《Plant Diseases and Pests》（中文译名《植物病虫害研究》）是美国USA-China Science & Culture Media Corporation（美中科技文化传媒公司）创办的英文学术期刊。刊物于2010年1月创刊，暂为月刊，国际刊号 ISSN 2152-3932 。主要报道植物病虫害的诊断、治疗和预防等方面的研究和创新性研究成果。该刊面向世界，旨在反映我国植物病虫害防治研究领域的最新研究进展，提高我国该领域研究的国际影响力。打字不易，如满意，望采纳。
plant cell 审稿流程如下：文章投稿成功后，编辑部一般会进行登记，并交给相关栏目的编辑进行初审。 编辑初审是指编辑人员对论文稿件进行初步审查和评价,以决定是退稿、退修、或者送专家评审。扩展资料：plant cell即《植物细胞》，是美国植物生物学家学会出版的生命科学领域学术刊物。即《植物细胞》，是著名学术刊物，影响因子10左右，在SCI植物类非评论性杂志中排名第一。SCI所收录期刊的内容主要涉及数、理、化、农、林、医、生物等基础科学研究领域，选用刊物来源于40多个国家，50多种文字。
审稿时间:约3个月 很好的期刊。研究的东西一定要新颖，而且有功能全面。
举例一： 论文题目：Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies on the antivirus effects of A (一种中草药) against virus B （一种病毒） 所 投杂志：Life Sciences 投稿结果：这次大修后又经过一次小修，被接受发表 编辑信内容（注： 有删节）： Dear M XXX, Your manuscript has been examined by the editors and qualified refereeM We think the manuscript has merit but requires revision before we can accept it for publication in the J Careful consideration must be given to the points raised in the reviewer comments, which are enclosed If you choose to submit a revision of your manuscript, please incorporate responses to the reviewer comments into the revised A complete rebuttal with no manuscript alterations is usually considered inadequate and may result in lengthy re-review A letter detailing your revisions point-by-point must accompany the You will be requested to upload this Response to Reviewers as a separate file in the Attach Files We ask that you resubmit your manuscript within 45 After this time, your file will be placed on inactive status and a further submission will be considered a new To submit a revision, go to and log in as an A You will see a menu item called Submission Needing R You will find your submission record Yours sincerely, Joseph J Bahl, PhD Editor Life Sciences Format Suggestion: Please access the Guide to Authors at our website to check the format of your Pay particular attention to our References Reviewers" comments: Reviewer #1: XXXXX （略） Reviewer #2: XXXXX （略） Editors note and suggestions: （注：编辑的建议） Title: Re-write the title to read more smoothly in contemporary English>>> Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies of the antiviral effects of A against virus B Abstract: Re-write the abstract to read more A, an alkaloid isolated from C (注：一种中草药), was tested for antiviral activity against virus B Both in vitro and in vivo assays along with serum pharmacological experiments showed A to have potent antiviral The pharmacokinetic profile of A in Sprague/Dawley rat plasma after oral administration was measured by HPLC Blood samples taken at selected time points were analyzed to study potential changes in antiviral pharmacodynamics as measured by infectivity of From the similarity of the serum concentration profiles and antiviral activity profiles it is concluded that A it self, rather than a metabolite, exerted the effect against the virus prior to The need for effective clinical agents against virus B and these results suggest the possibility of benefit from further experiments with A The authors should check to be sure that the terms blood samples, plasma and serum are always used appropriately throughout the abstract and Introduction: some sentences can be made less example 1st paragraph >>>> A appears to be the most important alkaloid isolated from the plant, its