英美文学方向的选题太多了啊，网上一搜一大堆，选一个你自己喜欢并感兴趣的就行了。1、 透过《傲慢与偏见》看现代社会爱情观2、生与死的抗争--《厄舍古厦的倒塌》主题解读3、浅谈“欧·亨利式结尾”及其文学影响4、从宗教角度解读简爱的多重性格5、从女权主义角度剖析《小妇人》中的乔6、 “英雄”的陨落--悲剧美学角度分析《老人与海》7、 从《菊花》中看女主人公Elisa实现自我价值的障碍8、奉献与宽容---浅析《双城记》中的仁爱精神9、 《格列佛游记》中对理性的反思与批判10、浅析《警察和赞美诗》的戏剧化特色11、一场失败革命的反思---论《动物庄园》中所表现的象征意义12、论詹姆斯·乔伊斯《阿拉比》的精神顿悟13、从后印象主义角度解读《到灯塔去》中的双性同体观14、 从中西方道德观差异谈《伊利亚特》与《封神演义》人物品德15、 韦伯《猫》中的女性主义16、 浅析《儿子与情人》中的心理冲突17、浅析中西方喜剧文化---以《武林外传》和《老友记》为例18、从女性主义看《傲慢与偏见》中的女性形象19、《瓦尔登湖》中自然主义的现实意义20、 从男性角色解读《简爱》中的女性反抗意识21、论《荆棘鸟》中的女性意识22、 论劳伦斯《虹》中的异化23、《罗密欧与朱丽叶》与《梁祝》悲剧结局所体现的中西文化差异24、从《在路上》看五六十年代美国社会价值观25、 评希思克利夫被扭曲的心路历程26、试论马克·吐温短篇小说的幽默特色27、惠特曼的死亡哲学28、 论《呼啸山庄》--原始古朴与文明理性的交错色彩29、 论《了不起的盖茨比》中“二元主角”手法的运用30、透过小说《威廉·威尔逊》和《黑猫》看艾伦·坡的善恶观
Wuthering Heights as a Religious NovelWuthering Heights is not a religious novel in the sense that it supports a particular religion (Christianity), or a particular branch of Christianity (Protestantism), a particular Protestant denomination (Church of England). Rather, religion in this novel takes the form of the awareness of or conviction of the existence of a overwhelming sense of the presence of a larger reality moved Rudolph Otto to call Wuthering Heights a supreme example of "the daemonic" in literature. Otto was concerned with identifying the non-rational mystery behind all religion and all religious experiences; he called this basic element or mystery the numinous. The numinous grips or stirs the mind so powerfully that one of the responses it produces is numinous dread, which consists of awe or awe-fullness. Numinous dread implies three qualities of the numinous: its absolute unapproachability, its power, and. its urgency or energy. A misunderstanding of these qualities and of numinous dread by primitive people gives rise to daemonic dread, which Otto identifies as the first stage in religious development. At the same time that they feel dread, they are drawn by the fascinating power of the numinous. Otto explains, "The daemonic-divine object may appear to the mind an object of horror and dread, but at the same time it is no less something that allures with a potent charm, and the creature, who trembles before it, utterly cowed and cast down, has always at the same time the impulse to turn to it, nay even to make it somehow his own." Still, acknowledgment of the "daemonic" is a genuine religious experience, and from it arise the gods and demons of later religions. It has been suggested that Gothic fiction originated primarily as a quest for numinous dread. For Derek Traversi the motive force of Brontë's novel is "a thirst for religious experience," which is not Christian. It is this spirit which moves Catherine to exclaim, "surely you and everybody have a notion that there is, or should be, an existence of yours beyond you. What were the use of my creation if I were entirely contained here? (Ch. ix, p. 64). Out of Catherine's–and Brontë's–awareness of the finiteness of human nature comes the yearning for a higher reality, permanent, infinite, eternal; a higher reality which would enable the self to become whole and complete and would also replace the feeling of the emptiness of this world with feelings of the fullness of being (fullness of being is a phrase used by and about mystics to describe the aftermath of a direct experience of God). Brontë's religious inspiration turns a discussion of the best way to spend an idle summer's day into a dispute about the nature of heaven. Brontë's religious view encompasses both Cathy's and Linton's views of heaven and of life, for she sees a world of contending forces which are contained within her own nature. She seeks to unite them in this novel, though, Traversi admits, the emphasis on passion and death tends to overshadow the drive for unity. Even Heathcliff's approaching death, when he cries out "My soul's bliss kills my body, but does not satisfy itself" (Ch. xxxiv, p. 254), has a religious John Winnifrith also sees religious meaning in the novel: salvation is won by suffering, as an analysis of references to heaven and hell reveals. For Heathcliff, the loss of Catherine is literally hell; there is no metaphoric meaning in his claim "existence after losing her would be hell" (Ch. xiv, p. 117). In their last interview, Catherine and Heathcliff both suffer agonies at the prospect of separation, she to suffer "the same distress underground" and he to "writhe in the torments of hell" (XV, p. 124). Heathcliff is tortured by his obsession for the dead/absent Catherine. Suffering through an earthly hell leads Healthcliff finally to his heaven, which is union with Catherine as a spirit. The views of Nelly and Joseph about heaven and hell are conventional and do not represent Brontë's views, according to has endured hell. Indeed, most of this novel becomes a test of what she can endure. Helen Burns and Miss Temple teach Jane the British stiff upper lip and saintly patience. Then Jane, star pupil that she is, exemplifies the stoicism, while surviving indignity upon indignity. Jane’s soul hunkers down deep inside her body and waits for the shelling to stop. Only at Moor’s End, where she teaches and grows, does her soul come out. She stops enduring and begins living. Jane begins to become an “I” in her 19th year. In the sentence, “Reader, I married him.” Jane makes clear who is in charge of her life and her marriage; she is. That “I” stands resolutely as the subject of the sentence commanding the verb and attaching itself to the object, “him.” She is no longer passive, waiting and sitting for Rochester’s attention. Rather, she goes out and gets him. She has gone a long way from the beginning of the novel. At Gateshead, Jane tries to direct her life. Her little “I” scolds Mrs. Reed and chastises John. Like the later Jane, she knows her mind and speaks it. Unlike the later Jane, however, she does not have the wherewithal to back up her soul. She does not have the physical strength, the mental skills, nor the finances to stand on her own. As a result, she can be thrown into the Red Room to repent her sins and can be cast into Lowood. At Lowood, her pernicious saints, Helen Burns and Miss Temple, suppress the young ego under a blanket of will, religion, and self-sacrifice. Helen teaches Jane to blame herself for everything and blame others for nothing. Helen suffers depredation upon humiliation in the name of dirty fingernails and disorganized socks, all the while chanting “Thank you sir, may I have another.” Jane internalizes this, so that she blames herself for Rochester’s faults and error and even forgives the unforgivable, Mrs. Reed. For her part, Miss Temple teaches Jane to be subversive, but charming. Rebellion is seed cake and a smile. Rebellion is not keeping the students from the ten-mile forced march to church. Jane follows these dictates as well, manipulating Rochester for scraps and sops. With one withering blast, Rochester dynamites these two icons into sanctimonious rubble and sends Jane back out into the elements. Her soul, long buried or locked away in the attic, bursts forth and sends Jane for the escape pods. Out in the moors, sucking on dirt, Jane chooses to live on and rebuilds herself. First with the help of her cousins, then with the arrogantly humble Rivers St. John, Jane rediscovers who she is and discards who she isn’t. Ironically, her final self-definition comes from Rivers when he proposes. Helen Burns and Miss Temple would have knelt at the chance, but Jane lets the cup pass by. In her rejection, she sweeps the debris away and stands by herself. So, when she returns to Thornfield, she comes with her own money and her own identity. Reduced or not, Rochester can only stand with Jane, not tower over her. She comes with a skill, cash, and self-knowledge. And under her own power, she submits herself to Rochester. She allows herself to be called Janet and to refer to him as “sir.” She willingly and momentarily drops her head. But not for long. In the ultimate chapter, Jane directly addresses her “Reader.” The final chapter takes place a year or two post-fire, as the mature Jane looks back on her life. By the act of writing, Jane has defined herself and stepped away from the saint-in-training. By writing the truth, in all of its ugliness, she separates herself from the persona. The Jane in the first 38 chapters is not the final Jane that addresses the reader. That Jane has had a child, has married a man, and has made a spot in the world. The great triumph of that line comes not from the man that she has married, but from the rediscovery and reaffirmation of the voice that once told off Mrs. Reed. The girl lost her voice at Lowood has become the woman who can tell us the story. The novel itself is Jane’s final "I."
