stse论文答辩

本科论文答辩不同于研究生的有点走过场的感觉，讲下当时的经历吧1.其实PPT什么的都无所谓，除非有特殊要求，你要真想折腾，自己带投影机都行，只要从进门到开始讲解别超过3分钟，否则评委们就等得不耐烦了。2.气氛什么的可以忽略，你当面前坐着几棵萝卜白菜就行，至于那些说什么一答辩就紧张的，纯粹是自己吓自己。3.着装嘛，不要穿奇装异服，男同学不要戴耳钉，也别乱染发，有些老教授们就看不惯那个；女同学嘛，着装大方得体即可，首饰可以带，但是不要戴太艳丽的，整体感觉要端庄一些，Mini，大耳环，浓妆之类的只能给自己带来不必要麻烦。4.流程嘛，其实很简单：一排桌子前坐着几个答辩评委，叫到你以后，你先把论文交给他们，然后在讲台上把你的图纸之类的展示出来，然后就发挥你的口才吧，一般对各位教授一顿猛忽悠，他们都会放生你的。不过切记，图纸和设计上不要有明显的失误，特别是一些常识性的和专业性不强的失误，比如说，该擦掉的线没有擦掉，该在左边的东西你画都右边了，这种简单错误，一般容易被看出来，而且教授们往往也不能容忍。另外注意一点，如果是理工学科的，折叠图纸要专业点，会折图吧。千万别搞什么先对折，再对折，然后再对折----说出去丢人啊，教授们一看，连个图都不会叠？这4年书是怎么念得？那还不得好好挑挑你毛病？一副大图，折好了就像手风琴或者折扇一样，左右左右的折叠起来，这样图纸不仅好展开，而且收放简单，更不会搞的自己手忙脚乱的。这些都是给自己加印象分的。你要知道一点：对于大部分答辩评委来说，你的课题他此前很可能没有深入接触过，所了解的仅仅是你的当场介绍以及你交给他的论文，换句话说，他只有大概十来分钟时间来做准备----你可是准备了至少3个月吧如果你的论文不打算去获奖，对答辩成绩只追求到良好即可，不妨对自己的论文和成果反复熟悉，尽量多收集一些相关的知识、扩展和实际应用。争取讲解的时候滔滔不绝，思路清晰，语言流畅，一套讲下来，很多教授反而问不出来问题了。只能问你些简单的，大众化的问题，切记，真不懂得问题，不要不懂装懂啊，对手都是老狐狸了，不懂装懂会弄巧成拙的。他们问你问题的时候，你一定要谦虚谨慎，把他们当大爷一样供着就对了，最好再做到微笑服务（提前对着镜子练练吧）我当时答辩的过程，基本就是忽悠教授们吧。论文是答辩前4天连夜赶出来的，图纸是抄现成的设计的，计算答案一部分是别人算好的，另外一部分是根据那些数据，自行推测的（反正答辩时没人会演算你得计算过程，如果你的课题没有其他人参与，那么你的最终结果合理即可）记得嘴甜一点，提前向你的指导教授打听下你那组答辩评委（一般很容易做到，有时候你指导教授会专门给你们讲解下答辩技巧，并且介绍下答辩组成员。这要是没有，那你就去问一下好了），课题主任，那就叫主任；副教授，就叫教授；什么都不是，那估计是来凑数的评委，不知道该怎么叫，就尊称“您”好了，反正在座的那个都比你大，谦虚点也不吃亏。到了答辩现场时候，我上去先讲了30多分钟，着重介绍了课题的目的，方案，思路，用途，设计理念，设计创新点，结构优缺点，实用度，以及制作成本，推广前景，对设计者水平的提高，思路的开阔，眼界的扩展and so on。总之就是忽悠各位教授们，等我介绍完了，几个评委实在没什么可问的了，随便问了两个问题，放过过关：就这么临时拼凑的东西，最后得了个良好----这样子还能良好，我自己都觉得没天理了记住：一般每人给半小时左右的时间。你讲解的时间越少，留给评委的自由时间越多，对你来说就越危险！让他们一直听你的讲解,他们就没时间思考你设计上的结构和缺陷，最后一般就随便问你几个问题，就放你过关，出于安全考虑，你讲解的时间最好控制在27-29分钟，给评委留那么一点点的时间就行，他们会稍微拖延下答辩时间的，但是也就拖延几分钟，没多余时间为难你。我见过一些同学，只傻乎乎的讲上5分钟，然后就：请各位老师批评指。结果评委真的就满足了他的愿望：花了半小时，把整个设计被批得体无完肤，拿回去修改，准备二次答辩----何苦呢，多说几分钟生动的讲解词又累不死，何苦拿回来二次答辩啊听说曾经还有位师兄，上去先说了快一个小说，而且说的生动活泼，内容引人，颇有点说评书的感觉，最后答辩组长看了看他说：好了，装袋吧（当时，如果通过答辩，那么评委给你个档案袋，让你装你的论文，图纸什么的，最后写上名字即可：装袋吧，就是说通过了，你可以顺利毕业了）。当然了，这些也只是经验之谈。要想顺利通过答辩，功底还是扎实点的好，作为评委，可以指着你的设计的任何你部分，问你这部分的功能，效果，设计思路等等，再狠点的，还可以问你这么设计有什么优缺点，和其它部分的相关性怎么样。总之，要对你准备上交的论文做到了如指掌（论文是谁写的不重要，重要的是读透读熟，就好像是你自己设计的一样），这么一来，以不变应万变，区区答辩又能如何？呵呵，说了这么多乱七八糟的，希望对你能有点帮助，如果还有不明白的地方就再来问好了

