写的雾都孤儿看完后，我心潮澎湃，思绪万千。小说中的主人公奥利佛在济贫院出生，他的母亲生下他就死了，他却被当作一个礼物送来送去，虽然他几次企图想自杀，但他都凭着坚强的毅力存活了下来。故事讲述的是旧时伦敦的一个孤儿身上发生了传奇故事，他是一个被遗弃的孩子在孤儿院里的生活，和他之后被迫成为小偷奇遇都磨炼了他，使他成为一个善良，正直，勇敢，坚强的孩子，并最终找到亲人，故事在最后画上句号。从奥利佛身上我明白了，无论你遇到什么困难都要勇敢的去面对。
读了着本书我看到了当时社会的黑暗，邪恶，但最终善良总是战胜邪恶，社会上也有好心人，当奥利佛受害时，他们都会化险为夷。不管你身处何种境地，做人都应该使终要保持着一颗善良的心。
今天，我看了一本书，名字叫《雾都孤儿》。这本书讲述了：一个小男孩他是个孤儿，他的名字叫奥利弗，他的妈妈生完他之后就死了，他的父亲去意大利去钱财的时候，却突然病死了。奥利弗住在一家贫民救济院里，奥利弗在九岁的是活就被送去了棺材店工作。奥利弗在那里受尽了粤待，于是，奥利弗就走去了伦敦，在伦敦那里，奥利弗差一点就成了小偷。
奥利弗在那里受到了许多好心人的帮助，也受到了那些强盗的欺负，其中的一位塞克斯是奥利弗的哥哥，奥利弗并不知道这件事情。奥利弗在利太太小的帮助拿回了自己的财产。拿回自己的财产之后就和布朗洛先生、利太太生活在一个小村子了，他的哥哥塞克斯因为把钱花光的，去抢劫而入狱。
读了这本书之后，我很敬佩这里面的奥利弗，虽然他受尽了粤待但他并没有放弃自己的'生命，他身上的永不放弃的精神很值得我们学习。还有就是利太太很善良。
这是与苦儿流浪记相似的一本书，同样的出身，同样苦难的经历。但有一点不同的是，雾都孤儿过多的描写了那些坏人的奸诈、丑陋，所以它也是批判社会的一本书。这本书中，我比较喜欢的人是南希，她虽然出身下流、劣但他的天性里仍然保持着某种好的东西，那就是自尊。
她虽然一生都在最肮脏的藏污纳垢之地度过，但一切的罪恶、奸诈以及__都没有消磨掉她天性中的自尊，这真是非常的难能可贵啊! 《雾都孤儿》读后感而这本书的主角奥利弗，虽然被他的异母兄弟所害，却也保留这正直、勇敢这些美好品质。奥利弗是个好孩子——尽管费根他们想把奥利弗培养成一个无恶不作的人。
当品味完一本著作后，大家对人生或者事物一定产生了许多感想，何不静下心来写写读后感呢？到底应如何写读后感呢？下面是我整理的《雾都孤儿》的读后感范文，欢迎阅读与收藏。
《雾都孤儿》这本书由著名的英国小说家狄更斯所著，讲述了一个孤儿悲惨的人生。
一个在街道上晕倒的美丽女子被教区的济贫院收留了，第二天，她生下了小男孩奥利弗。体力不支的女子最后看了一眼自己的孩子，便离开了人世，可怜的奥利弗成了一个孤儿。
后来，奥利弗与饥饿做着抗争，活到他第9个生日时，实在饿得受不了的他在小伙伴们的怂恿下、在吃完了自己的饭菜后，并要求添粥。
济贫院一气之下把他关了起来，并在后来把她卖给了一个棺材铺子做学徒。他在铺子里受尽了欺负，最后偷偷地逃跑了。
幼小的奥利弗逃到了伦敦，认识了一个小男孩，男孩把他带回了他的贼窝。他在菲根等人的强迫下偷东西，帮他们一起犯罪。
最后，奥利弗被子弹打伤，一户善良的人收留了他，并帮助他找到亲人，过上了幸福的生活。
读完这一本世界名著，从“奥利弗要求添粥”这一节，让我深深地感受到了小奥利弗与他的伙伴们的饥饿。
小奥利弗对那个欺负自己而又比自己大得多的诺亚大打出手，以及他出逃这些事，无处不体现着他的勇气和对抗争命运的执着。
最后，能帮助他过上幸福生活，感受到温暖的人是布兰多先生。
他带上奥利弗，把他当自己亲儿子一样照顾，并带上管家搬到了新居。
奥利弗最后拿下了一半的遗产。他的同父异母的哥哥拿到另一半的钱，跑到了大陆另一个地方，但他很快把钱花光了，并再次做起坏事。不久后，他与菲根几个人陆续死在了狱中。
这本书让我感受到了世间的善与恶，快乐与悲伤。
一个人的生命如同那薄薄的蝉翼，经不起风吹雨打，它是脆弱的，却又坚强无比。造物主创造了人，充满活力地来到这个世界，我们难道不应该珍惜这次降世的机会吗？
我看过一本书——《雾都孤儿》：它讲述了孤儿奥利弗·特威斯特出生在一家济贫院里，并在那里孤独、艰难的生活了九年之久，之后又被带到棺材店做学徒，因身边的人几乎都极为不好，而且被人误解，便独自一人到伦敦去。途中他又被小偷所，越进了他同父异母的哥哥与小偷事先安排好的完美陷阱了。但是，小奥利弗是勇敢、正义、向往美好生活的孩子。他为自己的美好未来所作出了巨大的努力，逃离小偷的魔爪。最后，他遇上了好心的人，他们帮助他主持公道，拿回了属于他的财产，寻找到了幸福的生活。
奥利弗的生世如此曲折，可是他依旧坚强的生活，重来没有轻生的念头。那怕生活在水生火热中可世间却有许多有轻生念头的人。
最近，我在电脑上看见一则新闻：韩国女星因比赛遗憾失败而跳楼自杀。有人爆料，她曾经患过抑郁症。有些人一辈子都没活够，而有些人却认为世界上没有什么好留念的，起了轻生的念头，甚至去做了。每个人的生命都是父母给予我们的，我们没有权利选择出生，但生命只有一次，一个人不会有第二次生命，所以我们才应该倍加珍惜。像奥利弗那样，我们虽然没有权选择出生，但我们可以选择今后的路程。
人生只有昨天，今天和明天。生命的路程在慢慢逝去，生命的意义不在于长短，而在于它精彩与否，把握住每一个瞬间，让生命如同璀璨的星群，发光发亮保护自己的生命是每一个人的天职，唯有活着才谈得上如何让生命更精彩。
初次翻开《雾都孤儿》这本书，是在一个午后，阳光暖暖的射在我的脸。在此之前，我看过同名的电影，电影中小主人公清澈的眼睛给了我十分深刻的印象。但是电影毕竟是短短的一个多小时，很难讲述出那长长的人生，于是我翻开了这本书。看了几页后，小奥利弗的形象便跳进我的脑海中。于是读着这本书就不再是看着简单的文字了，仿佛真实的生活在我的脑海中演绎着。
书中的主人翁奥利弗·特威斯特是一个孤儿，他出生在济贫院，出生不久他的妈妈就死了。后来，他被当作一件物品被送来送去，受尽折磨，直到最后遇到一位善良的布朗洛老先生，这位好心的老先生收留了他，但是又被那一伙贼绑回贼窝。最后善良的女扒手南希为了营救奥利佛，不顾贼头的监视和威胁，向班布尔报信，说奥利佛就是他找寻已久的外孙儿。南希被贼窝头目杀害，警察随即围剿了贼窝。奥利佛终于得以与亲人团聚。
这本书给我的感触很深。看着这本书，好几次泪水打湿了我的眼睛。不仅是为了小奥利弗的悲惨遭遇，更是为他的善良，南希和其他小扒手的无奈，甚至是老犹太费根。书中每一个人都有这鲜明的性格。奥利弗虽是书中的主人公，但我觉得奥利弗不是他一个人，而是孤儿院里的所有孤儿甚至是所有的在苦难中的孩子，也许他们最后都没有奥利弗的幸运，但奥利弗的幸运也只是作者对于生活的美好希望。他们都要为了希望而努力。
合上这本书，我的感慨只有一个：人活着只要不断地向这梦想前进，不需要顾虑太多，命运永远在我们手中！
我们的世界上总是会存在许多不正义的，罪恶的事情。但在十九世纪的英国，无论是在狄更斯的笔下还是在现实中这种事都很普遍。
当时的英国政府对穷人实行假惺惺的救助——把贫民集中管理在监狱中，并美其名曰“贫民习艺所”。它与监狱唯一的区别是需要干的活更多，每餐吃的更少。
《雾都孤儿》中的主人公小奥利弗厌恶了这样的生活，竟以九岁的年龄，仅带着一个便士，一个面包，几件衣物，孤身一人前往七十英里外的伦敦。由此可见当时“社会上层的绅士们”对贫民，特别是小孩的剥削是多么的.残酷。
虽然小奥利弗在伦敦也遇到了老犹太人费根这样十恶不赦的坏蛋，但也受到了布朗先生，梅里太太等人无私的帮助。最终他了解了自己的身世，并过上了幸福的生活。讽刺的是当年帮助过小奥得弗的贫民习艺所所长，在失业后也被习艺所收容了。
在读到小奥利弗被人帮助时，我的脸刷的一下红了。平时我可以说是一个嫉恶如仇的人，每当见到电影中不正义的事发生，我总想跑到电影中去指责坏人。而每当电视中播出穷苦人们的生活时，我更是恨不得立刻去帮助他们。但是在现实生活中，面对一个在火车站，汽车站乞讨的老人，我却没有一点慈悲之心。这也许可以说是现代社会中的欺太多，使人们不得不加强防范，但我更觉得这是我的爱心不够。
学校中有时会发生打架或吵架事件，而我每次都只充当一个旁观者，甚至还会嘲笑其中一方，而很少去调解。现在，我才感到羞愧难当。