英美文学是英国人民和美国人民长期以来创造性地使用英语语言的产物,是对时代生活的审美表现。下文是我为大家整理的关于英美文学类论文 范文 的内容，欢迎大家阅读参考! 英美文学类论文范文篇1 从英美经典电影分析英美文学女性形象 [摘要]很多英美经典电影，都是以英美文学为蓝本进行改编的。将文字转换为银幕上的画面，这样的变化，更有利于观众对原作中角色的定位。女性角色，是文学作品中不可或缺的元素，是文学话题制造的永恒话题。在诸多英美文学作品中，女性角色随着时代的变迁、社会背景的变化，也变换着不同的色彩。本文以一些经典的英美电影，对比那些英美文学作品中的女性形象进行了分析，包括对爱情的执著、自我价值的追求、悲剧色彩和独立自主的方面。 [关键词]英美电影;英美文学;女性形象 一、引 言 女性角色，是文学作品中不可或缺的元素，是文学话题制造的永恒话题。在诸多英美文学作品中，女性角色随着时代的变迁、社会背景的变化，也变换着不同的色彩。从莎士比亚时期开始，直到19世纪末20世纪初，以英国、法国、美国等作家的文学作品为例，英美文学作品中的女性角色，开始展现出不一样的活跃程度，特别是随着电影产业的兴起，将文学作品改编为电影，更加有利于对原作中女性形象的深刻展示。在这一点上，以好莱坞电影为代表的英美电影，以更加丰富的形式，诠释了电影视角下的女性角色新特点，其中对于女性主义的形象表现极为突出。 二、女性对于爱情的执著 爱情，是英美文学作品中一直延续的格调。无论是辉煌的史诗巨制，还是社会小人物的刻画写实，其中都有着爱情的主题。在爱情面前，电影，或者说原作中的这些女性角色们，敢于为了爱情反抗传统，反抗那些看似坚不可摧的世俗。改编自美国作家罗伯特的小说《廊桥遗梦》的电影中，弗朗西斯卡与罗伯特之间的爱情，突破了家庭与婚姻的禁制，两人的爱情在当时是一种被唾弃的行为，是对婚姻的背叛，对伦理道德的挑战。 在电影中，弗朗西斯卡在意大利长大，嫁人后随丈夫来到了美国。源于意大利的浪漫，弗朗西斯卡在美国乡村的生活无聊至极，在她与罗伯特的爱情中，尽情洋溢着自身的浪漫风情，这是冲破了世俗枷锁的爱情。弗朗西斯卡的爱情让观众落泪，是因为她没有因为爱而放弃自己的家庭，她仍旧记得自己身为母亲的责任，但却为了爱希望自己死后能与罗伯特在一起。 在原著中，弗朗西斯卡这一角色，对其爱情的描写文字较多，而在电影中，人们通过女演员眉宇间的那抹思念，很直接地理解了她对罗伯特执著的爱以及对家的责任感。爱情与女性之间，似乎是文学作品中必然保留的桥段，以英美文学作品改编而成的英美电影中，爱情的主旋律，不仅是对这些文学作品的一种致敬，更符合潮流下的电影要求。 又如在《简?爱》中，简?爱对罗切斯特的爱，是一种纯粹的爱，而无其他杂糅的情感。当简?爱拒绝了圣?约翰的求婚，虽然罗切斯特的豪宅已经被他那个疯子般的妻子烧毁，虽然罗切斯特因此而失明，但是简?爱按照心中对于爱的执著，认为这样的罗切斯特仍旧是自己的最爱。简?爱因为自己的爱而成为罗切斯特的天使，罗切斯特的余生因为简?爱而精彩。 在电影《傲慢与偏见》中，在尊重英国女性作家奥斯汀原著的基础上，小说中的人物伊丽莎白与达西之间的爱情，一直被人们所谈论。伊丽莎白的爱情观中，没有金钱财富，没有地位差距，有的是彼此之间的了解，是两人之间的彼此相爱。通过电影中，达西的傲慢与伊丽莎白的渴望平等，不难让观众理解原著中的那个对爱情很执著的伊丽莎白。虽然爱着达西，但是伊丽莎白的爱是建立在平等的基础上的，不需要无聊的高姿态和耍酷态度。 伊丽莎白这样的爱情观，也正是原著作者奥斯汀的爱情观。我们在看这些英美电影时，对于银幕中的女性形象有着更加直观的理解，而爱情这种在银幕上独特表现的情感，更容易让我们通过电影了解原著中女性的爱情世界，那是一个执著的感情观。 但是这样的爱情在英美文学作品中，很难有一个完美的结局，女性的爱情执著观，带来的往往是爱情悲剧。在电影《茶花女》中，玛格丽特对于爱情也是固执的，哪怕被自己的爱人阿尔芒误会，她仍旧默默地承担着因为爱情而带来的伤害。不管爱情的结果怎样，对于爱情，这些女性仍旧是那么执著与肯定。 三、追求自我价值的女权主义 在众多的英美电影中，都很好地再现了原著中反抗男权的思想，即强烈的女权主义。英美文学作品中的女权主义是女性主义最为显著的表现点。目前，改编的英美电影中，多以20世纪初期的英美文学作品作为蓝本，而这些文学作品中，开始阐述女权主义，反对男权。这种现象并不是这一时期文学作品所独有的。在当时的社会背景下，有很多的女性实际上开始走出家门，进入了竞争激烈的社会中。而这些女性正是反抗男权的代表，她们的身上少了些浪漫的气息，但是却多了一些职业性的元素。她们更加关注社会、政治等话题，这些女性角色，追求的是自我价值和社会价值，很多的英美电影中都有所体现。 例如，在美国女作家米切尔的小说《飘》中，女性角色斯嘉丽就是这样的一个女子。而在以《飘》改编的电影《乱世佳人》中，观众对于那个富家大小姐斯嘉丽印象深刻。影片以南北战争为背景，战争夺取了斯嘉丽家庭的一切，而斯嘉丽在重重困难中，从一个对国家大事漠不关心的大小姐，成长为一个智慧的现代女性。 斯嘉丽这个女性形象在原著中，属于写实人物，米切尔对于这个人物没有泾渭分明的描述，而是做了真实的叙述。在电影中，这种感觉更加直观一些，斯嘉丽似乎是一个追求自我价值的女性。所以，很多的英美文学作品中，女性不再是一个独立于外的弱势群体，导演与作者都在强调女性角色的社会地位和社会价值，她们有着自我价值。在电影《名利场》中，那个为了跻身上层社会的蓓基，按照现代的评判观点来看，用“女强人”来形容蓓基更加合适。 她为了能够过上更好的生活，不惜卖弄自己的学识、自己的歌声，甚至自己的肉体，蓓基一直在展示着自己的价值所在。无论是勾引好友艾米利亚的哥哥乔斯，还是对克劳莱家族继承人的罗登，蓓基都成功地将自己的价值融入计谋当中。 这些女性形象，在追求自我价值的同时，也是对男权的一种反抗，女权思想在电影或小说中都毫无掩饰。在电影《茶花女》中，玛格丽特本是巴黎的一个名妓，但是她爱上了阿尔芒，并与之在乡下同居。 阿尔芒的父亲认为是玛格丽特葬送了儿子的前程，胁迫玛格丽特移情别恋，而阿尔芒信以为真，愤怒下当众羞辱玛格丽特。玛格丽特终因病而亡，而阿尔芒事后知道了缘由后，悔恨不已。玛格丽特的死，是爱情悲剧的表现，更是对男权世界一种无声的反抗。同样地，在电影《傲慢与偏见》中，伊丽莎白与达西的爱情，一开始，伊丽莎白因为达西的高傲而没有接受他的表白。 我们通过电影，再去原著中寻找伊丽莎白与达西的爱情，会发现奥斯汀花费了大量的笔墨，来描写伊丽莎白与达西那奇妙的爱情。直到达西改掉了自己的“臭毛病”，伊丽莎白才真正地接受了达西。伊丽莎白虽然爱着达西，但是对于达西的那种大男子主义很厌恶，她故意地对达西冷漠，也正是对男权的一种反抗。在哈代的《无名的裘德》改编成电影后，苏的“新女性”形象更加凸显，她敢于追求自我的价值而反抗学校的规定，敢于直面对裘德的爱。 四、悲剧色彩浓重的女性形象 以英美文学作品改编的英美电影中，很多女性形象都是悲剧性的。这些女性形象虽不至于占据英美文学作品的大半，但是在我们观看的很多英美电影中，这样的悲剧色彩，似乎更受到导演和编剧的欢迎，也更能够引起观众的情感共鸣。从电影中，我们可以看出这些充满悲剧色彩的女性，更多是与作品创作背景下的大多数女性有着明显的思想和行为区别。正是因为这些女性角色“前卫”的行为，造成了她们悲剧的产生。这些悲剧多体现在女性的爱情上，还有社会阶级的残酷压榨上。 