其实可以选择啦，如果是自己投稿到那种世界级的顶级期刊、或者中文核心期刊的话，就按照采纳答案来，这是标准答案！但是你是要评职称的话，就像采纳答案说的，委托那些正规的论文中介帮你最好了，别找那种只有网站没有实体公司的机构，那种十个有七个都是片子，找有实体公司的中介发表！我自己之前找过一个在网上输入"壹品优"再输入刊他们公司都可以，百度搜一搜就知道了。
本人总结了几点经验，希望对第一次发表sci论文的同学有用。 1、选题。相对来说应用性研究比基础研究难发表论文，而且发表论文的因子也较低，结合老板的课题，要选择机理性研究课题。确定好关键词，在各大检索系统中分析所选课题是不是国际研究前沿，发表的论文数量和质量。如果相关文献档次很低，那么你选择的课题可能发表好文论文的可能性较低。 2、设计。选好课题不要急于动手，先看中文文献，主要是博士论文和综述，了解关键术语和研究进展。收集英文文献，总结研究进展，选好切入点，设计实验一、实验二..........实验n，根据文献提前构架论文发表框架，后面做完实验，填好数据。如选择胚胎发育相关课题，研究G基因在胚胎发育过程中的作用，参考已发表的文献JHAHKS等基因在胚胎发育过程中的作用，看看别人是怎么做的，通过那些实验证明自己的推断，这些验证也是你必须要做的，根据实验条件和需要选择，验证实验越充分，设计越合理，发表论文越容易。 3、实验。建议研究生早进实验室，开题之前熟悉实验室环境和运行，帮助师兄/姐做实验，练好基本操作。实验过程中会遇到各种问题，仪器设备、试剂、操作程序，很烦！有条件的可以要求公司负责部分实验。如高通量测序技术，应用广泛，必须要公司处理，数据分析，公司负责把图表做好，就等着发表了，事半功倍。我找过好几家公司，但是都不专业，提出的修改意见都不是很理想，经过同事介绍，我的文章在辑文编译www.***.net修改的特别好，我的第一篇SCI论文被录用了，非常感谢他们对我的帮助！ 4、写作。第一次写论文难度很大，论文的结构、语言表达、数据分析、图表处理等等，相关帖子好多，大家可以搜搜。我要说的是论文框架（实验结果组成、论文的中心）写好后先找有经验的人看看，没问题再写引言和讨论，保证数据支持论文结论。有了结论就是论文的中心，全文围绕中心展开写。最后写好了再找人看看，语言还不过关的找论文润色公司修改。
如何发表sci论文？这是许多研究者关注的内容。目前，发表sci论文可以给国内作者带来很大的优势。然而，在国际期刊上发表论文是有难度的。发表sci论文都需要掌握一定的技巧。充分的准备才能使论文更顺利地发表，首先需要一篇高质量的论文。这也要求作者阅读大量的英语文学作品，并具有较高的英语水平。如果英文水平不够，你可以先用中文写论文，然后找专业机构翻译成英文，他们也会对论文进行润色，使论文达到投稿的水平。国际sci论文审稿人是不习惯中国式英语的，很多国内作者投稿也是因为语言问题而被拒稿，想要避免这种情况就需要早做准备。论文写好后都会寻找相关的sci刊物投稿，大家阅读相关文献时也会知道一些与自己研究领域相关的sci刊物，掌握其影响因子及相关期刊的名称非常重要。小编建议先发一些比较高质量的期刊论文，如果能被送审，得到一些修改意见，即使被拒，也可以发表一些影响因子较低的期刊。选好期刊后根据“Instructions for Authors”，修改自己文章的格式。虽然比较繁琐的事情，却也能修改格式。比如说：文章标题、作者、通讯方式。对于参考文献也有不同的安排方式。总体来说想要发表sci论文并不容易，建议各位国内作者尽早的咨询专业老师，结合你的论文内容投稿相符合的杂志期刊，这样往往通过率会高一些。
SCI作为代表国外科研界最高的科学期刊，审稿人都是对本领域有相当研究的知名的学者，审稿严格程度不言而喻。而如果我们能用专业的语言来投稿，相信不仅能让审稿人耳目一新，而且能增强论文的专业性，促使投稿的成功。文章内应尽量注意使用本专业的专业术语，而其来源最好是专业书籍或论文而不是网上的翻译软件，同时也要注意模仿本专业内惯有的表达方式和语法习惯。
星科SCIER觉得：发表SCI（Science Citation Index）论文需要遵循以下步骤：1.选择期刊：首先要选择合适的期刊。你需要查找与你的研究领域相关的SCI期刊，并考虑期刊的影响因子和排名。你可以使用科学引文索引（Science Citation Index）或其他学术数据库来查找期刊。2.撰写论文：撰写一篇高质量的SCI论文需要遵循科学写作规范。你需要进行实验或调查研究，并记录实验结果或数据。在撰写论文时，你需要对研究进行清晰、详细的描述，并说明你的研究对该领域的贡献。3.提交论文：提交论文之前，你需要仔细阅读期刊的投稿要求，并遵循期刊的格式要求。你需要准备好论文、摘要、作者简介和其他必要的材料，并将它们提交给期刊编辑。一般来说，期刊编辑会在几个星期内回复你是否接受论文。4.审稿过程：如果你的论文被接受，期刊编辑会将它送给专家进行审稿。审稿专家会仔细评估你的研究方法、结果和结论，并提出意见和建议。你需要根据审稿专家的反馈对论文进行修改，并回复审稿意见。5.发表论文：一旦你的论文被接受并满足期刊要求，它将被发表在期刊上。你的论文将被分配一个DOI（数字对象标识符），它可以让其他学者轻松地引用你的研究。需要注意的是，发表SCI论文需要具备一定的研究能力和科学素养，也需要对自己的研究有足够的自信和信心。在提交论文之前，你需要花费大量的时间和精力进行研究和写作，同时也需要不断地修正和改进论文。
一、基础条件要求论文务必是原创的。Sci是一个尊重文章专利权的期刊，要想把论文发表到sci期刊上，前提之一论文一定是原创的，不能够随意抄袭别的论文，而且一旦发现将会使用法律手段来解决问题。
二、要求论文使用英文来进行表达。如果是原作者的英文水平有限，就需要邮发代号或者更高水平的英文编辑来帮忙翻译并母语化润色了。
三、要求sci论文的有一定的创新性。论文能否成功发表在sci期刊上，它的创新性很重要。发表在sci期刊上的论文，对其专业性要求很高，专业不同论文专题当然会有差异。所以在后来的科研学者要想把自己的论文发表在sci里，就必须要留意论文的创新性。另外，具有创新性的论文专题比常规性论文专题更易被收录。
四、要求论文的高度专业性。一般来说，能够在sci上发表的论文都是专业性很强的，所以这就要求了想要在sci上发表的论文的相当的专业性高度。
1。首先决定投那份SCI刊物。作者一般在撰写论文时就已经做出决定。主要决策依据应是主题内容合适，学术声誉好，读者多等。当然也要看自己成果的大小，论文的质量而定。勿一稿两投。论文完成后，要按照每份刊物的投稿要求投稿。一般的投稿清单包括：投稿信足够的稿件数所有图表齐全以及其它要求的材料将上述内容打包邮寄，或通过电子网络按要求投递稿件。2。论文投出后，一般刊物编辑部会给投稿作者发送收到稿件通知。如果编辑觉得论文题材不适合所投刊物，会回信退稿。否则，作者就进入等待期。收到稿件后，编辑挑选2－3名同行对论文进行评审。论文评审是对作者采用匿名形式。评审者不是专职，是自愿花时间评阅论文（并无评审费）。由于评阅人一般是已经在本领域建立了地位，比较忙，因此往往需要花较长时间。投稿者应对此予以理解。另外，由于评阅人较忙或其它原因，有的评审意见不一定贴切。是值得商榷的。编辑在审稿过程中是仲裁和最后决策者。审稿期间，作者一般应耐心等待。除按收稿通知建议时间与编辑联系外，一般应给评审4－6个月时间。若仍无消息，可以与编辑联系催促一下。3。论文评审的分一般内容和专业内容两部分。一般评审内容包括：稿件是否适合所投刊物若发表此文读者面会有多大是否有现势性－即是否需要尽快发表论文的理论、方法、和数据等是否有创新性论文有无重大缺陷（理论、方法、实验结果等）论文结果是否重要（若设立奖励的刊物会征求是否建议奖励）论文可读性如何长短是否合适－与论文重要性是否平衡图表是否必须，质量如何有没有忽略重要前人工作专业内容是评审者对论文中不正确或存有疑问的内容、表述方法、写作缺陷等提出批评。没有具体形式。4。审稿结束，作者迟早会收到稿件评审意见和编辑的仲裁结果。一般有四种情况：接收修改后可接收 可以修改后再投拒绝对第一种情况，作者会收到投递最终稿的指南。现在，一般需要提供数字文件，按要求提供图表。对第二种情况，应按照评审意见修改论文。提出拒绝修改某些部分的理由。将修改部分单独写成报告提供给编辑。一般来说编辑比评审者更具同情心。因此，一般可以期望收到象第一种情况那样的论文接收信。对第三种情况，看看评审意见，这种决定一般是由于论文需要补充材料，编辑希望继续修改提高。不要轻易放弃。修改后被接收的机会还是很大。对于高质量的杂志，多数论文第一次投稿时都会被按这种情况退回来。作者应根据评审意见认真修改。当然也可以提出对某些部分不修改的理由。若得到最后一种情况的答复，应根据评审意见修改文稿，然后投往其它刊物。国外刊物的拒稿率高低不等，一般专业刊物拒稿率在30％以上。不妨投到拒稿率低些或引用率低些的刊物上。5。论文被接收后。按照提供印刷稿件要求投稿后。下一个回合就是收到印刷编辑寄回的校样。校样一般需要尽快寄还给印刷编辑。寄校样时，出版商会要求填写版权转让书（Transfer of Copy Right）,并告知支付版面费的办法和订购单行本的方法。许多刊物不收版面费，但对特殊印刷（如彩版印刷）收费。有的对超过定额免费页数的页面按页收费。不少收版面费的刊物费用都挺高。如Journal of Geophysical Research, IEEE Transactions的系列刊物收费可以高达数千mei元。必须有所准备。版面费一般可以用信用卡支付。对校样要认真细读，特别注意公式和图表。 参考资料：脚丫代写论文
SCI论文只需要联系相关报刊机构即可发表。（相关机构联系方式是机密，无法透露，请自行收索相关网页获取联系方法）
