《财经》杂志英语翻译

economic, economics,和economy的用法及意思都不同．

Relentless expansion in the process of state-owned enterprises, China's private enterprises is not the only losers, the Chinese media also suffer the impact."Business Week" is the latest one being that the impact of the media. The announcement on its Web site, said this month, Beijing-based magazine will be ordered to stop. This is its rivalry with the State Grid Corporation and impose penalties. State Grid Corporation is the leader in state-owned enterprises in China, in 2009, "Fortune" magazine ranked the world's 500 15."Business Weekly" has published an article entitled "National Network Empire," the cover article by 25,000 words in length reported that the national power grid company in China is seeking its near monopoly power in the field to the network equipment to expand production. Why do hope that the national grid moving in this direction, is not difficult to imagine. Last year, China's electricity infrastructure investment to 840 billion dollarsBut the "Business Week," the article said, National Grid's plans by government-backed opposition from China Machinery Industry Federation; article also cited an internal document the Federation to support this assertion. Article bluntly blaming the State Grid Corporation's senior leadership, and to the company called "Frankenstein-type giant." "Business Week" Web site announcement said that the magazine press and publication department "violated propaganda discipline," "will disclose the contents of internal reference", and "the content and the fact that many serious discrepancies." Notice is not made it clear that "Business Weekly" what exactly occurs the so-called serious discrepancies with the facts. This is not the first time since the Chinese media reported that the article related to the energy industry and trouble. Three years ago, "Finance" magazine was forced to dismiss a national grid and the same article. During this time, including Chinese state-owned enterprises and foreign media when dealing with the media, including shows that a new roll the dice. Over the years, the state-owned enterprises have insisted on a review before the article was published, it had agreed to cooperate with journalists. This can to some extent explain why state-owned enterprises and foreign media quoted officials rarely comments. In the latest, state-owned enterprises has become more aggressive attitude. A few weeks ago, "The Wall Street Journal," a well-known state-owned public relations department received a call about our story about the company's overseas investment reports. The public relations staff began by saying, you illegal exposure of our company's trade secrets; we ask that you immediately remove the article from your website, and explain your sources. The public relations person went on, if you do not obey, we will take legal action against you. Of course, we did not move this article, and rejected the other side of these requirements. "Business Week" did more good, it said in the announcement: "This result, we accept it." "Business Week" will resume publication next month, but China business news in the "exposed Inside Story of" action has been yet another hit. Chinese publication before the next to go through the matter and to challenge the National Grid or any other state - in the current public sector giants such detailed attention than ever more important.

财政与经济

财经是指财政、金融、经济。财经类专业是指经济类和管理类专业，常见的专业包括市场行销、会计、人力资源管理、金融、国际贸易、企业管理、统计、财税等，是近几年来人才市场上的热门专业。书名《财经》是一本密切关注中国经济制度变革与现代市场经济进程的新闻性刊物。 更多→ 财经

finance and economics

China Business News

上面的文字如果要真的译的话，没有几个小时是不行的。机译就另当别论了,错误太多，不想说。如果你真要译，发个信息过来。我可以用邮件给你发过来。

In the process of state-owned enterprises, the cruel expansion of the private enterprises in China are not the only loser, Chinese media are weekly is the latest in a by the impact of the media. The announcement said on its website issued, the headquarters is located in Beijing's weekly sate this month. The state grid corporation is its reasoning with penalties. State grid corporation of China's state-owned enterprises is the leader in 2009, the fortune global 500 ranking weekly published a titled "empire of SGC cover articles with 25,000 word length, reported by state grid corporation is seeking to it in China power grid domain near-monopoly status of the power equipment manufacturing field to grid why hope toward the direction, it is not hard to imagine. Last year, China to power infrastructure investment 840 billion the bisiness weekly, said the state grid plan by government support of the China machinery industry federation opposed. Article also cited federation of an internal documents to support the claim. The outspoken to spear-headed by state grid corporation of the senior leadership, and put the company called "frankenstein type giant".Bisiness weekly web site, said the announcement that the press and publication department violate discipline ", "" propaganda NaCan publicity content", and "in conformity with the facts serious no confidently bisiness weekly what content to appear alleged that the serious is not the first Chinese media reported involved because the energy industry into trouble. Three years ago, caijing magazine was forced to remove an article about the same and national power 's state-owned enterprises at this time with the media, including the media, showing a new domineering. Long-term since, the state-owned enterprises have insisted on review published before, so it agreed to cooperate with reporters. This may explain why in a certain extent, the state-owned media rarely quoted recently, state-owned enterprises have become more aggressive attitude. A few weeks ago, Wall Street journal received a phone call from state-owned enterprises, public relations department about us an article about this company overseas investment reports. The public relations staff said, you start to our company's illegal exposure of commercial secrets, We request your immediate from your website to delete this article, and your sources. The pr people then said, if not obey, we will take legal action for you. Of course, we didn't move this article, and refused to answer these weekly is good, it said in a statement "this result, we accept it."Bisiness weekly next month, but the "China business news has been exposed shady" action again. China's next to think through after publication will to challenge the state grid or any other state-owned enterprises at present, and the public - and to the giant's careful attention than ever more important.