例如，在雨果的《悲惨世界》中，芳汀这个角色，被赶出了工厂，死在了医院里。她本有一个美好的爱情，但是却被情人抛弃，独自带着女儿珂赛特。在改编的音乐剧《悲惨世界》中，芳汀被迫去那个她永不想涉足的地方，卖了自己的头发、牙齿，甚至是身体。当I Dreamed a Dream响起时，芳汀的悲剧终究发生了。对于芳汀的死，是悲剧的结局，也是她的解脱。 又如，在《哈姆雷特》中，奥菲利亚这个角色，是莎士比亚在17世纪塑造的形象，而那个时期的英国女性，和中国的传统女性一样，对父亲和兄长十分尊敬，甚至达到了盲从的地步。然而奥菲利亚深爱着哈姆雷特，哈姆雷特对她的表白，被奥菲利亚的父亲否决。当奥菲利亚的父亲被哈姆雷特杀死后，奥菲利亚崩溃了。她一直在无声地承受着一切，但悲剧的脚步没有因为她停止。一个纤弱的女子，一个温柔的女子，一个性格柔弱的女子，在那个年代注定了她的悲剧色彩。 在英美文学中，女性的悲剧色彩是一个重要组成部分，特别是在电影改编后，这种女性悲剧更加真实。她们与周围生活的格格不入，导致了悲剧的发生，除去《哈姆雷特》中奥菲利亚这种被社会压到无法喘息的女性外，还有爱情带来的悲剧。例如在《廊桥遗梦》中，弗朗西斯卡的爱情就是一个悲剧，她有着自己的家庭，却爱上了罗伯特。 这样的爱情就是一个悲剧，在道德的束缚下，在伦理的谴责下，弗朗西斯卡的爱情只能以悲剧结束，四天深入骨髓的爱情，折磨了弗朗西斯卡的后半生，这样的悲剧让观众更加心痛。同样地，在《呼啸山庄》中，女主人公凯瑟琳，也是一个女性悲剧形象的代表。凯瑟琳对于爱情的渴望极其矛盾，她希望自己的爱情是不受世俗影响的纯净的爱，还期望能够找到身世好、家境富裕的白马王子。凯瑟琳同希斯克利夫之间的爱情，是纯净的，为此不惜打破社会的道德枷锁。而凯瑟琳还是放不下对财富的向往，她嫁给一个不认识的人，成为山庄的女主人。这是世俗中“美好”的婚姻，但她对爱情的矛盾，让她无法割舍爱情，最后为之付出了生命。 五、独立自主的女性形象 无论是对爱情的执著，还是对自我价值的追求，抑或是悲剧性的色彩，通过电影中的女性角色表达，我们可以看到一个英美文学作品中独立自主的女性形象，这也是女性主义在文字上的宣泄，在银幕上的爆发。在19世纪，简?奥斯汀、勃朗特等一大批女作家走向英美文学的高处，她们反对男权，发扬女性主义。例如，在勃朗特的《简?爱》中，女主人公简?爱就是一个独立自主的女性形象，她积极向上，以自己的聪明才智征服了男主人公罗彻斯特。 在简?爱与罗彻斯特的爱情中，简?爱一直保持着克制和清醒，她嘲笑那些可笑的权贵，她向往平等。简?爱是一个独立自主的女性角色，简?爱对于爱情的追求，一直保持着独立。她知道了罗彻斯特有妻子后，不愿贬低自己的地位价值，选择离去。而当她认识到自己对罗彻斯特的情感后，不顾罗彻斯特的失明和一无所有，仍旧回到罗彻斯特的身边。简?爱的容貌也许并不出众，但是她有一个高贵的灵魂，她追求独立和自主，她有更加吸引男性的自我修养和精神追求，特别是简?爱对于经济独立的认识。这都是独立自主女性形象的表现。无论是电影还是原著中，简?爱都让我们感叹不已，这是一个什么样的女性，这是一个多么伟大的女性!同样的女性特质，我们在《名利场》中的蓓基身上也能看到一些，蓓基的“女强人”特点，正是她独立自主的一些体现，虽然她一直想傍上一个富翁。 六、结 语 女性形象，在英美文学作品中扮演着重要的角色，无论是在爱情还是自我价值，抑或是悲剧色彩和独立自主方面，都有着吸引人的地方。通过电影的展示，小说中的女性形象似乎活了过来，以电影来分析小说中的女性形象，更加耐人寻味，也更容易被大众所接受。闲来无事，可以走进影院，去回顾一下这些英美经典。 [参考文献] [1]辛淑兰.超越傲慢与偏见：从女性视角看《傲慢与偏见》中的幸福婚姻[D].天津：天津师范大学，2006. [2]黄治康.《呼啸山庄》的女性意识研究[J].重庆交通学院学报(社会科学版)，2004(03). [3]王盈盈.从女性视角解读美国电影《廊桥遗梦》[J].电影文学，2013(08). [4]陶曦，李雯倩.西方女性主义电影理论[J].电影文学，2010(12). 英美文学类论文范文篇2 浅析英美文学与我国文学二者关系 摘 要:通过英美文学作品与我国文学作品的主题分析发现,英美文学主题,把人和自然的关系定位为回归自然与征服自然;而我国文学作品人和自然的关系为相互统一,二者是不可分割的整体。 关键词:英美文学;作品主题;人和自然 英美文学与我国文学在“人和自然”的主题方面存在差异,是我们从宏观上把握和研究英美文学与我国文学作品的重要线索。 一、英美文学发展的分析 英美文学是英国人民和美国人民长期以来创造性地使用英语语言的产物,是对时代生活的审美表现。英国文学经历了长期、复杂的发展演变过程。英国与美国语言因为同属于一个英语体系,长久以来认为美国文学是英国文学的一个分支。两国文学在发展过程中,由于受到各种现实的、历史的、政治的、 文化 的等外在力量的影响,以及遵循文学内部自身规律,其文学发展历经了古英语与中古英语、文艺复兴、新古典主义、浪漫主义、维多利亚、现代主义等不同的历史阶段,战后则大致呈现从写实到实验和多元的走势。中古英语时期的文学较以前在扩展主题、丰富类型等方面有了很大的进展,而且深受到__的影响,传奇小说及诗歌逐步流行。 二、英美文学中人和自然的主题分析 尽管英美文学在发展过程中都存在多元化,但社会的存在无外乎人和自然,世界上好多文学作品都是反映“人和自然”这一主题的,当然英美文学也不例外。 英美文学作家在作品中力图揭示在特定条件下主宰人的行为的两种力量:一方面是遗传,是人内在的力量,具体来说是描写人对其生物本能的依赖,即人追求爱情、金钱和享受的不可压抑、无法阻挡的欲望。另一方面是社会环境,是外在的力量,是作家对人所生存的社会的研究,具体来说,是描写高度文明的社会给人造成的威胁与围困。民族传统依据每个民族生活的社会条件和自然地理条件形成于特定的历史时期,民族传统一经形成便具有较大的稳定性,能长久地在民族成员中保留下去。 自然,既是人类的母亲和摇篮,又是人类的敌人和战场。这种矛盾的关系,体现在人类的自然观念中,便是两种对立的心态:回归自然与征服自然。这种对立一直贯穿英美思想、文学传统的始终。就文学家个体而言,他们的思想观念及其创作中所表现出来的“人与自然”显示出一种深刻的复杂性,甚至是矛盾性和变动性。有的礼赞、崇拜自然,有的在对抗、征服自然的过程中突显人的尊严和价值,有的聚焦于特殊的人化了的自然环境,有的呈现出一种回归自然与征服自然的交融,有的显示出超时代的远见卓识。 三、我国文学作品中人和自然的分析 我国神话中盘古开天辟地的 故事 含有丰富的泛神论思想:自然界的一切都神圣不可毁坏,因为一切都是从一个叫“盘古”的巨人身体长出来的———他嘴里呼出的气变成了春风和天空的云雾;声音变成了天空的雷霆;盘古的左眼变成太阳,照耀大地;右眼变成浩洁的月亮,给夜晚带来光明;千万缕头发变成颗颗星星,点缀美丽的夜空;鲜血变成江河湖海,奔腾不息;肌肉变成千里沃野,供万物生存;骨骼变成树木花草,供人们欣赏;筋脉变成了道路;牙齿变成石头和金属,供人们使用;精髓变成明亮的珍珠,供人们 收藏 ;汗水变成雨露,滋润禾苗;呼出的空气变成轻风和白云,汇成美丽的人间风光;盘古倒下时,他的头化作了东岳泰山,他的脚化作了西岳华山,他的左臂化作南岳衡山,他的右臂化作北岳恒山,他的腹部化作了中岳嵩山。 传说 盘古的精灵魂魄也在他死后变成了人类。