英语毕业论文答辩（通用6篇）

英语的论文答辩要点是格式最好少些瑕疵，提前将abstract和conclusion背一背。有利于答辩的顺利进行。下面是我为大家整理的.关于英语毕业论文的答辩。欢迎大家阅读。

Good morning, all appraiser committee members. I am **** and my supervisor is ***. With her constant encouragement and guidance, I have finished my paper. Now, it is the show time. I will present my efforts to you and welcome any correction.

The title of my paper is On Transformation of Parts of Speech in Translation. I choose this as my topic due to the following reasons. Different languages have different standards to distinguish parts of speech. Each language has its own special structure. And there are no equivalent parts of speech between different languages. In order to make the target version more idiomatic and standard, the transformation of parts of speech is always used by translators. So the transformation of parts of speech is playing a more important role in English to Chinese based on different characteristics of English and Chinese. For the above facts, I select the subject of On Transformation of parts of speech as the title of my paper.

I hope by studying this topic we can know the importance of the transformation of parts of speech in English to Chinese translation. Through transformation, we can get the better version and improve the translation skills.

The way of thinking and expressing is quite different between Chinese and English. English is a kind of static languages which tends to use more nouns. While Chinese is a dynamic one in which verbs are often used.

So when we make translation in English to Chinese, we should know this point and shift the parts of speech.

Part one presents an introduction to the basic concepts of parts of speech and transformation.Part two discusses the definition of translation and emphasizes the importance of transformation of parts of speech in the course of translation.Part three gives four basic ways of transformation of parts of speech through illustrative examples. There are transformed English words into Chinese verbs, nouns, adjectives and adverbs.Part four presents some problems about transformation and gives some advise to solve the problems.

Part five draws some conclusions that transformation between parts of speech is necessary for us to achieve good translation. It is demonstrated that we can have a good master of transformation and improve the translation. In addition, we must continuously study and explore in all kinds of translation practices.

OK! That is all. Thank you! Please ask questions.

Good morning,

Distinguished professors and teachers, ladies and gentlemen, thank you for attending the oral defense. (或Welcome to attend the oral defense.) ：

I am XX. First and foremost, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my supervisor, professorXX, for his intellectual guidance, invaluable instructions and comments on my thesis. It is with his valuable assistance that I have finally accomplished this thesis.

My topic is On the tragedy figures at historical turning points(Comparison of KongYiji and Rip Van )The whole thesis consists of 6 parts. The first part will give a brief introduction of the negative, evasive and conservative attitudes of Kong and Rip as well as the topic s significance in the real society. And the second part is going to analyze the figures background to show the historical necessity of the tragedies. In the third part, the tragic heroes failing in the character according to their living environment will be further discussed and the fourth part is to talk about their different tendency of dispositions and behaviors in the society. Then the author will dig into the root causes of the tragedies in the fifth part, and sum up the whole paper to reveal the ideological weak points of the two countries separately in the last part.

Thank you!

Good evening, all the appraiser committee members. I come from HUST, majoring in foreign linguistics and applied linguistics. I am xxx and my supervisor is prof.With her sincere and intellectual guidance, for nearly one whole year's hard work, I have finished my paper. Finally, it is the show time. This evening I will present my efforts to you all and I gratefully welcome any correction.

