大约10000字左右
法律与人们是相辅相成、相互促进的关系，法律是维护秩序，规范、调整人们的思想和行为的重要手段。下文是我为大家搜集整理的关于法律论文 范文 8000字的内容，欢迎大家阅读参考!
浅析宪法在依法治国中的重要作用
论文摘要：依法治国就是依完治国。宪法是国家的根本大法，是治国安邦的总章程，规定了整个国家的基本制度和法律运行机制，公民的基本权利和自由，具有最高的法律效力。加强宪法的实施，必须改进全社会的宪法观念，加强宪法的宣传，宪法实施的监督，宪法的司法化等工作。
党的十七大 报告 强调“依法治国基本方略深入落实，全社会法制观念进一步增强，法治政府建设取得新成效。”依法治国，概括而言，就是依照宪法和法律的规定来治理国家，管理社会事务，就是依宪治国。这是因为以宪法为最高法的完备而优良的法律体系是依法治国的基础。
一、宪法是国家的根本大法。是治国安邦的总章程
(一)宪法具有最高的法律效力，在社会主义法律体系中处于核心地位。
法律效力是指法律借助于国家权力所具有的强制力和约束力，它的高低、大小是衡量一部法律在法律体系中地位的重要标志。宪法具有最高法律效力，已为世界上各成文宪法国家所公认和接受。如日本国宪法规定，宪法为国家最高法律，凡与宪法条款相冲突的法律、法令、诏敕等一律无效。这说明：第一，宪法是其他法律的立法依据和立法基础，没有宪法依据和宪法授权，则不能制定法律;第二，即使其他法律有宪法上的立法依据，但其内容和精神也不得与宪法的原则和条文相抵触，否则无效或部分无效;第三，宪法是一切国家机关、社会团体和公民的最高行为准则。一切组织和个人都必须以宪法为根本活动准则，并且负有维护、遵守、保证宪法实施的职责。我国现行宪法也规定了自身最高的法律地位。
(二)宪法规定了法治匡f家的基本制度。
宪法规定的内容是国家社会制度和政治制度的基本原则。例如我国现行宪法包括四个修正案
(1)全面、准确地体现了党在社会主义初级阶段的基本路线。规定：“我国将长期处于社会主义初级阶段。国家的根本任务是沿着中国特色社会主义道路，集中力量进行社会主义现代化建设。中国各族人民将继续杂中国共产党领导下，在马克思列宁主义、毛泽东思想、邓小平理论和‘三个代表’重要思想指引下，坚持人民民主专政，坚持社会主义道路，坚持改革开放，不断完善社会主义的各项制度，发展市场经济">社会主义市场经济，发展社会主义民主，健全社会主义法制，自力更生，艰苦奋斗，逐步实现工业、农业、国防和科学技术的现代化，推动物质文明、政治文明和精神文明协调发展，把我国建设成为富强、民主、文明的社会主义国家。”而“—个中心、两个基本点”，即坚持以经济建设为中心，坚持四项基本原则，坚持改革开放，是党在社会主义初级阶段的基本路线的核心内容。
(2)规定了我国的国家性质，“中华人民共和国是工人阶级领导的、以工农联盟为基础的人民民主专政的社会主义国家。”这就是我们的国体，它确定了我们国家的性质和各阶级在国家中的地位。我国的人民民主专政实质上是无产阶级专政，但是从我国的实际情况出发，工人阶级是领导阶级，而百分之八十的人口是农民，还有其他劳动人民，把国体确定为“工人阶级领导的、以工农联盟为基础的人民民主专政”，更加符合我国的实际情况。
(3)规定了国家的根本政治制度。从我国的实际情况出发，我们把人民代表大会制度确定为国家的根本政治制度。规定：“人民行使国家权力的机关是全国人民代表大会和地方各级人民代表大会。”“全国人民代表大会和地方各级人民代表大会都由民主选举产生，对人民负责，受人民监督。”“国家行政机关、审判机关、检察机关都由人民代表大会产生，对它负责，受它监督。”从中体现出我们国家的一切权力属于人民，人民是国家和社会的主人。
(4)规定了我们国家在政治、经济、 文化 等方面的基本制度。再如美国1789年宪法第一条就规定了代议制度，其中包括美国国会的组成、职权、活动原则及其与总统、联邦法院的分权制衡关系等等。
(三)宪法规定了整个国家的法律运行机制。
宪法规定了宪法和法律的监督、解释体制。我国宪法在 总结 建国以来的实施 经验 和吸收各国宪政发展长处的基础上，确定由全国人民代表大会和人民代表大会常务委员会监督宪法的实施，这既保证了“议行合一”和“民主集中制”原则的贯彻执行，又兼取特设专门机关监督的优势，使宪法实施的监督真正落到实处。国家立法机关所制定的一般法律以及其他国家机关颁布的规范性文件必须遵循宪法，同宪法的原则精神相符合，否则势必会损害国家的根本利益，影响国家的法治建设，因此，各国宪法对于宪法实施的监督都做了规定。如，我国宪法就明确规定由立法机关即全国人民代表大会及其常务委员会监督宪法实施。
