当细细品完一本名著后，大家对人生或者事物一定产生了许多感想，这时就有必须要写一篇读后感了！到底应如何写读后感呢？下面是我为大家整理的《雾都孤儿》读后感范文，希望能够帮助到大家。
《雾都孤儿》的作者是狄更斯，是英国著名的作家。书中的主人公是一个叫奥立弗的孤儿，他的童年是在济贫院度过的。由于他的反叛，他被济贫院管事像物品一样送来送去。因为奥立弗不想再受压迫，就逃往伦敦，却阴错阳差地险入贼窟，却没有堕落。
最后，因为奥立弗的坚强、勇敢，以及坚持不懈的意志，最终和善良有正义感的人们战胜邪恶，过上了幸福的生活。
这个故事告诉了我：一个人不管身处何处，环境如何恶劣，只要有正义感和善良的心就会出淤泥而不染。
读了英国作家狄更斯《雾都孤儿》此篇小说，我感悟特深，又让我再一次看到了许多社会问题，此篇小说讲诉的是：一个孤儿悲惨的身世以及遭遇，而这个孤儿叫奥立费，就是这篇小说的主人公。我对他以及他当时待的孤儿院的伙伴感到同情。因为当时在孤儿院他们根本就吃不饱，还要饱受欺负。主人公奥立费的人生也让我很同情，他从经历学徒生涯，艰苦逃难，到误入贼窝，又被迫与狠毒的凶徒为伍，历尽无数辛酸，最后在善良人的帮助下，查明身世并获得了幸福。
由此我明白：命运的掌握权在自己手里，不能轻易放弃。
这个假期我阅读了一本书叫《雾都孤儿》，作者是英国的狄更斯。
里面的主人公是奥利弗，他一生下来她的妈妈就去世了，他的哭叫表示他到世上来是吃苦头的。他生下来就被送去一家育婴堂，转眼间，九年过去了，奥利弗九岁生日那天……奥利弗当过棺材店的学徒，独自一人徒步从棺材店走到伦敦，被迫当过小偷打了官司，好心的书店老板收留了他……
看着这本书，我联想到了自己，我那么胆小，一定要学习奥利弗那胆大的精神，不要躲避一切，奥利弗独自一人闯天涯，他还差点死掉，最后逼迫他当小偷的贼窝被警察倒掉了，人们终于过上了幸福的生活，奥利弗成了书店老板的养子。
读完这本书，我被鼓励了：不要弱小，要坚强。
国庆期间我读了狄更斯的长篇小说《雾都孤儿》，作品以孤儿奥立弗？退斯特这位善良、勇敢、坚强而乖巧的济贫院孤儿为中心，以善良美丽的少女、亲切和蔼的老绅士、心肠歹毒的小偷、粗暴狠毒的强盗，以及寄居陋巷的流浪儿童为陪衬，以雾色浓重的伦敦为背景，讲述他艰难曲折的童年生活。
通过这篇小说的阅读，我树立了正义必将战胜邪恶的信念，明白了要分清善恶，并且要懂得爱，懂得去爱别人！
寒假我读了一本名叫《雾都孤儿》的书。它主要讲了：一个孤儿奥立弗，从小生活艰苦，吃不饱、穿不暖，还要品尝巴掌和拳头的滋味。后来，他用自己的勇敢、善良和坚强换来了幸福的生活。
这个故事告诉我做一个人要坚强，不要被困难打倒。奥立弗生活在那样艰苦的环境里遇到了那么多的困难，他还能勇敢地站了起来，与困难作斗争，最后得到了真正的幸福。而我们和奥立弗相比，生活条件和环境比他好了不知多少倍，更应该不怕困难，好好学习，长大做个有用的人。
我被奥立弗的勇敢、善良深深感动，我为奥立弗获得幸福生活而击掌欢呼。困难并不可怕，命运是靠自己掌握，未来是靠自己创造。
《雾都孤儿》讲述的是一个孤儿的曲折故事：奥立弗他刚出生，母亲就去世了。难以忍受的饥饿、贫困和侮辱，迫使奥立弗逃到伦敦，在盗贼的驱使下，小小的奥立弗就这样成为了一个扒手，善良的女扒手南茜在他天真纯洁的身上看到往日清白的自己，同情之心油然而生。于是她冒着生命的危险终于将奥立弗救了出来。后来南茜被贼窝头杀害了，警察随即围剿了贼窝。奥立弗被布莱罗先生收养，从此过上了幸福的生活……在书中，我看到十九世纪英国儿童凄惨的生活；在书中，我感受到人们那种至善至美的天性；在书中，我更能感受到当时的社会是多么黑暗：许多孩子正承受巨大的痛苦，与饥饿、孤独、寒冷作斗争……
比起奥立弗的童年，我们的童年那么的绚丽多彩，那么充满幸福。我们从小就在父爱、母爱的包围里成长，他们给予了我们无尽的爱与无尽的关怀。
像奥立弗这样的孩子不仅仅出现在书中，在我们的身边，还有许多这样的孩子：还记得这样一幅广告吗？一位来自山区的一位小姑娘，睁着一双明亮的大眼睛，喊着：“我要读书！”从她的眼神里，我们读到了她渴望学识的心情，看到了她渴望上学的情感……
现在的孩子更是祖国的花骨朵，从幼儿园开始，爸爸妈妈爷爷奶奶的陪着，伸手要什么有什么，对于雾都孤儿这种经历是无法理解的。可是这也让我感受到现在孩子在挫折教育方面的重要。让我想到了班里的一个小女孩，妈妈告诉我，从小到大，爷爷奶奶从来不责备她，哪怕是小女孩打了爷爷奶奶。可是有一次，爷爷就说了小女孩一句，她就马上眼泪流下来了，还一个劲的说：“爷爷不好……”我发现很多孩子都把这样的`生活当做理所当然，从来不去体会别人的感受，在受到一点点委屈的时候就大发脾气，有时候甚至是他们自己的错。到了幼儿园就很难适应集体生活，往往要花比别人多出很多的时间，这是我们值得思考的问题。
《雾都孤儿》这本世界名著讲述的是发生在19世纪的一个动人的故事。
主人公奥利弗？退斯特是一个孤儿，在济贫院苦苦挣扎了九年之后在人间多次辗转，历经多种磨难，最后被好心的布朗罗先生收留并在他和露丝？梅莱等多位好心人的帮助下，明白身世，并得到遗产的动人故事。
人之初，性本善。这是一句家喻户晓的名言。人们初生时，善是人的本性，但不良的社会风气，造就了一个个坏人。奥利弗被歹徒弄走后，小偷们想把善良的奥利弗训练成一个偷鸡摸狗、为非作歹的坏人。可是善良的本性和基本的良心让他战胜恐惧，和歹徒斗智斗勇，逃了出来。这种利用自己的智慧，敢于和歹徒作斗争的大无畏精神是值得我们学习的。不低头，坚持不懈，那人们善良的本性就不会消失。
我们也要学习布朗先生，使他在奥利弗最困难得时候帮助了他，使他在与歹徒做斗争时不再无依无靠，使他坚定了脱离歹徒的信心。是他让这个世界少了一个坏人，多了一个好人。是他让可怜的奥利弗远离了这个污浊的世界。
和奥利弗相比，我们是多么的幸福。世界上还有许多孩子还在被饥饿和寒冷折磨，我们要珍惜现在的生活，努力读书，成为一个对社会有用的人。帮助那些需要帮助的孩子，让他们也能和我们一样拥有灿烂阳光般的美好生活。
今天我在家没事，就拿出书柜里的《雾都孤儿》，我怀着好奇心一口气读完了这本书。
《雾都孤儿》是英国著名作家狄更斯创作初期的一部作品。作者当时处于朝气蓬勃的青年时代，因作品具有十足的生气和活力，这些写作特点都充分体现在作品中对人性思索的自然流露上。
乍一看上去，狄更斯在这部小说中并没有刻意去探究人性的深意，相反，我们看见的更多是冷酷和无情，但文中哪怕是费根和塞克斯这种罪恶之徒都能把那一丁点儿光明的追求在严酷的现实中表现出来，费根在死囚室中侍死与奥立费的最后一面时，作者用了象征的笔触，让一个纯真的的少年如天使般引导了那罪孽深重然而又可悲又可怜的老朽的罪犯。塞克斯杀了南茜出逃途中夜晚的那场冲天大火，塞克斯看到那简直是一种新生活，他在无所不在的的恐惧和惶恐的折磨下忙着扑火，要逃避记忆，逃避自己，他比原先更强烈的意识到自己犯下了可怕的罪行。作者对两人的这些安排可谓耐人思索。
这章中，作者表面看上去是在表现主人翁奥立费的生活，而实际上更多的在表现作者自己的生活。
读完这本书，让我十分震惊，我会认真的体会这本书中的含义。
在暑假的每一天中，我都是非常快乐的，因为我合理运用了时间，使我的每一天都变得十分充实，而且我还有一个好习惯——‘爱读书’。有一天王楠来了，我们两个小书虫刚回到家就一屁股坐下来看书，她看《小王子》，我看《雾都孤儿》，我们的思想沐浴在书的温泉中。
《雾都孤儿》大概的内容是：在美国某市的一个济贫院中出生了一个孩子，他妈妈一生下他，看了他一眼就死了，有一个老女人给他取了一个名字叫奥利佛·退克斯。不久他被送到一家婴儿护理所，照顾他和另一群孩子的是一个老妇人，她老练的技术和毒辣的手法可以把一群淘气无比的孩子调教的乖乖的。一转眼，奥利佛九岁了，因为没有户口，他被再次带回了他出生的那个贫济院，离开了他出生入死的伙伴。后来他误入贼窝，南希之死让他看清了世间每一个人的真面目，最终奥利佛通过自己坚强的意志，勇敢的承担，耐心的思考，坦诚的对人和大家的帮助知道自己有一个哥哥，就是那个想杀他的贼。哥哥最终被判处绞刑。在法院的协助下父亲生前拥有的巨额财产判给了他和姐姐，他们终于过上了好日子。
这本书告诉我一个道理，坚强、坦诚、勇敢、耐心做好了，你离快乐就不远了。书是我在学习上的一个好助手，是我人生路上的引导人，是所有知识的来源，书中的知识将永远激励我向更广阔、更新奇的世界前进。
《雾都孤儿》是一篇世界名著。它是一篇写实小说。
《雾都孤儿》以雾都伦敦为背景，讲述了一个孤儿悲惨的身世及遭遇，主人公奥利弗在孤儿院长大，经历学徒生涯，艰苦逃难，误入贼窝，又被迫与狠毒的凶徒为伍，历尽无数辛酸。最后主人公奥利弗在善良人的帮助下，查明身世并获得了幸福。
读完《雾都孤儿》，我的心情久久不能平静。这本书揭露许多当时的社会问题，如救济院、童工、以及帮派教唆青少年参与犯罪等。这些不是小说中才会出现的社会场景，现实中也存在。
《雾都孤儿》有两处使我印象深刻。
第一点是作者狄更斯笔下的社会环境。社会环境真实，揭露社会的黑暗层面，对社会做出了有力的抨击。作者笔下的社会的黑暗、人性的邪恶和丑陋让我难受。不过其中也存有善良友好的人，如布朗罗和露丝·梅莱家。他们与主人公关系特殊。读着读着，我觉得很巧，为何奥利弗遇见的是他们，而且关系特殊。或许是无巧不成书吧，或许这样可以为奥利弗最后的幸福做铺垫，给受到社会挫败的人一些宽慰、一些希望。
第二点是主人公奥利弗的顽强、善良与执着。奥利弗成长的环境是艰苦的，他的经历是辛酸的。但从出生到最后，他都坚持本性，坚定善恶的标尺。在那样的环境，他没有同流合污，他拥有正确的是非善恶观。在当时分辨善恶是没人交给他的，但他却有正确的观念。为什么？
正应了“人之初，性本善”。本心人皆有，然贤者能勿丧。不禁佩服起奥利弗，在残酷的社会面前不低头，顽强生存着。
从《雾都孤儿》中，我认识到社会并不是完全美好的，但我们要向奥利弗学习，坚持本心。只要人人都坚持本心，社会将变得更美好。现在面对美好的生活我们应少些抱怨，多些努力！
品味完一本名著后，想必你一定有很多值得分享的心得，为此需要认真地写一写读后感了。可能你现在毫无头绪吧，以下是我整理的《雾都孤儿》读后感，仅供参考，希望能够帮助到大家。
《雾都孤儿》是一本出自英国著名作家狄更斯的著作，刚开始读，我就被主人公的遭遇感到同情，那这本书的主人公到底经历了什么呢？一起随我往下看吧。
本书写了一位名叫奥立弗的孤儿从小没有父母，被卖到棺材铺里当学徒，受尽欺辱，正当他忍无可忍逃出来时，却轻易的相信别人的诱，误入歧途，学做小偷。他知道这一行业的罪恶性，无意中被一位绅士救了，但又被那一帮人抢走了。一次入室行窃，奥立弗制止了他们，却因此不小心挨了一枪。最后，他被一家好心人家收留，好心人帮他得知了身世，讨回了公道，并找回了曾经收留他的绅士，和属于他的遗产。
奥立弗的经历可以算得上是惊心动魄，他的命运竟是如此悲惨。读了这本书，我更是发现了一些道貌岸然的卑鄙小人，他们竟然可以为了自己的利益，不顾别人活得怎样（就像书中卖了奥立弗的那些人），他们为什么不伸出自己的援手，帮助奥立弗，他们是知道奥立弗的现状的呀！终于，当我读到有好心人收留奥立弗时，心里才稍稍地感到了安慰。莎士比亚说过“金子，黄黄的，发光的，宝贵的金子！只要一点点儿，就可以使黑的变成白的，丑的变成美的，错的变成对的，卑贱的变成尊贵的，老人变成少年，懦夫变成勇士……”金钱真的这么重要吗？有人可以为了金钱出卖别人吗？这个社会真的只有金钱最重要吗？
读这本书吧，它会让你对人生有新的理解！
《雾都孤儿》是十九世纪英国最杰出的小说家查尔斯。狄更斯创作的一部小说。
小说中的主人公奥立弗。退斯特从小失去了父母，是一个孤儿。他是在济贫院里长大的。那里的生活非常艰苦，食物非常简单，通常是一碗玉米粥、一块干面包，奥立弗。退斯特在这样的环境中度过了九年。