Private business in China isn't the only loser from the relentless expansion of state-owned enterprises. The media is also suffering under the onslaught. 在国有企业无情扩张的过程中，中国的民营企业不是唯一的输家，中国的媒体也遭受着冲击。 Business Watch Magazine is the latest to feel the heat. The Beijing-based weekly won't be publishing this month, according to a notice posted on its website--its punishment for tangling with State Grid, the mother of all SOEs ranked 15th on Fortune's Global 500 list in 2009. 《商务周刊》是最新一家受到这种冲击的媒体。其网站发布的公告说，这家总部位于北京的周刊本月将停业整顿。这是它跟国家电网公司较劲受到的处罚。国家电网公司是中国国有企业的龙头老大，在2009年《财富》杂志全球500强中排名第15。 In a 25,000-word cover story called State Grid Empire, Business Watch had reported that the state giant was angling to extend its near-monopoly over the distribution of power in China to the business of manufacturing equipment for that grid. 《商务周刊》曾发表一篇名为《国网帝国》的封面文章，文章用25,000 字的篇幅报道说，国家电网公司正谋求将它在中国电网领域近乎垄断的地位扩大到电网设备生产领域。 It's not hard to see why State Grid would want to move in that direction. Last year, China spent $84 billion on power infrastructure. 国家电网为什么希望朝着这个方向行进，其实不难想象。去年，中国向电力基础设施领域投资了840亿美元。 But the Business Watch article said State Grid's ambitions are opposed by the state-backed China Machinery Industry Federation, and it cited an internal federation document to back up the assertion. The article didn't pull its punches, criticizing State Grid's top leaders and referring to the company as 'Frankenstein's monster.' 但《商务周刊》的文章说，国家电网的计划受到了政府支持的中国机械工业联合会的反对；文章还引用了联合会的一份内部文件来支持这一论断。文章直言不讳地把矛头指向了国家电网公司的高层领导，并把该公司称作“弗兰肯斯坦式巨人”。 In its website notice, Business Watch said publishing authorities found the magazine guilty of 'violating propaganda discipline' for 'revealing internal content,' as well as 'serious factual inaccuracies.' 《商务周刊》网站上的公告说，新闻出版主管部门认为该刊“违反宣传纪律”，“将内参内容公开化”，并且“多处内容与事实严重不符”。 Missing from the notice was any explanation of what facts Business Watch allegedly got wrong. 公告没有讲明《商务周刊》究竟哪些内容出现了所谓与事实严重不符的情况。 It's not the first time Chinese media has gotten into trouble over stories about the energy sector. Three years ago, Caijing magazine was forced to yank a story also related to State Grid. 这不是中国媒体第一次因为报道文章涉及能源行业而陷入麻烦。三年前，《财经》杂志曾被迫撤掉一篇同样和国家电网有关的文章。 There's a new swagger these days about Chinese SOEs in their dealings with the media, including the international media. SOEs have long insisted on the right to vet articles before publication as the condition for agreeing to cooperate with reporters. That helps to explain why so few SOE officials are quoted in the international media. 这段时间中国国有企业与包括外媒在内的媒体打交道时，显示出了一种新的霸气。长期以来，国有企业都坚持要在文章发表前进行审查，这样才同意跟记者合作。这可以在一定程度上解释为什么外媒极少引用国企官员的言论。 Lately, however, the tone has become more threatening. A few weeks ago, The Wall Street Journal fielded a call from the PR department of a prominent state company regarding a story we had broken on one of its international investments. 'You have illegally exposed our company's commercial secrets,' the PR official began. 'We demand that you immediately remove the story from your website and reveal the sources of your information.' Unless the Journal complied, the PR man went on 'we will take legal action against you.' Needless to say, we stood by the story--and rebuffed the demands. 而在最近，国企的态度已变得更加咄咄逼人。几周前，《华尔街日报》接到一家知名国企公关部门打来的电话，谈到我们一篇有关该公司海外投资的报道。这位公关人员一开始就说，你们非法曝光了我们公司的商业机密；我们要求你们立即从你们网站删除这篇文章，并说明你们的消息来源。这位公关人士接着又说，如果不服从，我们将对你们采取法律行动。当然，我们没动这篇文章，并拒绝了对方的这些要求。 Business Watch is acting appropriately chastened. 'We accept the result,' the notice said. 《商务周刊》做得比较乖，它在公告中说：“这个结果，我们接受它。” The magazine will be back on the streets next month. But muckraking business journalism in China has taken another hit. Chinese publications will think twice before having another go at State Grid, or any other SOE--at a time when public scrutiny of these industrial giants has never been more important. 《商务周刊》将在下个月复刊，但中国商业新闻中的“揭发黑幕”行动已经遭到又一次重创。中国出版物下次要经过三思之后才会去挑战国家电网或任何其他国企——而在当前，公众对这些行业巨头的仔细关注比以往任何时候都更加重要。