“我们无法改变这个世界，但我们可以改变自己。”这是一个小故事中说的，我觉得这也是我读了《雾都孤儿》后的感想。以后，我与其在家中发表激昂的讲话，还不如去社会中多做些好事。
奥利弗——一个孤儿，他被投入了一个充满贫困与犯罪的世界，忍饥挨饿，挨打挨骂，从来没有人关心他。邪恶的费金，残暴的比尔？赛克斯，以及一大群窃贼强盗。他们把奥利弗训练成一个神偷手，然后利用他去取钱财。可是奥利弗不愿去干这些事情，费金就对他，迫使奥利弗到处流浪。幸运的是，他遇到了一群善良的人，对他无微不至的关怀，让奥利弗感到非常温暖。
当我想到一个九岁的孩子，在伦敦被迫加入罪恶累累、堕落不堪的小偷、强盗、亡命之徒的行列之中。但他并未放弃，在他的心中仍向往着一个美好的生活，多次在好心人的帮助下，终于过上了自己所想往的生活。我真觉得奥利弗真勇敢、真坚强。而我们生活在蜜罐里，福窝里，却总是抱怨，总是不满足。但我们可曾想过，在世界上，还有许多孩子，正承受着巨大的痛苦；正和饥饿、寒冷、疾病作战；正面对着失去亲人，飘泊流浪的生活。他们需要别人的帮助，但更需要不屈的精神、勇敢的精神。我要学习奥利弗的坚强不屈的精神、勇敢的精神。我们也要学习善良的布朗洛，是他伸出了援助之手帮助奥利弗的。
看了《雾都孤儿》，让我受益非浅，让我懂得了社会的冷酷与人的性格的残暴。我们要行动，帮助他们，挽救他们。
我向大家推荐的书是这《雾都孤儿》，这里面突出了一个典型人物，可怜、凄惨、悲苦的南希，她生活在一个残忍的世界中，却挣扎着要忠实于她所爱的人。她为了帮助奥利弗，而背叛了她所爱的人，最后遭到了坏人的毒手……经过这一连串的事奥利弗却坚强不屈，勇于斗争，所以我向大家推荐这本书。
雾都孤儿这本世界名著讲述了一个动人的故事。书中主人翁是一位孤儿，他的名字叫奥利弗特威斯特。他出生于济贫院，出生不久妈妈就死了。他被当作一件物品送来送去，受尽折磨。他最后遇到了一位善良的老先生；布郎罗先生，这位先生好心收留了他，他过上了好的生活。可好景不长，奥利弗不幸在次身陷贼窟，赛克斯胁迫他参加一次远征行窃，最后失败了，挣扎在死亡线上，还是梅里夫人救了奥利弗并且好心收留了他。经过一段时间，奥利弗过上了幸福的生活。
书中的主人公奥立弗是个私生子，他妈妈刚生下他就死去了，可怜的奥立弗在济贫院里艰难地生活了9年，而后又被送到棺材铺里当学徒，晚上就睡在棺材堆里，每次吃饭时都把他打发到最冰冷的角落里吃那些发霉的食物。难以忍受的饥饿、贫困和侮辱，迫使奥立弗逃到伦敦，却误入贼窝。小偷费根想把奥立弗训练成扒手，奥立弗无论怎样都不肯屈服，他一次次地逃脱，又一次次被抓回来。读到这，我真的被奥立弗的善良、正直、勇敢深深地感动了，他向往美好的生活，虽然历尽艰辛，但他宁愿去流浪，也不愿意成为一个小偷，他才10岁呀！真不知道在他瘦弱的身躯下有着怎样顽强的毅力，书中我最喜欢的人物是两次帮助奥立弗的布朗娄先生，因为他的善良，奥立弗才得救，从此过上了幸福的生活。最痛恨的人是费根，他想把奥立弗训练成扒手，也就是说，他想让世界上多一个坏人，少一个好人，不过让我高兴的是，最后坏人都得到了应有的惩罚。
读了这本书，让我受益匪浅，我们的生活和奥立弗比起来，简直是一个天堂一个地狱，我会更加热爱这美好的生活，好好学习，同时在生活和学习中遇到困难也会永往直前，绝不退缩！
在这个寒假里，我读了一本令我思绪如海，感慨万千的书，名叫《雾都孤儿》。它的作者是英国著名小说家查尔斯·狄更斯，在这篇文章中，他运用幽默，夸张，讽刺的手法反映了刚刚通过济贫法的英国社会底层生活的黑暗，使文章有强烈的感染力，发人深省。
这本书是以有着‘雾都’美称的伦敦为背景，讲述了一个无依无靠的孤儿悲惨的身世及可怜的遭遇。主人公奥立弗出生在济贫院，刚出生不久，母亲就与世长辞，后来，他就在当时所谓的慈善机构———济贫院里过着地狱一般的生活，被当作一件物品一样被人们送来送去，受尽折磨，从未得到母爱和家庭的温暖的他，在9岁就被送进了一家棺材店，经历了学徒生涯，因不堪忍受非人的待遇，艰苦逃难，又不慎误入贼窝，被迫与狠毒的凶徒为伍，历尽了无数辛酸，但最后在善良人的帮助下，转危为安，化险为夷，查明了身世并获得了幸福。
读完这本书，我的心情久久不能平静。只要有光，就有阴影，《雾都孤儿》正好证明了这一点，奥立弗的勇敢，罗勃特的善良与贼窟首脑的凶残、孟斯的私刑形成了强烈的对比。但，如果没有布朗罗先生、露丝小姐、梅里夫人的善良和热心。只凭靠奥立弗的力量是远远不够的。
一架标准的钢琴有52个白键，36个黑键，其中的白键永远都是比黑键多的，就好比整个世界是一架标准的钢琴，善良纯洁的人都是白键，反之，丑恶歹毒的人都是黑键，无论何时何地，善良的人总比丑恶的人多，善有善报，恶有恶报。善良的人总会像荷花一样出淤泥而不染。自古以来邪不胜正，因为，内心充满罪恶的人，他已是一具没有思想，没有灵魂的行尸走肉，看似表面强壮的躯体，但他的灵魂却是瘦小不堪。一颗善良的心，种种磨难并不能使他们堕落，他们会为此更加努力的去拼搏，因为，他们的灵魂无比强壮。
合上这本书我只想说一句话：人活着只要不断地向着梦想前进，不需要顾虑太多，不要向命运低头，命运永远掌握在我们的手中。
最近，我读了一本书，它是英国著名作家查尔斯·狄更斯写的《雾都孤儿》，它使我受益匪浅，让我懂得做人要善良，要拥有“出淤泥而不染”的高贵品质。
这本书主要讲了一个孤儿悲惨的身世及遭遇。主人公奥利弗在孤儿院挣扎了九年，又被送到棺材店老板那儿做学徒。难以忍受的饥饿、贫穷和侮辱，迫使奥利弗逃到了雾都伦敦，却误入贼窟，被迫去当扒手。可是在这行为思想无比龌龊的社会底层里，在阴险狡诈、凶狠残暴的人群中，奥利弗并没有被他们所影响，仍然是那么纯洁善良。最后，在好心人南希的帮助下，他找到了自己的亲人，过上了幸福美满的生活。
奥利弗令我敬佩不已。他在这样恶劣的环境下，自始至终守护着自己的人格，不做可恶的交易与勾当，也不做鬼鬼祟祟的偷窃。他犹如一朵亭亭玉立的荷花一样纯洁，虽然生长在肮脏的河泥中，却洁身自好，不受半点玷污，仍然长得高贵动人。也许有人会为了求生放弃人格、放弃善良，更何况奥利弗只有九岁，这个容易放弃与动摇的年龄，他却能坚守自己的信念，不放弃、不动摇，种种磨难不能使他堕落，更加彰显出他出淤泥而不染的品质，这实在是非常可贵！最后，正所谓邪不压正，正义再次向世间证明一定可以战胜邪恶，扒手们都被捕入狱，奥利弗获得了幸福。
生活中也是如此，我们要学会控制自己，不被周围的不良环境所影响，要出淤泥而不染。比如，当其他人都沉迷于网络游戏不能自拔时，你要抵挡住这种诱惑，认真学习；当有人在讲那些刺耳的粗话脏话、污言秽语时，你要管住自己的嘴巴，不受他们的影响；当有人在做不文明的举动时，你要控制住自己的手脚，坚持文明行事……当你管不住自己，要做一些不正确的事情时，想想那个可怜的奥利弗吧，他在如此恶劣的环境下都能洁身自好，更何况我们呢？
周敦颐说得好：“出淤泥而不染，濯清涟而不妖。”让这句话在世间永存，让它永远铭刻在你我的心中。加油！
《雾都孤儿》读后感范文300字（通用16篇）
当看完一本著作后，大家心中一定有不少感悟，此时需要认真思考读后感如何写了哦。但是读后感有什么要求呢？下面是我为大家收集的《雾都孤儿》读后感范文（通用16篇），希望对大家有所帮助。
在一个悠闲宁静的下午，我读了一本叫做《雾都孤儿》的书。
在这本《雾都孤儿》里，主要讲了奥利弗为了找到亲人而经历了许多坎坷的事，最终找到自己的亲人的故事。
读完这本书以后，让我陷入了深深的沉思中。为什么奥利弗要当一名扒手?为什么他会要那么做?看到这里，我体会到了社会上的人们的无情。比如，我们整天说着要爱护动物，可又有多少人亦是这样?该丢的宠物狗继续丢，该虐待的流浪猫狗继续虐。
甚至有些人拿宠物来做衣服。有一条新闻是这样的：最近小区里业主们的猫总是失踪，弄的小区里的爱猫人士担惊受怕。后来有人在一家老奶奶家里找到了许多猫肉和用猫毛做的大衣，这时老奶奶才承认最近的猫都是她杀的，因为她觉得猫毛很适合做大衣。每当看到那篇新闻，我的心就久久不能平静。它们也是一条命啊!它们是活得啊，不是任你宰割的东西啊!
最后，我想告诉大家一句话：如果不爱，请别伤害!