structural formula is shown in Fig While it produced a general inhibition of antibody production lymphocyte proliferation was stimulated (Xia and Wang, 1997) These pharmacological properties suggest a potential use in the treatment of viral myocarditis against virus B that could be studied in experiments in cell culture and >>>The authors should check the entire manuscript for spelling errors (example given: in your text alkaloid is incorrectly spelled alkaloid) >>>The authors should read the guidelines to the authors and not include the first name of the authors being cited in the In the reference section the first name should be abbreviated as shown in the guideline to authors (thus the earlier text reference should be (Liu et , 2003)and the remaining one should be (Chen et , 2002) >>>>>The authors instead of directly answering the first complex question of reviewer #1 may include the three questions as future research aim in the discussion >>>>>>Rather than redrawing figure the authors may choose to amend the wording of the statistical analysis section to state that the result of tables are means +-SEM and for figures are +- SD >>>>> reviewer #1 comment number 8 and reviewer # 2 comment 3 might be satisfied by inclusion of a representative photo of cells and heart showing CPE Remember most readers of the journal have never seen what you are trying to Because I think that you can deal with all of the points raised I am hoping to see a revised manuscript that you have carefully checked for If you have questions or do not know how to respond to any of the points raised please contact me at du Joseph Bahl, PhD Editor 2 Life Sciences 作 者回复信原稿： Dear D Bahl, I’m （注：正式信函不要简写）very appreciate （注：不适合作为给编辑回信的开始，同时有语法错误）for your comments and I （注：实际上是学生做的）have conducted in vivo antivirus experiments again （注：要表明是应审稿人或编辑建议而作） Mice were sacrificed on 15 days and 30 days after Death rate, heart weight to body weight ratio (HW/BW), virus titers and pathologic slices （注：用词错误）were calculated（注：用词不当） Production of mRNA of IL-10, IFN-γand TNF-αwere （注：语法错误）measured by RT-PCR I have revised this manuscript and especially paid much attention to your comments and I would like to re-submit it to LIFE SCIENCE Title of manuscript has been changed to “The antivirus effects of A against virus B and its pharmacokinetic behaviour in SD rats serum” to make it more clear and Answers to Reviewers’ questions were as follows: （注：可附在给编辑的回复信后） Reviewer #1: XXXXX Reviewer #2: XXXXX Editors note and suggestions: Title: Re-write the title to read more smoothly in contemporary English Answer: I have rewrite the title to “The antivirus effects of A against virus B and its pharmacokinetic behaviour in SD rats serum” to make it more clear and smooth（注：多处语法错误） Abstract: Re-write the abstract to read more Answer: I have revise the abstract carefully to make it more smooth and informative（注：语法错误） The authors should check to be sure that the terms blood samples, plasma and serum are always used appropriately throughout the abstract and Answer: I have paid attention to this question and it is clearer （注：不具体） Introduction: some sentences can be made less Answer: I have revise the whole paper to make sentences less passive and obtained help of my colleague proficient in English （注：语法错误，句子不通顺） The authors should