会议论文是需要进行查重操作的，但是是否需要全篇查重的话，还是根据自己所在机构所规定的要求为准，如果自己选择论文查重网站对会议论文检测话，那便根据自己论文的实际情况以及所挑选的论文查重网站系统要求为准。一篇完整的会议论文主要是由目录、摘要、论文关键词、引言、论文正文、研究成果、致谢、参考文献和附录等部分构成的，一般主要查重的是会议论文的摘要、关键词、论文正文、致谢和附录等文字性的内容。会议论文是需要公开发表的，而期刊都是有论文查重率规定的，一般普通(省级或国家级)期刊的查重率标准是要求在30%以内，而核心期刊的查重率要求通常书规定不得超过10%。
如果没有要求你附带查重报告，就没问题。一般会议论文要求不算特别高，重复率20%以内就可以。
会议论文一般指的的是公共场合发表的论文。一般来说，会议论文集将在正式的学术交流会议上发表，因此发表的论文一般将作为职称评价和其他评价内容。那么，会议论文是否会被摘录，也就是说，会议论文会不会进行摘要查重？paperfree小编给大家讲解。 一、会议论文会不会对内容摘要查重？ 当然，会议论文的摘要会被复制。完整的论文都包括摘要、目录、正文、参考文献和附录，致谢等。摘要是对全文的高度进行总结，可以让读者在阅读教学论文研究之前有一个发展大致的了解。只检查所有的纸张，结果是最准确的，不用担心一些不需要检查的部分会影响论文的查重率，因为目前的检查系统会自动识别不需要检查的地方。 二、会议论文的查重率是多少？ 由于会议论文需要公开发表，论文发表的期刊类型与复检率密切相关。一般来说，普通期刊论文查重率标准不高于20-30%，核心期刊论文查重率不高于5%-10%。
会议论文一般都是要查重的。不过不一定会查全篇，这个要看机构的规定。查重系统使用知网、PaperPP都可以。
还没有，只是可能
ei论文不必须参会。ei论文分为会议论文和期刊论文，期刊论文不需要参会。而会议论文有时候会要求录用稿件需要有至少一个作者参加会议并缴纳参会费用。但是有很多也同样是不需要作者参会的。不参会的论文同样会被检索。所以ei论文不是必须参会的。
先发到会议，再发到期刊。
会议论文可以再投期刊。
论文，指科学或社会研究工作者在学术书籍或学术期刊上刊登，并用来进行科学研究的，从而描述或呈现自己研究成果、对前任工作总结的回顾及做出评价的文章，这类文章特别强调原创性。论文类别有学年论文、毕业论文、学位论文、科技论文、成果论文等。
会议的主要目的是交流。会议论文肯定是可以投期刊的，很大部分会议论文都是可以在中国知网和万方数据检索到。会议的主要目的是交流，所以投稿质量高的论文在交流和讨论后能够更好得修订。已投期刊的论文如已经被录用及发表后，则不能再投稿会议中了。
从广义上来讲，期刊的分类，可以分为非正式期刊和正式期刊两种。非正式期刊是指通过行政部门审核领取“内部报刊准印证”作为行业内部交流的期刊(一般只限行业内交流不公开发行)，但也是合法期刊的一种，一般正式期刊都经历过非正式期刊过程。
正式期刊是由国家新闻出版署与国家科委在商定的数额内审批，并编入“国内统一刊号”，办刊申请比较严格，要有一定的办刊实力，正式期刊有独立的办刊方针。
每个领域的标准不一样．在我的领域是可以的．一个简单的方法，就是去找一找你要投的期刊的论文．如果在某此论文第一页的左下角写着"part of the material has been used in ** conference"或"this paper has been presented in **** conference"就说明这个期刊可以发表会议论文．但在投稿的时候要特别注明，告之编辑．另外，会议和期刊的版权要属于同一个组织，否则，你还要向会议要版权转让声明．
1投码周期上:会议论义发表的周期比期一论又知，大比，投祸会议论又后焦心等得的时间会少十期刊论文。
2.内容上:会议论文通常介绍研究工作的初步发现或研究过程中出现的创新思想，是个未完成版，页数没有期刊论文那么多:而期刊论文发出来的是你这个阶段已经完成了的作品，不只是一个想法的展现和探讨，需要有比会议论文更全面、更深入的研究。
