玩偶之家英语毕业论文

1、 透过《傲慢与偏见》看现代社会爱情观2、生与死的抗争--《厄舍古厦的倒塌》主题解读3、浅谈“欧·亨利式结尾”及其文学影响4、从宗教角度解读简爱的多重性格5、从女权主义角度剖析《小妇人》中的乔6、 “英雄”的陨落--悲剧美学角度分析《老人与海》7、 从《菊花》中看女主人公Elisa实现自我价值的障碍8、奉献与宽容---浅析《双城记》中的仁爱精神9、 《格列佛游记》中对理性的反思与批判10、浅析《警察和赞美诗》的戏剧化特色11、一场失败革命的反思---论《动物庄园》中所表现的象征意义12、论詹姆斯·乔伊斯《阿拉比》的精神顿悟13、从后印象主义角度解读《到灯塔去》中的双性同体观14、 从中西方道德观差异谈《伊利亚特》与《封神演义》人物品德15、 韦伯《猫》中的女性主义英国文学毕业论文选题题目大全论文的题目是画龙点睛的神来之笔,是提纲挈领的综述概要。下面是我带来的关于英国文学 毕业 论文题目大全的内容，欢迎阅读参考!英国文学毕业论文题目大全(一)1. 《浮士德》的善恶冲突论2. 论《浮士德》思想体系的矛盾3. 论卢梭《忏悔录》的自审意识与超俗意识4. 济慈及其《夜莺颂》的美学魅力5. 欧洲社会的讽刺画卷——《唐璜》浅析6. 论雨果的人道主义思想7. 《巴黎圣母院》中的美丑对照原则8. 论《红与黑》中于连的形象9. 论司汤达小说心理描写的艺术10. 司汤达在现代小说史上的地位11. 成功与幻灭——拉斯蒂涅(《高老头》)与吕西安(《红与白》)之比较12. 巴尔扎克小说的现代 文化 意蕴13. 论《包法利夫人》14. 19世纪英国女小说家研究15. 《傲慢与偏见》的戏剧叙述16. 夏洛蒂·勃朗笔下的女性形象系统17. 《呼啸山庄》的叙述技巧与结构艺术18. 试析《简·爱》和《呼啸山庄》的情感模式19. 《呼啸山庄》与《金锁记》情感世界之比较20. 梅里美中短篇小说的艺术魅力21. 《茶花女》的悲剧艺术英国文学毕业论文题目大全(二)1. 茶花女与杜十娘比较2. 从蒙太里尼形象看《牛虻》的反宗教主题3. 论哈代小说中的新女性形象4. 莫泊桑、契诃夫、欧·亨利艺术风格之比较5. 论威尔斯的科学幻想小说6. 论《恶之花》的历史地位与意义7. 略论马克·吐温的艺术风格8. 易卜生《玩偶之家》娜拉形象9. 易卜生有肖伯纳的“社会问题剧”的异同论10. 19世纪俄国文学中“多余人”的形象11. 俄罗斯文学中的妇女形象12. 果戈理《死魂灵》的讽刺艺术13. 屠格涅夫笔下的女性形象14. 屠格涅夫的抒情手法15. 屠格涅夫与郁达夫比较研究16. 论陀思妥耶夫斯基的长篇小说17. 谈陀思妥耶夫斯基小说中的景物描写18. 陀思妥耶夫斯基与现代派文学19. “现代性”历史文化语境中的鲁迅与陀思妥耶夫斯基英国文学毕业论文题目大全(三)1. 古希腊神话 传说 中的文化精神2. 英雄符码及其解构——荷马史诗主要史诗主要形象论析3. 论《俄狄浦斯王》的冲突艺术美4. 论《美狄亚》在戏剧发展史上的重要意义5. 从古希腊到18世纪西方文学中人的观念6. 《埃涅阿斯纪》主题的原型意义7. 试论__伦理在西方文学中的演变8. 但丁与__文化9. 哥特式小说的原理与发展10. 中国武侠小说与骑士文学的比较11. 《堂吉诃德》的多重意义12. 论流浪汉小说的艺术特征13. 试论《威尼斯商人》的冲突艺术14. 《奥瑟罗》悲剧冲突艺术15. 论《李尔王》的人文主义思想16. 论《亨利四世》中的福斯塔夫形象17. 《罗密欧与朱丽叶》与《西厢记》抒情艺术之比较18. 试论莎士比亚喜剧风格19. 莎士比亚悲剧风格的特殊性及其历史意义20. 论《汤姆·琼斯》人物刻画的美学原则美国文学方向论文选题论文的题目是一篇论文的灵魂，好的题目可以吸引人们的眼球。下面是我带来的关于美国文学方向论文选题的内容，欢迎阅读参考!美国文学方向论文选题(一)1. 从《在路上》看五六十年代美国社会价值观2. 评希思克利夫被扭曲的心路历程3. 试论马克·吐温短篇小说的幽默特色4. 惠特曼的死亡哲学5. 论《呼啸山庄》--原始古朴与文明理性的交错色彩6. 论《了不起的盖茨比》中“二元主角”手法的运用7. 透过小说《威廉·威尔逊》和《黑猫》看艾伦·坡的善恶观8. 从《飘》看内战对美国文学的影响9. 论《美国丽人》一片中人物的两面性10. 论海明威小说中的死亡主题11. 浅析艾丽丝·沃克的《紫颜色》12. 女性作家的共性13. 《倾城之恋》与《飘》的女权意识比较研究14. 《失乐园》 与《圣经》中撒旦形象的对比15. 《老人与海》与《鲁宾逊漂流记》的比较研究16. 哥特式风格在《弗兰克斯坦》中的体现17. 浅议反讽手法在《蝇王》中的运用18. 分析麦尔维尔《白鲸》中的象征主义19. 艾略特早期诗歌中的人物形象分析20. 《丧钟为谁而鸣》中的女性形象分析美国文学方向论文选题(二)1. 从《简爱 》看早期女权主义的理想和追求2. 十九世 纪英国小说家笔下的真、善、美3. 英国十 八世纪浪漫主义诗人的自然观4. Romanticism in Mark Twin's works5. 批评方法之我见 段燕6. 浅谈泰戈尔的生命 段燕7. 浅谈《红字》中珠儿形象的作用8. 论《 红字》中的道德主题9. 论海丝特·白兰的性 格发展10. 《红字》中象征手法的运用11. 论霍桑《红字》中“A”的象征意义12. 象征意向在《了不起的盖茨比》中的运用13. 论《了不起的盖茨比》的艺术特点14. 伍尔夫创作中的女权主义立场15. 弗吉尼亚·伍尔夫的女权思想16. 伍尔夫女 性视角中的女性形象分析17. 流派研究18. 世纪美国浪漫主义与英国浪漫主义19. 超现实主义20. 魔幻现实主义21. Jane as a narrator and as a character22. Character Analysis of Nancy, the “criminal” in Oliver Twist23. Virginia Woolf and Modern Feminine Independence24. An Analysis of Charles Dickens' Great Expectation美国文学方向论文选题(三)1、 透过《傲慢与偏见》看现代社会爱情观2、生与死的抗争--《厄舍古厦的倒塌》主题解读3、浅谈“欧·亨利式结尾”及其文学影响4、从宗教角度解读简爱的多重性格5、从女权主义角度剖析《小妇人》中的乔6、 “英雄”的陨落--悲剧美学角度分析《老人与海》7、 从《菊花》中看女主人公Elisa实现自我价值的障碍8、奉献与宽容---浅析《双城记》中的仁爱精神9、 《格列佛游记》中对理性的反思与批判10、浅析《警察和赞美诗》的戏剧化特色11、一场失败革命的反思---论《动物庄园》中所表现的象征意义12、论詹姆斯·乔伊斯《阿拉比》的精神顿悟13、从后印象主义角度解读《到灯塔去》中的双性同体观14、 从中西方道德观差异谈《伊利亚特》与《封神演义》人物品德15、 韦伯《猫》中的女性主义16、 浅析《儿子与情人》中的心理冲突17、浅析中西方喜剧文化---以《武林外传》和《老友记》为例18、从女性主义看《傲慢与偏见》中的女性形象19、《瓦尔登湖》中自然主义的现实意义20、 从男性角色解读《简爱》中的女性反抗意识猜你喜欢：1. 英美文学方向毕业论文2. 文化方向论文题目3. 英美文学方向论文4. 美国文化学术论文格式5. 美国文化学术论文格式要求