在这本书中，奥利弗、南希都是善良的代表，他们都出生于苦难之中，在黑暗和充满罪恶的世界中成长，但在他们的心中始终保持着一偏纯洁的天地，一颗善良的心，种种磨难并不能使他们堕落或彻底堕落，发而更显示出他们出污泥而不染的光彩夺目的晶莹品质。
最后，邪不胜正，正义的力量战胜了邪恶，虽然南希最后遇难，但正是她的死所召唤出来的惊天动地的社会正义力量，正是她在冥冥中的在天之灵，注定了邪恶势力的代表——费金团伙的灭顶之灾。因此在小说中，南希的精神得到了升华，奥利弗则得到了典型意义上的善报。而恶人的代表——费金、蒙克斯、邦布尔、塞克斯无不一一落得个悲惨的下场。
这部名著在我心中留下了深刻的印象，使我懂得无论环境怎样恶劣，世界怎样复杂，我们都应该保持一份善良、博爱的的精神，这样于人于己都会带来快乐和幸福。
我怀着好奇的心情，用空闲的时间迫不及待的看完狄更斯写的雾都孤儿看完后，我心潮澎湃，思绪万千。小说中的主人公奥利佛在济贫院出生，他的母亲生下他就死了，他却被当作一个礼物送来送去，虽然他几次企图想自杀，但他都凭着坚强的毅力存活了下来。
故事讲述的是旧时伦敦的一个孤儿身上发生了传奇故事，他是一个被遗弃的孩子在孤儿院里的生活，和他之后被迫成为小偷奇遇都磨炼了他，使他成为一个善良，正直，勇敢，坚强的孩子，并最终找到亲人，故事在最后画上句号。从奥利佛身上我明白了，无论你遇到什么困难都要勇敢的去面对。读了着本书我看到了当时社会的黑暗，邪恶，但最终善良总是战胜邪恶，社会上也有好心人，当奥利佛受害时，他们都会化险为夷。不管你身处何种境地，做人都应该使终要保持着一颗善良的心。
寒假里，我读完了《雾都孤儿》，这本书内容很精彩。其中，我最喜欢的是第十四章。这一章讲的是：可怜的奥利弗被老先生带回家后，一直发高烧。老先生的太太对他很好，给他看病，把他照顾的无微不至。终于，奥利弗康复了，可以站起来走路了。老先生带着奥利弗参观了他的书房，书房里摆满了书，小奥利弗惊呆了。老先生教育他要做个文明人，要多读书
从这儿我感受到：当时的伦敦并不是所有的人都下流凶恶，也有善良的人。那位老先生就是其中的一个，我觉得他做奥利弗的老师是再合适不过了。奥利弗在老先生家的那段日子真是受到了很好的影响，这对他以后的成长很有利。虽然在伦敦凶多吉少，不过在好心人的帮助下，奥利弗的前途一定是光明的！
《雾都孤儿》给我带来了快乐，也带来了悲伤。在这本书中，我结识了许多新朋友！
这几天，我读完了一本书，名字叫《雾都孤儿》
《雾都孤儿》是英国最大的小说家——狄更斯在1838年创作的一部长篇小说，也是他的代表作之一。
这本书反映了19世纪初英国社会最底层的生活，主人公奥利弗尔悲惨遭遇让我非常同情。他才11岁，却过着非人的生活，每天吃不饱，穿不暖，并且几次误入贼窝，但他没有和他们一起犯罪，宁肯受尽折磨也不和他们同流合污，并且用坚强的意志抵制坏人的威逼和诱惑，后来梅里夫人救了奥利弗尔并且好心收留了他。经过一段时间，奥利弗过上了幸福的生活。
看完这本书后，我的心情久久不能平静，文中主人公的年龄和我一样大，可是，和他相比，我们的生活是多么的幸福，但是我们却还是不满足，遇到一点小小的'困难，就放弃，缺少意志力。我要学习奥利弗尔的坚强品质，克服一切艰难险阻，珍惜现在的一切，刻苦学习，成为一个对社会有用的人。
读完这本书后，我对这个孤儿很同情。他一生下来就是孤儿，他在人间也是饱受痛苦。那时的孤儿院就和地狱一样不错哦，9岁就被送到了棺材店当学徒，他因为吃不饱也睡不好还老是挨打就逃了出来。
可命运老和他开玩笑，他刚逃出来没多久就遇到了一伙盗贼，他费尽了千辛万苦终于逃了出来。可没多久有被抓了起来被迫和他们一起干，可在第一次抢东西时就被子弹打中了，在医院里挣扎在死亡线上，但又幸运的遇到了好心的露丝小姐和梅里夫人。她们用极大的爱心救活了他并收留了他。可在这时他同父异母的哥哥却和那些盗贼勾结上了……
最后他终于熬过了艰苦的日子和那些正直善良的人在一起。
全书反映了善于恶，美与丑的斗争。赞扬了人民的正直与善良。同时也揭露了英国的一些慈善机构的虚伪和的专横。
《雾都孤儿》是狄更斯的第二部长篇小说，这位年仅二十五岁的小说家真实的表现了当时伦敦贫民窟的悲惨。他抱着一个崇高的道德意图：抗议社会的不公，并唤起社会舆论，推行改革，使处于水深火热中的贫民得到救助，正因为如此，狄更斯历来被我国及前苏联学者界定为“英国文学上批判现实主义的创始人和最伟大的代表”。
当我想到一个九岁的孤儿——奥利弗，在伦敦被迫加入罪恶累累、堕落不堪的小偷、强盗、亡命之徒的行列之中，但他并未放弃，在他的心中仍向往这一个美好的生活，多次在好心人的帮助下，终于过上了自己所想过的生活，我觉得奥利弗很勇敢、很坚强。我们可曾想过，在世界上，还有许多孩子，正承受着巨大的痛苦，正和饥饿、寒冷、疾病作战；正面对失去亲人，漂泊流浪的生活。他们需要别人的帮助，但更需要不屈的精神，勇敢的精神。
如果让我来形容这样一部作品，那么我借用歌德的一句话：它比自然高了一层。
这本书中的故事描述了一个孤儿在外流浪的故事。他名叫：奥立费.特威斯特，他的妈妈刚让这个小生命来到人间时，就离开了这个小宝宝。
奥立费长大后在世间受尽了苦头，挨了无数的巴掌和拳头，后来还被象物品一样被人送来送去，受尽折磨，直到遇到好心的布朗洛老先生，才被收留，才过上好日子。
看完这本书，我的心情久久不能平静，奥立弗从小受尽了折磨，经历了很多苦痛，但他很坚强，一直向往着美好的生活。我觉得他很勇敢，想想我们自己，生活得多么美好，多么幸福，还不满足，还经常跟自己的父母发脾气，想想还真是不应该呀。
遇到一点小小的困难就想放弃，怕吃苦，贪图享受。我觉得我们要向他学习。还有就是，现在世上还有许多象奥立弗一样的孤儿，他们很可怜，需要大家的帮助，我们要珍惜现在的生活和学习条件，刻苦学习，让自己长大了成为一名对社会有用的人，这样我们才有能力去帮助他们，让他们的生活也一样充满阳光。
近几天我读了《雾都孤儿》这本书。
《雾都孤儿》这本书反映了十九世纪初英国的社会底层的生活。主人公奥利费儿悲惨遭遇让人们同情不已。整个故事告诉人们这样一个主题：善良可以克服一切艰难，最终战胜邪恶，给人们带来真正的快乐和幸福。
这本书主要讲了奥利费儿是个孤儿，在济贫院中长大，不幸误入了贼窟。有一天，奥利费尔在街上被警察误捕，好心的布朗洛绅士救了他。后来奥利尔又被盗匪劫去参加抢劫，好心的主人收留了它。原来，奥利费尔的同父异母兄长蒙克斯买通了贼中首领——老费金，企图把奥利费尔变成罪犯，自己霸占全部遗产。女贼南希找到说出了一切，结果被老费金的手下赛克斯所杀死。之后，老费金走上了绞架，好心的绅士布朗洛揭发了蒙克斯的罪恶，并收养了奥利费尔。从此，大家一起过上了幸福的生活。
这本书语句描写非常优美如：“夜色一片漆黑，大雾弥漫。店铺的灯光几乎不能穿过厚厚的浑浊雾气，街道和房屋都笼罩在朦胧的黑暗中。”书中的钢笔画插图也画的非常生动细致，让我陶醉其中。
第一次接触这本书是老师给我们推荐的，然后就抱着好奇的态度去了图书馆找来看，就当做是暑假看的课外书，当我翻进去，顿时就被里面的主人公奥利弗感动，现在自己的生活如此安定，父母工作稳定，身体也健康，而且还是如此的爱我，相比之下，我感觉这个世界好不公平。
从这本书我知道，查尔斯·狄更斯是英国的小说家。《雾都孤儿》是他著作之一。在这篇文章中，他运用幽默，夸张，讽刺的手法反映了刚刚通过济贫法的英国社会底层生活的黑暗，使文章有强烈的感染力，发人深省。
在刚看完《雾都孤儿》我觉得很乏味没有了解其蕴藏的内涵。然而，经过反复思考与细细品味，我终于有了更进一步的了解。他被送去上学，可在上学的途中又被那可恶的贼窝抓了回去。见奥立弗久久不回，罗勃特先生不愿相信他朋友的话，(说那小子穿着这么漂亮的衣服，背着这么好的书)不愿相信奥立弗会重回贼窝那。他一次又一次得叫仆人热菜，和爱他的人等待他回家……
最后奥立弗终于化险为夷，和爱他的亲人们团聚。当然，其中的过程也是历尽艰辛。
《雾都孤儿》正好证明了这一点，奥立弗的勇敢，罗勃特的善良与贼窟首脑的凶残、孟斯的私刑形成了强烈的对比。
在孤独中成长，在痛苦中挣扎，在尊严被摧残的情况下斗争，这就是狄更斯笔下的“雾都孤儿”——奥利弗·退斯特。小男孩儿奥利弗·退斯特在济贫院里艰难的长大，九岁的时候，他被送进棺材铺里做学徒，饥饿和侮辱迫使他逃了出来。在伦敦街头流浪的时候，他被小扒手发现，拉进了贼窝。
后来，再一次偷窃事件中，他又被善良的布朗罗先生收留，可是不幸又被扒手们拐了回去，还被迫参与打劫，事后，他被好心的梅莱太太一家收留，这家好心人找到布朗罗先生，通过同情奥利弗的女扒手南茜得知了她的身份，抓住了那伙强盗，并帮助奥利弗找到了亲人，最终获得了幸福！当我读完这个故事后，我想，作者一定是想通过小说传达正义必将战胜邪恶的信念，告诉我们要分清善恶，并且希望我们每个人都能够懂得爱，懂得去爱别人！怎么样？
你说我说的对吗？如果你也喜欢这本书，就赶快读读吧！让我们相信曹文轩所说的这句话：“一本好书，就是一轮太阳，灿烂千阳，照耀我们的成长！”愿这些灿烂的光芒，伴随我们一生！
《雾都孤儿》是英国作价狄更斯的长篇写实小说。小说年代设定在19世纪的雾都伦敦，讲述了孤儿奥利佛的身世与成长的故事。同时，作为社会小说的范例，揭露另外19世纪真实存在的社会问题，如雇佣童工、青少年犯罪等。
文中有一处情节让人感触颇深，奥利弗被带到小偷的聚集点，支配这群青少年的男子对着昂贵的手表和珠宝称赞死刑，看起来很难理解，违法者为什么不怕死刑，这与当时法律存在的缺陷有关，招供并不能改变遭受绞刑的命运，所以走上刑场的罪犯们不会选择让真相大白，这些奴役青少年的恶人们便因此逍遥法外。
小说中的主角奥利弗原本是一个单纯的少年，因为生存不得不与一群少年犯混在一起，抛开小说后来的转折不谈，如果奥利弗一直和这群人生活，学习他们“技术”，他的一生肯定会就此走向黑暗。虽然这些与十九世纪伦敦的复杂背景有关，但是我们仍要警惕，现在社会依然存在类似的现象。
关爱青少年身心健康需要我们所有社会公民共同努力，像小说里的老绅士一样，我们一次小小的帮助，一次简单的援手或许可以改变一个人的未来。
今天我在家没事，就拿出书柜里的《雾都孤儿》,我怀着好奇心一口气读完了这本书。
《雾都孤儿》是英国著名作家狄更斯创作初期的一部作品。作者当时处于朝气蓬勃的青年时代，因作品具有十足的生气和活力，这些写作特点都充分体现在作品中对人性思索的自然流露上。
乍一看上去，狄更斯在这部小说中并没有刻意去探究人性的深意，相反，我们看见的更多是冷酷和无情，但文中哪怕是费根和塞克斯这种罪恶之徒都能把那一丁点儿光明的追求在严酷的现实中表现出来，费根在死囚室中侍死与奥立费的最后一面时，作者用了象征的笔触，让一个纯真的的少年如天使般引导了那罪孽深重然而又可悲又可怜的老朽的罪犯。塞克斯杀了南茜出逃途中夜晚的那场冲天大火，塞克斯看到那简直是一种新生活，他在无所不在的的恐惧和惶恐的折磨下忙着扑火，要逃避记忆，逃避自己，他比原先更强烈的意识到自己犯下了可怕的罪行。作者对两人的这些安排可谓耐人思索。
这章中，作者表面看上去是在表现主人翁奥立费的生活，而实际上更多的在表现作者自己的生活。
读完这本书，让我十分震惊，我会认真的体会这本书中的含义。
《雾都孤儿》是英国作家狄更斯创作的13部长篇小说之一，讲述的是一个叫奥利弗的孤儿在伦敦发生的故事。
主人公奥利弗因受不了做棺材的工作而逃往伦敦，路上遇到一个扒手，把他带到了伦敦的扒手老巢，被迫成为扒手。但他不愿偷东西，却受到诬陷了，打入了监狱。被人证明了清白，一位好心人收留了他。之后他又被抓回了扒手窝，在坏人的挟持下去抢旅馆，没有成功，奥利弗这个可怜的孩子连中三枪，奄奄一息，被那家旅馆收留。他协助警方捣毁了扒手的老巢，又幸运地找到了失散多年的姐姐，并且继承了遗产，成为了一名高贵的绅士。
这本书让我懂得了许多做人的道理。首先不能得寸进尺，冤枉好人;不能够做、抢劫、偷盗等违法的事;不能随便怀疑别人，要有怜悯之心;更不能背信弃义，滥杀无辜，与警察作对。
不仅仅这些还要宽厚待人，互相友爱，真诚感激他人。没有强烈的爱，没有仁爱之心，没有对帮忙过自我的人的感恩之心是永远不会得到真正的幸福的。
是呀，正如书中写的“奥利弗永远不会忘记这个夜晚……”一样，我永远不会忘记《雾都孤儿》给予我的启示。
《雾都孤儿》这本书主要讲述的是一个感人的故事。
主人公奥立弗是一个孤儿，他出生在一个济贫院，奥立弗的妈妈生下他不久就死了，他就像礼物一样被人送来送去，最后还进入了贼窝，后来在许多朋友的帮助下，警察围剿了贼窝，查明了奥立弗的身世，帮他获得了遗产，回到了亲人的怀抱。
读完这本书，我的心情久久不能平静，可怜的奥立弗在过着地狱般的生活中，在饥饿、寒冷、孤独、悲伤中一步一步地前进。令我感动是奥立弗盗贼生涯那一章，虽然小偷们想把他培养成小偷，但无论怎么折磨他、他，他都毫不理睬，情愿在外流浪也不愿意与坏人为伍，最后乘机逃出了贼窝。想想奥立弗，在想想自己，虽然我比他幸福很多，但我有他那样坚强吗？虽然现在我不会流浪，但我却没有他那样机智、正义、勇敢。
书中另一位让我感动的人就是南希，尽管她是个贼，但为了帮助奥立弗，她宁愿背叛所爱的人，宁愿冒着被处死的危险，最后，惨死在拳头之下。南希所做的事情，让我感受到了她内心的矛盾、善良和公正。
读完这本书，我懂得了一个道理，每个人都有各自的经历，但不管遇到什么困难和挫折，都要有自信心，通过自身的努力，实现人生目标。
孤儿，是那些没有了父母的孩子，所以他们就住在了孤儿院。今天我们就来看看一本同样是关于孤儿的书——《雾都孤儿》。
这本书的主角是一个可怜的孤儿，他叫奥立费，他一出生母亲便死了，于是他就给带到了孤儿院。不过那个孤儿院却不是什么好地方，因为那里的主管对孤儿们很不好，孤儿们都很讨厌他。那个主管还把奥力费送到棺材店里做学徒。
在棺材铺里奥力费受尽了虐待，于是他就逃跑到了伦敦，结果被小偷“机灵鬼”带入了贼窝，被迫走上贼船。幸好有了布朗罗先生和露丝小姐等人的帮助，奥力费成功地逃出了费金等人的魔掌，并且让警察把那贼窝给翻了。蒙克斯也道出了奥力费的身世：蒙克斯和奥力费其实是同父异母的兄弟。不过奥力费的父亲已经去世了，他的财产就分给了他的两个儿子。从此，奥力费就和布朗罗先生生活在一起······
作者狄更斯把《雾都孤儿》写的很精彩，故事情节也很惊险，所以一下就把读者吸引住了，并且使读者的情绪随着故事的情节而改变。
生活中，总会有黑暗的一面。不过光明总会战胜黑暗的，会有无数个“布朗罗先生”和“露丝小姐”去帮助那些有困难了人。我也要向他们学习：尽自己所能地去帮助他人，并始终拥有一颗善良的心。
The work of the protagonist Oliver is an orphan, and grew up in the courtyard of the poor relief, others have been subject to discrimination. Because the extremely ill-treatment and fled to London, into Zeiwo, called by the beating, growing up, I do not know how much to eat suffered. While growing up in such an environment, but there is a Buddha Orie good heart, no matter by how much pain he did not want to do bad things is the greatest determination. He was Shouen people will never forget can not thank the benefactor. Although he is subject to a number of well-intentioned people and the sympathy of the adoption, such as Bulang Lu President, Lennart Meri wife, but the thieves, the group still did not miss him, and his half-brother also wish to kill him. Oliver's fate is tragic, but he's also been well-intentioned people to help identify his life, and the heritage. He has been the fate of the final change is expected to become a useful person to society. This works in Orie wrote at the beginning of the Buddha in relief of the poor house, in Charles Dickens described the living conditions of the poor house when a very ironic way: "Every child has a bowl of thin gruel, and that can not be increased only once To important public holiday, with the exception of a bowl of porridge outside in order to increase two and a quarter ounces of bread. They do not need to eat the Zhou Wan never wash, the children always scraping bowl of the spoon sauce residue has been driven Zeng Ming-Liang Shuo bowl. Scraping bowl of the matter is completed, they sit there and stare at large Tongguo helplessly, as if they are able to block a piece of brick stoves have to swallow it. This is a heinous and Tian Zhao They also own and finger , Ba Wangzhe a splash a few drops from child star to porridge. "Can be seen from the lives of those orphans how poverty, hunger throughout the day in the state, and no hope of Tianzhao his little finger, Bawang Zhao splash over the Congee child stars. One can imagine the children's life is very tragic, and Orie on the Buddha in such an environment. It is in the form of novels by Dickens to reflect the dark reality of the society and capitalist society under the lives of people of how poverty, poor life as works written by the same. Charles, known as the Victorian age eyes, because the novel in the form of the observed things with the novel in the form of re-emerged. That is why this works is the content of the true reflection of society at that time, and I think that the author describes the relief of the poor orphans living with a very vivid image of the language, a sharp way to expose the community The dark. Dickens wrote in the book a few years ago, the British Parliament adopted a new method of relief, cancellation of poor relief, but the poor directly to the port to house the poor relief. Dickens described the relief of the poor house at the time of poor relief is a true portrayal of the hospital. Poor relief in the hospital in no democracy, no freedom, only to be abused, hungry cold, a Mianhuangjishou months, fell to the ground at all times as likely to die, and the Diocese of those officers, those who Explorer, but eat a fat Head of the brain fertilizer, the full spirit. Dickens works in the hospital for the poor relief vivid description is a reflection of social problems. Some people think Charles Dickens's works this is a serious literary works, it works because it made a deep social problems, social development and progress is of great