奥立弗。退斯特非常不幸，但他也是幸运的，他曾被迫加入强盗的行列，但他没有泯灭天良。后来通过亲人、朋友的帮忙，奥立弗。退斯特终于弄清了自己的身份，并得到了一部分遗产：八百英镑。好心的布朗罗先生把奥立弗。退斯特当作亲生儿子来看待，奥立弗。退斯特建了新家，过上了幸福的生活。
书中最让人感动的是，十岁的奥立弗。退斯特被迫从济贫院里逃了出来，不料被一个名叫杰克的窃贼盯上。杰克把奥立弗。退斯特带到了贼窝，那些贼们妄想把奥立弗。退斯特训练成一个小偷。奥立弗。退斯特受尽了百般折磨，他不断地想方设法逃离，并十分顽强地与敌人搏斗，终于逃了出来。奥立弗。退斯特是宁愿过着流浪的生活，也宁死不愿去当小偷。
看完了这本书，我深切地感受到奥立弗。退斯特的命运是多么的曲折不幸。但他凭借着刚毅顽强的意志、坚持不懈的精神战胜了生活中碰到的一个个困难，终于让自己过上了美好的生活。奥立弗。退斯特真是好样的！
与奥立弗。退斯特相比，我真是太幸福了！我有一个幸福的家，爸爸妈妈很爱我！我要好好地珍惜这一切！更要努力学好知识，让自己成为一个有用的人，来回报家庭，回报社会呀！
这个寒假，我读了几本好书：《神奇的太阳花女孩》、《小飞侠彼得·潘》和《雾都孤儿》。其中，令我印象最深的应该是《雾都孤儿》了。《雾都孤儿》的作者查尔斯·狄更斯是英国十九世纪最杰出的批判现实主义作家。他的第二部作品《雾都孤儿》，讲述了奥利弗的一生。奥利弗·退斯特是一个孤儿，在不幸的学徒经历后，他逃到了伦敦，谁知却一不小心落入了一伙盗贼之手，他们用尽一切手段想要把他改造成一个扒手。他曾短暂地被善良的布朗劳先生救出，可又被匪徒诱拐，他们想留住奥利弗，非使他走上邪路不可。奥利弗在陪伴一盗贼偷盗时中了枪伤后落入梅丽太太和受其保护的露梓的家里。在这里，他受到了友好的对待和抚育，结果发现露梓是奥利佛的不幸母亲的妹妹，后来奥利弗被布朗劳先生收养，盗匪们都得到了他们应有的下场。在这本书里，我最喜欢的人物是奥利弗，因为他是一个善良的孩子，从“逮不着和贝茨每到一家水果店，就装出若无其事的样子，偷偷地把苹果或橘子往自己的口袋里塞。没多久，两人的口袋便鼓得再也装不下任何东西了。奥利弗对他们两人的行为感到十分厌恶。”可以看出，奥利弗虽然在逆境中成长，但他却没被影响，很令人敬佩。这本小说揭示当时十九世纪英国社会贫困儿童的生活及悲惨命运，生动地展示了社会流氓盗匪生活及心理状态。表明了在奥利弗身上，任何逆境中，善的原则都将存在并最终获胜。
《雾都孤儿》这部小说讲的是一个叫奥里弗的孤儿，他的童年是在济贫院里度过的，《雾都孤儿》读后感。后来，他被送到一个棺材铺里当学徒。因不堪忍受老板娘的压迫，他向伦敦逃去。路上，他遇上了一个外号机灵鬼的人，把他进了贼窝，在两次偷盗中，他都遇到了好人，把他留在家里抚养，但又一次次的被抓回去。终于，由于南西变好，告诉了他们偶然听到的一个秘密，说奥里弗的同父异母哥哥为了财产，要杀他，于是逮捕了贼窝的人，但出于同情，奥里弗放过了它的哥哥。奥里弗的灾难终于结束了，他被他第一次偷的那位老绅士收为义子。奥里弗才知道，他偷的两次，被偷的竟然是他父亲的好友和他的亲姨妈。
整部小说曲折惊险，让人不仅为奥里弗的身世叹息，为坏人说愤怒，被善良人所感动，为奥里弗最后的幸福生活而高兴，而我最喜爱的人物，是在两次奥里弗陷入危难时，没有计较他偷了东西，而是十分同情他，并帮助了他的两个人。因为他们的善良，奥里弗才得救，也因为他们的善良，才使世界上少了一个受苦的孩子，是将来少了一个贼，多了一个好人。如果世间的人都想他们一样的话，我想，世上便不会有受苦的人，不会有那么多的孤儿。而我也为其中的南西所感动，她是贼窝得一分子，但她没有被贼窝染黑了心，她知道悔改，知道去怜悯一个孤儿。但她也是被那个善良的人所感动了，可见如果多一个善良人，也许可以多感化一个在贼窝里的一刻还有一点点人性的心。但是，我也为南西所悲哀，她最后的结局十分惨，她被打死了，而打死她的人，确是她一直不舍得离开的人。南西曾有许多机会逃离那个肮脏的世界，但她放弃了，就是舍不得最后那个打死她的人。
《雾都孤儿》中的所有人，都使我知道了许多东西。
《雾都孤儿》是英国作家狄更斯的第二部长篇小说，它讲述了一个孤儿悲惨的身世及遭遇。书中的主人翁奥利弗?退斯特出生不久，他的妈妈就死了。他在孤儿院长大，经历了学徒生涯，艰苦逃难，不幸又误入贼窝，后又被迫与狠毒的凶徒为伍，历经无数辛酸，最后在善良人的帮助下，查明身世并获得了幸福。整本小说曲折惊险，让人为奥利弗的身世叹息，为卑鄙小人愤怒，为善良的布朗罗感动，为奥利弗得到新生而高兴。《雾都孤儿》中的人物众多，但特点鲜明，如：性情暴躁、两面派的邦布尔；
老奸巨猾的犹太人费金；凶猛残暴、犹如野兽的塞克斯；狡诈阴险的蒙克斯；善良可爱的露丝；毛手毛脚的罗斯波力医生；聪明机智、办事果断的布朗罗；疯疯癫癫的格林维格；还有心地善良、出淤泥而不染、命运悲苦的南希；更有天真活泼、纯洁善良，令人怜悯的奥利弗。值得一提的是，全篇文章中还详细刻画了每个人物的习惯性动作和口头禅。比如邦布尔总是戴着一顶三角帽，手握藤杖，走起路来大腹便便、大摇大摆，一幅不可一世的样子；再如，老费金计上心来时，总爱抚摸鼻子；塞克斯的口头禅：“天打雷劈”；格林维格的口头禅“我宁愿吞掉自己的脑袋”等等，真是妙趣横生，颇有意思。在孤独中成长，在痛苦间挣扎，在尊严的摧残下斗争，在悲惨的出生下奋进，这就是狄更斯笔下的雾都孤儿------奥列弗?退斯特。
这个寒假里我读了《雾都孤儿》这本世界名著。书里讲述的是发生在19世纪的一个动人故事。
书中的主人翁是一位孤儿，他的名字是奥利弗·特威斯特。他出生于一个济贫院，出生不久妈妈就死了。他被当作一件物品送来送去，受尽折磨。他最后遇到了一位善良的老先生：布朗洛老先生，这位老先生好心收留了他，他从此过上了好生活。
读完这本书，我心中久久不能平息。可怜的奥利弗，在已经失去家人的痛苦下，还受到了这么多折磨。真不知道在他瘦弱的躯体下，有着怎样的意志，能使他坚持不懈，使他在饥饿、寒冷、孤独、悲伤、痛苦下顽强的斗争，向美好的生活前进！最令我感动的是奥利弗遇到强盗集团的那章。奥利弗在路上走了七天七夜，饥饿和疲倦威胁着他。他遇到了杰克·道金斯：一位小偷，杰克把奥利弗带到了贼窝，小偷们想把奥利弗也训练成一位小偷。但奥利弗不愿意做小偷，逃了出来。
读完这章，一种油然而生的敬佩之情环绕着我的心扉。奥利弗是一位多么坚强，多么正义的孩子啊！他宁愿逃出贼窝，继续流浪，也不愿做一位小偷。面对生死的关头，面对的是死在街头或做一位小偷，他坚定的选择了正义。虽然他只有10岁，和我们年级差不多大，但他的坚强，他的正直，他的勇敢，让我特别的震撼。还有他对美好生活的向往，对生命的向往，都是支持他前进的力量！这些都是我们现代孩子们所没有的。
我们生活在蜜罐里，福窝里，却总是抱怨，总是不满足。但我们可曾想过，在世界上有好多国家孩子，他们饱受战乱的痛苦；正和饥饿、寒冷、疾病作战；正面对着失去亲人，飘泊流浪的生活。
所以我们要珍惜现在，不负时光，勇敢向前。
这几天我读了一本书：《雾都孤儿》，它的作者是英国的查尔斯·狄更斯，他有着和雾都孤儿费利奥·特维斯特一样的生活、一样的困难、一样的艰苦。
故事讲的是一个弃婴奥利佛在孤儿院里从出生到离开生活了9年之后，被送到棺材店老板那儿当学徒。难以忍受的饥饿、贫困，使奥利佛忍受不住煎熬逃到伦敦，又被迫当了小偷。他虽曾被富有的布莱罗先生收留，不幸让“同行”发现又被迫回到贼窝。善良的女扒手南希为了救奥利佛，不顾费根的监视，向布莱罗报信。但可惜的是南茜最终还是被比尔杀害。最终奥利佛终于得以与亲人团聚。
奥利佛是个勇敢的孩子，他在困难面不但前没有低头，反而更坚强了更勇敢了，从小受苦的他，当了棺材店的助手（没吃过一顿饱饭，一顿饱覚）、小偷（进过警察局）……虽然在中途被好心人收养，但还是在送书的时候被“同行”发现，虽经过这些困难，但奥利佛从没放弃过，一直努力着，不象困难低头，自个走自个的路，他曾经挨过饿、讨过饭、做过小偷，但这都是他坚强的表现、勇敢的象征，他虽不是武侠、超人或明星，但却给人一种崇拜的感觉，让我忘不了他。
他勇敢到我们无法想象，但只要一幸福就能幸福的五体投地，他经历了我们想也想不到的苦和幸福，他是个“英雄”！
奥利佛是一个在济贫院里度过了童年的男孩子，由于难以忍受的饥饿和暴力以及侮辱，他逃亡伦敦。又不幸误入贼窝，期间被一位善良的的老绅士布朗罗先生收留。但又被那一伙贼绑回贼窝。最后善良的女扒手南希为了营救奥利弗，不顾贼头的监视和威胁，向布朗罗报信，说奥利佛就是他找寻已久的外孙儿。南希被贼窝头目杀害，警察随即围剿了贼窝。奥利佛终于得以与亲人团聚。
奥利佛虽然在黑暗的习艺所里饱尝了生活的艰辛，但是并没有给这么一个美好的心灵蒙上灰尘。由于饥饿他向干事提出需要一碗稀粥时，被那些干事认为“这孩子将来一定会被绞死”。在当学徒的时候他面对人们对于他母亲的羞辱，奋起反抗。也许是由于初生牛犊不怕虎，竭尽全力反抗着。后来逃亡到伦敦后，纯洁的心灵让人们感到可笑。其中有一段话让我记忆尤深“那些都是老先生的，在我还热病快死掉的时候，是那位好心的先生把我带到他家里去，照看我养好了病。哦，求求你们把这些都送回去吧，把书和钱还给他。你们要我一辈子待在这儿都可以，我只求你们把这些东西送回去，不然他们应定会以为我逃跑了的，你们可怜可怜我，把书和钱送回去吧”这是小奥利弗被抓后说的话。他那种维护尊严的行为深深打动了我。是啊，一个人活着就要有尊严！
人活着只要不断地向着梦想前进，就要有自己的尊严，不要向命运低头，命运永远在我们手中！
春节妈妈送了我很多本书作为新年礼物，其中《雾都孤儿》这本书最令人深思。让我们这些妈妈的宠儿看到了从未看到过的社会的冷酷与人类的性格的残暴，了解了从未体会过的一个孤儿被贫困包围时的无助的心情。
这篇文章主要讲了：富人的弃婴奥立弗从小在教会长大，过着衣食难饱的生活，受尽虐待。仅仅因为实在饿得受不了，只多要了一口粮，就被逐出教会，成了棺材店的学徒。在这人间的地狱，奥立弗饱受侮辱，迫使他逃到了雾都伦敦，不幸又落入贼帮手中。小小的他在逆境中挣扎，他曾被富有的布莱罗先生收留，只可惜又让小扒手发现重入贼窝。最后善良的女扒手南希帮助了奥利弗，向布莱罗报信，说奥利弗就是他的外孙儿。警察随即围剿了贼窝。奥利弗终于得以与亲人团聚。
一口气阅读完这本书，我掩卷长思：奥利弗经过许许多多地磨难，最终找到了自己的外公。奥利弗勇敢，坚强，不怕困难，知恩图报，是我学习的好榜样！
此时夜已深，窗外一片寂静，而我的心情却久久不能平静。想想我们自己，生活得多幸福，但还常常抱怨不珍惜。世界上还有很多像奥利弗的孩子孤苦无依，和他们相比我们就像生活在天堂里的孩子。我们要感谢阳光、空气；感谢父母的爱，老师的教育，同学的帮助。让我们珍惜身边的一切，不要让它悄悄溜走，要知道它是如此的珍贵！
查尔斯狄更斯是19世纪英国现实主义文学的杰出代表。当时，英国称霸世界，繁荣一时然而英国社会仍然是“百姓多疮瘢”，工人和城市贫民手巾剥削和压榨，生活十分贫困。他所著的《雾都孤儿》更是反映了社会生活中的种种矛盾和弊病。
这篇小说的主人公奥立弗特威斯特是出身在救贫院的孤儿，他在救贫院的寄养所里悲惨地被“教育”了九年，然后被送到一个承办丧事的棺材店里当学徒;他无法忍受这里的不公和虐待，于是历经艰难逃往伦敦，不料落入了贼巢，一次偶然的机会在一些好心人和老绅士的帮助下逃出，却又一次被绑回贼巢中，经一番周折，最后在一些好心人和老绅士的帮助下重新得救并夺回遗产;老绅士收奥立弗特威斯特为养子并对他施以知识的恩泽。
在现实生活中也何尝不是呢?现在还有许多孤独无助的人们落难街头，过着乞讨的生活，有的穷苦人们甚至放下了“衣带渐宽终不悔，为伊消得人憔悴”的爱国献身精神，作起了偷鸡摸狗的勾当，成为了国家中的“害群之马”。
而对于孤儿们的苦衷，大家几乎坐视不理，除了对贫困山区、学校捐款，又有多少人对这些四海为家，天为铺，地为床的贫苦孤儿们加以关心、援助与问候呢?