所以,都说人类是世上的万物之灵,人类应该爱护自然和其他一切生命。 四、英美文学与我国文学中“人和自然”对比分析 在探讨英美文学中的“人与自然”时,实际上是包含着比较与借鉴的意图的。通过通读惠特曼、梭罗等人的作品,我们了解到他们都是受到过我国宗教和哲学的影响。越来越多的西方学者认识到,我国文学作品中包含的天人统一的思想具有非常重要的现代价值。事实上,现代西方某些哲学、伦理学在理论建构之际,就已经吸收了一些我国文化传统中的天人统一的智慧。德国学者格罗伊从东西方“人与自然”关系的基本对立特征,阐述了自己的观点。他认为,以印度佛教和我国道教为代表的东方传统“人与自然”与英美作品中反映的“人和自然”具有以下一些特征。 遗憾的是我国在进入现代社会以后,急于改变贫穷落后的面貌,大量引进以英美为代表的西方思想文化和科学技术,忽略对本国文化传统的建设与更新,如今已面临比西方国家更为严峻的自然问题。目前我国在大力倡导人与社会和谐、人与自然和谐,在这样一个思潮巨变的历史时刻,一方面,作家们应该大力弘扬我们祖先倡导的人与自然和谐的思想,大力推出优良作品;另一方面我们每一个炎黄子孙都要有责任感,要注重社会的我和自然的我的统一。 参考文献: [1]杨健红.论英美文学教学的道德关联性[J].市场周刊(理论研究), 2009(11).
楼上的看作者名字就知道不是外国人写的吧？=.=这个网址有超多资料的，有每一章节的分析、人物分析、故事总结等，绝对实用，以前我考试的时候用过。这个网址主要是分析《呼啸山庄》的中心思想和艺术元素，很有用，以前我考试的时候常常用。这个只是一篇相关的文章，随便在网上找的，看了一下，感觉还行，你也可以参考一下。
'Thrushcross Grange is my own, sir,' he interrupted, wincing. 'I should not allow any one to inconvenience me, if I could hinder it - walk in!' The 'walk in' was uttered with closed teeth, and expressed the sentiment, 'Go to the Deuce:' even the gate over which he leant manifested no sympathising movement to the words; and I think that circumstance determined me to accept the invitation: I felt interested in a man who seemed more exaggeratedly reserved than myself. When he saw my horse's breast fairly pushing the barrier, he did put out his hand to unchain it, and then sullenly preceded me up the causeway, calling, as we entered the court, - 'Joseph, take Mr. Lockwood's horse; and bring up some wine.' 'Here we have the whole establishment of domestics, I suppose,' was the reflection suggested by this compound order. 'No wonder the grass grows up between the flags, and cattle are the only hedge- cutters.'
《呼啸山庄》（Wuthering Heights），英国女作家艾蜜莉·勃朗特（Emily Brontë）的小说，也是她唯一的一部小说，于1847年首度出版。当时因为内容对人性丑恶的描写而遭致非议，被称为是一本“可怕而野蛮”的书，书中写尽了寂寥的荒野、偏僻的古堡、粗暴的爱情，气氛阴霾而深刻，于时人所不容。但是随着时间的推移，这部小说逐渐的被主流社会所认同，并且被认为是勃朗特姐妹所有的作品中最为出色的一部。艾米丽独特的气质，对世界的感悟，对荒原的依恋和描写，给这部小说增添了独特的审美意味，这是这部小说明显不同于维多利亚时代其他小说的原因。其中也继承了象征、恐怖和神秘等哥特小说手法。 Wuthering Heights is Emily Brontë's only novel. It was first published in 1847 under the pseudonym Ellis Bell, and a posthumous second edition was edited by her sister Charlotte. The name of the novel comes from the Yorkshire manor on the moors on which the story centers (as an adjective, Wuthering is a Yorkshire word referring to turbulent weather). The narrative tells the tale of the all-encompassing and passionate, yet thwarted, love between Heathcliff and Catherine Earnshaw, and how this unresolved passion eventually destroys them and many around them. Now considered a classic of English literature, Wuthering Heights met with mixed reviews by critics when it first appeared, mainly because of the narrative's stark depiction of mental and physical cruelty. Though Charlotte Brontë's Jane Eyre was originally considered the best of the Brontë sisters' works, many subsequent critics of Wuthering Heights argued that its originality and achievement made it superior. Wuthering Heights has also given rise to many adaptations and inspired works, including films, radio, television dramatisations, a musical by Bernard J. Taylor and songs (notably the hit "Wuthering Heights" by Kate Bush), ballet and opera.