historical significance. In this work successfully in Dickens depicts a series of characters, such as the Diocese of General bampur, thieves old man and head of the Jewish charity school students Noah, the bandit Powu Monks, and so on. Did not have to portray a lifelike, life-like image. However, the most successful works portray the character or the protagonist Oliver and the woman stole Nancy. Oliver was born with a moral people, know how to map Temple has been reported. He ate a lot a lot of suffering, but in the end, finally met a good man. Whether Bulang Lu President, Lennart Meri, or his wife or Miss Meri, Orie Fodu treated as ordinary family, even though he is a "thief" who are sympathetic to him, his adoption, and that he receive a good education, and finally get Qing his life, his legacy fight back. Oliver described the events of all, I admire the most is the sixth chapter say when he was struggling to resist mocking the incident, as the authors put it, "On the surface I have described is not so small Important, but in fact he was Oliver's future development and are indirectly affected, and has had a major change. "Oliver in the poor house while growing up, there will be no freedom itself, to be disposal, but he A very strong self-esteem, Noah in the face of personal attacks, he was extremely excited. Noah and because of Oliver's mother died of a vicious insult to his indignation, blood boiling. "He immediately jumped up, an overturned the tables and chairs, and then Noah caught the pipe, to exhaust the body's effort to shake in fury of Noah, Noah has been a bit of teeth chattered issue of noise, and then He gathered together a whole body of Noah's efforts to blow hard, straight knocked him to the ground. "Oliver reaction puzzled me, common sense, he has been a quiet, modest, though by non - Who has abused a dejected from the juvenile Gan unlucky, but at the moment cohesion of the whole body strength Noah beat. What is the strength of his courage to make such a decision, perhaps it should not be "decided" it, a strong sense of anger so that he has lost his reason, he does not allow other people to his mother in the slightest insulting. While Oliver's mother, his memory, the memory never know his mother look like. However, the mother has been accompanied by a sense of respect for him. So, when Noah insult his mother, Oliver showed no emotion before. The incident was the result of Oliver was beaten up and detained. Charles Dickens wrote in the details below, not only for paving the way, but also a deeper portrait of the heroine works Oliver's image, in order to safeguard the dignity of the mother, just go ahead Many scholars think that works in a portrait of the most successful characters is Nancy, while Oliver to work for the main character, but from the social psychology and psychoanalysis point of view, the role of Nancy greater practical significance. Nancy is a psychological complex young women, from childhood growing up in the Group of thieves, no one knew her life, she entered the post-Zeiwo did not have any good people, of course, the final Bulang Lu also met with President Lennart Meri and Miss But then it was too late. Finally, her tragic death at the hands of the bandits Sykes, her fate is tragic, as in the real world into a triad of orphans after the end of the same. Nancy seen through the group of thieves all the ugly things, that her aversion treacherous, vicious, ruthless cruelty, inhuman things, but she is also the Group of thieves have a certain feeling, and want to leave. She has sympathy for Oliver, as for their treatment as his younger brother, in times of crisis to disregard their own safety to come forward and saved him, but he will have to personally Oliver thieves onto the road. She envied culture and education, the warmth of the family women, but because of her own humble status Yingshang Qu dare not, dare not wish for such a happy life. She is the heart of the conflict, when Bulang Lu and President Lennart Meri Miss advised her to leave the Group of thieves over a new leaf, she refused their offers of help, although she had a yearning for this kind of life. Nancy contradictions from her in to see if the original: "I do not want to do it! I do not want to do it! Though he is the devil, and he even told me yet more vicious than the devil, but I do not want to do ... then another ... One reason is that his life of crime is life, I am also live in sin, we are together for many years to live such a life, so I can not betray them, not to mention some of them may have betrayed me, but They did not sell out, even though they are bad people. "Her inner conflict is real, in line with the general psychological normal. There are a lot of female juvenile offenders, once on the wrong may be similar to that of Nancy ideological contradictions: both want to leave the crime associates also want to leave. Although Nancy Sykes hated doing, but he can not do without, it was of the view that Nancy is not reasonable, but in any case, her actions are all true. Psychological and ideological problems is in itself a complex issue as it is not possible to use simple methods can be resolved. Nancy Oliver, and this is the work of the two most representative figure, which is undeniable. Dickens portrayed in these two figures also spent a wonderful way. However, I would like to talk about is the image of another person Monks. Monks is Oliver's half-brother, who was extremely cruel, to be his brother's property destroyed at the expense of their own younger brother. I think Charles Monks at the describing the act when a clever arrangement. Monks and the role is a reflection of society at that time some of the children of the nobility EXILE. Monks is a smart, he knows how to ease access to his brother's property. Monks at the Dickens portrayed the characters can be on step-by-step. First of all, Monks is to look at the class when Mr. Bull appeared, the first author of the text did not mention him, so I read in class, Mr. Bull to meet the guests unfamiliar with the plot, on intuition told me that this works The plot will reach another climax. The mysterious people coming out, is scheduled to have a good, but I did not expect this so-called mystery is who would be Oliver's brother, but did not expect the paper after he had played such an important role. Charles gave the Monks "smart" in mind, set up a seamless clothing plans, and the Monks in the implementation of this plan are not thieves with Lin Yu co-leader of the Jewish old man, can be called up for the purpose of the unscrupulous. Finally, the plan is brought to light, Monks also ended in defeat. I think the Charles Oliver's brother wrote a greedy, ruthless, shameless, on the one hand, the work can culminate in the story, on the other hand, fully demonstrated the reality of society in order to achieve the purpose of the fire regardless of the tragic family Phenomenon. The author of this sharp touch of irony at the time the fire agency, while at the same time want to wake up those sad people, they wake up the conscience and consciousness, to awaken the consciousness of all the people. After reading the novel, I was not quiet for a long time. Oliver is a strong, kind-hearted, intelligent and brave and innocent boy, but experienced a difficult life, the ultimate storm, ushered in a happy life. And we are now living in the honey tank in Waterloo-fu, has often complained that always satisfied. But we have thought about, there are many poor children, are faced with the loss of loved ones, vagrancy of life, perhaps in the face of dropping out of school and the plight of the hungry. They are filled with love of life, looking forward to a bright classrooms, a yearning for delicious food or warm clothing. In the face of these eager children live in poverty, we can turn a blind eye to it? Can not stand idly by? When I read Dickens to write about the lives of the poor orphan house, my mind flashed always saw on television pictures of refugees in Africa. The old social life of the poor are poor, hungry cold it is not unusual things, and in the 21st century, in this era of civilization, hunger, fear, the cold remains. In that Oliver had been abused, beaten by the circumstances, and when I do not think of the often seen in the streets and show those begging children. These shabby heard that the children into a gang is organized, whether it be money or show has been begging for money, hard or stolen money, but also turned over to their "head." This is the civilized society? The fate of the children, their lives, and works of Charles Dickens orphan Oliver's life, what difference does? Oliver is lucky, good people can encounter. But in reality those organizations into the unknown children, their fate will be how well-intentioned people can encounter it? I do not think so, they may be ending as it works in Nancy, or died of starvation and disease. This is the so-called civilized society, the inevitable result. The more social progress, the more human civilization, and those bad elements are, the more furious, and unfortunately into the hands of their children, the more tragic fate. Therefore, we need love to help those in the midst of the people to help them out, ushering in a happy life. The works I think of many real-life scenarios, I touch on a lot. Now, I'd like to go back to Dickens's art and writing in order to charm. Dickens is the Victorian representative of the critical realism, written in the book when he was a youth, when he hopes to use his novel of social reform, but his community is