最重要的是选择意向投稿期刊。根据本领域SCI收录期刊来选择。通过查看期刊的影响因子、发文频次及数量等来判断发文容易程度；
查看期刊近几期或近几年发文情况，判断其主要刊载主题、研究方向。根据所选意向期刊要求，回阅读大量相关中外文文献，进行论文撰写。
扩展资料：
SCI论文本身来说，我国科研工作者大多面临英语能力匮乏的缺陷，尤其对于年龄大和专业性强的科技工作者来说，内容不是问题，英语往往成为了制约的瓶颈。
SCI论文对我国大部分科技工作者来说依然是神秘的，难于发表的，正基于此，大部分科研机构、高校等单位引入作为评价标准，这也是有失公正，破坏了中文期刊的发展，降低了中文在科技领域的“币值”。
我国SCI检索的期刊名称：
1 北京科技大学学报（MMM英文版）
2 材料科学技术（英文版）
3 大气科学进展（英文版）
4 代数集刊（英文版）
5 地球物理学报
6 地质学报、土壤圈（英文版）
7 分析化学
8 钢铁研究学报（英文版）
9 高等学校化学学报
10 高等学校化学研究（英文版）
11 高分子科学（英文版）
12 高分子学报
13 高能物理与核物理
14 固体力学学报（英文版）
15 光谱学与光谱分析（中文）
16 红外与毫米波学报（中文）
17 化学学报
18 计算数学（英文版）
19 结构化学
20 科学通报（英文版）
21 理论物理通讯（英文版）
22 力学学报（英文版）
23 生物化学与生物物理进展
24 生物化学与生物物理学报
25 生物医学与环境科学（英文版）
26 世界胃肠病学杂志（英文版）
27 数学年刊B辑（英文版）
28 数学物理学报（英文版）
29 数学学报（英文版）
30 无机材料学报
31 无机化学学报
32 武汉工业大学学报（材料科学英文版）
33 物理化学学报
34 物理学报
35 物理学报—海外版
36 稀土学报（英文版）
37 稀有金属（英文版）
38 稀有金属与材料工程
39 应用数学和力学（英文版）
40 有机化学
41 植物学报（英文）
42 中国海洋工程（英文版）
43 中国化学（英文版）
44 中国化学工程学报（英文版）
45 中国化学快报（英文版）
46 中国科学A辑（英文版）
47 中国科学B辑（英文版）
48 中国科学C辑（英文版）
49 中国科学D辑（英文版）
50 中国科学E辑（英文版）
51 中国文学（英文版）
52 中国物理快报（英文版）
53 中国药理学报
54 中国有色金属学报（英文版）
55 中华医学杂志（英文版）
56 自然科学进展（英文版）
法学发表sci有用。根据查询显示Sci是国际知名期刊，收录的都是来自各个国家各个行业学术价值最高的期刊，可想而知sci论文的作用和认可度也是非常高的。
由于SCI是科学引文索引，因此SCI检索的期刊也好，文献也好，是偏向科学技术方向的，也就是偏理科一些，其实每个检索工具基本都有所侧重，例如EI就侧重工程技术方向。
我国被SCI检索的期刊名称：
1 北京科技大学学报（MMM英文版） 2 材料科学技术（英文版） 3 大气科学进展（英文版） 4 代数集刊（英文版） 5 地球物理学报 6 地质学报、土壤圈（英文版） 7 分析化学 8 钢铁研究学报（英文版） 9 高等学校化学学报 10 高等学校化学研究（英文版） 11 高分子科学（英文版） 12 高分子学报 13 高能物理与核物理 14 固体力学学报（英文版） 15 光谱学与光谱分析（中文） 16 红外与毫米波学报（中文） 17 化学学报 18 计算数学（英文版） 19 结构化学 20 科学通报（英文版） 21 理论物理通讯（英文版） 22 力学学报（英文版） 23 生物化学与生物物理进展 24 生物化学与生物物理学报 25 生物医学与环境科学（英文版） 26 世界胃肠病学杂志（英文版） 27 数学年刊B辑（英文版） 28 数学物理学报（英文版） 29 数学学报（英文版） 30 无机材料学报 31 无机化学学报 32 武汉工业大学学报（材料科学英文版） 33 物理化学学报 34 物理学报 35 物理学报—海外版 36 稀土学报（英文版） 37 稀有金属（英文版） 38 稀有金属与材料工程 39 应用数学和力学（英文版） 40 有机化学 41 植物学报（英文） 42 中国海洋工程（英文版） 43 中国化学（英文版） 44 中国化学工程学报（英文版） 45 中国化学快报（英文版） 46 中国科学A辑（英文版） 47 中国科学B辑（英文版） 48 中国科学C辑（英文版） 49 中国科学D辑（英文版） 50 中国科学E辑（英文版） 51 中国文学（英文版） 52 中国物理快报（英文版） 53 中国药理学报 54 中国有色金属学报（英文版） 55 中华医学杂志（英文版） 56 自然科学进展（英文版）
貌似是科研出版社旗下一本法学期刊吧，专门出法律相关的文章。看上面出版文章还挺多的，各个国家都有，应该还行。
需要。专硕毕业需要发表毕业论文。专业硕士的论文，必须强化应用导向，形式可以多种多样，鼓励采用调研报告、规划设计、产品开发案例分析、项目管理、文学艺术作品等多种形式。毕业论文是普通中等专业学校、高等专科学校、本科院校、高等教育自学考试本科及研究生学历专业教育学业的最后一个环节，为对本专业学生集中进行科学研究训练而要求学生在毕业前总结性独立作业、撰写的论文。
这是科研出版社的法律类英文期刊，接受关于各类法律问题的论文投稿，发表的论文能被知网学术和谷歌学术检索到。
The theory of criminal law of shallow understanding errors1. irrtumslehreLegal irrtumslehre, namely, refers to the illegality mistake for own behavior in law, whether what crime constitutes a crime shall be punished by, or what is wrong, is to oneself the legal nature of the action of meaning or misunderstandings. Legal irrtumslehre usually includes three conditions: (1) the actor's behavior in law does not constitute a crime, the offender and constitutes a crime for which imaginary guilty, (2) the behavior in law constitutes a crime and does not constitute a crime, the offender mistaken assumptions that innocent, (3) for his act constitutes a crime shall be convicted and punishment in light of the existing errors, misunderstanding or punishment. Due to the legal irrtumslehre, only to the behavior of the offender is not correct understanding of the legal assessment, and for their actions in fact correct understanding of the situation is still there, so its act constitutes a crime shall be investigated for criminal responsibility is and how it is not usually occurs.（1）Imaginary innocent treatment principleThe principles for imaginary innocence, whether it involves a deliberately elements. Foreign criminal law theory basically has the following kinds:1）Should know that don't speak, just for criminal facts have understanding. Canada criminal code article 19 regulation: "the ignorance of the law excuses and crime can be ShuZui reason." Motto: "Roman law and legal disclaimer" somehow also expressed a principle, namely: "in the crime as subjective FanYi established condition, not request to recognize his behavior of richtswitrig".2）Should know the reason, according to two: moral responsibility theory, personality responsibility theory. Moral responsibility theory emphasizes on the rationality of free will blame illegal conduct, is considered to be objective stance. 