3.审阅形式上:会议文注重交流，不走peer review的过程:而期刊论文会走peer review，在这一par t，你的论文很有可能被否掉，被期刊接受的率平均在40%-60%。
虽然大家普遍认为，期刊论文比会议论文更能展现学术水平，但随着近年来学术界对于会议论文的重重视，加之会议论文发表周期短，更能体现观点的创新性--会议论文，也成为了学术工作者新的追求。
通常，当文章作为会议摘要提交时，并不需要完整的信息。科研人员通常仅在会议上展示初步的发现和分析，并保留其他更具体和重要的数据以便在学术期刊上发表。同样，在会议上进行演讲时，报告内容仅揭示了研究的关键发现。因此，科研人员可以将先前发布的会议论文添加至少30-40％的附加数据转化为完整的期刊论文。如果您的文章在会议之前被一家期刊发表或接受，您可以在会议上展示您发表的作品。然而在这种情况下，作为一种道德惯例，您必须引用已发表的文章，并提供一个链接或DOI（如果可以在线访问）。如果您想从会议中撤回摘要，最好通知会议组织者有关发表的情况。如果会议组织者提到他们不想把摘要作为会议记录的一部分，那么您也只有撤回摘要，否则您可以保留摘要并适当地引用。
在学术会议发表的论文能否在期刊上发表得看两样东西：第一，在学术会议发表的论文是否收录进举办单位编撰的会议论文集（正式出版社 出版发行的论文集也是发表的一种形式）；比如鄙人的“农民产权与农民人权”，在广州的第三届三农论坛上做过大会发言后并收录进正式出版社出版的会议论文集（即使这个出版社是香港的出版社，也是如此），就不能再投稿给杂志社了；第二，如果没有正式出版社出版的论文集，那么，论文可以投稿到杂志社，但必须写清楚该文的这段学术会议的“发表”“经历”，杂志社将会根据自己的情况决定是否采用，一般杂志社欢迎这样的文章，但也有的杂志社拒绝这样的稿件，不能一概而论。
在回复审稿人意见的时候，诚恳的态度非常关键，最好可以附上一个新的cover letter。当你不同意审稿人的意见时，你可以说“Thank you for your comments. We understand your concern about XXX. However, because YYY. To make this clearer we have changed ZZZ on page/line XX.”首先站在审稿人的角度上去肯定审稿人的意见，然后客观的指出文章的原意，并且做出具体解释。从另一个角度来看，既然审稿人都理解错了，其他的读者更有可能，说明文章的表达还是需要改进的。建议对相关的句子重写，尽量表述得更加清晰。
在这里我们也分享一些常见的回复审稿人模板供题主参考：
当你同意审稿人意见时，可以这样写：
Thank you for your comments. We agree with your suggestion to XXX, because YYY. We have made changes to ZZZ on page/line XX as you suggested.
回复重点要包括以下几项：
你知道怎么回复审稿意见么
返修信（response letter）大抵都是长这样。
今天我们总结了开篇那些常见的套话。
1. Thank you very much for reviewing ourmanuscript. We also greatly appreciate the reviewers for their complimentarycomments and suggestions. We have carried out the experiments that thereviewers suggested（没补实验就把这个去掉） and revised the manuscript accordingly. Please find attached apoint-by-point response to reviewer’s concerns. We hope that you find ourresponses satisfactory and that the manuscript is now acceptable forpublication.