The title of my paper is A Study of the Causes of the Gothic Style in A Rose for Emily from a Feminist Perspective. I choose this as my topic due to the following reasons. Firstly, I am fond of literature works , especially gothic literature works. Secondly, I am quite familiar with this short story as this is one of the texts in our intensive teaching course and I have taught this text for more than 3 times . Last but not the least ,as a female , I am keen on the study of feminism. For the above facts, I select the subject of A Study of the Causes of the Gothic Style in A Rose for Emily from a Feminist Perspective as the title of my paper.

I hope by studying this short story we can know more about American southern women in certain history and culture and more importantly help women in modern society get a deeper understanding about ourselves ,help us raise our independence and confidence and show more concern for our mental health.

Next , I will present it to you. Here is an outline of my presentation. They are literature review, gothic tradition , the gothic style in the story and the causes of the gothic style .

This paper consists of six parts. Part one presents an introduction to the author William Faulkner and A Rose for Emily by pointing out the purpose and significance of this study. Part two is literature review which introduces the relevant research about this novel at home and abroad and then points out the theoretical basis and methods. Part three gives a timeline of the gothic tradition in literature and explains the main characteristics of gothic works. Part four explains the three aspects of the gothic style in the novel，that is, the death theme, grotesque characters and mystic atmosphere. Part five then explains in detail the causes of the gothic style in this novel: patriarchal oppression, the myth of southern ladyhood and Emily’s attitude towards love. Finally, in the conclusion, the author summarizes the previous parts and emphasizes the significance of the argument of the thesis again.

Ok, that's all. Now you may raise your questions ! I am ready! Thank you !

Good morning, appraises committee members and schoolmates. I come from class 08951, and I am Yu Lianfei.

Today, the title of my paper is On the Network Novels. In recent years, the network literature is developing rapidly. Network novel is one of the fast of them. In the middle schools, high schools and even universities, there is no lack of network novels' addicts. For the above facts,I select the subject of “on the network novels” as the title of my paper. Then, I will show it to you. In the main part of this paper, I divide it into four parts, as the concept of network novels, the classification of their authors, the development of network novels and the prospects of that.

The first part, the definition. Its concept can be divided into the generalized and the narrow. And it can also be divided into boys’ and girls’ in another way.

The second part, the classification of their authors. Generally speaking, there are four kinds of authors. The first kind is some people who have favor of literature, they are writing but not for fame. Then, there is some one has favor for literature and also be for fame. The third kind is some people who have explicit goals at the beginning of his writing. And the last kind are some people who just want to express their view, their viewpoint and their feeling with no desire of being published. They take up the most of the authors.

The third part, the development. The network novels’ development can not separate form the development of the net and the literature websites. Its developing process may be divided into three stages approximately. The first stage is from 1996 to 2000. This time's literary work often did not strive for (were also not aware of) the fame and fortune, and moreover received the control of tradition. The second stage is beginning of 21st century, mainly contains 2001 and 2002. In this period, the whole network presented the situation of “chaos”. The third stage is from May, 2003 and continues until now. In this period, many schools come into the world, and when a school became a hit there must be many people mimic it.

The last part, the forecast. Looking from the internal strength pattern, the outstanding writers in our country mainly hold one kind of critique and the pessimistic manner to the network novels at present. If each big literature website enlarges their own supervision, the vulgar works, the pornography and bad works like those things, meanwhile hanker for new person’s new article as well as depth ones, the network novels can be accepted by more people.

Not a low-level novel but a kind of enjoyment.

Teachers, good afternoon! My name is Chen Jing, the students of class xxx, my thesis topic is《 the power of the giver and the victim, foucault power interpretation theory perspective, the heroine in “the golden notebook, Anna》，thesis is completed under Wang Zhiqin teacher of meticulous guidance, here, I express my deep appreciation to my supervisor, to the teachers to take part in my thesis express our heartfelt thanks to you for, and for the past three years I have a chance to listen to the teachings, teachers say heartfelt tribute.Below I will this paper design the research background, significance and main content of the teacher made a report, please the teacher criticism guidance.

First of all, I want to talk about the research background and significance of the graduation thesis design.

