学术堂整理了三十三个好写的英语论文题目,供大家进行参考:1.《红字》中海丝特 白兰不理智的一面(The Irrational Side of Hester Prynne of The Scarlet Letter)2. 《董贝父子》中的矛盾冲突(The Conflict in Donbey and Son)3. 论文化不同对联想意义及翻译的影响(On Influence of Cultural Differences on Associative Meanings and Translation)4. 美国教育的衰弱(The Drop of American Education)5. 19世纪欧洲移民对美国工业化的积极影响(The Positive Impacts of European Immigration on American Industrialization in the 19th . 朱丽叶之人物分析(Character Studies in Juliet)7. 主述理论在文学中的运用(The Application of the Thematic Theory in Literature)8. 语用学中的会话含义理论(Conversational Implicature Theory in Pragmatics)9. 英语语音简析及对提高初学者口语的指导(A Brief Analysis of English Phonetics as well as a Guide to Improve Learners' Oral English)10. 比较两种对于哈姆雷特复仇的评论(Comparison on Two Kinds of Comments on Hamlet's Revenge)11. 英语语言中的性别歧视 (Sexism in English Language)12. 英语的学与教 (English Learning and Teaching)13. 由美国2004年总统选举所想到的 (More than 2004 Presidential Election)14. 论腐朽世界中的纯洁品质--关于《雾都孤儿》的赏析 (The Purity in a Corrupt World-An Analysis of Oliver Twister)15. 论理智与情感之关系--对《理智与情感》的人物分析16. 入世对中国银行业的挑战 (Challenges on Chinese Banking Sector after Entering the WTO)17. 西进运动对美国的影响 (The Influences of Westward Movement on America)18. 史蒂芬?克拉申的听读假设和二语习得 (Stephen Krashen's Input Hypothesis and Second Language Acquisition)19. 艾?巴?辛格--犹太文化的守护者 (L. B. Singer-the Patron of Jewish Civilization)20. 二十世纪60年代美国妇女运动的派别 (The Politics of American Women's Movement in the 1960's)21. 论《红字》的模糊性 (Ambiguity in The Scarlet Letter)22.《嘉莉姐妹》中无心的欲望 (The Limitless Desires in Sister Carrie) 23. 英语广告语言修辞特点 (Rhetorical Features in Advertising English)24.《儿子与情人》中的恋母情结 (Pau Morel's Oedipus Complex in Sons and Lovers) 25. 造成苔丝悲剧命运的原因 (The Reasons for Tess's Tragic Fate)26. 论恐怖主义的根源 (On the Root of Terrorism)27. 2003: 中印关系新纪元 (2003: A New Era of Sino-India Relationship)28. 希兹克利夫的复仇 (The Revenge of Heathcliff)29. 弗洛伊德理论对美国现代文学的影响 (The Influence of Freudian Theory on ModernAmerican Literature)30. 论萨姆一家人之"变形" (The Etamoephosis of the Samsas)31. 亚伯拉罕 ? 林肯的民主思想初探 (A Preliminary Research on Abraham Lincoln's Thought of Democracy)32. 评析《傲慢与偏见》的男主人公达西 (Mr. Darcy in Pride and Prejudice)33.《简爱》的圣经情书 (The Relationship Between Jane Eyre and the Bible)
imaginable. We seldom think of it. The days stretch out in an endless vista. So we
先不说内容，首先格式要正确，一篇完整的毕业论文，题目，摘要（中英文），目录，正文（引言，正文，结语），致谢，参考文献。学校规定的格式，字体，段落，页眉页脚，开始写之前，都得清楚的，你的论文算是写好了五分之一。然后，选题，你的题目时间宽裕，那就好好考虑，选一个你思考最成熟的，可以比较多的阅读相关的参考文献，从里面获得思路，确定一个模板性质的东西，照着来，写出自己的东西。如果时间紧急，那就随便找一个参考文献，然后用和这个参考文献相关的文献，拼出一篇，再改改。正文，语言必须是学术的语言。一定先列好提纲，这就是框定每一部分些什么，保证内容不乱，将内容放进去，写好了就。参考文献去中国知网搜索，校园网免费下载。《雾都孤儿》中人物的创造性叛逆——重塑《雾都孤儿》中的南希形象剖析小说《雾都孤儿》中前景化特征的文体分析污浊社会里的纯真——《雾都孤儿》中反映出的良知
题目不要太大，也不要太小，太大了面太广容易泛泛，小了就无材料可查，没东西可写。写你熟悉的 资料好查的 参考
人物形象分析，作者研究，写作风格，写作背景什么的都可以的
beked240
论文的题目不仅能准确反映论文特定的核心内容，也是读者最先映入眼帘的内容。下面是我带来的关于美国文学论文选题目录的内容，欢迎阅读参考! 美国文学论文选题目录(一) 1、 透过《傲慢与偏见》看现代社会爱情观 2、生与死的抗争--《厄舍古厦的倒塌》主题解读 3、浅谈“欧·亨利式结尾”及其文学影响 4、从宗教角度解读简爱的多重性格 5、从女权主义角度剖析《小妇人》中的乔 6、 “英雄”的陨落--悲剧美学角度分析《老人与海》 7、 从《菊花》中看女主人公Elisa实现自我价值的障碍 8、奉献与宽容---浅析《双城记》中的仁爱精神 9、 《格列佛游记》中对理性的反思与批判 10、浅析《警察和赞美诗》的戏剧化特色 11、一场失败革命的反思---论《动物庄园》中所表现的象征意义 12、论詹姆斯·乔伊斯《阿拉比》的精神顿悟 13、从后印象主义角度解读《到灯塔去》中的双性同体观 14、 从中西方道德观差异谈《伊利亚特》与《封神演义》人物品德 15、 韦伯《猫》中的女性主义 16、 浅析《儿子与情人》中的心理冲突 17、浅析中西方喜剧文化---以《武林外传》和《老友记》为例 18、从女性主义看《傲慢与偏见》中的女性形象 19、《瓦尔登湖》中自然主义的现实意义 20、 从男性角色解读《简爱》中的女性反抗意识 美国文学论文选题目录(二) 1、《红字》中海丝特白兰不理智的一面 2、《董贝父子》中的矛盾冲突 3、论文化不同对联想意义及翻译的影响 4、美国教育的衰弱 5、世纪欧洲移民对美国工业化的积极影响 6、朱丽叶之人物分析 7、主述理论在文学中的运用 8、语用学中的会话含义理论 9、英语语音简析及对提高初学者口语的指导 10、比较两种对于哈姆雷特复仇的评论 11、英语语言中的性别歧视 12、英语的学与教 13、由美国年总统选举所想到的 14、论腐朽世界中的纯洁品质——关于《雾都孤儿》的赏析 15、论理智与情感之关系——对《理智与情感》的人物分析 16、入世对中国银行业的挑战 17、西进运动对美国的影响 18、史蒂芬?克拉申的听读假设和二语习得 19、艾巴辛格——犹太文化的守护者 20、二十世纪年代美国妇女运动的派别 美国文学论文选题目录(三) 1. 中印关系新纪元 2. 希兹克利夫的复仇 3. 弗洛伊德理论对美国现代文学的影响 4. 论萨姆一家人之“变形” 5. 亚伯拉罕林肯的民主思想初探 6. 评析《傲慢与偏见》的男主人公达西 7. 《简爱》的圣经情书 8. 库区三角浮出水面——万州、开县、云阳经济宏图 9. 会话中的合作原则和礼貌原则 10. 浅析海明威笔下圣地亚哥与其它主人公之异同 11. 对嘉尔曼的偏见 12. 简爱——关于简爱的性格评论 13. 《呼啸山庄》中凯瑟琳和希斯克力夫之间的苦痛恋情 14. 简评妥协——研究《傲慢与偏见》 15. 《傲慢与偏见》中的婚姻面面观 16. 试论简奥斯汀生活对其小说的影响 17. “真实的诺言”与传统文化的碰撞——简析“真人秀”的实质和本地化过程 18. 从台湾问题看中美关系 19. 《傲慢与偏见》的生命力 20. 平凡中的不平凡——《傲慢与偏见》 21. 萨皮尔沃夫理论 猜你喜欢： 1. 关于英美文学的论文 2. 英美文学方向毕业论文 3. 英美文学论文范文 4. 浅谈英美文学论文 5. 美国文化学术论文格式要求