3）That said, the possible illegality of responsibility for deliberately, at least to the possibility of understanding illegality. While in China mainland, the introduction of the concept of crime has another concept -- social consciousness that harm to discuss richtswitrig already meaningless. Because the deliberate crime according to law condemn the illegality of the offender is not known, the law itself is not damaged, the law of the social consciousness is harm. Social harm consciousness is the essential contents of the crime, illegal consciousness is the legal form of social consciousness. Therefore, our country law more emphasis is on the rationality of essence, which is harmful to the society values. Just because of its social harmfulness, with a social moral evaluation colour, easier for people to grasp and observe. Therefore, the author thinks that, in general, the person need to recognize his behavior may be the result of inevitable or harmful to the society, and has already know. With intentionally But in fact, the forbidden by law and mass that is harmful to the society in our country nowadays the behavior under the constitution should be consistent, in other words, know the social harmfulness also know the possibility of illegal, but know the possibility of illegal is inevitable should also realize social harmfulness, both are unified. Therefore, it is generally thought that the law is no excuse, the reason of law does not exclude the misunderstanding in principle, but can be culpable for deliberately discretion. （2） Misunderstandings treatment principle. PunishmentWe might as well so the essence of blame for his due: the crime in the subjective should blame or blame, for the intent or negligence performance. If the offender because of misunderstanding that legal person feels very innocent, lack of this should blame or condemning sexual, from the fundamental measure, blame is absolutely not consider disclaimer. Especially in the modern society, the legal category SAN marino, legal entry in different fields and different levels of books, recognized, comprehend legal apparently endless and same, so the person of law and misunderstandings, not inexcusable. Now, both in theory and practice, the method not cling to forgive "seems to have in shake. Therefore, to a certain extent, can also think admits exceptions excusable is legal misunderstanding of criminal law is an important symbol of humanity. In addition, it was not in the act of which is prohibited by the laws and regulations, especially after a circumstance, should have knowledge of richtswitrig actor, constitute the understanding of deliberate point of view, with the attitude of this understanding, of course, that is not the illegality or by the simple statement actor. The author thinks that the only when the legal establishment of may, FangKeZu but intentionally.2. The fact mistakeThat mistake, is to determine its subjective behavior nature and the criminal responsibility of the relevant facts wrong understanding. From the wrong reasons and phenomenon of angles, generally known that there are several mistakes:（1） Object irrtumslehreThe object is known for errors, whether there is objectively error object. It includes actor in the implementation of the existing criminal behavior of the hazards for the object and actually does not exist, or for criminal object and actually does not exist, or infringe a criminal object and actually invaded another crime object. The object of objects is usually known errors caused by mistake, but the object of different social relationship reflects different. Evil doer of objects and actual expected in fact not only harm object does not agree, and in the nature of law is not consistent. Therefore, the object irrtumslehre may affect the form of sin, crime accomplishment, and may even attempted to influence the crime. For example, in view of the circumstances, not a thought before the enemy, and a party came to stick, afterwards just know the ox was wounded. A thought of damage is "people", and the actual wounded is "cow", do not belong to the same laws of the object. Similar situation and will