Since the Golden Notebook involves comprehensive themes such as colonialism,feminism,racism,communism etc. and due to its severely fragmented writing forms,it has intrigued groups of both domestic and overseas critics. The research abroad could be roughly divided into three stages. The first comes about the biography of the author”],the general introduction and reading background of this novel,then a number of explorations over the themes of this book have been conducted, from the most popular one feminism,psychological featuresto the philosophical elements. Finally, critics shifted their concentration to the unique form or style applied by Lessing,for instance they analyzed the varied narrative techniques employed within ,the aesthetic value it displayed ,as well as its artistic nature generated by its messy forms.And it is worth mentioning that in 2006 Tapan K.Ghosh has composed a specific collection of reviews on the Golden Notebook.While the study over this novel in foreign country has been quite fruitful and mature, the research in China is far lagging behind, most of them just emphasized the novel's multiplethemes such as feminism,eco-economic,psychology and modemism Thus more angels should be discovered by scholars at home, such as colonialism, religious and psychological exploration, and their research method should be more diversified,for instance,the potential inter-disciplinary study of this novel are waiting to be excavated, and seldomhave critics compared this masterpiece with other similar text.

Based on Foucault's power theory, this thesis is going to explore how the female protagonist Anna in Doris Lessing's the Golden Notebook, the producer and victim of power,fought against her catastrophic life. Through a close reading of the text, this thesis aims at making a Foucanldian interpretation on Lessing's motivation behind portraying such a schizophrenic female personality, convincing the reader that power permeates every capillary of the society mainly by exerting influence on power relations between individual. Sinceeverything concerns with the functioning of power, be it tragedy or comedy, Anna's destiny cannot be an exception, instead of restraining from the one-way suppress from men,Foucault's power theory enables us to put the heroine into a larger, more diverse cultural or social background where individual's identity could be perceived with much more plurality or heterogeneity. Ultimately, given Anna's gender attributes, the application of Foucault's power theory to the analysis of heroine can shed light on how women could wittedly deal with their counterpart, strike a balance between freedom and restriction, and thus heading feminism into a more reasonable and rational direction.

Secondly, I want to talk about the structure and main contents of this paper.

The author is going to divide this thesis into five chapters. The first chapter is a briefing about the research background of the Golden Notebook, which provides an overview on the fragmented content and complicated structure of this masterpiece. The second chapter is an introduction of the research status of this novel at home and abroad, at the same time,Foucault's power theory will be elaborated here as the theoretical framework. Chapter three concentrates on the text analysis of the female protagonist Anna's pursuit of the free woman identity, which will be conducted mainly from three perspectives, namely her political faith,marriage and love, as well we psychological status. Through asserting Foucault's power theory into the text analysis, we could get a clear view on how the heroine became the victim of the omnipresent power in contemporary social organizations, and also how individual resisted power via making explorations on the genealogy of the self. Chapter four gives two different interpretations of Anna's destiny, with each representing the common feminists'view and Foucault's version respectively. Via such comparison, the author attempts to find a correlation between Foucault's power theory and feminism, to tell in what ways Foucault'spower theory have modified parts of problems in current feminism, and how the formal convergent with the latter. The last chapter serves as a concluding part in which a summary of this thesis will be reached, and limitations as well as further implications will be point out.

Finally, I want to talk about the deficiency existing in this paper.

The limitations of this thesis cannot be regarded as the challenge to the relevance of Foucaxxlt's theory to feminism; on the contrary, it tells that the value of applying Foucault'spower theory lies precisely in his invitation to feminists to remain highly critical about their previous prejudices as well as their future trends. In order to make full use of Foucault's power theory in modifying feminism, we have to dig out more convergences they share with each other. With the idea that knowledge and truth are partial ones serving as a start,Genealogy is then an excellent perspective for farther explorations on the Foucauldian and feminist projects.

Thank you very much!

Good morning， Distinguished professors and teachers， ladies and gentlemen， thank you for attending the oral defense. I am XX. First and foremost， I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my supervisor， professorXX， for his intellectual guidance， invaluable instructions and comments on my thesis. It is with his valuable assistance that I have finally accomplished this thesis. My topic is On the tragedy figures at historical turning points(Comparison of KongYiji and Rip Van )The whole thesis consists of 6 parts. The first part will give a brief introduction of the negative， evasive and conservative attitudes of Kong and Rip as well as the topic’s significance in the real society.