(四)宪法规定了公民的基本权利和自由。
基本权利表明了公民在—个国家中的宪法地位，是公民行为合法性的依据。自宪法产生以来，公民的基本权利就是宪法的一项最重要、最基本的内容。我国是人民民主专政的社会主义国家，人民是国家和社会的主人，享有广泛的权利和自由。现行宪法总结历史的经验和教训，对公民的权利和自由作了广泛的、充分的规定。首先强调了公民在法律面前一律平等，这是我国公民的一项权利，也是社会主义法制的一条基本原则。还规定了公民的政治权利和自由，人身权利和自由，社会经济权利，监督权，老人、妇女和 儿童 等特定主体的权利等等。
我们不但在宪法中规定了公民的基本权利，而且在许多方面还有保障：(1)物质保障。我们国家的生产资料公有制和广大劳动人民直接掌握国民经济的命脉，为公民基本权利和自由的实现提供了物质条件。(2)政治保障。我们国家人民当家作主的国家政权决定了全力维护广大劳动人民享有的基本权利和自由，是社会主义国家政权的核心职能之一。(3)法律保障。我们社会主义国家的法律是广大人民群众利益的体现，因而它不仅规定了公民的基本权利和自由，而且通过依法制裁侵犯公民权利和自由的行为，保障公民基本权利和自由的实现。
宪法所规定的这些制度，不仅为法制的统一奠定了基础，而且也为法制的完整提供了保证。如果没有宪法，各种法律和法律制度就没有统一的依据，法制的内部一致性就没有了根本保证;同时，也只有在宪法制定和颁布之后，其他法律以及整个法律制度才能获得赖以产生的基础，有关立法、执法、司法和监督宪法等机关的组织，才能根据宪法的知道原则而被确立下来。
二、改进宪法观念，加强宪法实施
宪法是国家的根本法，是党的主张和人民意志的统一，但是只有把纸上的宪法转化为社会主体的行动指南，宪法才能真正成为物质力量，立宪的目的、宪法价值才能实现。因此我们需要在全社会进一步普及宪法知识，提高宪法意识，培植宪法信仰，使宪法铭刻在公民的心里，真正做到有法可依、有法必依、执法必严、违法必究。
首先，加强宪法的宣传工作
我国宪政建设缺乏先天的内在因素，宪政在很大程度上是由国家或政府推动的，是通过国家或政府来组织实施的。加强宪法的宣传工作，重要的是要对各级国家机关的领导干部及其工作人员进行宪法的普及、宣传。目前，在相当多的党政干部及国家机关工作人员头脑中，并没有宪法至上的观念。人民主权是宪法的原则之一，其核心思想就是国家的一切权力属于人民，政府的权力来自于人民，国家机关及其工作人员必须全心全意为人民服务。国家机关的党政干部、工作人员具备了较高的宪法意识，宪法在实施过程中就不会因遇到法盲而侵犯公民权益。加强宪法的宣传工作，还必须向公民宣传宪法知识。让公民了解宪法最根本的精神就是限制权利、保护权利，国家机关只是受人民委托，为人民服务的机构，应该置于人民的监督之下，国家权力应该时刻以保护公民权利为己任。不懂宪法，就意味着在市场经济条件下不能很好地运用法律武器来保护自己的合法权益。
其次，加强宪法实施的监督工作
一个国家法治状7兄和法治水平如何，与该国宪法的规定在实际中得到实现的程度密切相关。如果宪法得不到有效地实施，就不可能实现法治，至多只能造就人治形式下的法治，而不是真正意义上的法治。所以，保证宪法的实施就成为一国法治建设最重要的任务。加强宪法实施的监督，就要加强监督机构监督宪法实施活动的法律效力。通过法律和规范性法律文件将违宪的概念和含义确定下来，注重违宪与法律责任制度的衔接和关联，同时设立违宪责任形式和违宪责任所对应的法律制裁 措施 。对于此类工作，如能持之以恒，如能制度化，就可以极大地推动我国社会主义法治建设，树立宪法的权威地位。还要加强社会公众对宪法实施的监督。我国人民是国家的主人，社会公众对宪法的监督是人民对国家进行监督，对宪法进行监督的一种重要方式。一是通过宪法赋予公民的批评、建议和申诉、控告和检举权，通过制度的手段对违宪的国家机关和国家机关工作人员进行监督。二是通过大众传播媒介，也就是社会舆论和新闻批评的方式来实行对宪法的监督。
最后，加强宪法的司法化