generally be mistaken for drug trafficking items, Actor will stolen items in the theft of guns in stealing together. This object from the subjective errors, see, is a kind of mistake, From the objective, because the mistake crime to no avail, where the criminal attempted belongs.1）Object mistakeObjects can be generalized mistake, including object mistake to belong to the object know mistake is inevitable object irrtumslehre. These include, is known to be wrong object of legal property of the same object mistake and legal properties of different objects, namely the object irrtumslehre irrtumslehre. In order to distinguish with the object mistake here, the cognition to the same object only mean error between the different objects, namely the misunderstanding of the evil doer expected objects and actual harm to the object, but not in fact in the legal nature of the same situation. This object mistake again say things on purpose mistake not criminal responsibility. As a reserve, killing b shall be killed as b and c, do not affect a rap. This is the need to consider that a kill b behavior "mistake" cause others (c), belong to an intentional crime (b) "death", for the excess result, according to the results, which determine the ordinary mail of death was deliberately recognized for deliberately, to the death of the fault is propylene, identified as negligence, according to the intention or negligence of the general mark recognized FanYi or state of mind, not applicable rules of the mistake.2） Behavior irrtumslehreBehavior mainly includes two kind of mistake: first, the behavior nature irrtumslehre. That actor has to its social harm nature, such as understanding not imaginary defense. Behavior nature mistake might affect the form of sin, and may also affect crime. Second, the behavior tools (methods) irrtumslehre. That person to use when the conduct of tool (methods), which affects not correct understanding of harm results, behavior tools (methods) mistake can affect crime or attempted was founded, also can affect crime or belongs to the incident, a typical for murder on hazardous substances, because the drug failure and failed to kill people, can think method or tools for error doer of consciousness beyond reason not to succeed. And as actor see armour, second coming together, hence shot to play, but can't hit by the party and. Look, this is from the phenomenon of an object, or the final results for the mistake, but this error is based on the fact that the wrong doer identify offender is carefully identify to begin, can think recognize is accurate, errors in ChaWu itself. The solution to this situation, "said", its legal with qualitative and recognize wrong object is consistent, namely directly recognized as an intentional homicide accomplishment. The death of a person is directly intentionally to b, death is the indirect intentional, just for a to b is attempted, accomplished. Additionally, if in daily life because misidentification object and damage of consequences, the crime itself is not just any criminal negligence because of problems.3)Causality irrtumslehreCausality mistake, is on his behavior and harmful results of actual connection between errors. Generally include: first, not some harm result, as has happened actor. This generally constitute a crime. Second, has certain harm result, but not for actor or for his behavior is caused, and does not affect crime accomplishment. Third, really happened, the offender is aware of its behavior, but with the actual development between the harm to the process or a mistake, general to punish crime accomplishment. In theory, the offender is not only a crime, but continuous movement, this several continuous action is not a few crime, but a crime. In this sense, doesn't exist on the results of the sack.3.Legal irrtumslehre and facts mistake and proceduresDomestic scholars in fact know mistakes and errors between the issue legal representative views mainly include:（1）For own behavior whether in law constitutes a crime, criminal or what kind of criminal punishment shall be under the incorrect understanding is legal irrtumslehre for his behavior on the implementation of the incorrect understanding is the fact that mistake,（2）The objectivity of crime is a false understanding of crime, that mistake of objective facts have clear understanding, only to act in the evaluation of existing laws on the concept of law is not correct mistakes。