而我们这些有亲人呵护和关心的生活在无限快乐中的儿童，并没有像孤儿，比如就说小说中的奥立弗特威斯特一样受尽社会的不公和虐待，以及人们的讥讽和欺负，所以我们更应加倍关心身边有困难的人，伸出援助之手，让他们成为国家的栋梁，不让他们误入歧途。
这本《雾都孤儿》给我们以思想的震撼，让我们关心、帮助身边的困难人士，相信这样，世界将会变得更加美好。
《雾都孤儿》的具体内容没必要多做介绍，因为网络上的总结会比我的更好，写这篇日志也不过纯粹是想抒发一下感想。其实，《雾都孤儿》和以前看过的《魂断蓝桥》、《傲慢与偏见》、《塞万提斯》等电影差不多，都深深反映了那个时代西方社会的状况，都让人看到了人性的两面。整部电影中，小主人公奥利佛·特维斯特自然是给我影响最深的`，他坎坷的遭遇，让我的心从头至尾地纠结着，可是，我也很佩服他，在那样的环境下，不管怎样，他都挺过来了，这份耐力是我所欣赏的，也是我所渴求的。
如果处在那样环境之下的人是我，也许自己真的没办法挺过来，没勇气为了摆脱繁重的奴役而出走，没勇气承受枪伤所带来的疼痛，没勇气处于充满罪恶的贼窝，没勇气做的事太多太多。另一个让我印象深刻的人物就是南希，在她身上，我才真正的感受到了那个时代、那个社会人性的温暖，和周围冷漠的人群形成了鲜明对比。她为了营救奥利佛，不顾贼头的监视和威胁，向布莱罗报信，说奥利佛就是他找寻已久的外孙儿，因此，她最终摆脱不了噩运的牵绊，死在了贼头的手杖之下。我佩服她的那份勇气，如果是我，也许真的没办法像她那样吧。
原来，看完了，说到底能让我印象深刻的是勇气。印象中，好像听朋友说过，如果你缺少某样东西，你就会很在意它。也许吧，就像我缺乏勇气，所以，自己似乎一直在找寻勇气的影子，随着它，希望有一天也能拥有它，让自己变得勇敢、坚强。也许，某一天，自己真的能做到呢？正如那句老话说的"if you think you can ，you can !"
在孤独下成长，在痛苦间挣扎，在尊严的摧残下斗争，在悲惨的出身下奋进，这就是狄更斯笔下的雾都孤儿——奥利弗。
奥利弗从小在济贫院长大，他从未被任何一个人爱过，过着地狱般的生活。在九岁时，他被送进一家棺材店的老板当学徒，因为他受不了非人的待遇，逃向伦敦，却不料被小偷，走进了贼窟。幸好遇到好心人地帮助，才过上了平静的生活。
这个结果很美好，但是过程却是很凄惨。
我真的不知道在他那瘦弱的身躯下有着如此坚持不懈的精神；也不知道他在饥饿、悲伤、孤独、痛苦下有这样顽强斗争的意志；更不知道他在尊严受到严重摧残下仍屹立不倒的原因。
奥利弗的童年充满了悲伤，而我们呢？！
从小生活在蜜罐里，在爸爸、妈妈呵护下，却往往忽略了幸福的真谛，一味地抱怨，一味地不满足。
当我们得不到呵护、得不到关爱之时，我们能否有奥利弗般的屹立不倒；当我们受到饥饿、悲伤、孤独之际，我们是否具备顽强的斗争意志；当我们面临艰难困苦的时候，我们有没有坚持不懈的精神？想起这些，我们不妨把目光头向奥利弗，这样：你也许会想起在世界的某一角落，还有些许我们的同龄人正承受着巨大的痛苦，正和饥饿、疾病作战！你可能会想起在我们身边还有几多同伴因为家庭的贫困而无法享受学习的乐趣！你大概会想起在我们学校还有几个同学为明天的学费而暗自落泪！
真的该想想，我真的该想想了！
当我哭泣没有名牌鞋子穿之时，我应该发现还有人却没有鞋穿！
当我抱怨饭不好吃之际，我应该觉悟还有些须人在街头上挨饿！
当我被父母叫唤着去上学而自己却极不情愿的时候，我应该想起还有几多同龄人那双渴求知识的目光！
奥利弗的勇敢精神是感我肺腑的！因为我知道：
《雾都孤儿》这本书的作者是英国十九世纪杰出的批判现实主义作家查尔斯·狄更斯。这本书以无限的同情描写了纯洁善良和备受欺凌的劳动人民。以讽刺和夸张的手法抨击了虚伪和冷酷的社会。
小主人公奥利弗·特威斯特出生在贫民教养所，在这个世界上没有亲人。“半饥半饱的苦命人”，“在吃拳头，挨耳光中过日子的人”说得就是他。他在教养所受尽保育员的欺凌，在棺材店里吃足老板娘的苦头，后来还落入盗贼之手，被迫干起违背自己良心的勾当，险些送掉了性命。
奥利弗聪明，善良，讲义气，知感恩。他生活逐渐变好后最先想到的是在教养所里同甘共苦的好兄弟迪克。“我们要带他离开这，给他衣服穿，叫他去念书，还要把他送到哪个安静的乡下去，让他把身体养得又结实又健康……”
这本书中还有各色各样的人物，有乱断案的地方法官，有贪得无厌，奸诈狡猾的犹太老头儿，有杀人不眨眼的赛克斯，还有身在贼窝而又心地不坏的南希……在他们之间，展开了激烈的斗争。
小说情节惊险离奇，跌宕起伏。人物命运大起大落，但是作者最后却给奥利弗一个圆满的结局，让他过起了小绅士的生活。“善有善报，恶有恶报。”这是人类善良的愿望。
这部作品可以看出作者对美好生活的追求与向往，对光明的渴望，对黑暗现实的不满，以及对奥利弗悲惨遭遇的深切同情。警示人们要珍惜当下美好的生活，即使生活在充满黑暗的环境下，也要充满希望，坚定意志，才不会在黑暗中丢失自我，失掉心中的光明。让我们感受到作者对人类苦难的深切同情和仁爱精神。这种仁爱精神将永远照亮人心，指引我们走向光明之路。
《雾都孤儿》是一篇世界名著。它是一篇写实小说。
《雾都孤儿》以雾都伦敦为背景，讲述了一个孤儿悲惨的身世及遭遇，主人公奥利弗在孤儿院长大，经历学徒生涯，艰苦逃难，误入贼窝，又被迫与狠毒的凶徒为伍，历尽无数辛酸。最后主人公奥利弗在善良人的帮助下，查明身世并获得了幸福。
读完《雾都孤儿》，我的心情久久不能平静。这本书揭露许多当时的社会问题，如救济院、童工、以及帮派教唆青少年参与犯罪等。这些不是小说中才会出现的社会场景，现实中也存在。
《雾都孤儿》有两处使我印象深刻。
第一点是作者狄更斯笔下的社会环境。社会环境真实，揭露社会的黑暗层面，对社会做出了有力的抨击。作者笔下的社会的黑暗、人性的邪恶和丑陋让我难受。不过其中也存有善良友好的人，如布朗罗和露丝·梅莱家。他们与主人公关系特殊。读着读着，我觉得很巧，为何奥利弗遇见的是他们，而且关系特殊。或许是无巧不成书吧，或许这样可以为奥利弗最后的幸福做铺垫，给受到社会挫败的人一些宽慰、一些希望。
第二点是主人公奥利弗的顽强、善良与执着。奥利弗成长的环境是艰苦的，他的经历是辛酸的。但从出生到最后，他都坚持本性，坚定善
恶的标尺。在那样的环境，他没有同流合污，他拥有正确的是非善恶观。在当时分辨善恶是没人交给他的，但他却有正确的观念。为什么?
正应了“人之初，性本善”。本心人皆有，然贤者能勿丧。不禁佩服起奥利弗，在残酷的社会面前不低头，顽强生存着。
从《雾都孤儿》中，我认识到社会并不是完全美好的，但我们要向奥利弗学习，坚持本心。只要人人都坚持本心，社会将变得更美好。现在面对美好的生活我们应少些抱怨，多些努力!
