赏析简爱论文题目

Jane EyreThe development of Jane Eyre’s character is central to the novel. From the beginning, Jane possesses a sense of her self-worth and dignity, a commitment to justice and principle, a trust in God, and a passionate disposition. Her integrity is continually tested over the course of the novel, and Jane must learn to balance the frequently conflicting aspects of herself so as to find here to find out more!An orphan since early childhood, Jane feels exiled and ostracized at the beginning of the novel, and the cruel treatment she receives from her Aunt Reed and her cousins only exacerbates her feeling of alienation. Afraid that she will never find a true sense of home or community, Jane feels the need to belong somewhere, to find “kin,” or at least “kindred spirits.” This desire tempers her equally intense need for autonomy and her search for freedom, Jane also struggles with the question of what type of freedom she wants. While Rochester initially offers Jane a chance to liberate her passions, Jane comes to realize that such freedom could also mean enslavement—by living as Rochester’s mistress, she would be sacrificing her dignity and integrity for the sake of her feelings. St. John Rivers offers Jane another kind of freedom: the freedom to act unreservedly on her principles. He opens to Jane the possibility of exercising her talents fully by working and living with him in India. Jane eventually realizes, though, that this freedom would also constitute a form of imprisonment, because she would be forced to keep her true feelings and her true passions always in Brontë may have created the character of Jane Eyre as a means of coming to terms with elements of her own life. Much evidence suggests that Brontë, too, struggled to find a balance between love and freedom and to find others who understood her. At many points in the book, Jane voices the author’s then-radical opinions on religion, social class, and RochesterDespite his stern manner and not particularly handsome appearance, Edward Rochester wins Jane’s heart, because she feels they are kindred spirits, and because he is the first person in the novel to offer Jane lasting love and a real home. Although Rochester is Jane’s social and economic superior, and although men were widely considered to be naturally superior to women in the Victorian period, Jane is Rochester’s intellectual equal. Moreover, after their marriage is interrupted by the disclosure that Rochester is already married to Bertha Mason, Jane is proven to be Rochester’s moral regrets his former libertinism and lustfulness; nevertheless, he has proven himself to be weaker in many ways than Jane. Jane feels that living with Rochester as his mistress would mean the loss of her dignity. Ultimately, she would become degraded and dependent upon Rochester for love, while unprotected by any true marriage bond. Jane will only enter into marriage with Rochester after she has gained a fortune and a family, and after she has been on the verge of abandoning passion altogether. She waits until she is not unduly influenced by her own poverty, loneliness, psychological vulnerability, or passion. Additionally, because Rochester has been blinded by the fire and has lost his manor house at the end of the novel, he has become weaker while Jane has grown in strength—Jane claims that they are equals, but the marriage dynamic has actually tipped in her . John RiversClick here to find out more!St. John Rivers is a foil to Edward Rochester. Whereas Rochester is passionate, St. John is austere and ambitious. Jane often describes Rochester’s eyes as flashing and flaming, whereas she constantly associates St. John with rock, ice, and snow. Marriage with Rochester represents the abandonment of principle for the consummation of passion, but marriage to St. John would mean sacrificing passion for principle. When he invites her to come to India with him as a missionary, St. John offers Jane the chance to make a more meaningful contribution to society than she would as a housewife. At the same time, life with St. John would mean life without true love, in which Jane’s need for spiritual solace would be filled only by retreat into the recesses of her own soul. Independence would be accompanied by loneliness, and joining St. John would require Jane