（3）Actor known facts and actual fact don't agree is wrong, the person that judgment and objective law is law of illegal inconsistency errors.These ideas basically could in theory and legal irrtumslehre fact distinguish mistakes, it is important to emphasize that：1) With the conviction that the so-called irrelevant, as this mistake to hit each other, the shooting head caused the death of heart, without vision of research into our. 2) Study of the theory of error, error occurs when the purpose, but whether to intentionally resistance, reduce plots affected only the wrong cognition, natural sentencing nor will it into the error theory category. 3) This does not constitute a crime and actor for crime, and for their behavior in the criminal law on the crimes and how to apply for criminal punishment on such specific knowledge error, conviction according to law. Based on this, the author thinks that, at the fact that criminal law is only to know wrong doer of elements to know the so-called objective facts constituents of mistake is the fact that the legal irrtumslehre error refers to the legal action is illegal and the evaluation of the mistake. From the theory of facts and legal irrtumslehre error, but the problem is in the law, criminal elements to the facts and law closely combined circumstances (like some administrative crimes and economic crimes), or is in a fact itself contains certain laws of evaluation content, to distinguish with a mistake is the fact that mistake or legal wrong, is often difficult. If the property of his humanity and obscenity obscenity, administrative rules and regulations, JinYuOu, disrupt public until its precondition of the legitimacy of the public, and legal irrtumslehre facts wrong intertwined, and this is what we distinguish facts and legal irrtumslehre errors will solve the problem.In some cases, the defendant should know that because of the lack of knowledge, and not to the behavior of social harmfulness, so that the defendant is not "knowledge they will entail harmful consequences to society, and hope or allows such results" and deliberate crime, the burden of proof is only FanYi prosecution, in addition, prosecution without proof the defendant not normal, but normal mental and spiritual normal presumption defendant directly if the defendant that his spirit is not normal, it shall provide necessary evidence by himself to prove. Thus, the author, on legal irrtumslehre processing, can adopt the presumption of ways to handle. Which country presumption every normal citizens are known, unless the law can put forward defense "advantage prove" above, or the evidence rebut these presumption is established. From the efficiency of lawsuit, said the country is impossible to prove the defendant is known of the law.
貌似是科研出版社旗下一本法学期刊吧，专门出法律相关的文章。看上面出版文章还挺多的，各个国家都有，应该还行。
看了下，这个期刊2010年就见刊了，都十多年了，一直都有出刊，应该还不错吧，看看要求，如果满足要求还是可以投稿的。
是科研出版社旗下的一本期刊，法律类型。科研出版社近些年在中国学术界的名气打响了，和汉斯出版社貌似是一个集团运营。我身边很多做学术的同事知道这个出版社，虽然没在这本刊上发表过文章对这本期刊不太了解。但是有幸在Journal of Computer and Communications发表过，因为我是计算机领域的。编辑团队较给力，国人比较注重服务。服务不错。
The theory of criminal law of shallow understanding errors1. irrtumslehreLegal irrtumslehre, namely, refers to the illegality mistake for own behavior in law, whether what crime constitutes a crime shall be punished by, or what is wrong, is to oneself the legal nature of the action of meaning or misunderstandings. Legal irrtumslehre usually includes three conditions: (1) the actor's behavior in law does not constitute a crime, the offender and constitutes a crime for which imaginary guilty, (2) the behavior in law constitutes a crime and does not constitute a crime, the offender mistaken assumptions that innocent, (3) for his act constitutes a crime shall be convicted and punishment in light of the existing errors, misunderstanding or punishment. Due to the legal irrtumslehre, only to the behavior of the offender is not correct understanding of the legal assessment, and for their actions in fact correct understanding of the situation is still there, so its act constitutes a crime shall be investigated for criminal responsibility is and how it is not usually occurs.