JMCA被拒，理由是缺少性能比较，请大家给点意见

祝贺祝贺！

祝贺祝贺！

蹭蹭好运

祝贺

加油

祝贺，

好事多磨

祝贺

祝贺祝贺

沾福气

JMCA被编辑拒稿了，理由是没有充分比较最新研究。请大家帮忙看看我这个可以修改后重新投吗？先行谢过！
Thank you for your recent submission to Journal of Materials Chemistry A, published by the Royal Society of Chemistry. All manuscripts are initially assessed by the editors to ensure they meet the criteria for publication in the journal.

After careful evaluation of your manuscript, I regret to inform you that I do not find your manuscript suitable for publication in Journal of Materials Chemistry A. Although you report organic semiconductor thermoset composite films using poly(3-hexylthiophene)-b-poly(ε-caprolactone) (P3HT-b-PCL) block copolymer nanofibers produced via crystallization-driven self-assembly, unfortunately the performance is not clearly compared to similar state-of-the-art materials, meaning that it is not possible to judge what improvements have been made over current literature in the area. Therefore, your article has been rejected from Journal of Materials Chemistry A.

However, I am pleased to offer you the option to transfer your manuscript to the following journal(s) published by the Royal Society of Chemistry. Selecting one of these transfer options provides a quick and easy route for your manuscript to be considered by another journal without having to start a new submission. （RSC advances）
If you have any questions about transferring your manuscript to one of these journal(s), please contact me and I will pass your query to the relevant editorial office.

Full details of the initial assessment process can be found at

I am sorry not to have better news for you, however, thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your manuscript. I look forward to hearing from you about the transfer of your manuscript from Journal of Materials Chemistry A to another Royal Society of Chemistry journal.

Yours sincerely,

Dr Michaela Mühlberg, MRSC
Executive Editor
Royal Society of Chemistry

If you need to contact the journal, please use the email address
原文中的确缺少性能比较，还是说因为没有引用JMCA的文章呢。如果增加这些内容还有机会么？请大家给点意见

做一个性能比较，再引用一下我觉得还是有机会的（前提是你的东西确实有亮点）

感觉如果自信文章的亮点，可以argue下，试试

这个是执行编辑处理的，不是副编，执行编辑和出版编辑处理稿件经常因为没有性能比较不送审，加个表格做个性能对比呗。如果觉得文章质量不错，可以appeal。

可以试试！

谢谢大佬，希望能有个好运气

大佬 你又重新投jmca了吗 我也遇到了相同的问题 执行编辑说没有性能比较给我拒稿了

你这是做的啥？