Wuthering Heights as a Religious NovelWuthering Heights is not a religious novel in the sense that it supports a particular religion (Christianity), or a particular branch of Christianity (Protestantism), a particular Protestant denomination (Church of England). Rather, religion in this novel takes the form of the awareness of or conviction of the existence of a overwhelming sense of the presence of a larger reality moved Rudolph Otto to call Wuthering Heights a supreme example of "the daemonic" in literature. Otto was concerned with identifying the non-rational mystery behind all religion and all religious experiences; he called this basic element or mystery the numinous. The numinous grips or stirs the mind so powerfully that one of the responses it produces is numinous dread, which consists of awe or awe-fullness. Numinous dread implies three qualities of the numinous: its absolute unapproachability, its power, and. its urgency or energy. A misunderstanding of these qualities and of numinous dread by primitive people gives rise to daemonic dread, which Otto identifies as the first stage in religious development. At the same time that they feel dread, they are drawn by the fascinating power of the numinous. Otto explains, "The daemonic-divine object may appear to the mind an object of horror and dread, but at the same time it is no less something that allures with a potent charm, and the creature, who trembles before it, utterly cowed and cast down, has always at the same time the impulse to turn to it, nay even to make it somehow his own." Still, acknowledgment of the "daemonic" is a genuine religious experience, and from it arise the gods and demons of later religions. It has been suggested that Gothic fiction originated primarily as a quest for numinous dread. For Derek Traversi the motive force of Brontë's novel is "a thirst for religious experience," which is not Christian. It is this spirit which moves Catherine to exclaim, "surely you and everybody have a notion that there is, or should be, an existence of yours beyond you. What were the use of my creation if I were entirely contained here? (Ch. ix, p. 64). Out of Catherine's–and Brontë's–awareness of the finiteness of human nature comes the yearning for a higher reality, permanent, infinite, eternal; a higher reality which would enable the self to become whole and complete and would also replace the feeling of the emptiness of this world with feelings of the fullness of being (fullness of being is a phrase used by and about mystics to describe the aftermath of a direct experience of God). Brontë's religious inspiration turns a discussion of the best way to spend an idle summer's day into a dispute about the nature of heaven. Brontë's religious view encompasses both Cathy's and Linton's views of heaven and of life, for she sees a world of contending forces which are contained within her own nature. She seeks to unite them in this novel, though, Traversi admits, the emphasis on passion and death tends to overshadow the drive for unity. Even Heathcliff's approaching death, when he cries out "My soul's bliss kills my body, but does not satisfy itself" (Ch. xxxiv, p. 254), has a religious John Winnifrith also sees religious meaning in the novel: salvation is won by suffering, as an analysis of references to heaven and hell reveals. For Heathcliff, the loss of Catherine is literally hell; there is no metaphoric meaning in his claim "existence after losing her would be hell" (Ch. xiv, p. 117). In their last interview, Catherine and Heathcliff both suffer agonies at the prospect of separation, she to suffer "the same distress underground" and he to "writhe in the torments of hell" (XV, p. 124). Heathcliff is tortured by his obsession for the dead/absent Catherine. Suffering through an earthly hell leads Healthcliff finally to his heaven, which is union with Catherine as a spirit. The views of Nelly and Joseph about heaven and hell are conventional and do not represent Brontë's views, according to has endured hell. Indeed, most of this novel becomes a test of what she can endure. Helen Burns and Miss Temple teach Jane the British stiff upper lip and saintly patience. Then Jane, star pupil that she is, exemplifies the stoicism, while surviving indignity upon indignity. Jane’s soul hunkers down deep inside her body and waits for the shelling to stop. Only at Moor’s End, where she teaches and grows, does her soul come out. She stops enduring and begins living. Jane begins to become an “I” in her 19th year. In the sentence, “Reader, I married him.” Jane makes clear who is in charge of her life and her marriage; she is. That “I” stands resolutely as the subject of the sentence commanding the verb and attaching itself to the object, “him.” She is no longer passive, waiting and sitting for Rochester’s attention. Rather, she goes out and gets him. She has gone a long way from the beginning of the novel. At Gateshead, Jane tries to direct her life. Her little “I” scolds Mrs. Reed and chastises John. Like the later Jane, she knows her mind and speaks it. Unlike the later Jane, however, she does not have the wherewithal to back up her soul. She does not have the physical strength, the mental skills, nor the finances to stand on her own. As a result, she can be thrown into the Red Room to repent her sins and can be cast into Lowood. At Lowood, her pernicious saints, Helen Burns and Miss Temple, suppress the young ego under a blanket of will, religion, and self-sacrifice. Helen teaches Jane to blame herself for everything and blame others for nothing. Helen suffers depredation upon humiliation in the name of dirty fingernails and disorganized socks, all the while chanting “Thank you sir, may I have another.” Jane internalizes this, so that she blames herself for Rochester’s faults and error and even forgives the unforgivable, Mrs. Reed. For her part, Miss Temple teaches Jane to be subversive, but charming. Rebellion is seed cake and a smile. Rebellion is not keeping the students from the ten-mile forced march to church. Jane follows these dictates as well, manipulating Rochester for scraps and sops. With one withering blast, Rochester dynamites these two icons into sanctimonious rubble and sends Jane back out into the elements. Her soul, long buried or locked away in the attic, bursts forth and sends Jane for the escape pods. Out in the moors, sucking on dirt, Jane chooses to live on and rebuilds herself. First with the help of her cousins, then with the arrogantly humble Rivers St. John, Jane rediscovers who she is and discards who she isn’t. Ironically, her final self-definition comes from Rivers when he proposes. Helen Burns and Miss Temple would have knelt at the chance, but Jane lets the cup pass by. In her rejection, she sweeps the debris away and stands by herself. So, when she returns to Thornfield, she comes with her own money and her own identity. Reduced or not, Rochester can only stand with Jane, not tower over her. She comes with a skill, cash, and self-knowledge. And under her own power, she submits herself to Rochester. She allows herself to be called Janet and to refer to him as “sir.” She willingly and momentarily drops her head. But not for long. In the ultimate chapter, Jane directly addresses her “Reader.” The final chapter takes place a year or two post-fire, as the mature Jane looks back on her life. By the act of writing, Jane has defined herself and stepped away from the saint-in-training. By writing the truth, in all of its ugliness, she separates herself from the persona. The Jane in the first 38 chapters is not the final Jane that addresses the reader. That Jane has had a child, has married a man, and has made a spot in the world. The great triumph of that line comes not from the man that she has married, but from the rediscovery and reaffirmation of the voice that once told off Mrs. Reed. The girl lost her voice at Lowood has become the woman who can tell us the story. The novel itself is Jane’s final "I."
呼啸山庄英文读后感范文一
The book was written by Emily Bronte, it published in at that time, it seemed to hold little promise, selling very poorly and receiving only a few mixed reviews. I found this in our school library, I chose this book because the titleattracted me. The book is structured around two parallel love stories, the first half of the novel centering on the love between Catherine and Heathcliff, while theledramatic second half features the developing love between young Catherine and Hareton. In contrast to the first, the latter tale ends happily, restoring peace and order to Wuthering Heights and ThrushcroGrange. In the story, the two houses, Wuthering Heights and ThrushcroGrange, represent opposing worlds and values.
I spent twenty days reading this book. After reading this book, I felt for Heathcliff at first. Heathcliff begins his life as a homeleorphan on the streets of Liverpool, and then he tyrannized by Hindley Earnshaw. But he becomes a villain when he acquires power and returns to Wuthering Heights with money and the trappings of agentleman. His malevolence proves so great and long—lasting. As he himself points out, his abuse of Isabella—his wife is purely sadistic, as he amuses himself by seeing how much abuse she can take and still come cringing back for more.
Catherine represents wild nature, in both her high, lively spirits and her occasional cruelty. She loves Heathcliff so intensely that she claims they are the same person. However, her actions are driven in part by her social ambitions, which initially areawakened during her first stay at the Lintons, and which eventually compel her to marry Edgar. Catherine is free—spirited, beautiful, spoiled, and often arrogant, sheis given to fits of temper, and she is torn between her both of the men who loveher. The location of her coffin symbolizes the conflict that tears apart her short life. She is buried in a corner of the Kirkyard. In contrast to Catherine, Isabella Linton—Catherine’s sister—in—law represents culture and civilization, both in her refinement and in her weakness. Ultimately, she ruins her life by falling in love with Heathcliff. He never returns her feelings and treats her as a meretool in his quest for revenge on the Linton family.
Just as Isabella Linton serves as Catherine’s foil, Edgar Linton serves as Heathcliff’s. Edgar grows into a tender, constant, but cowardly man. He is almost the ideal gentleman. However, this full assortment of gentlemanly characteristics, along with his civilized virtues, proves uselein Edgar’s clashes with his foil. He sees his wife obviously in love with another man but unable to do anything to rectify thesituation. Heathcliff, who gains power over his wife, sister , and daughter.
The whole story make people’s mood heavy. Fortunately, the end is happy.
The author Emily Bronte lived an eccentric, closely guarded life. She was born in 1818, two years after Charlotte—the author of Jane Eyre and a year and a half before her sister Anne, who also became an author. Her father worked as a church rector, and her aunt, who raised the Bronte children after their mother died, was deeply religious. Emily Bronte did not take to her aunt’s Christian fervor, thecharacter of Joseph, a caricature of an evangelical, may have been inspired by her aunt’s religiosity. The Brontes lived in Haworth, a Yorkshire village in the midst of the moors. These wild, desolate expanses—later the setting of Wuthering Heights—made up the Brontes daily environment, and Emily lived among them her entire life. She died in 1848, at the age of thirty.
呼啸山庄英文读后感范文二
Published in 1847， WUTHERING HEIGHTS was not well received by the reading public， many of whom condemned it as sordid， vulgar， and unnatural--and author Emily Bronte went to her grave in 1848 believing that her only novel was afailure. It was not until 1850， when WUTHERING HEIGHTS received a second printing with an introduction by Emily's sister Charlotte， that it attracted a widereadership. And from that point the reputation of the book has never looked back. Today it is widely recognized as one of the great novels of English literature.
Even so， WUTHERING HEIGHTS continues to divide readers. It is not a pretty lovestory; rather， it is swirling tale of largely unlikeable people caught up in obsessivelove that turns to dark madness. It is cruel， violent， dark and brooding， and many people find it extremely unpleasant. And yet--it possesses a grandeur of language and design， a sense of tremendous pity and great loss that sets it apart from virtually every other novel written.