（1）Imaginary innocent treatment principleThe principles for imaginary innocence, whether it involves a deliberately elements. Foreign criminal law theory basically has the following kinds:1）Should know that don't speak, just for criminal facts have understanding. Canada criminal code article 19 regulation: "the ignorance of the law excuses and crime can be ShuZui reason." Motto: "Roman law and legal disclaimer" somehow also expressed a principle, namely: "in the crime as subjective FanYi established condition, not request to recognize his behavior of richtswitrig".2）Should know the reason, according to two: moral responsibility theory, personality responsibility theory. Moral responsibility theory emphasizes on the rationality of free will blame illegal conduct, is considered to be objective stance. 3）That said, the possible illegality of responsibility for deliberately, at least to the possibility of understanding illegality. While in China mainland, the introduction of the concept of crime has another concept -- social consciousness that harm to discuss richtswitrig already meaningless. Because the deliberate crime according to law condemn the illegality of the offender is not known, the law itself is not damaged, the law of the social consciousness is harm. Social harm consciousness is the essential contents of the crime, illegal consciousness is the legal form of social consciousness. Therefore, our country law more emphasis is on the rationality of essence, which is harmful to the society values. Just because of its social harmfulness, with a social moral evaluation colour, easier for people to grasp and observe. Therefore, the author thinks that, in general, the person need to recognize his behavior may be the result of inevitable or harmful to the society, and has already know. With intentionally But in fact, the forbidden by law and mass that is harmful to the society in our country nowadays the behavior under the constitution should be consistent, in other words, know the social harmfulness also know the possibility of illegal, but know the possibility of illegal is inevitable should also realize social harmfulness, both are unified. Therefore, it is generally thought that the law is no excuse, the reason of law does not exclude the misunderstanding in principle, but can be culpable for deliberately discretion. （2） Misunderstandings treatment principle. PunishmentWe might as well so the essence of blame for his due: the crime in the subjective should blame or blame, for the intent or negligence performance. If the offender because of misunderstanding that legal person feels very innocent, lack of this should blame or condemning sexual, from the fundamental measure, blame is absolutely not consider disclaimer. Especially in the modern society, the legal category SAN marino, legal entry in different fields and different levels of books, recognized, comprehend legal apparently endless and same, so the person of law and misunderstandings, not inexcusable. Now, both in theory and practice, the method not cling to forgive "seems to have in shake. Therefore, to a certain extent, can also think admits exceptions excusable is legal misunderstanding of criminal law is an important symbol of humanity. In addition, it was not in the act of which is prohibited by the laws and regulations, especially after a circumstance, should have knowledge of richtswitrig actor, constitute the understanding of deliberate point of view, with the attitude of this understanding, of course, that is not the illegality or by the simple statement actor. The author thinks that the only when the legal establishment of may, FangKeZu but intentionally.2. The fact mistakeThat mistake, is to determine its subjective behavior nature and the criminal responsibility of the relevant facts wrong understanding. From the wrong reasons and phenomenon