关于英语专业的论文题目，学术堂整理了十五个好写的，供大家参考：1．《红字》中海丝特 白兰不理智的一面（The Irrational Side of Hester Prynne of The Scarlet Letter）2. 《董贝父子》中的矛盾冲突（The Conflict in Donbey and Son）3. 论文化不同对联想意义及翻译的影响（On Influence of Cultural Differences on Associative Meanings and Translation）4. 美国教育的衰弱（The Drop of American Education）5. 19世纪欧洲移民对美国工业化的积极影响（The Positive Impacts of European Immigration on American Industrialization in the 19th Century。6. 朱丽叶之人物分析（Character Studies in Juliet）7. 主述理论在文学中的运用（The Application of the Thematic Theory in Literature）8. 语用学中的会话含义理论（Conversational Implicature Theory in Pragmatics）9. 英语语音简析及对提高初学者口语的指导（A Brief Analysis of English Phonetics as well as a Guide to Improve Learners’ Oral English）10. 比较两种对于哈姆雷特复仇的评论（Comparison on Two Kinds of Comments on Hamlet’s Revenge）11. 英语语言中的性别歧视 (Sexism in English Language)12. 英语的学与教 (English Learning and Teaching)13. 由美国2004年总统选举所想到的 (More than 2004 Presidential Election)14. 论腐朽世界中的纯洁品质——关于《雾都孤儿》的赏析 (The Purity in a Corrupt World—An Analysis of Oliver Twister)15. 论理智与情感之关系——对《理智与情感》的人物分析
提供一些英语专业的毕业论文题目，供参考。
先不说内容，首先格式要正确，一篇完整的毕业论文，题目，摘要（中英文），目录，正文（引言，正文，结语），致谢，参考文献。学校规定的格式，字体，段落，页眉页脚，开始写之前，都得清楚的，你的论文算是写好了五分之一。然后，选题，你的题目时间宽裕，那就好好考虑，选一个你思考最成熟的，可以比较多的阅读相关的参考文献，从里面获得思路，确定一个模板性质的东西，照着来，写出自己的东西。如果时间紧急，那就随便找一个参考文献，然后用和这个参考文献相关的文献，拼出一篇，再改改。正文，语言必须是学术的语言。一定先列好提纲，这就是框定每一部分些什么，保证内容不乱，将内容放进去，写好了就。参考文献去中国知网搜索，校园网免费下载。《雾都孤儿》中人物的创造性叛逆——重塑《雾都孤儿》中的南希形象剖析小说《雾都孤儿》中前景化特征的文体分析污浊社会里的纯真——《雾都孤儿》中反映出的良知
A Brief Comment on Shakespeare's' The Merchant of Venice (浅谈莎士比亚的《威尼斯商人》)Hamlet: His Characters as a Humanist(哈姆雷特人物性格分析)Parallelism and Contrast of Shakespeare's Dramatic Language(莎士比亚戏剧的排比与对照用语)The Social Significance of Dickens's Oliver Twist(狄更斯《雾都孤儿》的社会意义)On the Structure of Dickens's Hard Times(谈狄更斯《艰难时世》的结构)Jane Austen's Art of Irony and Its Rhetoric Effects(简·奥斯丁的反语及其修辞效果)Appreciation of Literary Language of Pride and Prejudice(《傲慢与偏见》文学语言欣赏)
关于英语专业的论文题目，学术堂整理了十五个好写的，供大家参考：1．《红字》中海丝特 白兰不理智的一面（The Irrational Side of Hester Prynne of The Scarlet Letter）2. 《董贝父子》中的矛盾冲突（The Conflict in Donbey and Son）3. 论文化不同对联想意义及翻译的影响（On Influence of Cultural Differences on Associative Meanings and Translation）4. 美国教育的衰弱（The Drop of American Education）5. 19世纪欧洲移民对美国工业化的积极影响（The Positive Impacts of European Immigration on American Industrialization in the 19th Century。6. 朱丽叶之人物分析（Character Studies in Juliet）7. 主述理论在文学中的运用（The Application of the Thematic Theory in Literature）8. 语用学中的会话含义理论（Conversational Implicature Theory in Pragmatics）9. 英语语音简析及对提高初学者口语的指导（A Brief Analysis of English Phonetics as well as a Guide to Improve Learners’ Oral English）10. 比较两种对于哈姆雷特复仇的评论（Comparison on Two Kinds of Comments on Hamlet’s Revenge）11. 英语语言中的性别歧视 (Sexism in English Language)12. 英语的学与教 (English Learning and Teaching)13. 由美国2004年总统选举所想到的 (More than 2004 Presidential Election)14. 论腐朽世界中的纯洁品质——关于《雾都孤儿》的赏析 (The Purity in a Corrupt World—An Analysis of Oliver Twister)15. 论理智与情感之关系——对《理智与情感》的人物分析
题目不要太大，也不要太小，太大了面太广容易泛泛，小了就无材料可查，没东西可写。写你熟悉的 资料好查的 参考
人物形象分析，作者研究，写作风格，写作背景什么的都可以的
论文选题是按一定价值标准或条件对可供选择的课题进行评价和比较并对研究方向、目标、领域和范围作出抉择的过程，是决定论文内容和价值的关键环节。那英语专业的硕士论文题目有哪些呢?下面我给大家带来2021英语专业的硕士论文题目有哪些，希望能帮助到大家!