to neglect her own legitimate needs for love and emotional support. Her consideration of St. John’s proposal leads Jane to understand that, paradoxically, a large part of one’s personal freedom is found in a relationship of mutual emotional BurnsHelen Burns, Jane’s friend at Lowood School, serves as a foil to Mr. Brocklehurst as well as to Jane. While Mr. Brocklehurst embodies an evangelical form of religion that seeks to strip others of their excessive pride or of their ability to take pleasure in worldly things, Helen represents a mode of Christianity that stresses tolerance and acceptance. Brocklehurst uses religion to gain power and to control others; Helen ascetically trusts her own faith and turns the other cheek to Lowood’s harsh Helen manifests a certain strength and intellectual maturity, her efforts involve self-negation rather than self-assertion, and Helen’s submissive and ascetic nature highlights Jane’s more headstrong character. Like Jane, Helen is an orphan who longs for a home, but Helen believes that she will find this home in Heaven rather than Northern England. And while Helen is not oblivious to the injustices the girls suffer at Lowood, she believes that justice will be found in God’s ultimate judgment—God will reward the good and punish the evil. Jane, on the other hand, is unable to have such blind faith. Her quest is for love and happiness in this world. Nevertheless, she counts on God for support and guidance in her search.我给你写了真么多，一定要给我加悬赏金 我在此谈谈读巨著《简爱》的读后感，当我合上简爱这本书之后，我深深的被Jane Erye（简爱）所打动，她是如此善良而优秀的女人。Eyre夫人有一颗金子般的心。她真爱着她身旁的每个人，并且真诚的给予他们帮助，她自重，并且做每件事都很优秀，我非常喜欢她。她不仅仅是我的老师还是我的挚友，每当我迷惘的时候，我就会想到她，想到她如果是此时的我将会怎么做，为什么不去读我的朋友《简爱》！ Let me tell what I feel after reading the great work Jane was really move by Jane Erye after closing the a kind and good woman!Mrs Eyre had a heart of really loved everyone around her,and gave others help sincerely(真诚地).She respected(尊重) herself and did her best to do really love are both a great teacher and a good friend of when I am confuse(迷惑的),I will think of will imagine what will she do if she is not read Jane Erye my friends!小说设计了一个很光明的结尾.罗彻斯特的庄园毁了,他本人也成了一个残废..在这样的情况下,简爱不再在尊严和爱之间矛盾.而同时获得满足-------她和罗彻斯特的结婚是有尊严的,同时也是有爱的. 小说告诉我们,人们最美好的生活就是尊严加爱.小说的结局按排的这是这样一种生活.虽然我觉得这样的结局过于完美,这样的完美有点浮浅..但我依然尊重作者对这种生活的美好理想.就是-------尊严加爱/ The novel tells us that the best people to increase the dignity of life is love. Novels by the end of the row that this is such a life. Although I think this kind of outcome is too perfect, so perfect .. a little superficial, but I still respect this author The ideal of a better kind of life. ------- Is to increase the dignity of love / In modern society, few people will like Jane Eyre, for the love for the character and abandon all, and without looking back.'s Whole-hearted pursuit of pay, and pure like a glass of ice water ....... Jane eyreEnglish: Jane eyre is a novel color autobiography, it explains the theme: people's value = dignity + . Love living in a parents, sponsor, grew up under the environment of treatment with peers, aunt abandon, cousin contempt, cousin insults and beating of a child... this is the dignity of the ruthless trample, but perhaps because it all, Jane. Love and faith of infinite indomitable spirit, a kind of inner personality can rochester, she never because he is a teacher and the family status meanness, but that they feel inferior is equal. Should not because she is a servant, but not respected by others. Also because of her integrity, noble and pure heart, no pollution, secular society for the shock, and rochester her as a spiritual and equality in the conversation, and slowly and deeply in love with eyre itself to us is a kind of simplified, is a fanpiaoguizhen, is a kind of pursuit of whole heart feeling, is a kind of simplified feelings and neglected, it is like a cup of water, purify every reader's heart, also cause readers, especially female readers简爱》 中文：《简爱》是一部带有自传色彩的长篇小说，它阐释了这样一个主题：人的价值＝尊严＋爱。 简。爱生存在一个父母双亡，寄人篱下的环境，从小就承受着与同龄人不一样的待遇，姨妈的嫌弃，表姐的蔑视，表哥的侮辱和毒打……这是对一个孩子的尊严的无情践踏，但也许正是因为这一切，换回了简。爱无限的信心和坚强不屈的精神，一种可战胜的内在人格力量。 在罗切斯特的面前，她从不因为自己是一个地位低贱的家庭教师而感到自卑，反而认为他们是平等的。不应该因为她是仆人，而不能受到别人的尊重。也正因为她的正直，高尚，纯洁，心灵没有受到世俗社会的污染，使得罗切斯特为之震撼,并把她看做了一个可以和自己在精神上平等交谈的人，并且慢慢地深深爱上了她。《简爱》所展现给我们的正是一种化繁为简，是一种返朴归真，是一种追求全心付出的感觉，是一种不计得失的简化的感情，它犹如一杯冰水，净化每一个读者的心灵，同时引起读者，特别是女性读者的共鸣。