of angles, generally known that there are several mistakes:（1） Object irrtumslehreThe object is known for errors, whether there is objectively error object. It includes actor in the implementation of the existing criminal behavior of the hazards for the object and actually does not exist, or for criminal object and actually does not exist, or infringe a criminal object and actually invaded another crime object. The object of objects is usually known errors caused by mistake, but the object of different social relationship reflects different. Evil doer of objects and actual expected in fact not only harm object does not agree, and in the nature of law is not consistent. Therefore, the object irrtumslehre may affect the form of sin, crime accomplishment, and may even attempted to influence the crime. For example, in view of the circumstances, not a thought before the enemy, and a party came to stick, afterwards just know the ox was wounded. A thought of damage is "people", and the actual wounded is "cow", do not belong to the same laws of the object. Similar situation and will generally be mistaken for drug trafficking items, Actor will stolen items in the theft of guns in stealing together. This object from the subjective errors, see, is a kind of mistake, From the objective, because the mistake crime to no avail, where the criminal attempted belongs.1）Object mistakeObjects can be generalized mistake, including object mistake to belong to the object know mistake is inevitable object irrtumslehre. These include, is known to be wrong object of legal property of the same object mistake and legal properties of different objects, namely the object irrtumslehre irrtumslehre. In order to distinguish with the object mistake here, the cognition to the same object only mean error between the different objects, namely the misunderstanding of the evil doer expected objects and actual harm to the object, but not in fact in the legal nature of the same situation. This object mistake again say things on purpose mistake not criminal responsibility. As a reserve, killing b shall be killed as b and c, do not affect a rap. This is the need to consider that a kill b behavior "mistake" cause others (c), belong to an intentional crime (b) "death", for the excess result, according to the results, which determine the ordinary mail of death was deliberately recognized for deliberately, to the death of the fault is propylene, identified as negligence, according to the intention or negligence of the general mark recognized FanYi or state of mind, not applicable rules of the mistake.2） Behavior irrtumslehreBehavior mainly includes two kind of mistake: first, the behavior nature irrtumslehre. That actor has to its social harm nature, such as understanding not imaginary defense. Behavior nature mistake might affect the form of sin, and may also affect crime. Second, the behavior tools (methods) irrtumslehre. That person to use when the conduct of tool (methods), which affects not correct understanding of harm results, behavior tools (methods) mistake can affect crime or attempted was founded, also can affect crime or belongs to the incident, a typical for murder on hazardous substances, because the drug failure and failed to kill people, can think method or tools for error doer of consciousness beyond reason not to succeed. And as actor see armour, second coming together, hence shot to play, but can't hit by the party and. Look, this is from the phenomenon of an object, or the final results for the mistake, but this error is based on the fact that the wrong doer identify offender is carefully identify to begin, can think recognize is accurate, errors in ChaWu itself. The solution to this situation, "said", its legal with qualitative and recognize wrong object is consistent, namely directly recognized as an intentional homicide accomplishment. The death of a person is directly intentionally to b, death is the indirect intentional, just for a to b is attempted, accomplished. Additionally, if in daily life because misidentification object and damage of consequences, the crime itself is not just any criminal negligence