英语专业硕士论文题目
1、论 英语阅读 教学对写作的影响及教学启示
2、论英语幽默语言的汉译策略
3、论 英语学习 的情感因素
4、从词汇学的角度论英语新词
5、论英语教学中的积极情感互动
6、论英语 广告 中的语法隐喻
7、论英语教学中高中生跨 文化 意识的培养和跨文化交际能力的提高
8、论英语学习和英语教学中的情感因素
9、论英语背诵教学的有效性
10、论英语教学与英语专业学生的批判性思维
11、论英语专有名词汉译的一般策略
12、论英语新闻中中国特色词汇的英译策略
13、论英语在初级对美汉语教学中的使用
14、论 英语听力 教学中存在的问题及改进的建议
15、论英语新闻标题中语用预设的作用
16、论英语专有名词汉译的一般策略
17、论英语科技论文修辞诉求
18、论英语影视字幕中修辞的汉译
19、论英语课程教材评估
20、论英语双基教学
21、论英语电影的字幕与配音翻译
22、论英语习语及其在中学英语教学中的作用
23、论英语学习和英语教学中的情感因素
24、论英语教学中跨文化交际能力的培养
25、论英语专业学生翻译能力的培养
26、论英语专业学生对外教口语课课堂活动的期望和感知
27、论英语游戏性教学在语文教学中的移用
28、论英语课程的文化品格
29、课程与教学论(英语)专业研究生课程现状调查及策略研究
30、从语域理论角度论英语新闻标题的翻译
31、论英语无灵主语句的汉译
32、论英语在初级对美汉语教学中的使用
33、论英语 句子 平衡及其对翻译的意义
34、论英语阅读教学对写作的影响及教学启示
35、论英语幽默语言的汉译策略
36、论英语 俚语 汉译
37、论英语中情态和否定的相互关系
38、再现幽默——论英语言语幽默另类中译策略
39、从交际翻译和语义翻译的角度论英语新闻标题的翻译
40、论英语 儿童 文学的汉译
41、论英语教学中跨文化交际能力的培养
42、从交际和语义翻译角度论英语新闻导语的汉译
43、论英语缩略词在汉语中应用的原因、价值与策略
44、模因论应用于初三 英语写作 教学的实证研究
45、论英语词汇呈现阶段语义图的构建
46、论英语新闻文体与汉译
47、论英语教学中的自主阅读
48、论英语新闻汉译中影响英语多义词词义确定的因素
49、论英语词汇习得中的文化因素
50、论英语语篇中的词汇搭配
51、论英语的时间系统
52、论英语习语中的语言世界图景
53、论英语例外格标记结构的句法生成
54、论英语习语及其在中学英语教学中的作用
55、论英语教学中跨文化交际能力的培养
56、论英语专业学生翻译能力的培养
57、论英语政治语篇中概念隐喻的应用
58、论英语幽默翻译
59、论英语电视剧字幕中幽默的翻译
60、论 英语口语 体的翻译策略
英语 教育 论文题目
浅探幼儿英语语音教学的有效 方法
粤北地区幼儿英语教育现状及原因分析
一对一数字化环境下的小学低段 英语 故事 阅读教学实践--以牛津英语幼儿故事“Books!”为例
关键期假设视角下的幼儿英语教育目标定位
全语言教学在幼儿英语教学中的应用
河北省幼儿英语师资现状调研及分析
幼儿英语学习的兴趣导向及培养
高校《幼儿英语教育》课程改革探究
民族地区农村幼儿英语教师培养策略研究--以湘西土家族苗族自治州为例
英语儿童绘本译作与中国幼儿文学的语言对比研究
浅谈幼儿英语教学的三个原则
幼儿英语教学之理性思考
中美幼儿英语教育方法的比较分析
父母期待对幼儿英语学习行为的影响分析
幼儿英语教学师资力量与学习效率的关系探讨
浅谈幼儿英语的 教学方法
技能型学前教育专业幼儿英语师资培养研究
大连市幼儿英语教育的现状分析及建议
游戏教学在幼儿英语教学中的应用
探究幼儿英语学习兴趣的培养模式
新课改视野下的幼儿英语教学初探
民办教育培训机构中幼儿英语教育的现状与问题研究--以河南省Z市J区为例
从整合教育的角度分析幼儿学前英语教育
活动教学法与幼儿英语教学的有效整合
校企合作共建区域幼儿英语师资培养机制
根据幼儿心理特点，探析英语教学方法
幼儿英语语音意识发展中教师多元角色的构建
幼儿英语课程改革的探究
幼儿教师英语口语构成研究
游戏教学法在幼儿英语教学中的角色及运用
试谈幼儿英语教学方法
培养幼儿师范学生的英语写作习惯漫谈
英语词汇类APP在幼儿英语学习中的应用研究
浅谈如何激发幼儿 学习英语 的兴趣
幼儿英语教育中的“游戏”教学法研究
现代信息技术在幼儿英语教学中的应用策略
浅谈英语浸入式下幼儿语言的发展
幼儿英语教师教学能力现状及提升途径
浅谈幼儿英语语音意识的培养
幼儿教师英语口语构成研究
幼儿英语课程改革的探究
英语文学论文题目参考
1、《红字》中海丝特白兰不理智的一面(The Irrational Side of Hester Prynne of The Scarlet Letter)
2、《董贝父子》中的矛盾冲突(The Conflict in Donbey and Son)
3、论文化不同 对联 想意义及翻译的影响(On Influence of Cultural Differences on Associative Meanings and Translation)
4、美国教育的衰弱(The Drop of American Education)
5、世纪欧洲移民对美国工业化的积极影响(The Positive Impacts of European Immigration on American Industrialization in theth Century)
6、朱丽叶之人物分析(Character Studies in Juliet)
7、主述理论在文学中的运用(The Application of the Thematic Theory in Literature)
8、语用学中的会话含义理论(Conversational Implicature Theory in Pragmatics)
9、英语语音简析及对提高初学者口语的指导(A Brief Analysis of English Phonetics as well as a Guide to Improve Learners’ Oral English)
10、比较两种对于哈姆雷特复仇的评论(Comparison on Two Kinds of Comments on Hamlet’s Revenge)
11、英语语言中的性别歧视 (Sexism in English Language)
12、英语的学与教 (English Learning and Teaching)
13、由美国年总统选举所想到的 (More than Presidential Election)
14、论腐朽世界中的纯洁品质——关于《雾都孤儿》的赏析 (The Purity in a Corrupt World—An Analysis of Oliver Twister)
15、论理智与情感之关系——对《理智与情感》的人物分析
16、入世对中国银行业的挑战 (Challenges on Chinese Banking Sector after Entering the WTO)
17、西进运动对美国的影响 (The Influences of Westward Movement on America)
18、史蒂芬?克拉申的听读假设和二语习得 (Stephen Krashen’s Input Hypothesis and Second Language Acquisition)
19、艾?巴?辛格——犹太文化的守护者 (LBSinger—the Patron of Jewish Civilization)
20、二十世纪年代美国妇女运动的派别 (The Politics of American Women’s Movement in the’s)
21、论《红字》的模糊性 (Ambiguity in The Scarlet Letter)
22、《嘉莉姐妹》中无心的欲望 (The Limitless Desires in Sister Carrie)
23、英语广告语言修辞特点 (Rhetorical Features in Advertising English)
24、《儿子与情人》中的恋母情结 (Pau Morel’s Oedipus Complex in Sons and Lovers)
25、造成苔丝悲剧命运的原因 (The Reasons for Tess’s Tragic Fate)
26、论恐怖主义的根源 (On the Root of Terrorism)
27、中印关系新纪元 (: A New Era of Sino-India Relationship)
28、希兹克利夫的复仇 (The Revenge of Heathcliff)
29、弗洛伊德理论对美国现代文学的影响 (The Influence of Freudian Theory on Modern American Literature)
30、论萨姆一家人之“变形” (The Etamoephosis of the Samsas)
31、亚伯拉罕林肯的民主思想初探 (A Preliminary Research on Abraham Lincoln’s Thought of Democracy)
32、评析《傲慢与偏见》的男主人公达西 (MrDarcy in Pride and Prejudice)
33、《简爱》的圣经 情书 (The Relationship Between Jane Eyre and the Bible)
34、库区三角浮出水面——万州、开县、云阳经济宏图 (The Triangle of Reservoir Region Is Surfacing—Wanzhou, Kaixian and Yunyang Open a Great Diagram of Economy)
35、会话中的合作原则和礼貌原则 (Cooperative Principle and Politeness Principle in Conversation)
36、浅析海明威笔下圣地亚哥与 其它 主人公之异同 (Analysis of the Similarities and Differences Between Santiago and Other Heroes by Hemingway)
37、对嘉尔曼的偏见 (The Prejudice Against Carmen)
38、简爱——关于简爱的性格评论 (Jane Eyre—A Review of Jane Eyre’s Character in Jane Eyre)
39、《呼啸山庄》中凯瑟琳和希斯克力夫之间的苦痛恋情 (The Suffering Love Between Catherine and Heathcliff in Wuthering Heights)
40、简评妥协——研究《傲慢与偏见》(A Brief Comment on the Compromise—A Study of Pride and Prejudice)
41、《傲慢与偏见》中的婚姻面面观 (Analysis of the Marriages in Pride and Prejudice)
42、试论简奥斯汀生活对其小说的影响 (On the Impact of Jane Austen’s Life on Her Novels)
43、“真实的诺言”与 传统文化 的碰撞——简析“真人秀”的实质和本地化过程 (When True Lies Challenge Tradition—An Analysis of the Reality and Localization of Reality TV)
44、从台湾问题看中美关系 (The Sino-US Relation—The Taiwan Issue)
45、《傲慢与偏见》的生命力 (The Great Vitality of Pride and Prejudice)
46、平凡中的不平凡——《傲慢与偏见》(Significance in Commonplace—Pride and Prejudice)
47、萨皮尔沃夫理论 (Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis)
48、论格里高尔的悲剧 (An Analysis of Gregor’s Tragedy)
49、对大学生心理健康问题予更多关注 (More Attention to the Psychological Health of College Students)
50、文体学: 语言学习的科学 (Stylistics: A Scientific Approach)
2021英语专业的硕士论文题目相关 文章 ：
★ 2021毕业论文题目怎么定
★ 优秀论文题目大全2021
