关于会计的英文论文

The Committee believes that calls for separate private company GAAP should be framed within the legal and institutional environment of each If public and private companies are subject to the same financial reporting requirements, as in many IASB countries, then the need for separate private company GAAP might be justified within an appropriate cost-benefit In contrast, private companies in the US are not required to comply with public company GAAP Given this difference in the institutional environment, calls for private company GAAP in the US must consider the demand for and supply of financial reporting information in the current private company Survey research in the US indicates that private company users find public company GAAP financial statements to have significant decision usefulness, and to be cost-benefit In addition, evidence suggests that when the cost-benefit calculus is not favorable, market forces lead to deviations from GAAP While some assert that the needs of private company financial statement users differ from those of public company stakeholders, the Committee does not find clear evidence of differential user needs or a clear articulation of how differential needs would lead to a framework for GAAP that differs from the current public company financial reporting requirements in the US Overall, if there is demand for separate private company GAAP, then market forces, rather than standard setters, may be better at meeting the differential information needs of The Committee does not see a persuasive argument for standard setters to create a separate private company GAAP in the US