because of problems.3)Causality irrtumslehreCausality mistake, is on his behavior and harmful results of actual connection between errors. Generally include: first, not some harm result, as has happened actor. This generally constitute a crime. Second, has certain harm result, but not for actor or for his behavior is caused, and does not affect crime accomplishment. Third, really happened, the offender is aware of its behavior, but with the actual development between the harm to the process or a mistake, general to punish crime accomplishment. In theory, the offender is not only a crime, but continuous movement, this several continuous action is not a few crime, but a crime. In this sense, doesn't exist on the results of the sack.3.Legal irrtumslehre and facts mistake and proceduresDomestic scholars in fact know mistakes and errors between the issue legal representative views mainly include:（1）For own behavior whether in law constitutes a crime, criminal or what kind of criminal punishment shall be under the incorrect understanding is legal irrtumslehre for his behavior on the implementation of the incorrect understanding is the fact that mistake,（2）The objectivity of crime is a false understanding of crime, that mistake of objective facts have clear understanding, only to act in the evaluation of existing laws on the concept of law is not correct mistakes。（3）Actor known facts and actual fact don't agree is wrong, the person that judgment and objective law is law of illegal inconsistency errors.These ideas basically could in theory and legal irrtumslehre fact distinguish mistakes, it is important to emphasize that：1) With the conviction that the so-called irrelevant, as this mistake to hit each other, the shooting head caused the death of heart, without vision of research into our. 2) Study of the theory of error, error occurs when the purpose, but whether to intentionally resistance, reduce plots affected only the wrong cognition, natural sentencing nor will it into the error theory category. 3) This does not constitute a crime and actor for crime, and for their behavior in the criminal law on the crimes and how to apply for criminal punishment on such specific knowledge error, conviction according to law. Based on this, the author thinks that, at the fact that criminal law is only to know wrong doer of elements to know the so-called objective facts constituents of mistake is the fact that the legal irrtumslehre error refers to the legal action is illegal and the evaluation of the mistake. From the theory of facts and legal irrtumslehre error, but the problem is in the law, criminal elements to the facts and law closely combined circumstances (like some administrative crimes and economic crimes), or is in a fact itself contains certain laws of evaluation content, to distinguish with a mistake is the fact that mistake or legal wrong, is often difficult. If the property of his humanity and obscenity obscenity, administrative rules and regulations, JinYuOu, disrupt public until its precondition of the legitimacy of the public, and legal irrtumslehre facts wrong intertwined, and this is what we distinguish facts and legal irrtumslehre errors will solve the problem.In some cases, the defendant should know that because of the lack of knowledge, and not to the behavior of social harmfulness, so that the defendant is not "knowledge they will entail harmful consequences to society, and hope or allows such results" and deliberate crime, the burden of proof is only FanYi prosecution, in addition, prosecution without proof the defendant not normal, but normal mental and spiritual normal presumption defendant directly if the defendant that his spirit is not normal, it shall provide necessary evidence by himself to prove. Thus, the author, on legal irrtumslehre processing, can adopt the presumption of ways to handle. Which country presumption every normal citizens are known, unless the law can put forward defense "advantage prove" above, or the evidence rebut these presumption is established. From the efficiency of lawsuit, said the country is impossible to prove the defendant is known of the law.