★ 英语语言学毕业论文题目参考选题大全
★ 英语专业文化类方面毕业论文题目选题
★ 英语语言学毕业论文题目参考选题大全
★ 大学生论文题目参考2021
★ 英语专业文化类方面毕业论文题目选题
★ 2021教育学专业毕业论文题目
★ 大学生论文题目大全2021
★ 优秀论文题目2021
关于英语专业的论文题目，学术堂整理了十五个好写的，供大家参考：1．《红字》中海丝特 白兰不理智的一面（The Irrational Side of Hester Prynne of The Scarlet Letter）2. 《董贝父子》中的矛盾冲突（The Conflict in Donbey and Son）3. 论文化不同对联想意义及翻译的影响（On Influence of Cultural Differences on Associative Meanings and Translation）4. 美国教育的衰弱（The Drop of American Education）5. 19世纪欧洲移民对美国工业化的积极影响（The Positive Impacts of European Immigration on American Industrialization in the 19th Century。6. 朱丽叶之人物分析（Character Studies in Juliet）7. 主述理论在文学中的运用（The Application of the Thematic Theory in Literature）8. 语用学中的会话含义理论（Conversational Implicature Theory in Pragmatics）9. 英语语音简析及对提高初学者口语的指导（A Brief Analysis of English Phonetics as well as a Guide to Improve Learners’ Oral English）10. 比较两种对于哈姆雷特复仇的评论（Comparison on Two Kinds of Comments on Hamlet’s Revenge）11. 英语语言中的性别歧视 (Sexism in English Language)12. 英语的学与教 (English Learning and Teaching)13. 由美国2004年总统选举所想到的 (More than 2004 Presidential Election)14. 论腐朽世界中的纯洁品质——关于《雾都孤儿》的赏析 (The Purity in a Corrupt World—An Analysis of Oliver Twister)15. 论理智与情感之关系——对《理智与情感》的人物分析
Oliver Twist is born in a workhouse in a provincial town. His mother has been found very sick in the street, and she gives birth to Oliver just before she dies. Oliver is raised un
Oliver Twist Oliver Twist, one of the most famous works of Charles Dickens’, is a novel reflecting the tragic fact of the life in Britain in 18th century. The author who himself was born in a poor family wrote this novel in his twenties with a view to reveal the ugly masks of those cruel criminals and to expose the horror and violence hidden underneath the narrow and dirty streets in London. The hero of this novel was Oliver Twist, an orphan, who was thrown into a world full of poverty and crime. He suffered enormous pain, such as hunger, thirst, beating and abuse. While reading the tragic experiences of the little Oliver, I was shocked by his sufferings. I felt for the poor boy, but at the same time I detested the evil Fagin and the brutal Bill. To my relief, as was written in all the best stories, the goodness eventually conquered devil and Oliver lived a happy life in the end. One of the plots that attracted me most is that after the theft, little Oliver was allowed to recover in the kind care of Mrs. Maylie and Rose and began a new life. He went for walks with them, or Rose read to him, and he worked hard at his lessons. He felt as if he had left behind forever the world of crime and hardship and poverty. How can such a little boy who had already suffered oppressive affliction remain pure in body and mind? The reason is the nature of goodness. I think it is the most important information implied in the novel by Dickens-he believed that goodness could conquer every difficulty. Although I don’t think goodness is omnipotent, yet I do believe that those who are kind-hearted live more happily than those who are evil-minded. For me, the nature of goodness is one of the most necessary character for a person. Goodness is to humans what water is to fish. He who is without goodness is an utterly worthless person. On the contrary, as the famous saying goes, ‘The fragrance always stays in the hand that gives the rose’, he who is with goodness undoubtedly is a happy and useful person. People receiving his help are grateful to him and he also gets gratified from what he has done, and thus he can do good to both the people he has helped and himself. To my disappointment, nowadays some people seem to doubt the existence of the goodness in humanity. They look down on people’s honesty and kindness, thinking it foolish of people to be warm-hearted. As a result, they show no sympathy to those who are in trouble and seldom offer to help others. On the other hand, they attach importance to money and benefit. In their opinion, money is the only real object while emotions and morality are nihility. If they cannot get profit from showing their ‘kindness’, they draw back when others are faced with trouble and even hit a man when he is down. They are one of the sorts that I really detest. Francis Bacon said in his essay, ‘Goodness, of all virtues and dignities of the mind, is the greatest, being the character of the Deity, and without it, man is a busy, mischievous, wretched thing, no better than a kind of vermin.’ That is to say a person without goodness is destined to lose everything. Therefore, I, a kind person, want to tell those ‘vermin-to-be’ to learn from the kind Oliver and regain the nature of goodness. 雾都孤儿 雾都孤儿》,其中最著名的作品的查尔斯•狄更斯的《反映,是一种新型的悲惨的现实,在18世纪的英国的生活。 作者自己出生在一个贫穷的家庭写这本书在他二十几岁时为了揭示丑陋的面具的残酷的罪犯,让恐怖和暴力隐藏在狭窄的,肮脏的街道在伦敦。 这本小说是的英雄,《雾都孤儿孤儿,谁被投进了的世界充满着贫穷和犯罪。他遭受巨大的痛苦,如饥饿、干渴、殴打和虐待。在阅读《悲惨的经历的小奥利弗,我感到震惊的是他的痛苦经历。我觉得为了可怜的男孩子,但同时我厌恶邪恶和残酷Fagin帐单。使我松了口气,写在所有最好的故事,最终征服了魔鬼,奥利佛善过上了幸福美满的生活结束。一个最吸引我的计谋是盗窃,小奥利弗被允许这种康复照顾夫人Maylie和玫瑰开始了一种新的生活。他去散步,与他们,或玫瑰念给他听,他努力学习功课。他感到他先前留下的世界永远犯罪和困难和贫穷。 怎能一个小男孩已经遭受苦难保持纯洁的压迫身体和心灵吗?原因是处于善性品德之中。我认为这是最重要的信息的小说中隐含Dickens-he相信善良能战胜一切困难。虽然我并不认为善良是无所不能的,我却相信,那些都是善良的过的更幸福的人比那些是愚昧无知。 对我来说,处于善性的品德是其中一个最必要的个性的一个人。善良是给人类就像鱼儿离不开水一样。谁是没有良善是一个完全无用的人。相反,正如著名的老话所说:“香味的手总是待在给玫瑰”一样。给你推荐一个网站，超棒！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！