The novel is told in the form of an extended flashback. After a visit to his strangelandlord， a newcomer to the area desires to know the history of the family--which he receives from Nelly Deans， a servant who introduces us to the Earnshaw family who once resided in the house known as Wuthering Heights. It was once a cheerful place， but Old Earnshaw adopted a "Gipsy" child who he named Heathcliff. And Catherine， daughter of the house， found in him the perfect companion: wild， rude， and as proud and cruel as she. But although Catherine loves him， even recognizes him as her soulmate， she cannot lower herself to marry so far below her social station. She instead marries another， and in so doing sets in motion an obsession that will destroy them all.
WUTHERING HEIGHTS is a bit difficult to "get into;" the opening chapters are so dark in their portrait of the end result of this obsessive love that they are somewhat off-putting. But they feed into the flow of the work in a remarkable way， setting the stage for one of the most remarkable structures in all of literature， a story that circles upon itself in a series of repetitions as it plays out across two generations. Catherine and Heathcliff are equally remarkable， both vicious and cruel， and yet never able to shed their impossible love no matter how brutally one may wound theother.
As the novel coils further into alcoholism， seduction， and one of the most elaborately imagined plans of revenge it gathers into a ghostly tone: Heathcliff， driven to madness by a woman who is not there but who seems reflected in every part of his world--dragging her corpse from the grave， hearing her calling to him from the moors， escalating his brutality not for the sake of brutality but so that her memory will never fade， so that she may never leave his mind until death itself. Yes， this is madness， insanity， and there is no peace this side of the grave or even beyond.
It is a stunning novel， frightening， inexorable， unsettling， filled with unbridled passion that makes one cringe. Even if you do not like it， you should read it at least once--and those who do like it will return to it again and again
艾米莉·勃朗特的长篇小说《呼啸山庄》，全篇充满反压迫、求自由的斗争精神，又始终笼罩着离奇、紧张、可怕的氛围。看完《呼啸山庄》，每个人都会有自己的体会，你对《呼啸山庄》的读后感是什么呢?下面是我为大家收集有关于呼啸山庄英语读后感1500字，希望你喜欢。
#756312 呼啸山庄英语读后感1500字1
书籍，一瞬间感觉自己对知识的渴望无限膨胀，于是便“不理智”地买下许多书，回到家便有一搭没一搭的翻着，只是感情仿佛经历了沧海桑田，变化太大。
我上初一的时候，相同的镜态，买了好几本书，有鲁迅的《呐喊》，冰心的《繁星》和艾米莉·勃朗特的《呼啸山庄》，只记得这几本。这是一次很神奇的读书经历。《呐喊》整个初中我读了三遍不止，而《呼啸山庄》每每翻至第五页便由衷地感觉读下去的自我强迫，以至于不得不放弃。中考结束后的某个暑假，雨夜，在我近视不是很深的时候(突然羡慕起眼睛不近视的时候，老师布置作业，寻找仙后座，观察月亮移动的轨迹)，我看到天空酱紫色的深邃，没有星星，感受着小雨的清凉，窗台上的串串红和月季很怡人，就去翻我的书柜，找到了这本“遗弃”的《呼啸山庄》，终于跨越了“五页”这个瓶颈，忘记了时间，忘记了我的夜晚，忘记了雨，忘记了串串红和月季。
抛开书的内容，翻译质量可圈可点，我看的是由上海美术出版社出版，翻译简约和真实，给人以干净和顺畅的好感。从内容上看，小说选取管家角度讲述整个事件，给人以床头故事的感觉，自然又顺畅。小说就是这样，再好的故事也经不住罗哩罗嗦，故意堆砌文字的打击。专业的评论人这样说它“全篇充满强烈的反压迫、争幸福的斗争精神，又始终笼罩着离奇、紧张的超现实气氛，惊悚恐怖之中感人至深，带有部分哥特文学的奇幻恐怖色彩。”对我来说，这些评价当然字字珠玉，但却又难以理解。喜欢它，不过是发自内心的喜欢，我个人的理由而已。
第一我感动的是希刺克里夫和凯瑟琳的爱情。无法理解爱和地位之间的矛盾，也无法体味他们之间的爱情。凯瑟琳说：“我这么爱他，并不是因为他长得英俊是因为他比我更像我自己。”我在后来的经历中慢慢体会到爱情的感觉就是这样，对方的样子就是你期待你自己的未来是那个样子，所谓的“更”则是更加接近期待的状态。凯瑟琳甘愿赴不幸的婚姻，接受命运的安排。从一开始，仿佛悲剧已然发生。凯瑟琳的那句“无论人类的灵魂是什么样的，他的和我的一模一样”(英文为whatever our souls are made of ，his and mine are the same。这句话，在一次投票中荣膺人们最喜欢的情话)我们无法想像希刺克里夫忍受了多大的折磨才将自己锻造为“文明人”，在我看来，这种锻造甚至是艰辛的。无论是19世纪的英国，亦或是宣扬“美国梦”，在梦想面前人人平等，更是今天的中国。无形的“阶级”依然存在，突破这种阶级的天然存在着实不易。更加让人倍感惊悚的便是凯瑟琳很早便已过世，希刺克里夫却一直坚持着他的复仇，凯瑟琳的灵魂独自在荒野飘荡和哭泣了20年，无法安息，无法永眠。
之所以喜欢这本书是由于凯瑟琳和希刺克里夫对社会的反抗和对自由的向往，他们挣扎于世俗之外。
相遇于爱情，却各自流浪。
#756477 呼啸山庄英语读后感1500字2
这样爱和恨的小说已经让自己盲目了，我不理解希思克利夫为什么会有复仇的心理?人就是这样一个怪物吧?明明知道自己爱了，却还是那样的顽固。
艾米莉“勃朗特这位伟大的作家仅仅活了三十年，可她的《呼啸山庄》却留给了后人，我们不得不惊叹这样一个没有婚姻的人却把爱情淋漓尽至的表达出来，这样的才女恐怕惟独她一人吧?!从而，奠定了她在文学史上的地位。并且她与《简爱》的作者夏洛蒂”勃朗特和她们的妹妹——《爱格尼斯“格雷》的作者安”勃朗特号称勃朗特三姊妹，在英国十九世纪文坛上焕发异彩。
小说从一位与故事几乎不相干的客人洛克乌德先生拜访画眉田庄与呼啸山庄开始，通过女管家丁恩太太之口重现凯瑟琳“恩萧与希思克利夫的爱情，让我们难以相信这样的爱，却还要这样的报复。难道真的是爱到了极限就是恨了吗?或许这样的事实是真的吧。我听过这样的话”如果两个人爱得轰轰烈烈分手了还可以做朋友那就是没有相爱过“，但是我一个旁观者想笑，难道真的让曾经相爱的彼此成为永远的最了解彼此的陌生人吗?当然我没有爱过，这样的观点也不好下什么定义?我能做的就是多读几本书，多写点读后感，让自己的精神生活更加的丰富而已。
从书中我们可以看见男主人公是如何由爱变成恨的，但是我们看到他最后还依然的爱着自己的心上人。在心上人死了之后，不吃饭，最终饿死自己的结局;难道我们真的还怨恨他吗?如果不是那个金钱与地位的社会，他们还会经历这么多吗?或许很多人还认为男主人公是残忍的，他的复仇真的那么让人难以理解吗?
其实我看完这本书，觉得矛盾很多。就象自己真的是个婴儿一样，什么也不知道。譬如，男主人公为什么要向女主人公的女儿复仇呢?为什么要娶自己不喜欢的人呢?为什么要把自己变得那样的丑恶呢?难道说他已经妒忌一切吗?黑夜里在旷野上，山岩底下散步……我们看到了什么?是他们的坟墓还是他们的灵魂?或许更多吧?