那一份简单的爱 一《简爱》读书有感

以下是一些可能的题目：《简爱》读后感《简爱》中的自由与爱情《简爱》中的女性意识《简爱》中的社会阶层与命运《简爱》中的道德与人性《简爱》中的宽恕与成长《简爱》中的心灵独白与人生哲思《简爱》中的女性解放《简爱》中的爱情观《简爱》中的反叛精神无论选择哪个题目，都应该在读后感中结合小说情节和人物形象，探讨小说所表达的主题和思想，并适当加入自己的感悟和评价。

论夏洛特.勃朗特《简爱》中性别文化政治我爱英语网 论文名称: 论夏洛特.勃朗特《简爱》中性别文化政治论文名称: Cultural Politics of Gender in Charlotte Bronte's Jane Eyre关键词:性别文化建构 cultural construction of gender性别主体 gendered subject父权 patriarchy性压迫 sexual oppression简爱 Jane Eyre[摘要]本论文尝试从性别文化政治的角度来重新诠释简爱中性别的议题。阐述在维多利亚时期的父权社会中，女主角简爱如何反抗当时的女性理想形象、反抗父权论述实践，及挑战当时的性别权利关系。第一章回顾国内外有关简爱的评论文章，并从中找出了重新阅读此小说的理由。其一，简爱是否颠覆当时传统的女性角色一直备受讨论但是尚无定论；其二，至今有关小说中性别是透过什么样的文化机制形塑而成，且简爱如何反抗性别主体的过程尚未有健全的讨论。因此，本论文采用Weedon和Jordan的性别文化政治及Foucault的权利观念来探讨小说中性别形塑的问题，及简爱对维多利亚性别主体的反动。第二章再现维多利亚女性理想意象，以便与夏绿蒂对简爱的描绘做一比较。简爱这一角色的描绘可说是与当时女性理想形象背道而驰，因此夏绿蒂与简爱受到相当多人的批评。批评者控诉他们颠覆维多利亚的社会价值观及女性理想形象；无可否认，这些控诉正证明简爱颠覆了当时传统的女性角色。第三章举例说明家庭、学校，及宗教这三个文化机制如何透过论述实践、纪律、与惩罚来形塑简爱成为一个性别主体。此外，这一章节也展现简爱如何反抗这些形塑力量。第四章主要论述简爱如何抵抗Rochester 及St. John的诱惑，而不至于成为Rochester的情妇及St. John有名无实的妻子，并阐述简爱如何寻找到自我，成为自己的主人而非Rochester及St. John的他者。此外，这一章将Bertha诠释为维多利亚时代性压迫下一个被压制的主体；但这并不表示Bertha就毫无权力可言，她透过暴力来展现对父权的反抗。第五章摘要了前几章的重点，并指出这本小说尚可探讨的空间。本论文只着重性别议题的讨论，而忽略阶级及种族的议题。基于Weedon及Jordan的观点，性别、阶级及种族都是文化建构的产品，他们促成了不同与不平。因此，这本小说中阶级及种族议题也可从文化政治的角度来加以探讨。

简爱人物性格解析/ 浅议简爱中的人物性格。 翻译成相应的英文即可