Oliver TwistSearch all of Oliver Twist: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------FROM: Appreciations and Criticisms of the Works of Charles DickensBY: Gilbert Keith ChestertonIn considering Dickens, as we almost always must consider him, as a man of rich originality, we may possibly miss the forces from which he drew even his original energy. It is not well for man to be alone. We, in the modern world, are ready enough to admit that when it is applied to some problem of monasticism or of an ecstatic life. But we will not admit that our modern artistic claim to absolute originality is really a claim to absolute unsociability; a claim to absolute loneliness. The anarchist is at least as solitary as the ascetic. And the men of very vivid vigour in literature, the men such as Dickens, have generally displayed a large sociability towards the society of letters, always expressed in the happy pursuit of pre-existent themes, sometimes expressed, as in the case of Moli鑢e or Sterne, in downright plagiarism. For even theft is a confession of our dependence on society. In Dickens, however, this element of the original foundations on which he worked is quite especially difficult to determine. This is partly due to the fact that for the present reading public he is practically the only one of his long line that is read at all. He sums up Smollett and Goldsmith, but he also destroys them. This one giant, being closest to us, cuts off from our view even the giants that begat him. But much more is this difficulty due to the fact that Dickens mixed up with the old material, materials so subtly modern, so made of the French Revolution, that the whole is transformed. If we want the best example of this, the best example is Oliver Twist. Relatively to the other works of Dickens Oliver Twist is not of great value, but it is of great importance. Some parts of it are so crude and of so clumsy a melodrama, that one is almost tempted to say that Dickens would have been greater without it. But even if be had been greater without it he would still have been incomplete without it. With the exception of some gorgeous passages, both of humour and horror, the interest of the book lies not so much in its revelation of Dickens's literary genius as in its revelation of those moral, personal, and political instincts which were the make-up of his character and the permanent support of that literary genius. It is by far the most depressing of all his books; it is in some ways the most irritating; yet its ugliness gives the last touch of honesty to all that spontaneous and splendid output. Without this one discordant note all his merriment might have seemed like levity. Dickens had just appeared upon the stage and set the whole world laughing with his first great story Pickwick. Oliver Twist was his encore. It was the second opportunity given to him by those who ha rolled about with laughter over Tupman and Jingle, Weller and Dowler. Under such circumstances a stagey reciter will sometimes take care to give a pathetic piece after his humorous one; and with all his many moral merits, there was much that was stagey about Dickens. But this explanation alone is altogether inadequate and unworthy. There was in Dickens this other kind of energy, horrible, uncanny, barbaric, capable in another age of coarseness, greedy for the emblems of established ugliness, the coffin, the gibbet, the bones, the bloody knife. Dickens liked these things and he was all the more of a man for liking them; especially he was all the more of a boy. We can all recall with pleasure the fact that Miss Petowker (afterwards Mrs. Lillyvick) was in the habit of reciting a poem called "The Blood Drinker's Burial." I cannot express my regret that the words of this poem are not given; for Dickens would have been quite as capable of writing "The Blood Drinker's Burial" as Miss Petowker was of reciting it. This strain existed in Dickens alongside of his happy laughter; both were allied to the same robust romance. Here as elsewhere Dickens is close to all the permanent human things. He is close to religion, which has never allowed the thousand devils on its churches to stop the dancing of its bells. He is allied to the people, to the real poor, who love nothing so much as to take a cheerful glass and to talk about funerals. The extremes of his gloom and gaiety are the mark of religion and democracy; they mark him off from the moderate happiness of philosophers, and from that stoicism which is the virtue and the creed of aristocrats. There is nothing odd in the fact that the same man who conceived the humane hospitalities of Pickwick should also have imagined the inhuman laughter of Fagin's den. They are both genuine and they are both exaggerated. And the whole human tradition has tied up together in a strange knot these strands of festivity and fear. It is over the cups of Christmas Eve that men have always competed in telling ghost stories. This first element was present in Dickens, and it is very powerfully present in Oliver Twist. It had not been present with sufficient consistency or continuity in Pickwick to make it remain on the reader's memory at all, for the tale of "Gabriel Grubb" is grotesque rather than horrible, and the two gloomy stories of the "Madman" and the "Queer Client" are so utterly irrelevant to the tale, that even if the reader remember them he probably does not remember that they occur in Pickwick. Critics have complained of Shakespeare and others for putting comic episodes into a tragedy. It required a man with the courage and coarseness of Dickens actually to put tragic