The work of the protagonist Oliver is an orphan, and grew up in the courtyard of the poor relief, others have been subject to discrimination. Because the extremely ill-treatment and fled to London, into Zeiwo, called by the beating, growing up, I do not know how much to eat suffered. While growing up in such an environment, but there is a Buddha Orie good heart, no matter by how much pain he did not want to do bad things is the greatest determination. He was Shouen people will never forget can not thank the benefactor. Although he is subject to a number of well-intentioned people and the sympathy of the adoption, such as Bulang Lu President, Lennart Meri wife, but the thieves, the group still did not miss him, and his half-brother also wish to kill him. Oliver's fate is tragic, but he's also been well-intentioned people to help identify his life, and the heritage. He has been the fate of the final change is expected to become a useful person to society. This works in Orie wrote at the beginning of the Buddha in relief of the poor house, in Charles Dickens described the living conditions of the poor house when a very ironic way: "Every child has a bowl of thin gruel, and that can not be increased only once To important public holiday, with the exception of a bowl of porridge outside in order to increase two and a quarter ounces of bread. They do not need to eat the Zhou Wan never wash, the children always scraping bowl of the spoon sauce residue has been driven Zeng Ming-Liang Shuo bowl. Scraping bowl of the matter is completed, they sit there and stare at large Tongguo helplessly, as if they are able to block a piece of brick stoves have to swallow it. This is a heinous and Tian Zhao They also own and finger , Ba Wangzhe a splash a few drops from child star to porridge. "Can be seen from the lives of those orphans how poverty, hunger throughout the day in the state, and no hope of Tianzhao his little finger, Bawang Zhao splash over the Congee child stars. One can imagine the children's life is very tragic, and Orie on the Buddha in such an environment. It is in the form of novels by Dickens to reflect the dark reality of the society and capitalist society under the lives of people of how poverty, poor life as works written by the same. Charles, known as the Victorian age eyes, because the novel in the form of the observed things with the novel in the form of re-emerged. That is why this works is the content of the true reflection of society at that time, and I think that the author describes the relief of the poor orphans living with a very vivid image of the language, a sharp way to expose the community The dark. Dickens wrote in the book a few years ago, the British Parliament adopted a new method of relief, cancellation of poor relief, but the poor directly to the port to house the poor relief. Dickens described the relief of the poor house at the time of poor relief is a true portrayal of the hospital. Poor relief in the hospital in no democracy, no freedom, only to be abused, hungry cold, a Mianhuangjishou months, fell to the ground at all times as likely to die, and the Diocese of those officers, those who Explorer, but eat a fat Head of the brain fertilizer, the full spirit. Dickens works in the hospital for the poor relief vivid description is a reflection of social problems. Some people think Charles Dickens's works this is a serious literary works, it works because it made a deep social problems, social development and progress is of great historical significance. In this work successfully in Dickens depicts a series of characters, such as the Diocese of General bampur, thieves old man and head of the Jewish charity school students Noah, the bandit Powu Monks, and so on. Did not have to portray a lifelike, life-like image. However, the most successful works portray the character or the protagonist Oliver and the woman stole Nancy. Oliver was born with a moral people, know how to map Temple has been reported. He ate a lot a lot of suffering, but in the end, finally met a good man. Whether Bulang Lu President, Lennart Meri, or his wife or Miss Meri, Orie Fodu treated as ordinary family, even though he is a "thief" who are sympathetic to him, his adoption, and that he receive a good education, and finally get Qing his life, his legacy fight back. Oliver described the events of all, I admire the most is the sixth chapter say when he was struggling to resist mocking the incident, as the authors put it, "On the surface I have described is not so small Important, but in fact he was Oliver's future development and are indirectly affected, and has had a major change. "Oliver in the poor house while growing up, there will be no freedom itself, to be disposal, but he A very strong self-esteem, Noah in the face of personal attacks, he was extremely excited. Noah and because of Oliver's mother died of a vicious insult to his indignation, blood boiling. "He immediately jumped up, an overturned the tables and chairs, and then Noah caught the pipe, to exhaust the body's effort to shake in fury of Noah, Noah has been a bit of teeth chattered issue of noise, and then He gathered together a whole body of Noah's efforts to blow hard, straight knocked him to the ground. "Oliver reaction puzzled me, common sense, he has been a quiet, modest, though by non - Who has abused a dejected from the juvenile Gan unlucky, but at the moment cohesion of the whole body strength Noah beat. What is the strength of his courage to make such a decision, perhaps it should not be "decided" it, a strong sense of anger so that he has lost his reason, he does not allow other people to his mother in the slightest insulting. While Oliver's mother, his memory, the memory never know his mother look like. However, the mother has been accompanied by a sense of respect for him. So, when Noah insult his mother, Oliver showed no emotion before. The incident was the result of Oliver was beaten up and detained. Charles Dickens wrote in the details below, not only for paving the way, but also a deeper portrait of the heroine works Oliver's image, in order to safeguard the dignity of the mother, just go ahead Many scholars think that works in a portrait of the most successful characters is Nancy, while Oliver to work for the main character, but from the social psychology and psychoanalysis point of view, the role of Nancy greater practical significance. Nancy is a psychological complex young women, from childhood growing up in the Group of thieves, no one knew her life, she entered the post-Zeiwo did not have any good people, of course, the final Bulang Lu also met with President Lennart Meri and Miss But then it was too late. Finally, her tragic death at the hands of the bandits Sykes, her fate is tragic, as in the real world into a triad of orphans after the end of the same. Nancy seen through the group of thieves all the ugly things, that her aversion treacherous, vicious, ruthless cruelty, inhuman things, but she is also the Group of thieves have a certain feeling, and want to leave. She has sympathy for Oliver, as for their treatment as his younger brother, in times of crisis to disregard their own safety to come forward and saved him, but he will have to personally Oliver thieves onto the road. She envied culture and education, the warmth of the family women, but because of her own humble status Yingshang Qu dare not, dare not wish for such a happy life. She is the heart of the conflict, when Bulang Lu and President Lennart Meri Miss advised her to leave the Group of thieves over a new leaf, she refused their offers of help, although she had a yearning for this kind of life. Nancy contradictions from her in to see if the original: "I do not want to do it! I do not want to do it! Though he is the devil, and he even told me yet more vicious than the devil, but I do not want to do ... then another ... One reason is that his life of crime is life, I am also live in sin, we are together for many years to live such a life, so I can not betray them, not to mention some of them may have betrayed me, but They did not sell out, even though they are bad people. "Her inner conflict is real, in line with the general psychological normal. There are a lot of female juvenile offenders, once on the wrong may be similar to that of Nancy ideological contradictions: both want to leave the crime associates also want to leave. Although Nancy Sykes hated doing, but he can not do without, it was of the view that Nancy is not reasonable, but in any case, her actions are all true. Psychological and ideological problems is in itself a complex issue as it is not possible to use simple methods can be resolved. Nancy Oliver, and this is the work of the two most representative figure, which is undeniable. Dickens portrayed in these two figures also spent a wonderful way. However, I would like to talk about is the image of another person Monks. Monks is Oliver's half-brother, who was extremely cruel, to be his brother's property destroyed at the expense of their own younger brother. I think Charles Monks at the describing the act when a clever arrangement. Monks and the role is a reflection of society at that time some of the children of the nobility EXILE. Monks is a smart, he knows how to ease access to his brother's property. Monks at the Dickens portrayed the characters can be on step-by-step. First of all, Monks is to look at the class when Mr. Bull appeared, the first author of the text did not mention him, so I read in class, Mr. Bull to meet the guests unfamiliar with the plot, on intuition told me that this works The plot will reach another climax. The mysterious people coming out, is scheduled to have a good, but I did not expect this so-called mystery is who would be Oliver's brother, but did not expect the paper after he had played such an important role. Charles gave the Monks "smart" in mind, set up a seamless clothing plans, and the Monks in the implementation of this plan are not thieves with Lin Yu co-leader of the Jewish old man, can be called up for the purpose of the unscrupulous. Finally, the plan is brought to light, Monks also ended in defeat. I think the Charles Oliver's brother wrote a greedy, ruthless, shameless, on the one hand, the work can culminate in the story, on the other hand, fully demonstrated the reality of society in order to achieve the purpose of the fire regardless of the tragic family Phenomenon. The author of this sharp touch of irony at the time the fire agency, while at the same time want to wake up those sad people, they wake up the conscience and consciousness, to awaken the consciousness of all the people. After reading the novel, I was not quiet for a long time. Oliver is a strong, kind-hearted, intelligent and brave and innocent boy, but experienced a difficult life, the ultimate storm, ushered in a happy life. And we are now living in the honey tank in Waterloo-fu, has often complained that always satisfied. But we have thought about, there are many poor children, are faced with the loss of loved ones, vagrancy of life, perhaps in the face of dropping out of school and the plight of the hungry. They are filled with love of life, looking forward to a bright classrooms, a yearning for delicious food or warm clothing. In the face of these eager children live in poverty, we can turn a blind eye to it? Can not stand idly by? When I read Dickens to write about the lives of the poor orphan house, my mind flashed always saw on television pictures of refugees in Africa. The old social life of the poor are poor, hungry cold it is not unusual things, and in the 21st century, in this era of civilization, hunger, fear, the cold remains. In that Oliver had been abused, beaten by the circumstances, and when I do not think of the often seen in the streets and show those begging children. These shabby heard that the children into a gang is organized, whether it be money or show has been begging for money, hard or stolen money, but also turned over to their "head." This is the civilized society? The fate of the children, their lives, and works of Charles Dickens orphan Oliver's life, what difference does? Oliver is lucky, good people can encounter. But in reality those organizations into the unknown children, their fate will be how well-intentioned people can encounter it? I do not think so, they may be ending as it works in Nancy, or died of starvation and disease. This is the so-called civilized society, the inevitable result. The more social progress, the more human civilization, and those bad elements are, the more furious, and unfortunately into the hands of their children, the more tragic fate. Therefore, we need love to help those in the midst of the people to help them out, ushering in a happy life. The works I think of many real-life scenarios, I touch on a lot. Now, I'd like to go back to Dickens's art and writing in order to charm. Dickens is the Victorian representative of the critical realism, written in the book when he was a youth, when he hopes to use his novel of social reform, but his community is not enough understanding of the profound, at the time of the ruling class also With the hope of a better place. In this work also reflects his idea. Under normal circumstances, the best realism in the novel, the story is often in a specific environment under the action of the history of the development of character, that is, Gorky said "some kind of character typical of the history and composition of growth." However, Charles Dickens, his informal set of any cell, the number of coincidence want to arrange the number of coincidence. If Oliver for the first time with the thieves took to the streets to be out of pocket, he is a friend of his late father before his death, Mr. Bulang Lu; thieves in his second head hostage Sikes under the burglary of the stolen happens to be his pro-aunt Ruth Merritt family; Also, due to his messenger haste to go and hit those who have the means哥哥蒙克斯him, and the Monks are let in the collision, he is looking for his brother. This is a series of coincidence in the sense just can not be justified in any case, however, Dickens's own rich imagination and clever idea, in the specific circumstances described in the breath of life and full of passion, so that readers can not breathe when reading a tension , That would have been far-fetched, unnatural circumstances has no choice but to believe, and have a great interest in this, can not wait to read down. This is the art of Dickens World charm. In addition, from a political perspective, this work made orphans of the social status of this very real problem, and, as well as the issue directly related to the issue of the quality of officials, community organizations, as well as a number of law in all sectors of the people's psychological tendencies And a long mental illness issues. Dickens has pointed out that one of these problems, but he thought of a way to solve these problems is not realistic. This is because the youth of his community not to understand the profound. With his wealth of experience of society, the society is also a deeper understanding of his ideas are slowly maturing, which, in his later works will be able to be reflected. Charles to use his vast and profound language to give the reader sometimes laughing, sometimes knowing smile, they are sometimes shed tears of laughter or pain and numbness of helpless laughter. However, no matter what kind of laughter, given all the capitalist society of endless irony.