And the second part is going to analyze the figures’ background to show the historical necessity of the tragedies. In the third part， the tragic heroes’ failing in the character according to their living environment will be further discussed and the fourth part is to talk about their different tendency of dispositions and behaviors in the society.

Then the author will dig into the root causes of the tragedies in the fifth part， and sum up the whole paper to reveal the ideological weak points of the two countries separately in the last part. Thank you!

1．学员必须在论文答辩会举行之前半个月，将经过指导老师审定并签署过意见的毕业论文一式三份连同提纲、草稿等交给答辩委员会，答辩委员会的主答辩老师在仔细研读毕业论文的基础上，拟出要提问的问题，然后举行答辩会。2．在答辩会上，先让学员用15分钟左右的时间概述论文的标题以及选择该论题的原因，较详细地介绍论文的主要论点、论据和写作体会。3．主答辩老师提问。主答辩老师一般提三个问题。老师提问完后，有的学校规定，可以让学生独立准备15—20分钟后，再来当场回答，而中央党校函授学院则规定，主答辩老师提出问题后，要求学员当场立即作出回答(没有准备时间)，随问随答。可以是对话式的，也可以是主答辩老师一次性提出三个问题，学员在听清楚记下来后，按顺序逐一作出回答。根据学员回答的具体情况，主答辩老师和其他答辩老师随时可以有适当的插问。4．学员逐一回答完所有问题后退场，答辩委员会集体根据论文质量和答辩情况，商定通过还是不通过，并拟定成绩和评语。5．召回学员，由主答辩老师当面向学员就论文和答辩过程中的情况加以小结，肯定其优点和长处，指出其错误或不足之处，并加以必要的补充和指点，同时当面向学员宣布通过或不通过。至于论文的成绩，一般不当场宣布。中共中央党校函授学院规定，对答辩不能通过的学员，提出修改意见，允许学员待半年后另行答辩。 在毕业论文答辩会上，主答辩老师的提问方式会影响到组织答辩会目的的实现以及学员答辩水平的发挥。主答辩老师有必要讲究自己的提问方式。1．提问要贯彻先易后难原则。主答辩老师给每位答辩者一般要提三个或三个以上的问题，这些要提的问题以按先易后难的次序提问为好。所提的第一个问题一般应该考虑到是学员答得出并且答得好的问题。学员第一个问题答好，就会放松紧张心理，增强“我”能答好的信心，从而有利于在以后几个问题的答辩中发挥出正常水平。反之，如果提问的第一个问题就答不上来，学员就会背上心理包袱，加剧紧张，产生慌乱，这势必会影响到对后面几个问题的答辩，因而也难以正确检查出学员的答辩能力和学术水平。2．提问要实行逐步深入的方法。为了正确地检测学员的专业基础知识掌握的情况，有时需要把一个大问题分成若干个小问题，并采取逐步深入的提问方法。如有一篇《浅论科学技术是第一生产力》的论文，主答辩老师出的探测水平题，是由以下四个小问题组成的。(1)什么是科学技术?(2)科学技术是不是生产力的一个独立要素?在学员作出正确回答以后，紧接着提出第三个小问题：即(3)科学技术不是生产力的一个独立要素，为什么说它也是生产力呢?(4)你是怎样理解科学技术是第一生产力的?通过这样的提问，根据学员的答辩情况，就能比较正确地测量出学员掌握基础知识的扎实程度。如果这四个小问题，一个也答不上，说明该学员专业基础知识没有掌握好；如果四个问题都能正确地回答出来，说明该学员基础知识掌握得很扎实；如果能回答出其中的2—3个，或每个小问题都能答一点，但答得不全面，或不很正确，说明该学员基础知识掌握得一般。倘若不是采取这种逐步深入的提问法，就很难把一个学员掌握专业基础知识的情况准确测量出来。