episodes into a farce. But they are not caught up into the story at all. In Oliver Twist, however, the thing broke out with an almost brutal inspiration, and those who had fallen in love with Dickens for his generous buffoonery may very likely have been startled at receiving such very different fare at the next helping. When you have bought a man's book because you like his writing about Mr. Wardle's punch-bowl and Mr. Winkle's skates, it may very well be surprising to open it and read about the sickening thuds that beat out the life of Nancy, or that mysterious villain whose face was blasted with disease. As a nightmare, the work is really admirable. Characters which are not very clearly conceived as regards their own psychology are yet, at certain moments, managed so as to shake to its foundations our own psychology. Bill Sikes is not exactly a real man, but for all that he is a real murderer. Nancy is not really impressive as a living woman; but (as the phrase goes) she makes a lovely corpse. Something quite childish and eternal in us, something which is shocked with the mere simplicity of death, quivers when we read of those repeated blows or see Sikes cursing the tell-tale cur who will follow his bloody foot-prints. And this strange, sublime, vulgar melodrama, which is melodrama and yet is painfully real, reaches its hideous height in that fine scene of the death of Sikes, the besieged house, the boy screaming within, the crowd screaming without, the murderer turned almost a maniac and dragging his victim uselessly up and down the room, the escape over the roof, the rope swiftly running taut, and death sudden, startling and symbolic; a man hanged. There is in this and similar scenes something of the quality of Hogarth and many other English moralists of the early eighteenth century. It is not easy to define this Hogarthian quality in words, beyond saying that it is a sort of alphabetical realism, like the cruel candour of children. But it has about it these two special principles which separate it from all that we call realism in our time. First, that with us a moral story means a story about moral people; with them a moral story meant more often a story about immoral people. Second, that with us realism is always associated with some subtle view of morals; with them realism was always associated with some simple view of morals. The end of Bill Sikes exactly in the way that the law would have killed him -- this is a Hogarthian incident; it carries on that tradition of startling and shocking platitude. All this element in the book was a sincere thing in the author, but none the less it came from old soils, from the graveyard and the gallows, and the lane where the ghost walked. Dickens was always attracted to such things, and (as Forster says with inimitable simplicity) "but for his strong sense might have fallen into the follies of spiritualism." As a matter of fact, like most of the men of strong sense in his tradition, Dickens was left with a half belief in spirits which became in practice a belief in bad spirits. The great disadvantage of those who have too much strong sense to believe in supernaturalism is that they keep last the low and little forms of the supernatural, such as omens, curses, spectres, and retributions, but find a high and happy supernaturalism quite incredible. Thus the Puritans denied the sacraments, but went on burning witches. This shadow does rest, to some extent, upon the rational English writers like Dickens; supernaturalism was dying, but its ugliest roots died last. Dickens would have found it easier to believe in a ghost than in a vision of the Virgin with angels. There, for good or evil, however, was the root of the old diablerie in Dickens, and there it is in Oliver Twist. But this was only the first of the new Dickens elements, which must have surprised those Dickensians who eagerly bought his second book. The second of the new Dickens elements is equally indisputable and separate. It swelled afterwards to enormous proportions in Dickens's work; but it really has its rise here. Again, as in the case of the element of diablerie, it would be possible to make technical exceptions in favour of Pickwick. Just as there were quite inappropriate scraps of the gruesome element in Pickwick, so there are quite inappropriate allusions to this other topic in Pickwick. But nobody by merely reading Pickwick would even remember this topic; no one by merely reading Pickwick would know what this topic is; this third great subject of Dickens; this second great subject of the Dickens of Oliver Twist. This subject is social oppression. It is surely fair to say that no one could have gathered from Pickwick how this question boiled in the blood of the author of Pickwick. There are, indeed, passages, particularly in connection with Mr. Pickwick in the debtor's prison, which prove to us, looking back on a whole public career, that Dickens had been from the beginning bitter and inquisitive about the problem of our civilisation. No one could have imagined at the time that this bitterness ran in an unbroken river under all the surges of that superb gaiety and exuberance. With Oliver Twist this sterner side of Dickens was suddenly revealed. For the very first pages of Oliver Twist are stern even when they are funny. They amuse, but they cannot be enjoyed, as can the passages about the follies of Mr. Snodgrass or the humiliations of