not enough understanding of the profound, at the time of the ruling class also With the hope of a better place. In this work also reflects his idea. Under normal circumstances, the best realism in the novel, the story is often in a specific environment under the action of the history of the development of character, that is, Gorky said "some kind of character typical of the history and composition of growth." However, Charles Dickens, his informal set of any cell, the number of coincidence want to arrange the number of coincidence. If Oliver for the first time with the thieves took to the streets to be out of pocket, he is a friend of his late father before his death, Mr. Bulang Lu; thieves in his second head hostage Sikes under the burglary of the stolen happens to be his pro-aunt Ruth Merritt family; Also, due to his messenger haste to go and hit those who have the means哥哥蒙克斯him, and the Monks are let in the collision, he is looking for his brother. This is a series of coincidence in the sense just can not be justified in any case, however, Dickens's own rich imagination and clever idea, in the specific circumstances described in the breath of life and full of passion, so that readers can not breathe when reading a tension , That would have been far-fetched, unnatural circumstances has no choice but to believe, and have a great interest in this, can not wait to read down. This is the art of Dickens World charm. In addition, from a political perspective, this work made orphans of the social status of this very real problem, and, as well as the issue directly related to the issue of the quality of officials, community organizations, as well as a number of law in all sectors of the people's psychological tendencies And a long mental illness issues. Dickens has pointed out that one of these problems, but he thought of a way to solve these problems is not realistic. This is because the youth of his community not to understand the profound. With his wealth of experience of society, the society is also a deeper understanding of his ideas are slowly maturing, which, in his later works will be able to be reflected. Charles to use his vast and profound language to give the reader sometimes laughing, sometimes knowing smile, they are sometimes shed tears of laughter or pain and numbness of helpless laughter. However, no matter what kind of laughter, given all the capitalist society of endless irony.
我也是写这个 正找材料呢 交流交流哦
《雾都孤儿》是一部非常成功的作品，是狄更斯这位享誉盛名的代表作之一，它揭露了隐藏在伦敦狭小、肮脏的偏僻街道里的恐怖和暴力，也展示出了18世纪伦敦罪犯的真实面目；同时，狄更斯还试图说明：善良最终能够克服一切艰难险阻。《雾都孤儿》不仅吸引了评论家和公众的注意，同时它背后潜藏着的那一种强烈的情感不仅打动了与他同时代的读者，也深深地打动了我。《雾都孤儿》中主人公的英文名字为Oliver Twist，而Twist其英文意思是“扭曲，曲折，使苦恼”，这暗示着主人公Oliver的一生很坎坷，要经历很多的痛苦。在这个对社会进行抗议的情节剧式的小说中，奥利弗被当作一个主人公，其目的不是要触动我们的文学敏感性，而是要打动我们的情感。奥立弗·退斯特出生于19世纪30年代英国的一所济贫院，他妈妈用冰冷而毫无血色的嘴唇怜爱地在孩子的额头亲了一下后倒过去，咽了气。没父没母的奥立弗的童年过得极其凄惨，最初的9年是生活在一个管理不善的孤儿院，之后被转到收容成年人的济贫院。济贫院是维多利亚时期中产阶级建立的用来收养穷孩子的机构，因为人们认为穷人的身上有固有的恶习，穷人的家庭造就了这样的恶习，为了阻止这样的恶习产生，所以穷人夫妻就要分开，以阻止他们生孩子，从而减少下层社会的人。但可以这样形容当时的济贫院：济贫院给穷人提供的是慢性挨饿的机会，而在街头则是快速饿死。奥利弗和他的小伙伴们忍受着“慢性饥饿的折磨”。曾给我留下一个特别深刻印象的镜头是：一天晚上吃饭时，一个小孩子跟其他小孩子说，如果不给他多吃一碗粥，说不定会吃了谁。孩子们都很害怕，于是抓阄决定谁输了就要为那个孩子多要点吃的来。奥立弗输了，于是午饭后，其他孩子坚持奥立弗在晚饭时多要点食物。他的请求震惊了当局，结果使他们出5英镑作为酬金，要人把他从他们手上带走。因而可见，《雾都孤儿》是对维多利亚时期穷人的社会境遇的严厉批判。《雾都孤儿》的起势情节是：绝望之中的奥立弗在黎明中出逃，奔向伦敦，在伦敦城外，又饿又累的他遇到了一个与他相仿年纪的男孩—杰克，杰克让他住在自己的恩人费金的住处——实际上是一个窃贼之家，费金这个“枯瘦如柴的犹太老头”兼职为犯罪头头专门训练孤儿为他偷东西。经过几天的训练，奥立弗和其他两个小孩被派去偷东西。当奥立弗看到他们偷了一个老绅士的手绢的时候，吓得拔腿就逃，他被抓住了，但勉强地躲过了指控，没有因偷盗被定罪。布朗罗先生，就是手绢的被偷者，把发烧的奥立弗带回家中护理，让他恢复健康，原本以为黑暗的生活会远离他而去，但是费金贼帮里的两个大人赛克斯和他的情人南希把奥立弗抓住，并送回费金那里。在《雾都孤儿》中，颇具争议性问题的人物是南希。南希在道德上的复杂性在几位主要人物中是很独特的。南希自幼便是一个小偷，饮酒无度，而且是一个妓女，她所陷入的罪恶为她的社会所不齿，但当她牺牲自己的生命去保护奥立弗这个她并不是很熟悉的小孩时，她的行为又是最为高尚的。正因为南希，奥立弗被狄更斯掩藏下的真实身份才有了渐渐浮出水面的一刻。随后，费金派奥立弗去帮助赛克斯抢劫。奥立弗被那家的仆人用枪击中，赛克斯弃下受伤的奥立弗逃跑了。上天可怜善良的奥立弗，他被住在那里的梅莱太太和她漂亮的养女露西收留了。奥立弗开始了一种新生活。他常常与露西和梅莱太太外出散步，有时露西读书给他听，他也努力地学习功课。他觉得自己好像永远把罪恶，艰辛和贫困的世界抛在背后了。小说中，梅莱太太和露西所担任的母性角色使奥立弗第一次生活在正常的家庭当中，在她们母亲般的关爱下，奥立弗在乡下度过了美好的夏天。并且在梅莱一家的帮助下，布朗罗先生和奥立弗又团聚了，并消除了彼此间的误会。随后，布朗罗先生找到孟可思，追问奥立弗的真实身世，真相终于大白。原来孟可思是奥立弗同母异父的，和费金一起密谋陷害奥立弗，使之声名狼藉，并且是病态的，品行不端的坏兄弟，而且还查明了露西是奥立弗的亲生阿姨。小说的最后总结了狄更斯的道德和宗教观念：如果没有强烈的爱，没有博爱之心，如果对以慈悲为准则，以博爱一切生灵为最高标志的上帝不知感恩，那是绝对得不到幸福的，因而，有罪恶的得到了严厉的惩罚，穷凶恶及的人物到最后仍承担着罪恶，相应的，好人终究有好报，布朗罗先生收养了品性善良，道德高尚，宽容仁慈的奥立弗，他们和梅莱一家一起回乡下，从此过着幸福的生活。
Oliver Twist Oliver Twist, one of the most famous works of Charles Dickens’, is a novel reflecting the tragic fact of the life in Britain in 18th century. The author who himself was born in a poor family wrote this novel in his twenties with a view to reveal the ugly masks of those cruel criminals and to expose the horror and violence hidden underneath the narrow and dirty streets in London. The hero of this novel was Oliver Twist, an orphan, who was thrown into a world full of poverty and crime. He suffered enormous pain, such as hunger, thirst, beating and abuse. While reading the tragic experiences of the little Oliver, I was shocked by his sufferings. I felt for the poor boy, but at the same time I detested the evil Fagin and the brutal Bill. To my relief, as was written in all the best stories, the goodness eventually conquered devil and Oliver lived a happy life in the end. One of the plots that attracted me most is that after the theft, little Oliver was allowed to recover in the kind care of Mrs. Maylie and Rose and began a new life. He went for walks with them, or Rose read to him, and he worked hard at his lessons. He felt as if he had left behind forever the world of crime and hardship and poverty. How can such a little boy who had already suffered oppressive affliction remain pure in body and mind? The reason is the nature of goodness. I think it is the most important information implied in the novel by Dickens-he believed that goodness could conquer every difficulty. Although I don’t think goodness is omnipotent, yet I do believe that those who are kind-hearted live more happily than those who are evil-minded. For me, the nature of goodness is one of the most necessary character for a person. Goodness is to humans what water is to fish. He who is without goodness is an utterly worthless person. On the contrary, as the famous saying goes, ‘The fragrance always stays in the hand that gives the rose’, he who is with goodness undoubtedly is a happy and useful person. People receiving his help are grateful to him and he also gets gratified from what he has done, and thus he can do good to both the people he has helped and himself. To my disappointment, nowadays some people seem to doubt the existence of the goodness in humanity. They look down on people’s honesty and kindness, thinking it foolish of people to be warm-hearted. As a result, they show no sympathy to those who are in trouble and seldom offer to help others. On the other hand, they attach importance to money and benefit. In their opinion, money is the only real object while emotions and morality are nihility. If they cannot get profit from showing their ‘kindness’, they draw back when others are faced with trouble and even hit a man when he is down. They are one of the sorts that I really detest. Francis Bacon said in his essay, ‘Goodness, of all virtues and dignities of the mind, is the greatest, being the character of the Deity, and without it, man is a busy, mischievous, wretched thing, no better than a kind of vermin.’ That is to say a person without goodness is destined to lose everything. Therefore, I, a kind person, want to tell those ‘vermin-to-be’ to learn from the kind Oliver and regain the nature of goodness. 雾都孤儿 雾都孤儿》,其中最著名的作品的查尔斯•狄更斯的《反映,是一种新型的悲惨的现实,在18世纪的英国的生活。 作者自己出生在一个贫穷的家庭写这本书在他二十几岁时为了揭示丑陋的面具的残酷的罪犯,让恐怖和暴力隐藏在狭窄的,肮脏的街道在伦敦。 这本小说是的英雄,《雾都孤儿孤儿,谁被投进了的世界充满着贫穷和犯罪。他遭受巨大的痛苦,如饥饿、干渴、殴打和虐待。在阅读《悲惨的经历的小奥利弗,我感到震惊的是他的痛苦经历。我觉得为了可怜的男孩子,但同时我厌恶邪恶和残酷Fagin帐单。使我松了口气,写在所有最好的故事,最终征服了魔鬼,奥利佛善过上了幸福美满的生活结束。一个最吸引我的计谋是盗窃,小奥利弗被允许这种康复照顾夫人Maylie和玫瑰开始了一种新的生活。他去散步,与他们,或玫瑰念给他听,他努力学习功课。他感到他先前留下的世界永远犯罪和困难和贫穷。 怎能一个小男孩已经遭受苦难保持纯洁的压迫身体和心灵吗?原因是处于善性品德之中。我认为这是最重要的信息的小说中隐含Dickens-he相信善良能战胜一切困难。虽然我并不认为善良是无所不能的,我却相信,那些都是善良的过的更幸福的人比那些是愚昧无知。 对我来说,处于善性的品德是其中一个最必要的个性的一个人。善良是给人类就像鱼儿离不开水一样。谁是没有良善是一个完全无用的人。相反,正如著名的老话所说:“香味的手总是待在给玫瑰”一样。给你推荐一个网站，超棒！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！
你怎么研究电影而不是小说啊？强烈建议你把电影去掉，（也许就思想主题而言，电影和小说是一回事）开题报告如何写？①：在百度搜索：开题报告 范文②：去学校图书馆的期刊论文数据库搜索：雾都孤儿英文的搜索：Oliver Twist
实再现经典名著 在原创能力普遍衰竭的今天，无数电影人将目光投向经典名著，拙劣的改编者往往对原著伤筋动骨，既伤害了先人又贻误了后代，更有不少投机取巧者只把名著的架子拿来，装的是自己的货色，这样的改编实际上是移植和借用。在过去20多个《雾都孤儿》电影版本中，童党头目“费金”均被描绘成一个十恶不赦的大 ... 据悉，为还原19世纪30年代英国伦敦的风貌，主创人员研究了大量当时伦敦的地图和 ...雾都孤儿》. 以电影绘制动态油画 由大师解读名著经典.