假如上述问题采用这样提问法：请你谈谈为什么科学技术是第一生产力?学员很可能把论文中的主要内容重述一遍。这样就很难确切知道该学员掌握基础知识的情况是好、是差、还是一般。3．当答辩者的观点与自己的观点相左时，应以温和的态度，商讨的语气与之开展讨论，即要有“长者”风度，施行善术，切忌居高临下，出言不逊。不要以“真理”掌握者自居，轻易使用“不对”、“错了”、“谬论”等否定的断语。要记住“是者可能非，非者可能有是”的格言，要有从善如流的掂量。如果作者的观点言之有理，持之有据，即使与自己的观点截然对立，也应认可并乐意接受。倘若作者的观点并不成熟、完善，也要善意地、平和地进行探讨，并给学员有辩护或反驳的平等权利。当自己的观点不能为作者接受时，也不能以势欺人，以权压理，更不要出言不逊。虽然在答辩过程中，答辩老师与学员的地位是不平等的(一方是审查考核者，一方是被考核者)，但在人格上是完全平等的。在答辩中要体现互相尊重，做到豁达大度，观点一时难以统一，也属正常。不必将自己的观点强加于人，只要把自己的观点亮出来，供对方参考就行。事实上，只要答辩老师讲得客气、平和，学员倒愈容易接受、考虑你的观点，愈容易重新审视自己的观点，达到共同探索真理的目的。4．当学员的回答答不到点子上或者一时答不上来的问题，应采用启发式、引导式的提问方法。参加过论文答辩委员会的老师可能都遇到过这样的情况：学员对你所提的问题答不上来，有的就无可奈何地“呆”着；有的是东拉西扯，与你绕圈子，其实他也是不知道答案。碰到这种情况，答辩老师既不能让学员尴尬地“呆”在那里，也不能听凭其神聊，而应当及时加以启发或引导。学员答不上来有多种原因，其中有的是原本掌握这方面的知识只是由于问题完全出乎他的意料而显得心慌意乱，或者是出现一时的“知觉盲点”而答不上来。这时只要稍加引导和启发，就能使学员“召回”知识，把问题答好。只有通过启发和引导仍然答不出或答不到点子上的，才可判定他确实不具备这方面的知识。 毕业论文答辩流程一般包括自我介绍、答辩人陈述、提问与答辩、总结和致谢五部分。 自我介绍：自我介绍作为答辩的开场白，包括姓名、学号、专业。介绍时要举止大方、态度从容、面带微笑，礼貌得体的介绍自己，争取给答辩小组一个良好的印象。好的开端就意味着成功了一半。答辩人陈述：收到成效的自我介绍只是这场答辩的开始，接下来的自我陈述才进入正轨。自述的主要内容包括论文标题；课题背景、选择此课题的原因及课题现阶段的发展情况；有关课题的具体内容，其中包括答辩人所持的观点看法、研究过程、实验数据、结果；答辩人在此课题中的研究模块、承担的具体工作、解决方案、研究结果。文章的创新部分；结论、价值和展望；自我评价。提问与答辩：答辩教师的提问安排在答辩人自述之后，是答辩中相对灵活的环节，有问有答，是一个相互交流的过程。一般为3个问题，采用由浅入深的顺序提问，采取答辩人当场作答的方式。总结：上述程序一一完毕，代表答辩也即将结束。答辩人最后纵观答辩全过程，做总结陈述，包括两方面的总结：毕业设计和论文写作的体会；参加答辩的收获。答辩教师也会对答辩人的表现做出点评：成绩、不足、建议。致谢：感谢在毕业设计论文方面给予帮助的人们并且要礼貌地感谢答辩教师。 在一篇题为《把股份合作制引入开发农业之我见》的论文中，答辩时，主答辩老师提出了如下三个问题：(1)请简要谈谈学术界对股份合作制性质方面的争议。(2)合作经济与股份制经济有何区别?(3)稳定家庭联产承包责任制与发展股份合作制有无矛盾?请简述理由。又譬如，在《把山区经济推向市场的思考与对策》一文中，答辩时，主答辩老师提出的三个问题是：(1)你在写这篇论文时，收集了哪些方面的资料，是怎样收集的?(2)市场有几重含义?与此相联系，你是怎么理解市场经济的?(3)请你谈谈把山区经济推向市场的有利条件和不利因素。当然，在答辩过程中，根据论文的内容和答辩的具体情况，答辩老师还可以适当插问。例如，在上述第一篇论文中，答辩老师觉得学员对合作经济说得很含糊，就在学员回答完了第二个问题后，插问了“请你谈谈我国50年代农村有哪几种合作制形式，它们的性质有何区别”的问题。通过对这些问题的提问和答辩，答辩委员会就会了解毕业论文是不是学员自己通过辛勤劳动写成的，即检查了论文的真实性；也大体上摸清了学员对所学知识掌握的深广度，以及学员临场的应对能力和对知识理解的透彻程度；同时也可以搞清论文中薄弱环节的原因。从而有利于对论文的质量和学员的知识能力作出合理、公平的评价。

