flag毕业论文

微博上对在空间和朋友圈经常立flag的人有一种评价，那就是他们喜欢把那种人称为思想上的巨人，行动上的矮子。我觉得这种评价非常的贴合实际。原因是因为每次我身边的人立flag，结果往往就是打脸，然后被一众人嘲笑，他们立的flag总是经常性的倒。每次都我把它们当成一个笑话来看，就默默的看着他们自己打自己的脸玩儿。

我觉得立flag，它已经不是一个正能量的词了，恰恰相反它现在已经变成了一个非常搞笑的梗。可能刚开始的时候，人们是这样想的，我把自己的目标还有自己想达成的愿望发在微博微信或者是朋友圈空间之中，让认识我的人，包括我的朋友，我的家人一起来监督我，这样的话，有利于我实现自己的目标。而且，当你把自己的目标宣之于众的话，如果不能实现，可能会非常的丢脸，所以就更加的督促你，要努力实现自己的目标，我觉得这是立flag一开始的状态。

可是慢慢的可能会出现这种状况，那就是我虽然把自己的目标宣之于众，但是没有实现，不过周围的人，不管是同学朋友还是亲人，他们并没有讽刺你或者是嘲笑你，恰恰相反，他们是用一种开玩笑的语气打趣你，这样的话你可能觉得，没有实现也无所谓，大家都把这件事情当成一个笑话一个玩笑来跟你调侃。

所以到最后立flag的含义已经完全变了，就是你明明知道你做不成这个事情，你偏偏要发出来让大家都知道，让大家在下面打趣你，现在这个已经不是一个励志的词汇了，而是一个玩笑的词汇。也许有的人就享受那种被打击的过程被讽刺的过程。

1The Uneasy Trade RelationshipIntroductionEver since Deng Xiaoping ushered in a wave of liberalization in the late 1970s, the world has witnessed a surge in Chinese economic power. Over the last quarter century, China has averaged percent growth annually, more than quadrupled its gross domestic product (GDP), and lifted over 400 million of its citizens out of poverty. In 1977, China had the thirtieth-ranked trade volume in the world; in ten years it is projected to be the world's top trading nation; and in fifteen, it will likely have the world's largest rapid rise was aided by the normal trade relations China established with the United States in 1979, and later by China's accession into the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2001. But trade relations have always been somewhat uneasy; for many years, Congress used an annual review of China's "Most Favored Nation" trading status to link trade liberalization with Beijing's human rights record. More recently, . leaders have begun to worry about a massive trade imbalance that continues to grow. Protectionists in Washington and Beijing have begun to dig in their heels against the powerful economic forces that are changing their nations, while . calls for China to revalue its currency and crack down on counterfeiting have not made much VolumeA major factor in China's quick rise has been its vigorous trade activity with the United States. Trade volume between the two nations reached $ billion in 2005, more than eighty times the $ billion exchanged in 1979, the year they established normal trade relations. This has accelerated in recent years; from 2001 to 2005, the volume of trade increased an average of percent a year. The United States has become the top destination of Chinese merchandise exports and China is buying up more and more . goods, with . exports to China rising percent each of the last four ImbalanceIn 2005 the United States ran a bilateral trade deficit with China of $202 billion, up from $162 billion the previous year. Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY) said in a statement to press that these figures should be "a red flag to the Congress and to the global economy." Many Americans worry the United States is too dependent upon China for its imports, and blame the deficit for the loss of . manufacturing jobs. Despite public fervor, the trade deficit does not have all economists worried. "I personally don't believe the bilateral trade deficit is dangerous for the United States," says Benn Steil, a CFR senior fellow and director of international economics. This is partly because, while China has a massive trade surplus with the United States, its overall trade surplus is not excessively large. Furthermore, the bilateral deficit doesn't take into account products manufactured in China by . and other foreign companies. CFR Senior Fellow Adam Segal says some of the increase in the trade deficit is because "China has replaced all the Asian producers the United States used to import from."There is some concern the imbalance might not be good for China's economy either. Brookings Fellow Jing Huang told a recent audience that 80 percent of China's GDP is derived from trade, which he cautions is a sign China's economic development is uneven. But Steil says there is no cause for alarm: "That statistic is not that outlandish by international comparison," he concern is that, with its focus on exports, China has failed to develop a domestic consumption base. This reliance upon outside markets, warns Huang, has created an "investment bubble," leaving China's economy vulnerable in the event of a downturn in its export markets. But Carnegie Endowment economist Albert Keidel says warnings of an investment bubble are "very loose talk about something that hasn't happened yet."Many experts say trade relations are generally normal and healthy. Brookings Fellow Jeffrey Bader told a February 16 meeting of the Brookings Council that Chinese exports have had some rather positive effects for the United States. Cheaply manufactured goods have kept inflation low, easing the burden on poor and middle-class consumers. Bader also points out that Chinese investment has helped finance . debt, while . investors have generally profited from their ventures in China. Washington Post columnist Sebastian Mallaby wrote in an April 17 op-ed, "American business is in a golden phase right now because its imaginative culture fits the challenges of the post-industrial age. A low-wage economy that crams on science is not going to take that away from us."CurrencyOne of the hot-button issues in trade relations is the value of China's currency, the yuan (also known as the renminbi or RMB). . critics allege that China is artificially keeping the value of the yuan some 40 percent below what its value would otherwise be on the open market. This, they say, makes Chinese goods cheaper in the United States and . goods more expensive in China, thus contributing to the large trade imbalance between the two nations. According to Schumer, "China's refusal to play by international economic rules cripples our ability to compete on a level playing field." Schumer and fellow senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) sponsored a bill that would have levied a percent tariff on all Chinese imports unless the yuan was substantially revalued. The bill was withdrawn in March after the two senators visited China and were persuaded that Beijing was committed to currency reforms.真郁闷，百度不让发全文，给你地址吧2这个是中英对照的：