文学研究论文参考文献
论文写作中我们需要大量阅读参考文献来丰富我们的知识面，拓展我们的知识深度。下面是我和大家分享的文学研究论文参考文献，更多内容请关注毕业论文网。
篇一：参考文献
[1] 姜晓丽. 女权主义对翻译的影响探析[D]. 西安电子科技大学 2013
[2] 王君. 英语经济类语篇汉译实践报告[D]. 辽宁师范大学 2014
[3] 赵菁婕. 论文学翻译中的创造性叛逆[D]. 青岛大学 2014
[4] 李夏. 女性哥特视角下《简爱》与《呼啸山庄》的对比分析[D]. 中国海洋大学 2013
[5] 阳英. 关联理论视角下《雾都孤儿》荣译本与何译本比较研究[D]. 湖南工业大学 2014
[6] 沈蔼亲. 操纵学派“忠实观”与传统“忠实观”的对比研究[D]. 湖南工业大学 2014
[7] 郭慧. 操纵论视角下理雅各与许渊冲《诗经》英译本的对比研究[D]. 湖南工业大学 2013
[8] 王番. 概念隐喻理论视角下的情感隐喻翻译[D]. 南京工业大学 2013
[9] 姜姗. 语境视域下的英语经济新闻文本汉译实践报告[D]. 辽宁师范大学 2014
[10] 蔡莹莹. 风景抒情唐诗英译的象似性研究[D]. 辽宁师范大学 2014
[11] 王凯华. 帕尔默文化语言学视角下的宋词英译意象传递研究[D]. 辽宁师范大学 2014
[12] 滕娇月. 概念整合理论视阙下唐诗颜色词的英译研究[D]. 辽宁师范大学 2014
[13] 王筱. 默认值图式视域下的《聊斋志异》英译研究[D]. 辽宁师范大学 2014
[14] 支翠霞. 新闻翻译的后殖民视角[D]. 湖南工业大学 2012
[15] 薛颖然. 目的论视野下的英汉字幕翻译[D]. 湖南工业大学 2012
[16] 贺倩. 女性主义翻译理论与小说Jane Eyre的翻译[D]. 新疆师范大学 2012
[17] 何婧舒. 操纵理论视角下《简·爱》两个中译本的文化再现比较研究[D]. 四川师范大学 2012
[18] 吴云云. 《简爱》的女权话语研究[D]. 华北电力大学(北京) 2010
[19] 纪娜. 成长路上的逃离与皈依[D]. 湖南师范大学 2008
[20] 胡娟娟. 《简·爱》在20世纪中国的经典化建构及其女主人公的形象变迁[D]. 上海外国语大学 2012
篇二：参考文献
[1] 刘禾着，宋伟杰等译.跨语际实践[M]. 三联书店， 2002
[2] 胡安江. 文本旅行与翻译研究[J]. 四川外语学院学报. 2007(05)
[3] 郭延礼着.中国近代翻译文学概论[M]. 湖北教育出版社， 1998
[4] 孟昭毅，李载道主编.中国翻译文学史[M]. 北京大学出版社， 2005
[5] 张南峰着.中西译学批评[M]. 清华大学出版社， 2004
[6] 谢天振着.译介学[M]. 上海外语教育出版社， 1999
[7] (美)爱德华·W.赛义德(EdwardW.Said)着，谢少波，韩刚等译.赛义德自选集[M]. 中国社会科学出版社， 1999
[8] 冯庆华，主编.文体翻译论[M]. 上海外语教育出版社， 2002
[9] 陈福康着.中国译学理论史稿[M]. 上海外语教育出版社， 2000
[10] 刘宓庆着.当代翻译理论[M]. 中国对外翻译出版公司， 1999
[11] 冯庆华编着.实用翻译教程[M]. 上海外语教育出版社， 1997
[12] 唐玉娟，谭少青. 译者措辞中的意识形态因素--《简·爱》两个中译本的比较[J]. 成都教育学院学报. 2006(11)
[13] 符白羽. 从旅行理论看文学作品在翻译中的旅行[J]. 长沙大学学报. 2006(04)
[14] 赵俊姝. 文学多元系统理论视角解读胡适翻译思想[J]. 昆明师范高等专科学校学报. 2005(02)
[15] 李坤，贾德江. 《简爱》两个中译本的历时比较[J]. 河北理工学院学报(社会科学版). 2007(01)
[16] 苏留华. 小说对话的翻译--从符号学角度分析《简·爱》[J]. 广州大学学报(社会科学版). 2004(11)
[17] Clifford,James.Routes: Travel and Translation in the Late Twentieth Century. . 1997
[18] Andre Lefevere.Translation/History/Culture-A Source Book. . 2004
[19] Lefevere Andre.Translation, Rewriting and the Manipulation of Literary Fame. . 2004
[20] 于德英. 用另一只眼睛看多元系统论--多元系统论的形式主义分析[J]. 中国翻译. 2004(05)
篇三：参考文献
[1] 刘美玲. 操控理论视角下《世界是平的》两中译本的研究[D]. 华中师范大学 2013
[2] 杨晓琳. 从翻译共性的角度探析英译汉中的“翻译文体”[D]. 浙江大学 2013
[3] 伊塔马·埃文-佐哈尔，张南峰. 多元系统论[J]. 中国翻译. 2002(04)
[4] 张书玲. 英国博物馆资料翻译实践报告[D]. 中南大学 2013
[5] 笪鸿安，陈莉. 从《简·爱》两汉译本谈直译与意译的运用[J]. 河海大学学报(社会科学版). 1999(03)
[6] 叶荷. 翻译与改写[D]. 华侨大学 2009
[7] 王晓元. 意识形态与文学翻译的互动关系[J]. 中国翻译. 1999(02)
[8] 廖秋忠. 篇章与语用和句法研究[J]. 语言教学与研究. 1991(04)
[9] 周忠良. 重思抵抗式翻译[D]. 广东外语外贸大学 2009
[10] 张焰明. 剩余信息在翻译中的应用--兼评祝庆英和黄源深的《简·爱》译本[J]. 韩山师范学院学报(社会科学版). 2004(01)
[11] 葛中俊. 翻译文学：目的'语文学的次范畴[J]. 中国比较文学. 1997(03)
[12] 蒋骁华. 意识形态对翻译的影响：阐发与新思考[J]. 中国翻译. 2003(05)
[13] 杨自俭. 语篇和语境--《衔接与连贯理论的发展及应用》序[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报. 2003(02)
[14] 谢世坚. 从中国近代翻译文学看多元系统理论的局限性[J]. 四川外语学院学报. 2002(04)
[15] 郑雪青. 《简·爱》两个译本翻译比较[J]. 齐齐哈尔大学学报(哲学社会科学版). 2001(01)
[16] 潘红. 夹缝里的风景--谈黄源深先生《简爱》译本的审美特点[J]. 福州大学学报(哲学社会科学版). 2002(02)
[17] 颜凡博. 从文化差异角度谈中式菜名的英译[D]. 中北大学 2011
[18] 赵伟. 鲁迅小说两个英译本的对比研究[D]. 上海海运学院 2000
[19] Zhang Haifeng. A Principle with the English Translation of Chinese Classical Poetry[D]. 广东外语外贸大学 2001
[20] 陈王青. 虚构专名英译中的行为常式[D]. 广东外语外贸大学 2007
[21] 杜洪洁. 政治与翻译：西方(后)现代主义小说在中国的译介(1979-1988)[D]. 天津理工大学 2008
Oliver Twist Oliver Twist, one of the most famous works of Charles Dickens’, is a novel reflecting the tragic fact of the life in Britain in 18th century. The author who himself was born in a poor family wrote this novel in his twenties with a view to reveal the ugly masks of those cruel criminals and to expose the horror and violence hidden underneath the narrow and dirty streets in London. The hero of this novel was Oliver Twist, an orphan, who was thrown into a world full of poverty and crime. He suffered enormous pain, such as hunger, thirst, beating and abuse. While reading the tragic experiences of the little Oliver, I was shocked by his sufferings. I felt for the poor boy, but at the same time I detested the evil Fagin and the brutal Bill. To my relief, as was written in all the best stories, the goodness eventually conquered devil and Oliver lived a happy life in the end. One of the plots that attracted me most is that after the theft, little Oliver was allowed to recover in the kind care of Mrs. Maylie and Rose and began a new life. He went for walks with them, or Rose read to him, and he worked hard at his lessons. He felt as if he had left behind forever the world of crime and hardship and poverty. How can such a little boy who had already suffered oppressive affliction remain pure in body and mind? The reason is the nature of goodness. I think it is the most important information implied in the novel by Dickens-he believed that goodness could conquer every difficulty. Although I don’t think goodness is omnipotent, yet I do believe that those who are kind-hearted live more happily than those who are evil-minded. For me, the nature of goodness is one of the most necessary character for a person. Goodness is to humans what water is to fish. He who is without goodness is an utterly worthless person. On the contrary, as the famous saying goes, ‘The fragrance always stays in the hand that gives the rose’, he who is with goodness undoubtedly is a happy and useful person. People receiving his help are grateful to him and he also gets gratified from what he has done, and thus he can do good to both the people he has helped and himself. To my disappointment, nowadays some people seem to doubt the existence of the goodness in humanity. They look down on people’s honesty and kindness, thinking it foolish of people to be warm-hearted. As a result, they show no sympathy to those who are in trouble and seldom offer to help others. On the other hand, they attach importance to money and benefit. In their opinion, money is the only real object while emotions and morality are nihility. If they cannot get profit from showing their ‘kindness’, they draw back when others are faced with trouble and even hit a man when he is down. They are one of the sorts that I really detest. Francis Bacon said in his essay, ‘Goodness, of all virtues and dignities of the mind, is the greatest, being the character of the Deity, and without it, man is a busy, mischievous, wretched thing, no better than a kind of vermin.’ That is to say a person without goodness is destined to lose everything. Therefore, I, a kind person, want to tell those ‘vermin-to-be’ to learn from the kind Oliver and regain the nature of goodness. 雾都孤儿 雾都孤儿》,其中最著名的作品的查尔斯•狄更斯的《反映,是一种新型的悲惨的现实,在18世纪的英国的生活。 作者自己出生在一个贫穷的家庭写这本书在他二十几岁时为了揭示丑陋的面具的残酷的罪犯,让恐怖和暴力隐藏在狭窄的,肮脏的街道在伦敦。 这本小说是的英雄,《雾都孤儿孤儿,谁被投进了的世界充满着贫穷和犯罪。他遭受巨大的痛苦,如饥饿、干渴、殴打和虐待。在阅读《悲惨的经历的小奥利弗,我感到震惊的是他的痛苦经历。我觉得为了可怜的男孩子,但同时我厌恶邪恶和残酷Fagin帐单。使我松了口气,写在所有最好的故事,最终征服了魔鬼,奥利佛善过上了幸福美满的生活结束。一个最吸引我的计谋是盗窃,小奥利弗被允许这种康复照顾夫人Maylie和玫瑰开始了一种新的生活。他去散步,与他们,或玫瑰念给他听,他努力学习功课。他感到他先前留下的世界永远犯罪和困难和贫穷。 怎能一个小男孩已经遭受苦难保持纯洁的压迫身体和心灵吗?原因是处于善性品德之中。我认为这是最重要的信息的小说中隐含Dickens-he相信善良能战胜一切困难。虽然我并不认为善良是无所不能的,我却相信,那些都是善良的过的更幸福的人比那些是愚昧无知。 对我来说,处于善性的品德是其中一个最必要的个性的一个人。善良是给人类就像鱼儿离不开水一样。谁是没有良善是一个完全无用的人。相反,正如著名的老话所说:“香味的手总是待在给玫瑰”一样。给你推荐一个网站，超棒！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！
《雾都孤儿》是一部非常成功的作品，是狄更斯这位享誉盛名的代表作之一，它揭露了隐藏在伦敦狭小、肮脏的偏僻街道里的恐怖和暴力，也展示出了18世纪伦敦罪犯的真实面目；同时，狄更斯还试图说明：善良最终能够克服一切艰难险阻。《雾都孤儿》不仅吸引了评论家和公众的注意，同时它背后潜藏着的那一种强烈的情感不仅打动了与他同时代的读者，也深深地打动了我。《雾都孤儿》中主人公的英文名字为Oliver Twist，而Twist其英文意思是“扭曲，曲折，使苦恼”，这暗示着主人公Oliver的一生很坎坷，要经历很多的痛苦。在这个对社会进行抗议的情节剧式的小说中，奥利弗被当作一个主人公，其目的不是要触动我们的文学敏感性，而是要打动我们的情感。奥立弗·退斯特出生于19世纪30年代英国的一所济贫院，他妈妈用冰冷而毫无血色的嘴唇怜爱地在孩子的额头亲了一下后倒过去，咽了气。没父没母的奥立弗的童年过得极其凄惨，最初的9年是生活在一个管理不善的孤儿院，之后被转到收容成年人的济贫院。济贫院是维多利亚时期中产阶级建立的用来收养穷孩子的机构，因为人们认为穷人的身上有固有的恶习，穷人的家庭造就了这样的恶习，为了阻止这样的恶习产生，所以穷人夫妻就要分开，以阻止他们生孩子，从而减少下层社会的人。但可以这样形容当时的济贫院：济贫院给穷人提供的是慢性挨饿的机会，而在街头则是快速饿死。奥利弗和他的小伙伴们忍受着“慢性饥饿的折磨”。曾给我留下一个特别深刻印象的镜头是：一天晚上吃饭时，一个小孩子跟其他小孩子说，如果不给他多吃一碗粥，说不定会吃了谁。孩子们都很害怕，于是抓阄决定谁输了就要为那个孩子多要点吃的来。奥立弗输了，于是午饭后，其他孩子坚持奥立弗在晚饭时多要点食物。他的请求震惊了当局，结果使他们出5英镑作为酬金，要人把他从他们手上带走。因而可见，《雾都孤儿》是对维多利亚时期穷人的社会境遇的严厉批判。《雾都孤儿》的起势情节是：绝望之中的奥立弗在黎明中出逃，奔向伦敦，在伦敦城外，又饿又累的他遇到了一个与他相仿年纪的男孩—杰克，杰克让他住在自己的恩人费金的住处——实际上是一个窃贼之家，费金这个“枯瘦如柴的犹太老头”兼职为犯罪头头专门训练孤儿为他偷东西。经过几天的训练，奥立弗和其他两个小孩被派去偷东西。当奥立弗看到他们偷了一个老绅士的手绢的时候，吓得拔腿就逃，他被抓住了，但勉强地躲过了指控，没有因偷盗被定罪。布朗罗先生，就是手绢的被偷者，把发烧的奥立弗带回家中护理，让他恢复健康，原本以为黑暗的生活会远离他而去，但是费金贼帮里的两个大人赛克斯和他的情人南希把奥立弗抓住，并送回费金那里。在《雾都孤儿》中，颇具争议性问题的人物是南希。南希在道德上的复杂性在几位主要人物中是很独特的。南希自幼便是一个小偷，饮酒无度，而且是一个妓女，她所陷入的罪恶为她的社会所不齿，但当她牺牲自己的生命去保护奥立弗这个她并不是很熟悉的小孩时，她的行为又是最为高尚的。正因为南希，奥立弗被狄更斯掩藏下的真实身份才有了渐渐浮出水面的一刻。随后，费金派奥立弗去帮助赛克斯抢劫。奥立弗被那家的仆人用枪击中，赛克斯弃下受伤的奥立弗逃跑了。上天可怜善良的奥立弗，他被住在那里的梅莱太太和她漂亮的养女露西收留了。奥立弗开始了一种新生活。他常常与露西和梅莱太太外出散步，有时露西读书给他听，他也努力地学习功课。他觉得自己好像永远把罪恶，艰辛和贫困的世界抛在背后了。小说中，梅莱太太和露西所担任的母性角色使奥立弗第一次生活在正常的家庭当中，在她们母亲般的关爱下，奥立弗在乡下度过了美好的夏天。并且在梅莱一家的帮助下，布朗罗先生和奥立弗又团聚了，并消除了彼此间的误会。随后，布朗罗先生找到孟可思，追问奥立弗的真实身世，真相终于大白。原来孟可思是奥立弗同母异父的，和费金一起密谋陷害奥立弗，使之声名狼藉，并且是病态的，品行不端的坏兄弟，而且还查明了露西是奥立弗的亲生阿姨。小说的最后总结了狄更斯的道德和宗教观念：如果没有强烈的爱，没有博爱之心，如果对以慈悲为准则，以博爱一切生灵为最高标志的上帝不知感恩，那是绝对得不到幸福的，因而，有罪恶的得到了严厉的惩罚，穷凶恶及的人物到最后仍承担着罪恶，相应的，好人终究有好报，布朗罗先生收养了品性善良，道德高尚，宽容仁慈的奥立弗，他们和梅莱一家一起回乡下，从此过着幸福的生活。
我也是写这个 正找材料呢 交流交流哦
Oliver Twist Oliver Twist, one of the most famous works of Charles Dickens’, is a novel reflecting the tragic fact of the life in Britain in 18th century. The author who himself was born in a poor family wrote this novel in his twenties with a view to reveal the ugly masks of those cruel criminals and to expose the horror and violence hidden underneath the narrow and dirty streets in London. The hero of this novel was Oliver Twist, an orphan, who was thrown into a world full of poverty and crime. He suffered enormous pain, such as hunger, thirst, beating and abuse. While reading the tragic experiences of the little Oliver, I was shocked by his sufferings. I felt for the poor boy, but at the same time I detested the evil Fagin and the brutal Bill. To my relief, as was written in all the best stories, the goodness eventually conquered devil and Oliver lived a happy life in the end. One of the plots that attracted me most is that after the theft, little Oliver was allowed to recover in the kind care of Mrs. Maylie and Rose and began a new life. He went for walks with them, or Rose read to him, and he worked hard at his lessons. He felt as if he had left behind forever the world of crime and hardship and poverty. How can such a little boy who had already suffered oppressive affliction remain pure in body and mind? The reason is the nature of goodness. I think it is the most important information implied in the novel by Dickens-he believed that goodness could conquer every difficulty. Although I don’t think goodness is omnipotent, yet I do believe that those who are kind-hearted live more happily than those who are evil-minded. For me, the nature of goodness is one of the most necessary character for a person. Goodness is to humans what water is to fish. He who is without goodness is an utterly worthless person. On the contrary, as the famous saying goes, ‘The fragrance always stays in the hand that gives the rose’, he who is with goodness undoubtedly is a happy and useful person. People receiving his help are grateful to him and he also gets gratified from what he has done, and thus he can do good to both the people he has helped and himself. To my disappointment, nowadays some people seem to doubt the existence of the goodness in humanity. They look down on people’s honesty and kindness, thinking it foolish of people to be warm-hearted. As a result, they show no sympathy to those who are in trouble and seldom offer to help others. On the other hand, they attach importance to money and benefit. In their opinion, money is the only real object while emotions and morality are nihility. If they cannot get profit from showing their ‘kindness’, they draw back when others are faced with trouble and even hit a man when he is down. They are one of the sorts that I really detest. Francis Bacon said in his essay, ‘Goodness, of all virtues and dignities of the mind, is the greatest, being the character of the Deity, and without it, man is a busy, mischievous, wretched thing, no better than a kind of vermin.’ That is to say a person without goodness is destined to lose everything. Therefore, I, a kind person, want to tell those ‘vermin-to-be’ to learn from the kind Oliver and regain the nature of goodness. 雾都孤儿 雾都孤儿》,其中最著名的作品的查尔斯•狄更斯的《反映,是一种新型的悲惨的现实,在18世纪的英国的生活。 作者自己出生在一个贫穷的家庭写这本书在他二十几岁时为了揭示丑陋的面具的残酷的罪犯,让恐怖和暴力隐藏在狭窄的,肮脏的街道在伦敦。 这本小说是的英雄,《雾都孤儿孤儿,谁被投进了的世界充满着贫穷和犯罪。他遭受巨大的痛苦,如饥饿、干渴、殴打和虐待。在阅读《悲惨的经历的小奥利弗,我感到震惊的是他的痛苦经历。我觉得为了可怜的男孩子,但同时我厌恶邪恶和残酷Fagin帐单。使我松了口气,写在所有最好的故事,最终征服了魔鬼,奥利佛善过上了幸福美满的生活结束。一个最吸引我的计谋是盗窃,小奥利弗被允许这种康复照顾夫人Maylie和玫瑰开始了一种新的生活。他去散步,与他们,或玫瑰念给他听,他努力学习功课。他感到他先前留下的世界永远犯罪和困难和贫穷。 怎能一个小男孩已经遭受苦难保持纯洁的压迫身体和心灵吗?原因是处于善性品德之中。我认为这是最重要的信息的小说中隐含Dickens-he相信善良能战胜一切困难。虽然我并不认为善良是无所不能的,我却相信,那些都是善良的过的更幸福的人比那些是愚昧无知。 对我来说,处于善性的品德是其中一个最必要的个性的一个人。善良是给人类就像鱼儿离不开水一样。谁是没有良善是一个完全无用的人。相反,正如著名的老话所说:“香味的手总是待在给玫瑰”一样。给你推荐一个网站，超棒！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！
《雾都孤儿》是一部非常成功的作品，是狄更斯这位享誉盛名的代表作之一，它揭露了隐藏在伦敦狭小、肮脏的偏僻街道里的恐怖和暴力，也展示出了18世纪伦敦罪犯的真实面目；同时，狄更斯还试图说明：善良最终能够克服一切艰难险阻。《雾都孤儿》不仅吸引了评论家和公众的注意，同时它背后潜藏着的那一种强烈的情感不仅打动了与他同时代的读者，也深深地打动了我。《雾都孤儿》中主人公的英文名字为Oliver Twist，而Twist其英文意思是“扭曲，曲折，使苦恼”，这暗示着主人公Oliver的一生很坎坷，要经历很多的痛苦。在这个对社会进行抗议的情节剧式的小说中，奥利弗被当作一个主人公，其目的不是要触动我们的文学敏感性，而是要打动我们的情感。奥立弗·退斯特出生于19世纪30年代英国的一所济贫院，他妈妈用冰冷而毫无血色的嘴唇怜爱地在孩子的额头亲了一下后倒过去，咽了气。没父没母的奥立弗的童年过得极其凄惨，最初的9年是生活在一个管理不善的孤儿院，之后被转到收容成年人的济贫院。济贫院是维多利亚时期中产阶级建立的用来收养穷孩子的机构，因为人们认为穷人的身上有固有的恶习，穷人的家庭造就了这样的恶习，为了阻止这样的恶习产生，所以穷人夫妻就要分开，以阻止他们生孩子，从而减少下层社会的人。但可以这样形容当时的济贫院：济贫院给穷人提供的是慢性挨饿的机会，而在街头则是快速饿死。奥利弗和他的小伙伴们忍受着“慢性饥饿的折磨”。曾给我留下一个特别深刻印象的镜头是：一天晚上吃饭时，一个小孩子跟其他小孩子说，如果不给他多吃一碗粥，说不定会吃了谁。孩子们都很害怕，于是抓阄决定谁输了就要为那个孩子多要点吃的来。奥立弗输了，于是午饭后，其他孩子坚持奥立弗在晚饭时多要点食物。他的请求震惊了当局，结果使他们出5英镑作为酬金，要人把他从他们手上带走。因而可见，《雾都孤儿》是对维多利亚时期穷人的社会境遇的严厉批判。《雾都孤儿》的起势情节是：绝望之中的奥立弗在黎明中出逃，奔向伦敦，在伦敦城外，又饿又累的他遇到了一个与他相仿年纪的男孩—杰克，杰克让他住在自己的恩人费金的住处——实际上是一个窃贼之家，费金这个“枯瘦如柴的犹太老头”兼职为犯罪头头专门训练孤儿为他偷东西。经过几天的训练，奥立弗和其他两个小孩被派去偷东西。当奥立弗看到他们偷了一个老绅士的手绢的时候，吓得拔腿就逃，他被抓住了，但勉强地躲过了指控，没有因偷盗被定罪。布朗罗先生，就是手绢的被偷者，把发烧的奥立弗带回家中护理，让他恢复健康，原本以为黑暗的生活会远离他而去，但是费金贼帮里的两个大人赛克斯和他的情人南希把奥立弗抓住，并送回费金那里。在《雾都孤儿》中，颇具争议性问题的人物是南希。南希在道德上的复杂性在几位主要人物中是很独特的。南希自幼便是一个小偷，饮酒无度，而且是一个妓女，她所陷入的罪恶为她的社会所不齿，但当她牺牲自己的生命去保护奥立弗这个她并不是很熟悉的小孩时，她的行为又是最为高尚的。正因为南希，奥立弗被狄更斯掩藏下的真实身份才有了渐渐浮出水面的一刻。随后，费金派奥立弗去帮助赛克斯抢劫。奥立弗被那家的仆人用枪击中，赛克斯弃下受伤的奥立弗逃跑了。上天可怜善良的奥立弗，他被住在那里的梅莱太太和她漂亮的养女露西收留了。奥立弗开始了一种新生活。他常常与露西和梅莱太太外出散步，有时露西读书给他听，他也努力地学习功课。他觉得自己好像永远把罪恶，艰辛和贫困的世界抛在背后了。小说中，梅莱太太和露西所担任的母性角色使奥立弗第一次生活在正常的家庭当中，在她们母亲般的关爱下，奥立弗在乡下度过了美好的夏天。并且在梅莱一家的帮助下，布朗罗先生和奥立弗又团聚了，并消除了彼此间的误会。随后，布朗罗先生找到孟可思，追问奥立弗的真实身世，真相终于大白。原来孟可思是奥立弗同母异父的，和费金一起密谋陷害奥立弗，使之声名狼藉，并且是病态的，品行不端的坏兄弟，而且还查明了露西是奥立弗的亲生阿姨。小说的最后总结了狄更斯的道德和宗教观念：如果没有强烈的爱，没有博爱之心，如果对以慈悲为准则，以博爱一切生灵为最高标志的上帝不知感恩，那是绝对得不到幸福的，因而，有罪恶的得到了严厉的惩罚，穷凶恶及的人物到最后仍承担着罪恶，相应的，好人终究有好报，布朗罗先生收养了品性善良，道德高尚，宽容仁慈的奥立弗，他们和梅莱一家一起回乡下，从此过着幸福的生活。
买本雾都孤儿的蓝星导读，就是那种双语的小蓝本，虽然写得很浅显，但故事和人物分析挺全面的，就算你以前没读过这部小说，用它就行，省时间最大的问题就是定题，要看你的指导老师严不严了，一定把论点范围缩小再缩小，具体再具体在学校提供给你们的文献库多多下载文献资料，雾都孤儿的的文献很多，能下载到你想吐，但这样不愁没得写 还有问题可以联系我
你怎么研究电影而不是小说啊？强烈建议你把电影去掉，（也许就思想主题而言，电影和小说是一回事）开题报告如何写？①：在百度搜索：开题报告 范文②：去学校图书馆的期刊论文数据库搜索：雾都孤儿英文的搜索：Oliver Twist
我也是写这个 正找材料呢 交流交流哦
《雾都孤儿》是一部非常成功的作品，是狄更斯这位享誉盛名的代表作之一，它揭露了隐藏在伦敦狭小、肮脏的偏僻街道里的恐怖和暴力，也展示出了18世纪伦敦罪犯的真实面目；同时，狄更斯还试图说明：善良最终能够克服一切艰难险阻。《雾都孤儿》不仅吸引了评论家和公众的注意，同时它背后潜藏着的那一种强烈的情感不仅打动了与他同时代的读者，也深深地打动了我。《雾都孤儿》中主人公的英文名字为Oliver Twist，而Twist其英文意思是“扭曲，曲折，使苦恼”，这暗示着主人公Oliver的一生很坎坷，要经历很多的痛苦。在这个对社会进行抗议的情节剧式的小说中，奥利弗被当作一个主人公，其目的不是要触动我们的文学敏感性，而是要打动我们的情感。奥立弗·退斯特出生于19世纪30年代英国的一所济贫院，他妈妈用冰冷而毫无血色的嘴唇怜爱地在孩子的额头亲了一下后倒过去，咽了气。没父没母的奥立弗的童年过得极其凄惨，最初的9年是生活在一个管理不善的孤儿院，之后被转到收容成年人的济贫院。济贫院是维多利亚时期中产阶级建立的用来收养穷孩子的机构，因为人们认为穷人的身上有固有的恶习，穷人的家庭造就了这样的恶习，为了阻止这样的恶习产生，所以穷人夫妻就要分开，以阻止他们生孩子，从而减少下层社会的人。但可以这样形容当时的济贫院：济贫院给穷人提供的是慢性挨饿的机会，而在街头则是快速饿死。奥利弗和他的小伙伴们忍受着“慢性饥饿的折磨”。曾给我留下一个特别深刻印象的镜头是：一天晚上吃饭时，一个小孩子跟其他小孩子说，如果不给他多吃一碗粥，说不定会吃了谁。孩子们都很害怕，于是抓阄决定谁输了就要为那个孩子多要点吃的来。奥立弗输了，于是午饭后，其他孩子坚持奥立弗在晚饭时多要点食物。他的请求震惊了当局，结果使他们出5英镑作为酬金，要人把他从他们手上带走。因而可见，《雾都孤儿》是对维多利亚时期穷人的社会境遇的严厉批判。《雾都孤儿》的起势情节是：绝望之中的奥立弗在黎明中出逃，奔向伦敦，在伦敦城外，又饿又累的他遇到了一个与他相仿年纪的男孩—杰克，杰克让他住在自己的恩人费金的住处——实际上是一个窃贼之家，费金这个“枯瘦如柴的犹太老头”兼职为犯罪头头专门训练孤儿为他偷东西。经过几天的训练，奥立弗和其他两个小孩被派去偷东西。当奥立弗看到他们偷了一个老绅士的手绢的时候，吓得拔腿就逃，他被抓住了，但勉强地躲过了指控，没有因偷盗被定罪。布朗罗先生，就是手绢的被偷者，把发烧的奥立弗带回家中护理，让他恢复健康，原本以为黑暗的生活会远离他而去，但是费金贼帮里的两个大人赛克斯和他的情人南希把奥立弗抓住，并送回费金那里。在《雾都孤儿》中，颇具争议性问题的人物是南希。南希在道德上的复杂性在几位主要人物中是很独特的。南希自幼便是一个小偷，饮酒无度，而且是一个妓女，她所陷入的罪恶为她的社会所不齿，但当她牺牲自己的生命去保护奥立弗这个她并不是很熟悉的小孩时，她的行为又是最为高尚的。正因为南希，奥立弗被狄更斯掩藏下的真实身份才有了渐渐浮出水面的一刻。随后，费金派奥立弗去帮助赛克斯抢劫。奥立弗被那家的仆人用枪击中，赛克斯弃下受伤的奥立弗逃跑了。上天可怜善良的奥立弗，他被住在那里的梅莱太太和她漂亮的养女露西收留了。奥立弗开始了一种新生活。他常常与露西和梅莱太太外出散步，有时露西读书给他听，他也努力地学习功课。他觉得自己好像永远把罪恶，艰辛和贫困的世界抛在背后了。小说中，梅莱太太和露西所担任的母性角色使奥立弗第一次生活在正常的家庭当中，在她们母亲般的关爱下，奥立弗在乡下度过了美好的夏天。并且在梅莱一家的帮助下，布朗罗先生和奥立弗又团聚了，并消除了彼此间的误会。随后，布朗罗先生找到孟可思，追问奥立弗的真实身世，真相终于大白。原来孟可思是奥立弗同母异父的，和费金一起密谋陷害奥立弗，使之声名狼藉，并且是病态的，品行不端的坏兄弟，而且还查明了露西是奥立弗的亲生阿姨。小说的最后总结了狄更斯的道德和宗教观念：如果没有强烈的爱，没有博爱之心，如果对以慈悲为准则，以博爱一切生灵为最高标志的上帝不知感恩，那是绝对得不到幸福的，因而，有罪恶的得到了严厉的惩罚，穷凶恶及的人物到最后仍承担着罪恶，相应的，好人终究有好报，布朗罗先生收养了品性善良，道德高尚，宽容仁慈的奥立弗，他们和梅莱一家一起回乡下，从此过着幸福的生活。
买本雾都孤儿的蓝星导读，就是那种双语的小蓝本，虽然写得很浅显，但故事和人物分析挺全面的，就算你以前没读过这部小说，用它就行，省时间最大的问题就是定题，要看你的指导老师严不严了，一定把论点范围缩小再缩小，具体再具体在学校提供给你们的文献库多多下载文献资料，雾都孤儿的的文献很多，能下载到你想吐，但这样不愁没得写 还有问题可以联系我
The work of the protagonist Oliver is an orphan, and grew up in the courtyard of the poor relief, others have been subject to discrimination. Because the extremely ill-treatment and fled to London, into Zeiwo, called by the beating, growing up, I do not know how much to eat suffered. While growing up in such an environment, but there is a Buddha Orie good heart, no matter by how much pain he did not want to do bad things is the greatest determination. He was Shouen people will never forget can not thank the benefactor. Although he is subject to a number of well-intentioned people and the sympathy of the adoption, such as Bulang Lu President, Lennart Meri wife, but the thieves, the group still did not miss him, and his half-brother also wish to kill him. Oliver's fate is tragic, but he's also been well-intentioned people to help identify his life, and the heritage. He has been the fate of the final change is expected to become a useful person to society. This works in Orie wrote at the beginning of the Buddha in relief of the poor house, in Charles Dickens described the living conditions of the poor house when a very ironic way: "Every child has a bowl of thin gruel, and that can not be increased only once To important public holiday, with the exception of a bowl of porridge outside in order to increase two and a quarter ounces of bread. They do not need to eat the Zhou Wan never wash, the children always scraping bowl of the spoon sauce residue has been driven Zeng Ming-Liang Shuo bowl. Scraping bowl of the matter is completed, they sit there and stare at large Tongguo helplessly, as if they are able to block a piece of brick stoves have to swallow it. This is a heinous and Tian Zhao They also own and finger , Ba Wangzhe a splash a few drops from child star to porridge. "Can be seen from the lives of those orphans how poverty, hunger throughout the day in the state, and no hope of Tianzhao his little finger, Bawang Zhao splash over the Congee child stars. One can imagine the children's life is very tragic, and Orie on the Buddha in such an environment. It is in the form of novels by Dickens to reflect the dark reality of the society and capitalist society under the lives of people of how poverty, poor life as works written by the same. Charles, known as the Victorian age eyes, because the novel in the form of the observed things with the novel in the form of re-emerged. That is why this works is the content of the true reflection of society at that time, and I think that the author describes the relief of the poor orphans living with a very vivid image of the language, a sharp way to expose the community The dark. Dickens wrote in the book a few years ago, the British Parliament adopted a new method of relief, cancellation of poor relief, but the poor directly to the port to house the poor relief. Dickens described the relief of the poor house at the time of poor relief is a true portrayal of the hospital. Poor relief in the hospital in no democracy, no freedom, only to be abused, hungry cold, a Mianhuangjishou months, fell to the ground at all times as likely to die, and the Diocese of those officers, those who Explorer, but eat a fat Head of the brain fertilizer, the full spirit. Dickens works in the hospital for the poor relief vivid description is a reflection of social problems. Some people think Charles Dickens's works this is a serious literary works, it works because it made a deep social problems, social development and progress is of great historical significance. In this work successfully in Dickens depicts a series of characters, such as the Diocese of General bampur, thieves old man and head of the Jewish charity school students Noah, the bandit Powu Monks, and so on. Did not have to portray a lifelike, life-like image. However, the most successful works portray the character or the protagonist Oliver and the woman stole Nancy. Oliver was born with a moral people, know how to map Temple has been reported. He ate a lot a lot of suffering, but in the end, finally met a good man. Whether Bulang Lu President, Lennart Meri, or his wife or Miss Meri, Orie Fodu treated as ordinary family, even though he is a "thief" who are sympathetic to him, his adoption, and that he receive a good education, and finally get Qing his life, his legacy fight back. Oliver described the events of all, I admire the most is the sixth chapter say when he was struggling to resist mocking the incident, as the authors put it, "On the surface I have described is not so small Important, but in fact he was Oliver's future development and are indirectly affected, and has had a major change. "Oliver in the poor house while growing up, there will be no freedom itself, to be disposal, but he A very strong self-esteem, Noah in the