2. We would like to thank the reviewer forcareful and thorough reading of this manuscript and for the thoughtful commentsand constructive suggestions, which help to improve the quality of this response follows (the reviewer’s comments are in italics). (审稿意见斜体)
3. Thank you for your letter andconstructive comments concerning our manuscript entitled “XXXX文章题目”. We have studied your commentscarefully and made major correction which we hope meet with your approval. Weanswer your questions or comments in details in the following texts. Detailedanswer to review:
4. It is with excitement that I resubmit toyou a revised version of manuscript “文章题目”for the “杂志名“. Thank you for giving me the opportunity to revise andresubmit this manuscript. In keeping with my last communication with you, I amresubmitting this revision before the agreed upon deadline, March 16, 2012. Iappreciate the time and detail provided by each reviewer and by you and haveincorporated the suggested changes into the manuscript to the best of myability. The manuscript has certainly benefited from these insightful revisionsuggestions. I look forward to working with you and the reviewers to move thismanuscript closer to publication in the 杂志名. （这段拍马屁的写得真长哇，憋不出来的可以参考下）
5. Thank you for reading our manuscript andreviewing it, which will help us improve it to a better scientific level. Werevised our manuscript, and quite a lot of changes have taken place. So, wehave sent the revised manuscript, and a version containing all the changes tobe visible. At the following, the points mentioned by the reviewers will bediscussed: (其实我比较喜欢这种简单直白的开场）
6. Sincerest thanks for your response andreviewers comments on our manuscript. We sincerely apologise for the great timeit has taken us to respond to these comments (due to force majeaure with firstauthor), and hope that a revised version of the manuscript will still beconsidered by 杂志名. We havemodified the paper in response to the extensive and insightful reviewercomments. We have added additional explanations for non-haematologists andadditional table (Table 1) to fully address the reviewer’s comments. Furthermore we haverewritten sections of the manuscript and we hope that this comply with thereferee’s remarks. We will respond to the comments point counter point. （这段挺长的，还就返修时间过长进行了致歉）
you for your email dated xxxxxx enclosing the reviewers’ comments. We have carefully reviewed the comments and have revised the manuscript accordingly. Our responses are given in a point-by-point manner below. Changes to the manuscript are shown in underline/red/bold.
8.（需要润色）We tried our best to improve the manuscript and made some changes in the manuscript. These changes will not influence the content and framework of the paper. And here we did not list the changes but marked in red in revised paper. We appreciate for Editors/Reviewers’ warm work earnestly, and hope that the correction will meet with approval.
或者Thanks for your suggestion. We feel sorry for our poor writings, however, we do invite a friend of us who is a native English speaker from USA help polish our article. And we hope the revised manuscript could be acceptable for you.
或者 Thanks for your suggestion. We have tried our best to polish the language in the revised manuscript.
feel sorry for our carelessness. In our resubmitted manuscript, the typo is revised. Thanks for your correction.
或者We have carefully checked the manuscript and corrected the errors accordingly.
10.（返修让加文献）We sincerely appreciate the valuable comments. We have checked the literatures carefully and added more references on ___ and___ into the INTRODUCTION part in the revised manuscript.
参考文献1
参考文献2
have investigated the recyclable property for ___ by using ___ that have the best activity. Figure 1 reveals only slight decrease in the ___ after the three-run test, indicating very good stability of ___ in photocatalytic manuscript has been revised accordingly to clarify the above concerns.
或者We agree that more study would be useful to understand details of interaction and enhancement. At this point we do not have the necessary tool-set to study the ___. We hope, in the future, to employ ___ techniques to determine ___. This study is beyond the scope of this report which focuses on answering critical questions regarding the ___. We note also that since submission of our manuscript there has been apublication by Alex Bell and Martin Head-Gordon at Berkeley showing that Fe on Au2O3 has enhanced OER activity with DFT calculations (Ref. 79). We have added this citation and reference to the manuscript.
there are any other modifications we could make, we would like very much to modify them and we really appreciate your help. Thank you very much for your help.
for your nice suggestions. We have formatted all the references.
is with excitement that I resubmit to you a revised version of manuscript （稿号） for the 杂志名. Thank you for giving me the opportunity to revise and resubmit this manuscript. In keeping with my last communication with you, I am resubmitting this revision before the agreed upondeadline. I appreciate the time and detail provided by each reviewer and by you and have incorporated the suggested changes into the manuscript to the best of my ability. The manuscript has certainly benefited from these insightful revision suggestions. I look forward to working with you and the reviewers to move this manuscript closer to publication in the杂志名. （返修有拖延时用）
have responded specifically to each suggestion below, beginning with your own. To make the changes easier to identify where necessary, I have numbered them.
you again for your positive comments on our manuscript. 杂志名 is an influential journal which aims to improve ourunderstanding of cancer prevention/other. From all the papers published in your journal, readers have been learning a lot. Hopefully, we could have our article been considered of publication in your journal. Should there been any other corrections we could make, please feel free to contact us.
you for your kind comments on ourmanuscript entitled “文章名”. We have carefully revised the manuscript according to the reviewer’s comments. Based on the suggestions, we have made an extensive modification on the revised manuscript. Detailed revision was shown as follows. The changes to our manuscript within the document were aslo highlighted by using red colored text.