Mr. Winkle. The difference between the old easy humour and this new harsh humour is a difference not of degree but of kind. Dickens makes game of Mr. Bumble because he wants to kill Mr. Bumble; he made game of Mr. Winkle because he wanted him to live for ever. Dickens has taken the sword in hand; against what is he declaring war? It is just here that the greatness of Dickens comes in; it is just here that the difference lies between the pedant and the poet. Dickens enters the social and political war, and the first stroke he deals is not only significant but even startling. Fully to see this we must appreciate the national situation. It was an age of reform, and even of radical reform; the world was full of radicals and reformers; but only too many of them took the line of attacking everything and anything that was opposed to some particular theory among the many political theories that possessed the end of the eighteenth century. Some had so much perfected the perfect theory of republicanism that they almost lay awake at night because Queen Victoria had a crown on her head. Others were so certain that mankind had hitherto been merely strangled in the bonds of the State that they saw truth only in the destruction of tariffs or of by-laws. The greater part of that generation held that clearness, economy, and a hard common-sense, would soon destroy the errors that had been erected by the superstitions and sentimentalities of the past. In pursuance of this idea many of the new men of the new century, quite confident that they were invigorating the new age, sought to destroy the old entimental clericalism, the old sentimental feudalism, the old-world belief in priests, the old-world belief in patrons, and among other things the old-world belief in beggars. They sought among other things to clear away the old visionary kindliness on the subject of vagrants. Hence those reformers enacted not only a new reform bill but also a new poor law. In creating many other modern things they created the modern workhouse, and when Dickens came out to fight it was the first thing that he broke with his battle-axe. This is where Dickens's social revolt is of more value than mere politics and avoids the vulgarity of the novel with a purpose. His revolt is not a revolt of the commercialist against the feudalist, of the Nonconformist against the Churchman, of the Free-trader against the Protectionist, of the Liberal against the Tory. If he were among us now his revolt would not be the revolt of the Socialist against the Individualist, or of the Anarchist against the Socialist. His revolt was simply and solely the eternal revolt; it was the revolt of the weak against the strong. He did not dislike this or that argument for oppression; he disliked oppression. He disliked a certain look on the face of a man when he looks down on another man. And that look on the face is, indeed, the only thing in the world that we have really to fight between here and the fires of Hell. That which pedants of that time and this time would have called the sentimentalism of Dickens was really simply the detached sanity of Dickens. He cared nothing for the fugitive explanations of the Constitutional Conservatives; he cared nothing for the fugitive explanations of the Manchester School. He would have cared quite as little for the fugitive explanations of the Fabian Society or of the modern scientific Socialist. He saw that under many forms there was one fact, the tyranny of man over man; and he struck at it when he saw it, whether it was old or new. When he found that footmen and rustics were too much afraid of Sir Leicester Dedlock, he attacked Sir Leicester Dedlock; he did not care whether Sir Leicester Dedlock said he was attacking England or whether Mr. Rouncewell, the Ironmaster, said he was attacking an effete oligarchy. In that case he pleased Mr. Rouncewell, the Ironmaster, and displeased Sir Leicester Dedlock, the Aristocrat. But when he found that Mr. Rouncewell's workmen were much too frightened of Mr. Rouncewell, then he displeased Mr. Rouncewell in turn; he displeased Mr. Rouncewell very much by calling him Mr. Bounderby. When he imagined himself to be fighting old laws he gave a sort of vague and general approval to new laws. But when he came to the new laws they had a bad time. When Dickens found that after a hundred economic arguments and granting a hundred economic considerations, the fact remained that paupers in modern workhouses were much too afraid of the beadle, just as vassals in ancient castles were much too afraid of the Dedlocks, then he struck suddenly and at once. This is what makes the opening chapters of Oliver Twist so curious and important. The very fact of Dickens's distance from, and independence of, the elaborate financial arguments of his time, makes more definite and dazzling his sudden assertion that he sees the old human tyranny in front of him as plain as the sun at noon-day. Dickens attacks the modern workhouse with a sort of inspired simplicity as a boy in a fairy tale who had wandered about, sword in hand, looking for ogres and who had found an indisputable ogre. All the other people of his time are attacking things because they are bad economics or because they are bad politics, or because they are bad science; he alone is attacking things because they are bad. All the others are Radicals with a large R; he alone is radical with a small one. He encounters