Oliver Twist Oliver Twist, one of the most famous works of Charles Dickens’, is a novel reflecting the tragic fact of the life in Britain in 18th century. The author who himself was born in a poor family wrote this novel in his twenties with a view to reveal the ugly masks of those cruel criminals and to expose the horror and violence hidden underneath the narrow and dirty streets in London. The hero of this novel was Oliver Twist, an orphan, who was thrown into a world full of poverty and crime. He suffered enormous pain, such as hunger, thirst, beating and abuse. While reading the tragic experiences of the little Oliver, I was shocked by his sufferings. I felt for the poor boy, but at the same time I detested the evil Fagin and the brutal Bill. To my relief, as was written in all the best stories, the goodness eventually conquered devil and Oliver lived a happy life in the end. One of the plots that attracted me most is that after the theft, little Oliver was allowed to recover in the kind care of Mrs. Maylie and Rose and began a new life. He went for walks with them, or Rose read to him, and he worked hard at his lessons. He felt as if he had left behind forever the world of crime and hardship and poverty. How can such a little boy who had already suffered oppressive affliction remain pure in body and mind? The reason is the nature of goodness. I think it is the most important information implied in the novel by Dickens-he believed that goodness could conquer every difficulty. Although I don’t think goodness is omnipotent, yet I do believe that those who are kind-hearted live more happily than those who are evil-minded. For me, the nature of goodness is one of the most necessary character for a person. Goodness is to humans what water is to fish. He who is without goodness is an utterly worthless person. On the contrary, as the famous saying goes, ‘The fragrance always stays in the hand that gives the rose’, he who is with goodness undoubtedly is a happy and useful person. People receiving his help are grateful to him and he also gets gratified from what he has done, and thus he can do good to both the people he has helped and himself. To my disappointment, nowadays some people seem to doubt the existence of the goodness in humanity. They look down on people’s honesty and kindness, thinking it foolish of people to be warm-hearted. As a result, they show no sympathy to those who are in trouble and seldom offer to help others. On the other hand, they attach importance to money and benefit. In their opinion, money is the only real object while emotions and morality are nihility. If they cannot get profit from showing their ‘kindness’, they draw back when others are faced with trouble and even hit a man when he is down. They are one of the sorts that I really detest. Francis Bacon said in his essay, ‘Goodness, of all virtues and dignities of the mind, is the greatest, being the character of the Deity, and without it, man is a busy, mischievous, wretched thing, no better than a kind of vermin.’ That is to say a person without goodness is destined to lose everything. Therefore, I, a kind person, want to tell those ‘vermin-to-be’ to learn from the kind Oliver and regain the nature of goodness. 雾都孤儿 雾都孤儿》,其中最著名的作品的查尔斯•狄更斯的《反映,是一种新型的悲惨的现实,在18世纪的英国的生活。 作者自己出生在一个贫穷的家庭写这本书在他二十几岁时为了揭示丑陋的面具的残酷的罪犯,让恐怖和暴力隐藏在狭窄的,肮脏的街道在伦敦。 这本小说是的英雄,《雾都孤儿孤儿,谁被投进了的世界充满着贫穷和犯罪。他遭受巨大的痛苦,如饥饿、干渴、殴打和虐待。在阅读《悲惨的经历的小奥利弗,我感到震惊的是他的痛苦经历。我觉得为了可怜的男孩子,但同时我厌恶邪恶和残酷Fagin帐单。使我松了口气,写在所有最好的故事,最终征服了魔鬼,奥利佛善过上了幸福美满的生活结束。一个最吸引我的计谋是盗窃,小奥利弗被允许这种康复照顾夫人Maylie和玫瑰开始了一种新的生活。他去散步,与他们,或玫瑰念给他听,他努力学习功课。他感到他先前留下的世界永远犯罪和困难和贫穷。 怎能一个小男孩已经遭受苦难保持纯洁的压迫身体和心灵吗?原因是处于善性品德之中。我认为这是最重要的信息的小说中隐含Dickens-he相信善良能战胜一切困难。虽然我并不认为善良是无所不能的,我却相信,那些都是善良的过的更幸福的人比那些是愚昧无知。 对我来说,处于善性的品德是其中一个最必要的个性的一个人。善良是给人类就像鱼儿离不开水一样。谁是没有良善是一个完全无用的人。相反,正如著名的老话所说:“香味的手总是待在给玫瑰”一样。给你推荐一个网站，超棒！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！
人物形象分析，作者研究，写作风格，写作背景什么的都可以的
Oliver Twist is born in a workhouse in a provincial town. His mother has been found very sick in the street, and she gives birth to Oliver just before she dies. Oliver is raised un
Oliver Twist Oliver Twist, one of the most famous works of Charles Dickens’, is a novel reflecting the tragic fact of the life in Britain in 18th century. The author who himself was born in a poor family wrote this novel in his twenties with a view to reveal the ugly masks of those cruel criminals and to expose the horror and violence hidden underneath the narrow and dirty streets in London. The hero of this novel was Oliver Twist, an orphan, who was thrown into a world full of poverty and crime. He suffered enormous pain, such as hunger, thirst, beating and abuse. While reading the tragic experiences of the little Oliver, I was shocked by his sufferings. I felt for the poor boy, but at the same time I detested the evil Fagin and the brutal Bill. To my relief, as was written in all the best stories, the goodness eventually conquered devil and Oliver lived a happy life in the end. One of the plots that attracted me most is that after the theft, little Oliver was allowed to recover in the kind care of Mrs. Maylie and Rose and began a new life. He went for walks with them, or Rose read to him, and he worked hard at his lessons. He felt as if he had left behind forever the world of crime and hardship and poverty. How can such a little boy who had already suffered oppressive affliction remain pure in body and mind? The reason is the nature of goodness. I think it is the most important information implied in the novel by Dickens-he believed that goodness could conquer every difficulty. Although I don’t think goodness is omnipotent, yet I do believe that those who are kind-hearted live more happily than those who are evil-minded. For me, the nature of goodness is one of the most necessary character for a person. Goodness is to humans what water is to fish. He who is without goodness is an utterly worthless person. On the contrary, as the famous saying goes, ‘The fragrance always stays in the hand that gives the rose’, he who is with goodness undoubtedly is a happy and useful person. People receiving his help are grateful to him and he also gets gratified from what he has done, and thus he can do good to both the people he has helped and himself. To my disappointment, nowadays some people seem to doubt the existence of the goodness in humanity. They look down on people’s honesty and kindness, thinking it foolish of people to be warm-hearted. As a result, they show no sympathy to those who are in trouble and seldom offer to help others. On the other hand, they attach importance to money and benefit. In their opinion, money is the only real object while emotions and morality are nihility. If they cannot get profit from showing their ‘kindness’, they draw back when others are faced with trouble and even hit a man when he is down. They are one of the sorts that I really detest. Francis Bacon said in his essay, ‘Goodness, of all virtues and dignities of the mind, is the greatest, being the character of the Deity, and without it, man is a busy, mischievous, wretched thing, no better than a kind of vermin.’ That is to say a person without goodness is destined to lose everything. Therefore, I, a kind person, want to tell those ‘vermin-to-be’ to learn from the kind Oliver and regain the nature of goodness. 雾都孤儿 雾都孤儿》,其中最著名的作品的查尔斯•狄更斯的《反映,是一种新型的悲惨的现实,在18世纪的英国的生活。 作者自己出生在一个贫穷的家庭写这本书在他二十几岁时为了揭示丑陋的面具的残酷的罪犯,让恐怖和暴力隐藏在狭窄的,肮脏的街道在伦敦。 这本小说是的英雄,《雾都孤儿孤儿,谁被投进了的世界充满着贫穷和犯罪。他遭受巨大的痛苦,如饥饿、干渴、殴打和虐待。在阅读《悲惨的经历的小奥利弗,我感到震惊的是他的痛苦经历。我觉得为了可怜的男孩子,但同时我厌恶邪恶和残酷Fagin帐单。使我松了口气,写在所有最好的故事,最终征服了魔鬼,奥利佛善过上了幸福美满的生活结束。一个最吸引我的计谋是盗窃,小奥利弗被允许这种康复照顾夫人Maylie和玫瑰开始了一种新的生活。他去散步,与他们,或玫瑰念给他听,他努力学习功课。他感到他先前留下的世界永远犯罪和困难和贫穷。 怎能一个小男孩已经遭受苦难保持纯洁的压迫身体和心灵吗?原因是处于善性品德之中。我认为这是最重要的信息的小说中隐含Dickens-he相信善良能战胜一切困难。虽然我并不认为善良是无所不能的,我却相信,那些都是善良的过的更幸福的人比那些是愚昧无知。 对我来说,处于善性的品德是其中一个最必要的个性的一个人。善良是给人类就像鱼儿离不开水一样。谁是没有良善是一个完全无用的人。相反,正如著名的老话所说:“香味的手总是待在给玫瑰”一样。给你推荐一个网站，超棒！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！
Oliver TwistSearch all of Oliver Twist: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------FROM: Appreciations and Criticisms of the Works of Charles DickensBY: Gilbert Keith ChestertonIn considering Dickens, as we almost always must consider him, as a man of rich originality, we may possibly miss the forces from which he drew even his original energy. It is not well for man to be alone. We, in the modern world, are ready enough to admit that when it is applied to some problem of monasticism or of an ecstatic life. But we will not admit that our modern artistic claim to absolute originality is really a claim to absolute unsociability; a claim to absolute loneliness. The anarchist is at least as solitary as the ascetic. And the men of very vivid vigour in literature, the men such as Dickens, have generally displayed a large sociability towards the society of letters, always expressed in the happy pursuit of pre-existent themes, sometimes expressed, as in the case of Moli鑢e or Sterne, in downright plagiarism. For even theft is a confession of our dependence on society. In Dickens, however, this element of the original foundations on which he worked is quite especially difficult to determine. This is partly due to the fact that for the present reading public he is practically the only one of his long line that is read at all. He sums up Smollett and Goldsmith, but he also destroys them. This one giant, being closest to us, cuts off from our view even the giants that begat him. But much more is this difficulty due to the fact that Dickens mixed up with the old material, materials so subtly modern, so made of the French Revolution, that the whole is transformed. If we want the best example of this, the best example is Oliver Twist. Relatively to the other works of Dickens Oliver Twist is not of great value, but it is of great importance. Some parts of it are so crude and of so clumsy a melodrama, that one is almost tempted to say that Dickens would have been greater without it. But even if be had been greater without it he would still have been incomplete without it. With the exception of some gorgeous passages, both of humour and horror, the interest of the book lies not so much in its revelation of Dickens's literary genius as in its revelation of those moral, personal, and political instincts which were the make-up of his character and the permanent support of that literary genius. It is by far the most depressing of all his books; it is in some ways the most irritating; yet its ugliness gives the last touch of honesty to all that spontaneous and splendid output. Without this one discordant note all his merriment might have seemed like levity. Dickens had just appeared upon the stage and set the whole