1.苏东坡的文学背景和他的赋SU TUNG-PO’S LITERARY BACKGROUND AND HIS PROSE-POETRY by Qian Zhongshu (Primarily written as a foreword to “Su Tung-Po’s Prose-poems” translated into English With Notes and Commentaries by C. D. Le Gros Clark, this is published here by kind permission of Mr. Le Gros Clark. Those who are interested in textual criticism may consult Mr. Wu Shih-ch’ang’s review in Chinese which appeared in The Crescent Monthly, Vol. IV, No. 3. –Ed.)Of the Sung dynasty, it may be said, as Hazlitt said of himself, that it is nothing if not critical. The Chinese people dropped something of their usual wise passiveness during the Sung dynasty, and “pondered, searched, probed, vexed, and criticized”. This intellectual activity, however, is not to be compared with that of the Pre-Chin period, the heyday of Chinese philosophy. The men of the Sung dynasty were inquisitive rather than speculative, filled more with a sense of curiosity than with a sense of mystery. Hence, there is no sweep, no daring, no roominess or margin in their intellectualism. A prosaic and stuffy thing theirs is, on the whole. This critical spirit revealed itself in many directions, particularly in the full flourish of literary criticism and the rise of the tao-hsüeh （道学）, that mélange adultere of metaphysics, psychology, ethics and criticism in China is an unduly belated art. Apart from a handful of obiter dicta scattered here and there, Liu Hsieh’s Literary Mind （刘勰文心雕龙） and Lo Chi’s A Prose-poem on Literature （陆机文赋） are the critical writings that count up to the Sung dynasty. There is Chung Yung’s Classification of Poets (钟嵘诗品) of course. But Chung Yung is a literary genealogist rather than a critic, and his method of simply dividing poets into sheep and goats and dispensing praise or dispraise where he thought due, is the reverse of critical, let alone his fanciful attempts to trace literary parentages(1). Ssu-Kung Tu’s Characterisations of Poetry (司空图诗品) is a different matter(2). Ssu-Kung Tu seeks to convey purely with imagery the impressions registered by a sensitive mind of twenty four different kinds of poetry: “pure, ornate, grotesque,” etc. His is perhaps the earliest piece of “impressionistic” or “creative criticism” ever written if any language, so quietly ecstatic and so autonomous and self-sufficient, as it were, in its being but it fails on that very account to become sober and proper criticism. It is not until the Sung dynasty that criticism begins to be practiced in earnest. Numerous “causeries on poetry” （诗话）are written and principles of literature are canvassed by way of commentaries on individual poets. Henceforth, causeries on poetry become established as the vehicle for Chinese criticism. One must note in passing that there do not appear professional critics with the rise of criticism. In those good old days of China, criticism is always the prerogative of artists themselves. The division of labour between critics and artists in the West is something that the old Chinese literati would scoff at. The criticism of Sung dynasty, like all Chinese criticismsbefore the “New Literature Movement” with the possible exception of Hsieh’s Literary Mind, is apt to fasten upon particulars and be given too much to the study of best words in best places. But it is symptomatic of the critical spirit, and there is an end of Chinese common reader often regards the men of the Sung dynasty as prigs. Their high seriousness and intellectual and moral squeamishness are at once