face of personal attacks, he was extremely excited. Noah and because of Oliver's mother died of a vicious insult to his indignation, blood boiling. "He immediately jumped up, an overturned the tables and chairs, and then Noah caught the pipe, to exhaust the body's effort to shake in fury of Noah, Noah has been a bit of teeth chattered issue of noise, and then He gathered together a whole body of Noah's efforts to blow hard, straight knocked him to the ground. "Oliver reaction puzzled me, common sense, he has been a quiet, modest, though by non - Who has abused a dejected from the juvenile Gan unlucky, but at the moment cohesion of the whole body strength Noah beat. What is the strength of his courage to make such a decision, perhaps it should not be "decided" it, a strong sense of anger so that he has lost his reason, he does not allow other people to his mother in the slightest insulting. While Oliver's mother, his memory, the memory never know his mother look like. However, the mother has been accompanied by a sense of respect for him. So, when Noah insult his mother, Oliver showed no emotion before. The incident was the result of Oliver was beaten up and detained. Charles Dickens wrote in the details below, not only for paving the way, but also a deeper portrait of the heroine works Oliver's image, in order to safeguard the dignity of the mother, just go ahead Many scholars think that works in a portrait of the most successful characters is Nancy, while Oliver to work for the main character, but from the social psychology and psychoanalysis point of view, the role of Nancy greater practical significance. Nancy is a psychological complex young women, from childhood growing up in the Group of thieves, no one knew her life, she entered the post-Zeiwo did not have any good people, of course, the final Bulang Lu also met with President Lennart Meri and Miss But then it was too late. Finally, her tragic death at the hands of the bandits Sykes, her fate is tragic, as in the real world into a triad of orphans after the end of the same. Nancy seen through the group of thieves all the ugly things, that her aversion treacherous, vicious, ruthless cruelty, inhuman things, but she is also the Group of thieves have a certain feeling, and want to leave. She has sympathy for Oliver, as for their treatment as his younger brother, in times of crisis to disregard their own safety to come forward and saved him, but he will have to personally Oliver thieves onto the road. She envied culture and education, the warmth of the family women, but because of her own humble status Yingshang Qu dare not, dare not wish for such a happy life. She is the heart of the conflict, when Bulang Lu and President Lennart Meri Miss advised her to leave the Group of thieves over a new leaf, she refused their offers of help, although she had a yearning for this kind of life. Nancy contradictions from her in to see if the original: "I do not want to do it! I do not want to do it! Though he is the devil, and he even told me yet more vicious than the devil, but I do not want to do ... then another ... One reason is that his life of crime is life, I am also live in sin, we are together for many years to live such a life, so I can not betray them, not to mention some of them may have betrayed me, but They did not sell out, even though they are bad people. "Her inner conflict is real, in line with the general psychological normal. There are a lot of female juvenile offenders, once on the wrong may be similar to that of Nancy ideological contradictions: both want to leave the crime associates also want to leave. Although Nancy Sykes hated doing, but he can not do without, it was of the view that Nancy is not reasonable, but in any case, her actions are all true. Psychological and ideological problems is in itself a complex issue as it is not possible to use simple methods can be resolved. Nancy Oliver, and this is the work of the two most representative figure, which is undeniable. Dickens portrayed in these two figures also spent a wonderful way. However, I would like to talk about is the image of another person Monks. Monks is Oliver's half-brother, who was extremely cruel, to be his brother's property destroyed at the expense of their own younger brother. I think Charles Monks at the describing the act when a clever arrangement. Monks and the role is a reflection of society at that time some of the children of the nobility EXILE. Monks is a smart, he knows how to ease access to his brother's property. Monks at the Dickens portrayed the characters can be on step-by-step. First of all, Monks is to look at the class when Mr. Bull appeared, the first author of the text did not mention him, so I read in class, Mr. Bull to meet the guests unfamiliar with the plot, on intuition told me that this works The plot will reach another climax. The mysterious people coming out, is scheduled to have a good, but I did not expect this so-called mystery is who would be Oliver's brother, but did not expect the paper after he had played such an important role. Charles gave the Monks "smart" in mind, set up a seamless clothing plans, and the Monks in the implementation of this plan are not thieves with Lin Yu co-leader of the Jewish old man, can be called up for the purpose of the unscrupulous. Finally, the plan is brought to light, Monks also ended in defeat. I think the Charles Oliver's brother wrote a greedy, ruthless, shameless, on the one hand, the work can culminate in the story, on the other hand, fully demonstrated the reality of society in order to achieve the purpose of the fire regardless of the tragic family Phenomenon. The author of this sharp touch of irony at the time the fire agency, while at the same time want to wake up those sad people, they wake up the conscience and consciousness, to awaken the consciousness of all the people. After reading the novel, I was not quiet for a long time. Oliver is a strong, kind-hearted, intelligent and brave and innocent boy, but experienced a difficult life, the ultimate storm, ushered in a happy life. And we are now living in the honey tank in Waterloo-fu, has often complained that always satisfied. But we have thought about, there are many poor children, are faced with the loss of loved ones, vagrancy of life, perhaps in the face of dropping out of school and the plight of the hungry. They are filled with love of life, looking forward to a bright classrooms, a yearning for delicious food or warm clothing. In the face of these eager children live in poverty, we can turn a blind eye to it? Can not stand idly by? When I read Dickens to write about the lives of the poor orphan house, my mind flashed always saw on television pictures of refugees in Africa. The old social life of the poor are poor, hungry cold it is not unusual things, and in the 21st century, in this era of civilization, hunger, fear, the cold remains. In that Oliver had been abused, beaten by the circumstances, and when I do not think of the often seen in the streets and show those begging children. These shabby heard that the children into a gang is organized, whether it be money or show has been begging for money, hard or stolen money, but also turned over to their "head." This is the civilized society? The fate of the children, their lives, and works of Charles Dickens orphan Oliver's life, what difference does? Oliver is lucky, good people can encounter. But in reality those organizations into the unknown children, their fate will be how well-intentioned people can encounter it? I do not think so, they may be ending as it works in Nancy, or died of starvation and disease. This is the so-called civilized society, the inevitable result. The more social progress, the more human civilization, and those bad elements are, the more furious, and unfortunately into the hands of their children, the more tragic fate. Therefore, we need love to help those in the midst of the people to help them out, ushering in a happy life. The works I think of many real-life scenarios, I touch on a lot. Now, I'd like to go back to Dickens's art and writing in order to charm. Dickens is the Victorian representative of the critical realism, written in the book when he was a youth, when he hopes to use his novel of social reform, but his community is not enough understanding of the profound, at the time of the ruling class also With the hope of a better place. In this work also reflects his idea. Under normal circumstances, the best realism in the novel, the story is often in a specific environment under the action of the history of the development of character, that is, Gorky said "some kind of character typical of the history and composition of growth." However, Charles Dickens, his informal set of any cell, the number of coincidence want to arrange the number of coincidence. If Oliver for the first time with the thieves took to the streets to be out of pocket, he is a friend of his late father before his death, Mr. Bulang Lu; thieves in his second head hostage Sikes under the burglary of the stolen happens to be his pro-aunt Ruth Merritt family; Also, due to his messenger haste to go and hit those who have the means哥哥蒙克斯him, and the Monks are let in the collision, he is looking for his brother. This is a series of coincidence in the sense just can not be justified in any case, however, Dickens's own rich imagination and clever idea, in the specific circumstances described in the breath of life and full of passion, so that readers can not breathe when reading a tension , That would have been far-fetched, unnatural circumstances has no choice but to believe, and have a great interest in this, can not wait to read down. This is the art of Dickens World charm. In addition, from a political perspective, this work made orphans of the social status of this very real problem, and, as well as the issue directly related to the issue of the quality of officials, community organizations, as well as a number of law in all sectors of the people's psychological tendencies And a long mental illness issues. Dickens has pointed out that one of these problems, but he thought of a way to solve these problems is not realistic. This is because the youth of his community not to understand the profound. With his wealth of experience of society, the society is also a deeper understanding of his ideas are slowly maturing, which, in his later works will be able to be reflected. Charles to use his vast and profound language to give the reader sometimes laughing, sometimes knowing smile, they are sometimes shed tears of laughter or pain and numbness of helpless laughter. However, no matter what kind of laughter, given all the capitalist society of endless irony.