world laughing with his first great story Pickwick. Oliver Twist was his encore. It was the second opportunity given to him by those who ha rolled about with laughter over Tupman and Jingle, Weller and Dowler. Under such circumstances a stagey reciter will sometimes take care to give a pathetic piece after his humorous one; and with all his many moral merits, there was much that was stagey about Dickens. But this explanation alone is altogether inadequate and unworthy. There was in Dickens this other kind of energy, horrible, uncanny, barbaric, capable in another age of coarseness, greedy for the emblems of established ugliness, the coffin, the gibbet, the bones, the bloody knife. Dickens liked these things and he was all the more of a man for liking them; especially he was all the more of a boy. We can all recall with pleasure the fact that Miss Petowker (afterwards Mrs. Lillyvick) was in the habit of reciting a poem called "The Blood Drinker's Burial." I cannot express my regret that the words of this poem are not given; for Dickens would have been quite as capable of writing "The Blood Drinker's Burial" as Miss Petowker was of reciting it. This strain existed in Dickens alongside of his happy laughter; both were allied to the same robust romance. Here as elsewhere Dickens is close to all the permanent human things. He is close to religion, which has never allowed the thousand devils on its churches to stop the dancing of its bells. He is allied to the people, to the real poor, who love nothing so much as to take a cheerful glass and to talk about funerals. The extremes of his gloom and gaiety are the mark of religion and democracy; they mark him off from the moderate happiness of philosophers, and from that stoicism which is the virtue and the creed of aristocrats. There is nothing odd in the fact that the same man who conceived the humane hospitalities of Pickwick should also have imagined the inhuman laughter of Fagin's den. They are both genuine and they are both exaggerated. And the whole human tradition has tied up together in a strange knot these strands of festivity and fear. It is over the cups of Christmas Eve that men have always competed in telling ghost stories. This first element was present in Dickens, and it is very powerfully present in Oliver Twist. It had not been present with sufficient consistency or continuity in Pickwick to make it remain on the reader's memory at all, for the tale of "Gabriel Grubb" is grotesque rather than horrible, and the two gloomy stories of the "Madman" and the "Queer Client" are so utterly irrelevant to the tale, that even if the reader remember them he probably does not remember that they occur in Pickwick. Critics have complained of Shakespeare and others for putting comic episodes into a tragedy. It required a man with the courage and coarseness of Dickens actually to put tragic episodes into a farce. But they are not caught up into the story at all. In Oliver Twist, however, the thing broke out with an almost brutal inspiration, and those who had fallen in love with Dickens for his generous buffoonery may very likely have been startled at receiving such very different fare at the next helping. When you have bought a man's book because you like his writing about Mr. Wardle's punch-bowl and Mr. Winkle's skates, it may very well be surprising to open it and read about the sickening thuds that beat out the life of Nancy, or that mysterious villain whose face was blasted with disease. As a nightmare, the work is really admirable. Characters which are not very clearly conceived as regards their own psychology are yet, at certain moments, managed so as to shake to its foundations our own psychology. Bill Sikes is not exactly a real man, but for all that he is a real murderer. Nancy is not really impressive as a living woman; but (as the phrase goes) she makes a lovely corpse. Something quite childish and eternal in us, something which is shocked with the mere simplicity of death, quivers when we read of those repeated blows or see Sikes cursing the tell-tale cur who will follow his bloody foot-prints. And this strange, sublime, vulgar melodrama, which is melodrama and yet is painfully real, reaches its hideous height in that fine scene of the death of Sikes, the besieged house, the boy screaming within, the crowd screaming without, the murderer turned almost a maniac and dragging his victim uselessly up and down the room, the escape over the roof, the rope swiftly running taut, and death sudden, startling and symbolic; a man hanged. There is in this and similar scenes something of the quality of Hogarth and many other English moralists of the early eighteenth century. It is not easy to define this Hogarthian quality in words, beyond saying that it is a sort of alphabetical realism, like the cruel candour of children. But it has about it these two special principles which separate it from all that we call realism in our time. First, that with us a moral story means a story about moral people; with them a moral story meant more often a story about immoral people. Second, that with us realism is always associated with some subtle view of morals; with them realism was always associated with some simple view of morals. The end of Bill Sikes exactly in the way that the law would have killed him -- this is a Hogarthian incident; it carries on that tradition of startling and shocking platitude. All this element in the book was a sincere thing in the author, but none the less it came from old soils, from the graveyard and the gallows, and the lane where the ghost walked. Dickens was always attracted to such things, and (as Forster says with inimitable simplicity) "but for his strong sense might have fallen into the follies of spiritualism." As a matter of fact, like most of the men of strong sense in his tradition, Dickens was left with a half belief in spirits which became in practice a belief in bad spirits. The great disadvantage of those who have too much strong sense to believe in supernaturalism is that they keep last the low and little forms of the supernatural, such as omens, curses, spectres, and retributions, but find a high and happy supernaturalism quite incredible. Thus the Puritans denied the sacraments, but went on burning witches. This shadow does rest, to some extent, upon the rational English writers like Dickens; supernaturalism was dying, but its ugliest roots died last. Dickens would have found it easier to believe in a ghost than in a vision of the Virgin with angels. There, for good or evil, however, was the root of the old diablerie in Dickens, and there it is in Oliver Twist. But this was only the first of the new Dickens elements, which must have surprised those Dickensians who eagerly bought his second book. The second of the new Dickens elements is equally indisputable and separate. It swelled afterwards to enormous proportions in Dickens's work; but it really has its rise here. Again, as in the case of the element of diablerie, it would be possible to make technical exceptions in favour of Pickwick. Just as there were quite inappropriate scraps of the gruesome element in Pickwick, so there are quite inappropriate allusions to this other topic in Pickwick. But nobody by merely reading Pickwick would even remember this topic; no one by merely reading Pickwick would know what this topic is; this third great subject of Dickens; this second great subject of the Dickens of Oliver Twist. This subject is social oppression. It is surely fair to say that no one could have gathered from Pickwick how this question boiled in the blood of the author of Pickwick. There are, indeed, passages, particularly in connection with Mr. Pickwick in the debtor's prison, which prove to us, looking back on a whole public career, that Dickens had been from the beginning bitter and inquisitive about the problem of our civilisation. No one could have imagined at the time that this bitterness ran in an unbroken river under all the surges of that superb gaiety and exuberance. With Oliver Twist this sterner side of Dickens was suddenly revealed. For the very first pages of Oliver Twist are stern even when they are funny. They amuse, but they cannot be enjoyed, as can the passages about the follies of Mr. Snodgrass or the humiliations of Mr. Winkle. The difference between the old easy humour and this new harsh humour is a difference not of degree but of kind. Dickens makes game of Mr. Bumble because he wants to kill Mr. Bumble; he made game of Mr. Winkle because he wanted him to live for ever. Dickens has taken the sword in hand; against what is he declaring war? It is just here that the greatness of Dickens comes in; it is just here that the difference lies between the pedant and the poet. Dickens enters the social and political war, and the first stroke he deals is not only significant but even startling. Fully to see this we must appreciate the national situation. It was an age of reform, and even of radical reform; the world was full of radicals and reformers; but only too many of them took the line of attacking everything and anything that was opposed to some particular theory among the many political theories that possessed the end of the eighteenth century. Some had so much perfected the perfect theory of republicanism that they almost lay awake at night because Queen Victoria had a crown on her head. Others were so certain that mankind had hitherto been merely strangled in the bonds of the State that they saw truth only in the destruction of tariffs or of by-laws. The greater part of that