evil with that beautiful surprise which, as it is the beginning of all real pleasure, is also the beginning of all righteous indignation. He enters the workhouse just as Oliver Twist enters it, as a little child. This is the real power and pathos of that celebrated passage in the book which has passed into a proverb; but which has not lost its terrible humour even in being hackneyed. I mean, of course, the everlasting quotation about Oliver Twist asking for more. The real poignancy that there is in this idea is a very good study in that strong school of social criticism which Dickens represented. A modern realist describing the dreary workhouse would have made all the children utterly crushed, not daring to speak at all, not expecting anything, not hoping anything, past all possibility of affording even an ironical contrast or a protest of despair. A modern, in short, would have made all the boys in the workhouse pathetic by making them all pessimists. But Oliver Twist is not pathetic because he is a pessimist. Oliver Twist is pathetic because he is an optimist. The whole tragedy of that incident is in the fact that he does expect the universe to be kind to him, that he does believe that he is living in a just world. He comes before the Guardians as the ragged peasants of the French Revolution came before the Kings and Parliaments of Europe. That is to say, he comes, indeed, with gloomy experiences, but he comes with a happy philosophy. He knows that there are wrongs of man to be reviled; but he believes also that there are rights of man to be demanded. It has often been remarked as a singular fact that the French poor, who stand in historic tradition as typical of all the desperate men who have dragged down tyranny, were, as a matter of fact, by no means worse off than the poor of many other European countries before the Revolution. The truth is that the French were tragic because they were better off. The others had known the sorrowful experiences; but they alone had known the splendid expectation and the original claims. It was just here that Dickens was so true a child of them and of that happy theory so bitterly applied. They were the one oppressed people that simply asked for justice; they were the one Parish Boy who innocently asked for more.
Oliver Twist is born in a workhouse in a provincial town. His mother has been found very sick in the street, and she gives birth to Oliver just before she dies. Oliver is raised under the care of Mrs. Mann and the beadle Mr. Bumble in the workhouse. When it falls to Oliver’s lot to ask for more food on behalf of all the starving children in the workhouse, he is trashed, and then apprenticed to an undertaker, Mr. Sowerberry. Another apprentice of Mr. Sowerberry’s, Noah Claypole insults Oliver’s dead mother and the small and frail Oliver attacks him. However, Oliver is punished severely, and he runs away to London. Here he is picked up by Jack Dawkins or the Artful Dodger as he is called. The Artful Dodger is a member of the Jew Fagin’s gang of boys. Fagin has trained the boys to become pickpockets. The Artful Dodger takes Oliver to Fagin’s den in the London slums, and Oliver, who innocently does not understand that he is among criminals, becomes one of Fagin’s Oliver is sent out with The Artful Dodger and another boy on a pickpocket expedition Oliver is so shocked when he realizes what is going on that he and not the two other boys are caught. Fortunately, the victim of the thieves, the old benevolent gentleman, Mr. Brownlow rescues Oliver from arrest and brings him to his house, where the housekeeper, Mrs. Bedwin nurses him back to life after he had fallen sick, and for the first time in his life he is , with the help of the brutal murderer Bill Sikes and the prostitute Nancy Fagin kidnaps Oliver. Fagin is prompted to do this by the mysterious Mr. Monks. Oliver is taken along on a burglary expedition in the country. The thieves are discovered in the house of Mrs. Maylie and her adopted niece, Rose, and Oliver is shot and wounded. Sikes escapes. Rose and Mrs. Maylie nurse the wounded Oliver. When he tells them his story they believe him, and he settles with them. While living with Rose and Mrs. Maylie Oliver one day sees Fagin and Monks looking at him in through a window. Nancy discovers that Monks is plotting against Oliver for some reason, bribing Fagin to corrupt his innocence. Nancy also learns that there is some kind of connection between Rose and Oliver; but after having told Rose’s adviser and friend Dr. Losberne about it on the steps of London Bridge, she is discovered by Noah Claypole, who in the meantime has become a member of Fagin’s gang, and Sykes murders her. On his frantic flight away from the crime Sykes accidentally and dramatically hangs himself. Fagin and the rest of the gang are arrested. Fagin is executed after Oliver has visited him in the condemned cell in Newgate Prison. The Artful Dodger is transported after a court scene in which he eloquently defends himself and his ’ plot against Oliver is disclosed by Mr. Brownlow. Monks is Oliver’s half-brother seeking all of the inheritance for himself. Oliver’s father’s will states that he will leave money to Oliver on the condition that his reputation is clean. Oliver’s dead mother and Rose were sisters. Monks receives his share of the inheritance and goes away to America. He dies in prison there, and Oliver is adopted by Mr. Brownlow.