突然想知道什么是爱?如果爱的代价是这样的残酷，我们还该选择吗?书，只是一个时代的背景，只是一个故事的开始与结尾，只是一个人生的一个小片段……而更多的我们应该去沉思……
#756540 呼啸山庄英语读后感1500字3
说道本书，更多的是现实主义的批判，对社会间不关心，不联系的自私的埋怨，结尾充斥着浪漫主义色彩，孤魂相伴，留恋人间的美好结局视角独特，这是欧美风格的全面彰显，因地广人稀与规整体制等因素的影响，形成了亲情、爱情至上的亲情社会，与人口繁密的中国人情社会大相径庭，是两个极端。
这与艾米利本人深沉忧郁性格相结合，诞生了这部震撼千古的巨作，与其姊夏洛蒂的《简·爱》相反，不以爱写爱，而是以恨写爱，更多的，更真实地展现人性，因此这部书在浪漫风过后即作者死后近百年，才引起万众的崇拜，其浪漫结尾绝不亚于中国的比翼双飞，但这也触动了教会与信仰的原则，超凡脱俗的风格使其不能在当时为愚昧的世人所接受。
不过我个人认为这部书并不是完美的，可能是我心智不够成熟吧。我觉得全书的情感过分拘泥与山庄田庄之间，没有开阔的意境，因而有抱怨的意味——世界太小了。这也许是女性作者先天的缺陷吧，不过她姐姐就做得很好。
全书的价值观、爱情观露出深切的凡人的欲望真爱，而不是传奇般伟大的爱情，它可以打动每一个人，却无法给人以境界的提升，《飘》在这一点上却登峰造极。不管怎么说，这是一本好书，什么叫好书?就是看完以后能学到很多的东西，并且常读常新。这本书让我认识到人性，也进一步使我了解了当时英国社会情景，而更多的，它警示我三思而后行，要尊重恒存心底的神圣的自我，做个理智的人。
我仿佛看见，山口呼啸疾驰的风中，两只画眉鸟在枝头嬉戏向啄。
#756593 呼啸山庄英语读后感1500字4
今天，我看完了《呼啸山庄》这本书，我有许多感受。
这本书写的是一个山庄叫呼啸山庄，从安宁到欢乐，从欢乐到不得安宁，然后有到愤怒，最后又像以往一样平安无事。
这都是从“爱情争夺战”引起的更大的事。如果我们别像他们一样把小事闹大，那如今的大蒜。绿豆都还那么贵吗?不都是从小价格“炒”到大价格吗?我们应该听取别人正确的意见，改正不足的地方，也要学习别人的优点。
这本书好看，又易懂，很值得看。
呼啸山庄读后感英文
呼啸山庄读后感英文，细密的雨丝托来了夏日的信件，遇到不懂的问题可以查查注解，读书可以丰富一个人的思想，通过阅读感悟人生的真谛，是一件很有趣的事情，现在为大家提供呼啸山庄读后感英文。
My Feelings after reading Wuthering Heights
Wuthering Heights is a well-written tragedy of love. After reading the whole story, I would like to talk about the main characters of the story—Catherine Earnshaw and Heathcliff. Catherine Earnshaw and Heathcliff love each other very much, but they do not have the right attitude towards love, which leads to the tragedy.
In Catherine’s life, she made a very foolish decision---marrying to Edgar. In fact, her love for Edgar can never be compared to that for Heathcliff. She did so, because she thought the wealth of Edgar would be useful to Heathcliff. But in reality, it did not work. She did not have a good understanding of love, which is something pure and saint. If anyone add any purpose into love, love itself lost its meaning. Catherine’s wrong decision hurt two people who love her, and even destroyed the happiness of their offspring.
Heathcliff is a man full of retaliation. He loved Catherine very much, but what he did, on the contrary, added to the misery of Catherine. In my opinion, if he really loved Catherine, he should not walk into Catherine’s life again after his disappearance. Further more, after the death of Catherine, what Heathcliff did brought agony to Catherine’s daughter, as well as his own son.
After reading, I have a better understanding of love. If you love really someone, his or her happiness is the thing that most matters.
《呼啸山庄》读后感
《呼啸山庄》是一部写得很好的爱情悲剧。读完整个故事,我想谈谈故事的主人公——凯瑟琳和希斯克利夫。凯瑟琳和希斯克利夫非常相爱,但他们没有采取正确的态度对待爱情,从而导致悲剧。
在凯瑟琳的生命中,她作了一个非常愚蠢的决定——和埃德加结婚。事实上,她给埃德加的爱永远不可能与给希斯克利夫的相比。她这样做,是因为她认为埃德加的财富会对希斯克利夫有用。但实际上,它没有用。她不懂得爱情,爱情是圣洁的。如果有人给爱情添加任何目的,爱情本身就失去了意义。凯瑟琳的错误决定伤害了两个爱她的人,甚至破坏了他们的`后代的幸福。
希斯克利夫是一个充满复仇心的男人。他非常爱凯瑟琳,但他的所作所为恰恰相反地增加了凯瑟琳的痛苦。在我看来,如果他真的爱凯瑟琳,他不应该在他消失之后再次走进凯瑟琳的生活。此外,凯瑟琳死后,希斯克利夫给凯瑟琳的女儿以及他自己的儿子带来了极度的痛苦,。
读后,我对爱有了一个更好的理解。如果你真的爱某人,他或她的幸福绝对经得住所有困难的考验。
Wuthering heights have been popular in the city and control the influence of paint a completely original landscape of mountain wilderness. Enable people to enjoy a totally different world. Retains the original character of the book: desperate love, hate up regardless of the consequences. Everything in our these the restraint of traditional etiquette for a long time people it seems it is very special, very fresh.
When I finish the profound connotation and essence of the book, I find that in "wuthering heights" I learned a lot of, the other I feel most is that it has taught me to keep human dignity and freedom of mind. No matter how severe challenge we face or how cruel test, we should all aspire to freedom.
我看完了《呼啸山庄》，感到一个未婚女子能能写出爱的如此深刻，恨的.如此入骨的小说，很惊叹。
《呼啸山庄》没有受到城市里大众化的影响和控制，完全描绘出了一个原汁原味的山村荒野的景象。使人们领略了一个完全不同的世界。故事中的主人公都保留着原始的性格：爱起来不顾一切，恨起来不计后果。这一切的一切在我们这些长期受到传统礼仪的约束的人们看来就显得非常特别，非常有新鲜感。
当我回味着这本书的深刻内涵和本质时，我发现在《呼啸山庄》中我学到了许许多多，其中另我感触最深的.是它教会了我保持人性的尊严和心灵的自由。无论我们面临着多么严峻的挑战或是多么残酷的考验，我们都应该向往自由。
The whole story make people’s mood heavy. Fortunately, the end is happy.
The author Emily Bronte lived an eccentric, closely guarded life. She was born in 1818, two years after Charlotte—the author of Jane Eyre and a year and a half before her sister Anne, who also became an author. Her father worked as a church rector, and her aunt, who raised the Bronte children after their mother died, was deeply religious. Emily Bronte did not take to her aunt’s Christian fervor, the character of Joseph, a caricature of an evangelical, may have been inspired by her aunt’s religiosity. The Brontes lived in Haworth, a Yorkshire village in the midst of the moors. These wild, desolate expanses—later the setting of Wuthering Heights—made up the Brontes daily environment, and Emily lived among them her entire life. She died in 1848, at the age of thirty.
I like this book because it rest on the unforgettable characters. Wuthering Heights is based partly on the Gothic tradition, a style of literature that featured supernatural encounters, crumbling ruins, moonless nights, and grotesque imagery, seeking to create effects of mystery and fear. I would like to recommend this book to other readers.