feel great thanks for your professional review work onour article. As you are concerned, there are several problems that need to beaddressed. According to your nice suggestions, we have made extensivecorrections to our previous draft, the detailed corrections are listed below.
to the reviewer’s comments, we have revised the manuscript extensively. If there are any other modifications we could make, we would like very much to modify them and we really appreciate your help. We hope that our manuscript could be considered for publication in your journal. Thank you very much for your help.
behalf of all the contributing authors, I would like to express our sincere appreciations of your letter and reviewers’ constructive comments concerning our article entitled “XXX文章” (Manuscript No.:XXXX). These comments are all valuable and helpful for improving our article. According to the associate editor and reviewers’ comments,we have made extensive modifications to our manuscript and supplemented extra data to make our results convincing. In this revised version, changes to ourmanuscript were all highlighted within the document by using red colored text. Point-by-pointresponses to the nice associate editor and two nice reviewers are listed below this letter.
would like to thank you first for all the positive comments of ourmanuscript (No.: XXXX) entitled “XXXXX”. We really appreciate your help and patience. We also think highly of the comment sof both reviewers who kindly provide professional suggestions on our have seriously thought about them and provided our response to reviewers. Forthe detailed response, please see below.
to the associate editor and reviewers’ comments, we have made extensive modifications to our manuscript and supplemented extra data to make our results convincing.（根据审稿意见，我们对我们的手稿进行了大量修改，并补充了额外的数据，以使我们的结果令人信服。）
this revised version, changes to our manuscript were all highlighted within thedocument by using red colored text.（在这个修订版本中，我们的手稿的更改都通过使用红色文本在文档中突出显示。）
you for yournice comments on our article. According to your suggestions, we havesupplemented several data here and corrected several mistakes in our previousdraft. Based on your comments, we also attached a point-by-point letter to youand the other two reviewers. We have made extensive revisions to our previous draft. The detailed point-by-point responses are listed below. （感谢您对我们文章的评论，根据您的建议，我们在这里补充了几个数据并纠正了我们之前的一些错误。根据您的意见，我们还向您和其他两位审稿人的评审意见一一回复， 我们对以前的草案进行了大量修改，下面列出了详细的逐点响应。）
for yourhelp. We feel really sorry for our carelessness. （谢谢你的帮助，我们对粗心大意感到非常抱歉。）
you for your reminding. You and theother two reviewers’ comments are all of great importance to our article. Allof these comments have contributed a lot to improve the quality of our this revision, we have written a point-by-point response letter to you asyou can see above. Meanwhile, we also wrote a point-by-point response letter tothe other two nice reviewers to acknowledge their helps and denote where we made revisions.（谢谢您的提醒， 您和其他审稿人的评论对我们的文章都非常重要。所有这些评论都为提高我们文章的质量做出了很多贡献。在这次修订之后，我们已经为您写了一封逐点回复信，您可以在上面看到。与此同时，我们还向其他两位审稿人写了一份回复信，以表达他们的帮助，并标识了我们在哪些地方进行了修订。）