check the entire manuscript for spelling errors Answer: I’m very sorry to give you so much trouble for those spelling errors （注：不必道歉，按建议修改即可） I have carefully corrected The authors should read the guidelines to the authors and not include the first name of the authors being cited in the In the reference section the first name should be abbreviated as shown in the guideline to authors (thus the earlier text reference should be (Liu et , 2003) and the remaining one should be (Chen et , 2002) Answer: I changed the style of Rather than redrawing figure the authors may choose to amend the wording of the statistical analysis section to state that the result of tables are means +-SEM and for figures are +- SD Answer: （注：作者请编辑公司帮回答） reviewer #1 comment number 8 and reviewer # 2 comment 3 might be satisfied by inclusion of a representative photo of cells and heart showing CPE Remember: most readers of the journal have never seen what you are trying to Answer: Thank you for your I have supplemented pictures of cardiac pathologic slices in the paper (Fig2) I have to apologize for giving you so much trouble because of those misspelling and confusing statements （注：一般不是延误或人为失误，不必轻易道歉，按建议修改即可） Your comments and suggestions really helped me a I have put great efforts to this I wish it can be If there’s （注：正式信函不要简写）any information I can provide, please don’t hesitate to contact Thank you again for your time and Look forward to hear （注：语法错误）from Yours Sincerely Xxxx Xxxx (通讯作者名)
三个月之内都算正常的。一般期刊给审稿人的审稿时间会是3个月、60天，快的也会是30天，不同期刊要求不一样，你总得给点时间人家审稿人吧？:D人家也不是专业审稿的，还有很多科研工作甚至行政工作要做啊，呵呵！只要是under review就好，安心等待吧！
朋友你好，根据我多年从事文字工作的经验，你真接向所要投稿的报刊、网站邮箱投稿就好，如果稿件合适、质量达到了该媒体的发表要求，一定会被发表的。我认为：如果投稿更有针对性，命中率会更高一些。这就关系到，你是哪里的？干什么的？写的稿件是什么体裁？什么内容？如果说投稿的话，最好投当地的报刊、网络或者是你从事的职业报刊发表，要投哪个媒体首先要研究哪个媒体，看它需要什么内容、什么体裁、什么格式的稿件，“对症下药”，这样会更轻松一些、方便一些，命中率会更高一些。如果你能够告诉我你的具体情况（干什么工作，哪里的，写的小说的大致内容等），我可以给你一些建议。我1993年开始在部队时开始发表各类文章，包括：报告文学、新闻、诗歌、散文、小说、评论等体裁的，到目前，先后在《人民日报》《法制日报》《农民日报》《中国文化报》《法制文萃》《半月谈》《解放军报》《中国国防报》《中国绿色时报》《中国日报》《中国教育报》《人民公安报》《中国交通报》《中国安全生产报》《中国转业军官》《中国人事》《道路交通管理》等报刊发表的大约5000篇左右吧，有40多篇获奖。另外：投稿时，第一要有信心，第二要投对报刊媒体，这两点非常重要。祝你成功！
7天。期刊范围涵盖遥感科学所有领域，从传感器的设计、验证和校准，到遥感在地球科学、环境生态、城市建筑等各方面的广泛应用。 Remote Sensing采取单盲同行评审，一审周期约为8天，文章从接收到发表仅需7天。Remote sensing is the science and art of identifying, observing, and measuring an object without coming into direct contact with This involves the detection and measurement of radiation of different wavelengths reflected or emitted from distant objects or materials, by which they may be identified and
PDF 不便于编辑。因为编辑需要进行排版(假设发表)
PNAS审稿还是比较快的，首次投稿成功到第一次决定平均时间3周。PNAS是美国国家科学院院刊, 全称是Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America，作为全球屈指可数的“百年名刊”之一，同时作为国际期刊界的“四大天王”（Nature，Science，Cell，PNAS）之一，于1914年创刊，出版频率是周刊。 PNAS的每一篇研究论文都由美国国家科学院的一名院士编辑和处理。NAS是一个私营非营利组织，由2405名美籍院士和483名外籍院士组成，其中183人是诺贝尔奖得主。PNAS这本期刊总结起来有4大特点：1、 全球性62%的投稿来自美国以外地区，作者分布广泛。95%的投稿来自作者直接投稿而非美国院士专享绿色通道。2、 投稿初稿无需调整格式投稿的时候不需要根据杂志的要求调整正文、参考文献和图片等格式。3、 审稿和上线速度快首次投稿成功到第一次决定平均时间3周。文章接收后4-5周online。4、 支持开放获取PNAS是混合出版模式期刊，但是支持单篇文章开放获取。回答参考资料ISE国际科学编辑论文翻译润色，可以将手稿交给与所在研究领域相匹配的英语母语学术编辑进行润色，他们将修正拼写，语法，标点和句法错误。 编辑还将改进句子结构，并确保使用符合科学论文写作的专业用语。 当润色稿返回给作者后，对于变动部分（非完全新增加段落）小于500单词的稿件，国际科学编辑还将提供免费的第二轮校对。
出版周期：irregular一般至少3个月,会有under review的。这个时间还很长，但是4个月才到外审阶段，说明杂志稿件多或效率极低，under review才一个月，不建议催。国外的编辑会觉得为什么要催，什么都有流程的，催会让他们很烦。这是我个人的想法