它狂放不羁的浪漫主义风格源自于人物“爱”与“恨”的极端的冲突，而在希克厉和凯瑟琳这对旷世情侣身上，极度的爱中混合着极度的恨，失去凯瑟琳使希克厉成为一个复仇狂。加之，作者把故事背景放置在一个封闭的小社会——两个山庄，和开放的大自然——荒原之中，整个小说的情境就格外地“戏剧化”，阴冷而暴力，神秘怪烈又隐含着神圣的温情。 其次，女作家放弃了那种从头说起，原原本本的叙事手法，19世纪的女作家，像她姐姐写《简·爱》，奥斯丁写《傲慢与偏见》，都采用的是这样一种易于为大众接受的传统手法，艾米莉则为了讲清楚发生在两代人身上的复杂故事，别出心裁地采用了当时少见的“戏剧性结构”，借用了一位闯入呼啸山庄的陌生人洛克乌先生之耳目从故事的中间切入，这时候，女主人公凯瑟琳已死去，希克厉正处于极度暴虐地惩罚两家族的第二代的时候，这就设置了一个巨大的悬念，使读者急于追索事情的前因，又时时关注着人物未来的命运。当然，对于当时读惯古典小说的人们来说，接受这种叙事系统是有些吃力的，以致于有人指责此书“七拼八凑，不成体统”。 《呼啸山庄》深层次的主题是什么： 现在，多数人认为是对于人性的探索，洛克乌先生到来时所做的恶梦可谓是开启故事主题的钥匙，那是人性的冻结，之后30年旧事的倒叙正说明人性的堕落的过程，而最后四章，则顺叙了人性的复苏，希克厉终于悟到了无止境的报复只会带来糟糕的结局。小说基本上在讲叙恶的过程中最终发现了善的可能。 在当时的文坛，艾米莉远远地走于人们之前： 直至那个世纪结束后，才有人一反前说，认为“在19世纪，《呼啸山庄 》是一位女作家所能写出的最好的散文诗”；不仅如此，在本世纪，人们重新阅读与评价勃朗特三姐妹的文学作品时，开始提出：艾米莉·勃朗特是“三姐妹中最伟大的天才”，《呼啸山庄》也成为西方学者们欲琢磨个究竟的一块玉石，笼罩在它身上的百思不得其解的谜面背后那丰富的答案将渐渐被解释开来，毕竟，它是部可读性很强的天才之作，而非是云雾团里的“天书”。 这部小说的独特之处： 首先在于它揭示了人性的复杂与深刻，在于它所蕴含的爱与恨的激情。凯瑟琳与希思克利夫的爱情是以他们的性格和兴趣完全认为同为基础的，他们之间的爱情主要是精神上一致而非外貌上的相互吸引，是心灵的契合而非欲望上的需要，就在他们最后一次见面中那狂风暴雨般不可遏制的激情，也不夹杂有丝毫的情欲成份，这也寄托了作家对理想的、纯洁的爱情的向往。 一本书看久了，感觉和感悟也就淡了： 我不欣赏书中的情与恨相互交织，如果爱过，就不要有恨，如果有恨就没有真正的爱过。人是有情感的动物，只有有情感的人才是真正的至真至情至诚中人，才会更显得可爱，但这种狂热到将爱变成了恨，我不赞同，幸好最后希思克利夫终于没有了恨，也让小凯瑟琳和哈里顿这对有情人能够走到一起，也说明真情能感动所有的人。 结合我自己的感情经历来说，我对爱最大的体会却是宽容，如果真正的爱，那么没有得到又有何访呢？只要他（她）是幸福的，只要他（她）曾经也真心地爱过自己，留下美好的记忆，彼此祝福，在无人的夜晚能静静的想想彼此，这就够了。 读一本名著，真的是一件很累很享受的事，当我被其中的人物感情所打动时，我会流泪，更会得到启发。 附：故事简介 《呼啸山庄》讲的是一个爱情与复仇的故事，弃儿希思克利夫在利物浦的大街上被好心的恩肖先生捡起，抱回家收养，与恩肖的儿子辛德雷和女儿凯瑟琳在一起生活，辛德雷讨厌希思克利夫，而他的妹妹却喜欢希思克利夫，恩肖死后，辛德雷成了一家之主，把希思克利夫当仆人和佃农对待，剥夺了他受教育的权利，半百般侮辱，虐待他。与此同时，凯瑟琳和希思克利夫由于性格和爱好上的一致而成为最好的朋友并产生了朦胧的爱情。邻近的富绅之子林顿向凯瑟琳求爱，频繁登门拜访，凯瑟琳对他表示了好感并决定嫁给他，希思克利夫愤而出走。三年后凯瑟琳嫁给了林顿。希思克利夫也发财回来，同时实施报复。辛德雷因丧妻而染上了酗酒和同赌博的恶习，希思克利夫引诱他进一步堕落，轻而易举地占有了他的全部家产，并将他的儿子教唆成一个文盲和无赖。希思克利夫利用欺手段娶了林顿的妹妹伊莎贝拉为妻，婚后百般虐待她。凯瑟琳在病疼中生下女儿小凯瑟琳后去世，伊莎贝拉在认清希思克利夫的真面目后也离他而去，并生下了儿子小林顿。后来，伊莎贝拉列死去，儿子被希思克利夫夺回到自己手中，并诱使他与小凯瑟琳相爱。在林顿病重之时，他设计劫持了小凯瑟琳，强迫她与自己的儿子小林顿成亲，吞并了林顿的全部家产，完成了他的复仇计划。小林顿不久死去，小凯瑟琳与辛德雷的儿子哈里顿产生了爱情。与此同时，希思克利夫被凯瑟琳的鬼魂缠绕得坐卧不宁，不思饮食睡眠，他从哈里顿与小凯瑟琳的眼睛里看到了凯瑟琳的那双眼睛不愿再阻挠他们的爱情，在抑郁和精神错乱中死去。
索尼论文网上关于呼啸山庄的论文题目呼啸山庄中的爱与仇呼啸山庄中Heathcliff 性格分析开题报告文献综述论文参考资料 英文论文呼啸山庄环境分析 开题报告文献综述论文参考资料 英文论文论呼啸山庄中卡瑟琳的婚姻论《呼啸山庄》的哥特式风格
把《呼啸山庄》的人物分成几组。。。分析他们的性格差异。。以及代际的继承问题。。还可以写一下书里反映的宗教观
1 曹召伦,李晓明;医学心理学的新发展[J];安徽农业大学学报(社会科学版);2002年04期 2 邹颉;;复仇者的同与异:希思克利夫和仇虎——《呼啸山庄》和《原野》中男主人公之比较[J];安徽农业大学学报(社会科学版);2006年06期 3 王喆;;《呼啸山庄》中窗意象的文化解读[J];安徽农业大学学报(社会科学版);2008年06期 4 张舒予;论伍尔夫与勃朗特的心灵与创作之关联[J];安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版);2003年03期 5 刘俊;;爱与恨的复合体——浅析希克厉这一人物形象[J];安徽文学(下半月);2006年09期 6 叶琴;刘爱花;;从阿德勒的人格理论谈心理健康与治疗[J];安徽文学(下半月);2006年09期 7 王华颖;;回归家庭——女性悲哀和幸福的双重所在——对《简爱》结局的新解读[J];安徽文学(下半月);2009年01期 8 肖晶;;心理学视角下的凯瑟琳·恩肖形象再议[J];安徽文学(下半月);2009年02期 9 唐正;;试分析艾米莉在《呼啸山庄》中的个性体现[J];安徽文学(下半月);2009年06期 10 唐正;;试分析《简·爱》中独特的女性主义声音[J];安徽文学(下半月);2009年07期
1、主题说描写吉卜赛弃儿希斯克利夫被山庄老主人收养后，因受辱和恋爱不遂．外出致富。回来后对与其女友凯瑟琳结婚的地主林顿及其子女进行报复的故事。全篇充满强烈的反压迫、争幸福的斗争精神，又始终笼罩着离奇、紧张的浪漫气氛。2、写作背景艾米丽生性寂寞，自小内向的她，缄默又总带着几分以男性自居的感觉，诚如夏洛蒂所说的：“她的性格是独一无二的。”少女时代，当她和姐妹们在家里“编造”故事、写诗的时候，她就显得很特别，后来收录在她们诗歌合集中艾米丽的作品总是如同波德莱尔或爱伦·坡那样被“恶”这一主题所困惑，在纯净的抒情风格之间总笼罩着一层死亡的阴影。在她写作《呼啸山庄》时，这种困惑与不安的情绪变得更加急躁，她迫切需要创造一个虚构的世界来演绎它，把自己心底几近撕裂的痛苦借小说人物之口淋漓尽致地发泄出来。因此《呼啸山庄》是饱含作者心血与情感的作品。3、作者简介艾米莉·简·勃朗特（Emily Jane Bronte，1818年7月30日－1848年12月19日），19世纪英国作家与诗人，著名的勃朗特三姐妹之一，世界文学名著《呼啸山庄》的作者。这部作品是艾米莉·勃朗特一生中唯一的一部小说，奠定了她在英国文学史以及世界文学史上的地位。此外，她还创作了193首诗，被认为是英国一位天才型的女作家。
讲的是高与低的不等于。
有爱引发的悲剧，人类浑浊思想的罪孽！
如果你们老师不是刻意为难的话，只会问一些基本的问题，比如说：为什么会选择这个作为论文题目；这个作者一共有多少作品，因为艾米莉·勃朗特是女作家而且家中姐妹也都有过好的作品，所以可能会问及她是否有姐妹，叫什么，有什么作品； 然后会关于《呼啸山庄》本身所反映的问题，所隐射的社会问题，你对此的感想；剩下的回到论文本身，对你论文的那个part或者是句子进行提问...差不多就这些。