feel greatthanks for your professional review work on our article. As you are concerned,there are several problems that need to be addressed. According to your nicesuggestions, we have made extensive corrections to our previous draft. We haveadded necessary data to supplement our results and edited our articleextensively. The detailed corrections are listed below. （我们对您的专业评审工作感到非常感谢。如您所知，有几个问题需要解决。根据您的建议，我们对之前的草案进行了大量更正。我们添加了必要的数据来补充我们的结果，并对我们的文章进行了全面的编辑。详细的更正如下。）
feel sorry that we did not provide enough information about XXXX.（非常抱歉我们没有提供足够的信息…..）
或it is really agiant mistake to the whole quality of our article. We feel sorry for our carelessness. We have corrected it and we also feel great thanks for your pointour. （这确实影响了本文的整体质量，我们对于自己的失误非常抱歉，但我们已经纠正了它，我们也非常感谢您的观点。）
for yoursuggestions. We feel sorry for our poor writings, however, we do invite afriend of us who is a native English speaker from USA help polish our article. Dueto our friend’s help, the article was edited extensively. And we hope therevised manuscript could be acceptable for you. （谢谢你的建议，我们为我们糟糕的作品感到遗憾，但是，我们邀请了来自美国的母语为英语的人帮助我们修改我们的文章。在朋友的帮助下文章被广泛编辑。我们希望手稿可以为您接受。）
for your careful checks. We aresorry for our carelessness. Based on your comments, we have made thecorrections to make the unit harmonized within the whole manuscript. （谢谢您的仔细检查。我们因粗心大意而烦恼。根据您的意见，我们进行了修正，使整个手稿内的单位协调一致。）
31. your suggestion really means a lot to us. Yes,it would be more understandable if we XXX. （您的建议对我们来说真的意味着很多。是的，如果我们XXX，这将更容易理解。）
to your suggestion, we havecorrected the “XXX” into “XXX”. （根据您的建议，我们将“XXX”修改为“XXX”。）
for your correction. It was indeeda serious grammatical error. And we have corrected it according to yoursuggestion. （谢谢您的纠正。这确实是一个严重的语法错误。我们已经根据你的建议纠正了它。）
34. thanks for yoursuggestions. We feel sorry for the improper wording. We have used “XXXX” as yousuggested. （谢谢您的建议。我们为不正确的措辞感到抱歉。我们已经使用了“XXXX”。）
to the reviewer’s comments, wehave revised the manuscript extensively. If there are any other modificationswe could make, we would like very much to modify them and we really appreciateyour help. “xxxx” is a journal of great popularity and prestige. We hope that ourmanuscript could be considered for publication in your journal. Thank you verymuch for your help. （根据审稿人的意见，我们已经广泛修改了手稿。如果我们可以做任何其他修改，我们非常希望修改它们，我们非常感谢您的帮助。“xxxx”是一本颇受欢迎和声望的杂志。我们希望我们的稿件可以考虑在您的期刊上发表。非常感谢您的帮助。）
附模板如下
链接：
提取码：5678
保持正确的语调，做出回应。
说明
（1）在回复审稿人意见的时候，除了写明修改内容外，还有一些话是必须要写的。这个其实也可以归纳为礼貌用语，大家一般也都会注意到。但是，有些时候还是容易“放飞自我”。实验室的一位师兄，花了很长的时间搞出来一个很有idea的文章。
（2）在回复审稿意见的时候，前面还是客客气气的回复，一读到关于自己核心idea的时候，立马心态就炸了，言辞什么的就有点过激了，最后当然直接被拒了。其实能作为审稿人，一般都是这个领域的专家或者有一定贡献的人，既然能指出你的问题，就说明还是存在不合理的地方，那就认认真真去修改就好了，千万不要太持才傲物。
（3）里很多人都会轻易犯错，尤其是刚发论文的时候，总觉得自己一定要根据审稿人的每一条意见都做出修改。我以自己的亲身经历发誓，这样做只会使你的论文变得支离破碎，可读性变差且言之无物（因为我自己曾改出过这么一篇不忍直视的论文，连我自己都读不下去）。论文上署的是你的名字，你得对所有内容负责。
（4）不妨想想审稿人的审稿动机和职责，他们才不会去想这些审稿意见对你的论文究竟有没有用。如果你不同意某些意见，或者觉得一些意见并不能提升你论文的价值的话，那就把握好回复的分寸，对这些意见予以一定反驳，并且反驳时尽量使用参考文献，使之有理有据。
挺难的，相当于顶级SCI期刊，你觉得呢~
会议期刊很多时候都是推荐到杂志作为增刊出版的，这样被拒的概率很小当然也要看文章的档次和会议的资料刊的chief-editor是大会主席跟会不会被拒没有什么必然的联系吧
看这个官网2022年的已经出版和检索，第二届估计明年出版没有问题，还是SPIE了
emnlp会议论文算顶刊。EMNLP是由国际语言学会（ACL）下属的SIGDAT小组主办的自然语言处理领域的顶级国际会议，在计算语言学类别下影响力排名全球第二。EMNLP每年举办一次，去年则与IJCNLP联合，在香港举办，今年由于疫情转为线性举办。EMNLP2020录取结果出炉：接受论文754篇，接收为Findings论文520篇，被拒论文1840篇，总体接收率为24%。Findings中的论文将遵循与EMNLP 2020会议录中接受的论文相同的时间表。也就是说，它们有相同的DDL。这些论文与EMNLP会议接收的论文不同之处在于，Findings论文不会在会议上进行演讲（包括演讲和poster）。被Findings接收的论文不能提交给其他会议或期刊。