论文答辩是什么，答辩流程，看完全明白了

正式答辩开始，下面是我的部分发言：尊敬的评委老师以及在座的各位同学：大家早上好。我是X级XX专业的XX，很高兴在这里论文答辩，希望今天能为我20年的学生生涯画上一个完满的句号。（这句可是我琢磨了半天的经典啊）下面，论文答辩 论文答辩ppt 论文答辩技巧,就我毕业论文的选题原因，国内外研究现状，研究目的，研究方法，研究内容，研究结论等问题向大家做一个简单的汇报。之所以选择这样一个论文题目，主要是基于以下三方面的考虑：…………以上是我毕业论文的一些基本情况，欢迎各位老师批评指正（这句话挨了一顿批，答辩主席先给我个下马威。这句可是我上网时看到的，以示谦卑，没想到犯了本本主义错误。答辩之前最好是多答辩评委老师的性格爱好都有个底，尤其是答辩委员会的主席，他可是一把手），谢谢。在答辩中有一些小体会，这里与大家分享，希望对大家有所帮助。答辩分为三个阶段：陈述期（20-25分钟）、提问期、回答期，三个阶段大致一个多小时左右一个人。在陈述期的20分钟，有的学院要答辩者做PPT,有的则不用；有的陈述时要脱稿，有的则可以看稿子。在这个阶段，一般情况下没有老师在听你讲什么，他们都在低头看你给他们发的论文和论文简介，因为这么厚的论文是没有老师有时间看的，他们也都是临阵摸枪，看个大概。所以在这一阶段，你的任务就是磨时间，注意语气要平缓，要稳，发言时尽量不要太专业化，没有人听你讲晦涩的理论，当然，更不能拉家常，说一些你们邻居家怎们怎么的事情，这显得你太没专业素养和水准。总之，这个度要拿捏好。注意观察老师和同学的表情，察言观色才是硬道理。在提问期这个阶段，聆听是你的主要任务。老师会为你磨时间。有本校的老师，一般都会先评价下你的论文，当然是说很多好话的，这都是讲给答辩委员会主席听的。接下来就是提问，老师提问的时候你要记好他的问题，理解他的意思。在记得时候要注意把你回答的要点关键字一起写上，因为老师问完了你就要回答的，如果你反应比较快，你可以把老师的问题分类做个概述，然后按类作答，这样更显得你这孩子不错。回答之前要对老师的评价和建议表示感谢，接下来回答老师的问题。第一个问题，先念一下题目，然后作答。作答时忌讳一盲目自大，得意洋洋，一副欠抽的样子，忌讳二信心不足，慌里慌张，没有底气，一副心虚的样子。要知道论文是你写的，你看的相关东西比他们多，所以你可以大胆的说，只要自圆其说即可。在这一阶段回答时要言简意赅，一语中的，废话少说，言多语失，能说就说，不能说的就说自己在这方面写论文的时候也考虑过，但考虑的不充分。忌讳的是不知道了就不说话，大家都不说话，气氛就凝固了，在论文答辩中如果没人说话，那就不好了，所以一定要说，哪怕你说不会，也比不说好。值得一提的是，老师提问的问题有大有小。有对理论的，所以你要对你论文的理论了如指掌，尤其是一些相近的名词，尤其是长的差不多的词，比如这次我们同学的社会资源、社会资本、社会关系这三个词就让老师给缠了半天；有对方法的，所以你要对你做的调查细节注意再注意，不要有闪失。应付的东西老师都能看出来，人家干了这么多年，眼睛都很毒的；有对细节感兴趣的，所以你要对你的论文的逻辑结构、句子通顺与否、措词、错别字、标点尤其是摘要部分注意注意再注意注意，在这些方面出问题显得你不够认真仔细，所以校对时要下功夫，可以和同学交换校对，因为我们对自己写的东西，挑错别字是很困难的。摘要就那么点字，又在论文开头，这可是门面啊，还有最好有个后记，感谢之类的话，虽然老套，但咱们读了这么多年的书也应该感谢一下老师，必须的嘛。答辩通过基本上是十拿九稳的，但是咱们也不能弄的太难看。自己丢人无所谓，给导师丢人就是罪过了。为了导师，为了自己，也要好好表现。好了，基本上就说这么多吧，各个专业各个学校的情况不一样，我说的只是一家之言，仅供参考而已，希望对大家有些帮助。