generation held that clearness, economy, and a hard common-sense, would soon destroy the errors that had been erected by the superstitions and sentimentalities of the past. In pursuance of this idea many of the new men of the new century, quite confident that they were invigorating the new age, sought to destroy the old entimental clericalism, the old sentimental feudalism, the old-world belief in priests, the old-world belief in patrons, and among other things the old-world belief in beggars. They sought among other things to clear away the old visionary kindliness on the subject of vagrants. Hence those reformers enacted not only a new reform bill but also a new poor law. In creating many other modern things they created the modern workhouse, and when Dickens came out to fight it was the first thing that he broke with his battle-axe. This is where Dickens's social revolt is of more value than mere politics and avoids the vulgarity of the novel with a purpose. His revolt is not a revolt of the commercialist against the feudalist, of the Nonconformist against the Churchman, of the Free-trader against the Protectionist, of the Liberal against the Tory. If he were among us now his revolt would not be the revolt of the Socialist against the Individualist, or of the Anarchist against the Socialist. His revolt was simply and solely the eternal revolt; it was the revolt of the weak against the strong. He did not dislike this or that argument for oppression; he disliked oppression. He disliked a certain look on the face of a man when he looks down on another man. And that look on the face is, indeed, the only thing in the world that we have really to fight between here and the fires of Hell. That which pedants of that time and this time would have called the sentimentalism of Dickens was really simply the detached sanity of Dickens. He cared nothing for the fugitive explanations of the Constitutional Conservatives; he cared nothing for the fugitive explanations of the Manchester School. He would have cared quite as little for the fugitive explanations of the Fabian Society or of the modern scientific Socialist. He saw that under many forms there was one fact, the tyranny of man over man; and he struck at it when he saw it, whether it was old or new. When he found that footmen and rustics were too much afraid of Sir Leicester Dedlock, he attacked Sir Leicester Dedlock; he did not care whether Sir Leicester Dedlock said he was attacking England or whether Mr. Rouncewell, the Ironmaster, said he was attacking an effete oligarchy. In that case he pleased Mr. Rouncewell, the Ironmaster, and displeased Sir Leicester Dedlock, the Aristocrat. But when he found that Mr. Rouncewell's workmen were much too frightened of Mr. Rouncewell, then he displeased Mr. Rouncewell in turn; he displeased Mr. Rouncewell very much by calling him Mr. Bounderby. When he imagined himself to be fighting old laws he gave a sort of vague and general approval to new laws. But when he came to the new laws they had a bad time. When Dickens found that after a hundred economic arguments and granting a hundred economic considerations, the fact remained that paupers in modern workhouses were much too afraid of the beadle, just as vassals in ancient castles were much too afraid of the Dedlocks, then he struck suddenly and at once. This is what makes the opening chapters of Oliver Twist so curious and important. The very fact of Dickens's distance from, and independence of, the elaborate financial arguments of his time, makes more definite and dazzling his sudden assertion that he sees the old human tyranny in front of him as plain as the sun at noon-day. Dickens attacks the modern workhouse with a sort of inspired simplicity as a boy in a fairy tale who had wandered about, sword in hand, looking for ogres and who had found an indisputable ogre. All the other people of his time are attacking things because they are bad economics or because they are bad politics, or because they are bad science; he alone is attacking things because they are bad. All the others are Radicals with a large R; he alone is radical with a small one. He encounters evil with that beautiful surprise which, as it is the beginning of all real pleasure, is also the beginning of all righteous indignation. He enters the workhouse just as Oliver Twist enters it, as a little child. This is the real power and pathos of that celebrated passage in the book which has passed into a proverb; but which has not lost its terrible humour even in being hackneyed. I mean, of course, the everlasting quotation about Oliver Twist asking for more. The real poignancy that there is in this idea is a very good study in that strong school of social criticism which Dickens represented. A modern realist describing the dreary workhouse would have made all the children utterly crushed, not daring to speak at all, not expecting anything, not hoping anything, past all possibility of affording even an ironical contrast or a protest of despair. A modern, in short, would have made all the boys in the workhouse pathetic by making them all pessimists. But Oliver Twist is not pathetic because he is a pessimist. Oliver Twist is pathetic because he is an optimist. The whole tragedy of that incident is in the fact that he does expect the universe to be kind to him, that he does believe that he is living in a just world. He comes before the Guardians as the ragged peasants of the French Revolution came before the Kings and Parliaments of Europe. That is to say, he comes, indeed, with gloomy experiences, but he comes with a happy philosophy. He knows that there are wrongs of man to be reviled; but he believes also that there are rights of man to be demanded. It has often been remarked as a singular fact that the French poor, who stand in historic tradition as typical of all the desperate men who have dragged down tyranny, were, as a matter of fact, by no means worse off than the poor of many other European countries before the Revolution. The truth is that the French were tragic because they were better off. The others had known the sorrowful experiences; but they alone had known the splendid expectation and the original claims. It was just here that Dickens was so true a child of them and of that happy theory so bitterly applied. They were the one oppressed people that simply asked for justice; they were the one Parish Boy who innocently asked for more.
Oliver Twist is born in a workhouse in a provincial town. His mother has been found very sick in the street, and she gives birth to Oliver just before she dies. Oliver is raised under the care of Mrs. Mann and the beadle Mr. Bumble in the workhouse. When it falls to Oliver’s lot to ask for more food on behalf of all the starving children in the workhouse, he is trashed, and then apprenticed to an undertaker, Mr. Sowerberry. Another apprentice of Mr. Sowerberry’s, Noah Claypole insults Oliver’s dead mother and the small and frail Oliver attacks him. However, Oliver is punished severely, and he runs away to London. Here he is picked up by Jack Dawkins or the Artful Dodger as he is called. The Artful Dodger is a member of the Jew Fagin’s gang of boys. Fagin has trained the boys to become pickpockets. The Artful Dodger takes Oliver to Fagin’s den in the London slums, and Oliver, who innocently does not understand that he is among criminals, becomes one of Fagin’s Oliver is sent out with The Artful Dodger and another boy on a pickpocket expedition Oliver is so shocked when he realizes what is going on that he and not the two other boys are caught. Fortunately, the victim of the thieves, the old benevolent gentleman, Mr. Brownlow rescues Oliver from arrest and brings him to his house, where the housekeeper, Mrs. Bedwin nurses him back to life after he had fallen sick, and for the first time in his life he is , with the help of the brutal murderer Bill Sikes and the prostitute Nancy Fagin kidnaps Oliver. Fagin is prompted to do this by the mysterious Mr. Monks. Oliver is taken along on a burglary expedition in the country. The thieves are discovered in the house of Mrs. Maylie and her adopted niece, Rose, and Oliver is shot and wounded. Sikes escapes. Rose and Mrs. Maylie nurse the wounded Oliver. When he tells them his story they believe him, and he settles with them. While living with Rose and Mrs. Maylie Oliver one day sees Fagin and Monks looking at him in through a window. Nancy discovers that Monks is plotting against Oliver for some reason, bribing Fagin to corrupt his innocence. Nancy also learns that there is some kind of connection between Rose and Oliver; but after having told Rose’s adviser and friend Dr. Losberne about it on the steps of London Bridge, she is discovered by Noah Claypole, who in the meantime has become a member of Fagin’s gang, and Sykes murders her. On his frantic flight away from the crime Sykes accidentally and dramatically hangs himself. Fagin and the rest of the gang are arrested. Fagin is executed after Oliver has visited him in the condemned cell in Newgate Prison. The Artful Dodger is transported after a court scene in which he eloquently defends himself and his ’ plot against Oliver is disclosed by Mr. Brownlow. Monks is Oliver’s half-brother seeking all of the inheritance for himself. Oliver’s father’s will states that he will leave money to Oliver on the condition that his reputation is clean. Oliver’s dead mother and Rose were sisters. Monks receives his share of the inheritance and goes away to America. He dies in prison there, and Oliver is adopted by Mr. Brownlow.