irritating and amusing to the ordinary easy-going Chinese temperament. There is something paralyzing and devitalizing in their wire-drawn casuistry which induces hostile critics to attribute the collapse of the Sung dynasty to its philosophers. There is also a disingenuousness in their attempts at what may be called for want of a better name, philosophical masquerade: to dress up Taoism of Buddhism as orthodox Confucianism. One need but look into Sketches in a Villa（阅微草堂笔记）and Causeries on Poetry in a Garden（随园诗话） to see what a good laugh these two coxcombs of letters, Chi Yuen （纪昀） and Yuan Mei （袁枚） have had at the expense of the Sung philosophers and critics respectively. Nevertheless ofe is compelled to admit that the Sung philosophers are unequalled in the study of mental chemistry. Never has human nature been subject to a more rigorous scrutiny before or since in the history of Chinese thought. For what strikes one most in the tao-hsüeh is the emphasis on self-knowledge. This constant preying upon itself of the mind is quite in the spirit of the age. The Sung philosophers are morbidly introspective, always feeling their moral pulses and floundering in their own streams of consciousness. To them, their mind verily “ a kingdom is”. They analyse and pulverize human nature. But for that moral bias which Nietzsche thinks to be also the bane of German philosophy, their vivisection of human soul would have contributed a good deal to what Santayna calls literary poetry of the sung dynasty is also a case in point. It is a critical commonplace that the Sung poetry furnishes a striking contract to the T’ang poetry. Chinese poetry, hitherto ethereal and delicate, seems in the Sung dynasty to take on flesh and becomes a solid, full-blooded thing. It is more weighted with the burden of thought. Of course, it still looks light and slight enough by the side of Western poetry. But the lightness of the Sung poetry is that of an aeroplane describing graceful curves, and no longer that of a moth fluttering in the mellow twilight. In the Sung poetry one finds very little of that suggestiveness, that charm of a beautiful thing imperfectly beheld, which foreigners think characteristic of Chinese poetry in general. Instead, one meets with a great deal of naked thinking and outright speaking. It may be called “sentimental” in contradistinction to the T’ang poetry which is on the whole “naïve”, to adopt Schiller’s useful antithesis. The Sung poets, however, make up for their loss in lisping naivete and lyric glow by a finesse in feeling and observation. In their descriptive poetry, they have the knack of taking the thing to be described sur le vif: witness Lo Yu (陆游) and Yang Wan-li （杨万里）. They have also a better perception of the nuances of emotion than the T’ang poets, as can be seen particularly in their Ts’u （词）, a species of song for which the Sung dynasty is justly famous(3). Small wonder that they are deliberate artists, considering the fact that they all have been critics in the off hours of their inspiration. The most annoying thing about them is perhaps their erudition and allusiveness which makes the enjoyment of them to a large extent the luxury of the initiated even among the Chinese. （3000字）还有一篇在玩偶之家的身份抗争（6000字）和一篇马丁路德金的《我有一个梦》文体分析（10000字）如果需要就麻烦您告诉我您的邮箱，再给您发过去。