Oliver Twist一、英国作家狄更斯的名著。关于狄更斯和他的小说艺术，心里早有一些想法，趁写这篇前言之便，说出来，就正于广大狄更斯爱好者。狄更斯生于英国朴茨茂斯的一个贫苦家庭，父亲是个海军小职员，10岁时全家被迁入债务入监狱，11岁起就开始承担繁重的家务，12岁时被迫辍学到鞋油作坊当学徒，饱受侮辱，从而对工人阶级的生活和苦难有所了解，尤其对不幸的儿童产生了深厚的同情。16岁时，他在律师事务所当缮写员，走遍伦敦大街小巷，广泛了解社，后又担任法庭速记员和新闻记者，熟悉了议会政治中的种种弊端。当时他为伦敦几家报纸拟稿。狄更斯发表1836年底的第一部长篇小说、讽刺资产阶级民主虚伪性的〈匹克威克外传〉就取得了惊人的成就，使他一举成名。此后34年中，他共写了十几部长篇小说。24岁时和凯瑟琳女士结婚，由于性格和趣味上的差异，给他的创作，特别是晚年生活带来不幸。他一生除了刻苦写作外还喜欢戏剧，曾亲自参加演出和导演，举办过朗诵会。1870年6月他在写作小说〈艾德温。德鲁德之谜〉时，由于劳累过度，谇然逝世。葬于伦敦斯敏斯特教堂。狄更斯在小说中无情地揭露和鞭挞了资本主义社会的黑暗和虚伪。1838年和1839年，他发表了〈雾都孤儿〉和〈尼古拉斯。尼可贝〉，描写了资本主义社会穷苦儿童的悲惨生活，揭露了贫民救济所和学校教育的黑暗。狄更斯是英国最伟大的小说家之一，英国现实主义文学的杰出代表，对世界文学有巨大的影响。《雾都孤儿》是狄更斯第二部长篇小说。这位年仅二十五岁的小说家决心学习英国现实主义画家威廉•荷加斯（William Hogarth,1697一1764）的榜样，勇敢地直面人生，真实地表现当时伦敦贫民窟的悲惨生活。他抱着一个崇高的道德意图：抗议社会的不公，并唤起社会舆论，推行改革，使处于水深火热中的贫民得到救助。正因为如此，狄更斯历来被我国及前苏联学者界定为“英国文学上批判现实主义的创始人和最伟大的代表”。对此，我有一些不同的见解：文学艺术是一种特殊的社会意识形态，它必然是社会存在的反映。但是，我们决不能把反映现实的文学都说成是现实主义文学，把“现实主义”的外延无限扩展。事实上，作家运用的创作方法多种多样，因人而异，这和作家的特殊气质和性格特点密切相关。狄更斯的创作，想象力极为丰富，充满诗的激情，他着意渲染自己的道德理想，处处突破自然的忠实临摹，借用一句歌德的话：它比自然高了一层。这和萨克雷、特洛罗普等坚持的客观。冷静、严格写实的方法有显著的区别。试以《雾都孤儿》为例，（一）个性化的语言是狄更斯在人物塑造上运用得十分出色的一种手段。书中的流氓、盗贼、妓女的语言都切合其身份，甚至还用了行业的黑话。然而，狄更斯决不作自然主义的再现，而是进行加工、提炼和选择，避免使用污秽、下流的话语。主人公奥立弗语言规范、谈吐文雅，他甚至不知偷窃为何物。他是在济贫院长大的孤儿，从未受到良好的教育，所接触的都是罪恶累累、堕落不堪之辈，他怎么会讲这么好的英文呢？这用“人是一切社会关系总和”的历史唯物主义观点是无法解释的。可见，狄更斯着力表现的是自己的道德理想，而不是追求完全的逼真。（二）在优秀的现实主义小说中，故事情节往往是在环境作用下的人物性格发展史，即高尔基所说的“某种性格、典型的成长和构成的历史”。然而，狄更斯不拘任何格套，想要多少巧合就安排多少巧合。奥立弗第一次跟小偷上街，被掏兜的第一人恰巧就是他亡父的好友布朗罗。第二次，他在匪徒赛克斯的劫持下入室行窃，被偷的恰好是他亲姨妈露丝•梅莱家。这在情理上无论如何是说不过去的。但狄更斯自有天大的本领，在具体的细节描写中充满生活气息和激情，使你读时紧张得喘不过气来，对这种本来是牵强的、不自然的情节也不得不信以为真。这就是狄更斯的艺术世界的魅力。（三）狄更斯写作时，始终有一种“感同身受的想象力”（Sympathetic imagination），即使对十恶不赦的人物也一样。书中贼首、老犹太费金受审的一场始终从费金的心理视角出发。他从天花板看到地板，只见重重叠叠的眼睛都在注视着自己。他听到对他罪行的陈述报告，他把恳求的目光转向律师，希望能为他辩护几句。人群中有人在吃东西，有人用手绢扇风，还有一名青年画家在画他的素描，他心想：不知道像不像，真想伸过脖子去看一看……一位绅士出去又进来，他想：准是吃饭去了，不知吃的什么饭？看到铁栏杆上有尖刺，他琢磨着：这很容易折断。从此又想到绞刑架，这时，他听到自己被处绞刑。他只是喃喃地说，自己岁数大了，大了，接着就什么声音也发不出来了。在这里，狄更斯精心选择了一系列细节，不但描绘了客观事物，而且切入了人物的内心世界，表现了他极其丰富的想象力。他运用的艺术方法，不是“批判现实主义”所能概括的。我倒是赞赏英国作家、狄更斯专家乔治•吉辛（George Giss－ing，1857—1903）的表述，他把狄更斯的创作方法称为“浪漫的现实主义”（romantic realism）。我认为这一表述才够准确，才符合狄更斯小说艺术的实际。小说的主人公奥利弗。特威斯特，是一名生在济贫院的孤儿，忍饥挨饿，备受欺凌，由于不堪棺材店老板娘、教区执事邦布儿等人的虐待而独自逃往伦敦，不幸刚一到达就误入贼窟。窃贼团伙的首领费金千方百计，企图把奥利弗训练为扒手供他驱使。奥利弗跟随窃贼伙伴“机灵鬼”和贝茨上街时，被误认为他偷了一位叫布朗洛的绅士(恰巧是他父亲生前的好友)的手绢而被警察逮捕。后因书摊老板证明了他的无辜，说明小偷另有其人，他才被释放。由于他当时病重昏迷，且容貌酷似友人生前留下的一副少妇画像，布朗洛收留他在家中治病，得到布朗洛及其女管家比德温太太无微不至的关怀，第一次感受到人间的温暖。窃贼团伙害怕奥利弗会泄露团伙的秘密，在费金指示下，塞克斯和南希费尽心机，趁奥利弗外出替布朗洛归还书摊老板的图书的时候用计使他重新陷入了贼窟。但当费金试图惩罚毒打奥利弗的上时候，南希挺身而出保护了奥利弗。费金用威胁、利诱、灌输等手段企图迫使奥利弗成为一名窃贼，成为费金的摇钱树。一天黑夜，奥利弗在塞克斯的胁迫下参加对一座大宅院的行窃。正当奥利弗准备趁爬进窗户的机会向主人报告时，被管家发现后开枪打伤。窃贼仓惶逃跑时，把奥利弗丢弃在路旁水沟之中。奥利弗在雨雪之中带伤爬行，无意中又回道那家宅院，昏到在门口。好心的主人梅丽夫人及其养女罗斯小姐收留并庇护了他。无巧不成书，这位罗斯小姐正是奥利弗的姨妈，但双方都不知道。在梅丽夫人家，奥利弗真正享受到了人生的温馨和美好。但费金团伙却不能放过奥利弗。有一天一个名叫蒙克斯的人来找费金，这人是奥利弗的同父异母兄长，由于他的不肖，他父亲在遗嘱中将全部遗产给了奥利弗，除非奥利弗和蒙克斯是一样的不肖儿女，遗产才可由蒙克斯继承。为此蒙克斯出高价买通费金，要他使奥利弗变成不可救药的罪犯，以便霸占奥利弗名下的全部遗产，并发泄自己对已去世的父亲的怨恨。正当蒙克斯得意洋洋的谈到他如何和帮布尔夫妇狼狈为奸，毁灭了能证明奥利弗身份的唯一证据的时候，被南希听见。南西见义勇为，同情奥利弗的遭遇，冒生命危险，偷偷找到罗斯小姐，向她报告了这一切。正当罗斯小姐考虑如何行动时，奥利弗告诉她，他找到了布朗洛先生。罗斯小姐就和布朗洛商议了处理方法。罗斯小姐在布朗洛陪同下再次和南西会面时，布朗洛获知蒙克斯即他的已故好友埃得温。利弗得的不肖儿子，决定亲自找蒙克斯交涉，但他们的谈话被费金派出的密探听见。塞克斯就凶残的杀害了南西。南西之死使费金团伙遭到了灭顶之灾。费金被捕，后上了绞刑架，塞克斯在逃窜中失足被自己的绳子勒死。与此同时，蒙克斯被布朗洛挟持到家中，逼他供出了一切，事情真相大白，奥利弗被布朗洛收为养子，从此结束了他的苦难的童年。为了给蒙克斯自新的机会，把本应全归奥利弗继承的遗产分一半给他。但蒙克斯劣性不改，把家产挥霍殆尽，继续作恶，终被锒铛入狱，死在狱中。邦布尔夫恶有恶报，被革去一切职务，一贫如洗，在他们曾经作威作福的济贫院度过余生。在这本书中，奥利弗、南希、罗斯小姐都是善良的代表，他们都出生于苦难之中，在黑暗和充满罪恶的世界中成长，但在他们的心中始终保持着一偏纯洁的天地，一颗善良的心，种种磨难并不能使他们堕落或彻底堕落，发而更显示出他们出污泥而不染的光彩夺目的晶莹品质。最后，邪不胜正，正义的力量战胜了邪恶，虽然南希最后遇难，但正是她的死所召唤出来的惊天动地的社会正义力量，正是她在冥冥中的在天之灵，注定了邪恶势力的代表——费金团伙的灭顶之灾。因此在小说中，南希的精神得到了升华，奥利弗则得到了典型意义上的善报。而恶人的代表——费金、蒙克斯、邦布尔、塞克斯无不一一落得个悲惨的下场。