长期以来，一些同志认为宪法作为根本法的作用，不是通过宪法条文的规定直接实现的，而是通过其他部门法来实现的，所以，宪法规范对人们的行为没有直接的法律约束力。这种错误认识是宪法在实施过程中缺乏必要的法律调控手段造成的。加强宪法的实施关键还在于加强宪法的权威性，最突出的就是宪法的司法化。为此，必须赋予宪法的可诉性，使宪法直接进入司法活动当中，人们从自己周围发生的各种案例中体验到宪法的价值，在利益关系中实现宪法规范。公开取缔、撤销违宪立法，禁止、杜绝违宪行为，依法追究各种违宪责任。建立、健全我国的违宪审查制度，强化全国人大及其会的机构建设，强化普通法院的行政庭建没，规定审查违宪案件的权限，撤销同宪法相抵触的行政法规、决定、命令以及地方性法规等，对违宪法律、法规宣告无效或者拒绝适用。通过弹劾、罢免等方式追究违宪行为的责任，直至追究法律责任。我们欣喜地看到2001年8月3日最高人民法院关于山东“齐玉苓案”的批复，开创了将宪法引入司法诉讼的先河，这意味着任何公民的权利都会受到宪法的保护，从而使公民从心理上产生了对宪法的神圣感与崇敬感。
浅析舆论对刑事审判的影响及规制
一、舆论影响刑事审判的形式
法院是刑事裁判的唯一主体和权力行使者，但由于媒体报道产生的社会效应，使其在刑事审判中掌握了主动权，成为引领刑事判决的风向标。目前，我国舆论影响审判的形式主要有两种：一种是由于传媒报道了具有争议性的司法案件，引起了民众大规模的热议，然后传媒以公共讨论平台的身份发布这些争议，致使形成了舆论与法院之间观点的对峙;[1]另一种是网民为引起广泛关注，在网络媒介上发布了争议性的案件，导致了大量的评论和转载，各家媒体也开始闻风争相报道，舆论在所谓情理的参与下带有明显的倾向性，给法院带来了巨大的舆论压力。媒体在对进入司法程序中的司法案件进行报道时，抢先对案件进行讨论、分析，甚至攻击、侮辱与案件有关的法官、当事人及 其它 诉讼参与人，得出预测性结论，令受众产生“先入为主”的印象，造成直接或间接地影响法院审判的现象。[2]
二、舆论影响刑事案件的特征
(一)当事人身份特殊。
涉案当事人是国家机关工作人员，社会名人往往是媒体吸睛寻求关注的出发点，为了防止具有特殊身份的涉案人员获得特殊法律待遇，对案情进行大肆报道，引起民众的广泛监督。法官在民众的监督下如履薄冰，稍有不慎，便会威严扫地。
(二)具有间接性和代理人效应。
舆论以其明显的倾向性引导大众，生成了一种足以影响法院独立审判的舆论氛围，从而使得审判在不同程度上丧失了其应有的公正性。[3]而另一方面，一方当事人为寻求自身利益最大化，试图从舆论方向影响司法审判，主动要求媒体介入报道，媒体对当事人的一面之词先入为主作出倾向性的报道，引起社会大众关注，形成舆论观点，对法院的审判评论和干预，法院的中立地位受到威胁，被倾向性观点开始引领，大大影响了司法审判公正度的最大化。
(三)影响被告人的定罪量刑。
我国刑法为实现量刑的合理合法化，针对不同的案件性质和事实，规定了不同的量刑情节。在实践中由于媒体等舆论的倾向性报道和评论，使得一些本应具有减轻，从轻量刑的被告人因其身份特殊而受到限制，法院在权衡下，选择了妥协民愤，舍弃了司法审判原则，牺牲了被告人的利益。
(四)影响司法公信力和权威。
随着舆论对审判影响的日益严重，使人们不得不怀疑司法的公信力和权威性，公平正义是法律追求的重要价值，是人们信服司法和法律的根本，司法的权威性才能牢树于民心，然而，政府部门为了平息民愤对司法进行大肆干预，严重威胁司法的独立性，使法官妥协于社会舆论，致使本已明确审判方向的在审案件被迫改变初衷，作出迎合舆论的裁判，已经生效的判决也再次被掀起再审风波。司法的权威性荡然无存，导致社会秩序的混乱，人们不再信赖和尊重司法，反而遇事直接诉诸舆论或信访，司法名存实亡。
三、舆论影响刑事审判的规制
(一)提高媒体素质。
在一些重大刑事案件的审理中，媒体的报道和评论往往具有很严重的倾向性和针对性，无法以法律的角度作出客观的评论，经常以道德的名义对案件情况进行倾向性报道，在案件没有作出判决前，提前给涉案人员定罪量刑，扣上犯罪的帽子。所以，媒体应首先做到对案件的相关情况做到保密，尤其是被告人的隐私。其次要时刻维护司法尊严，客观评价司法行为，充分考虑报道的时机和场合，适时适度的对案件进行报道，正确引领舆论方向，同时也要提高自身的法律素质，丰富 法律知识 ，培养法律思维，从法律角度出发，与司法部门进行沟通，避免观点分歧。
(二)推动司法公开。
舆论之所以相悖于司法，正是由于司法的不公开透明，才会引起民众对司法正义性的质疑，对法院产生误解。司法公开是人民真正理解司法活动公正性，避免误解性舆论泛滥的有效途径。建立健全司法公开 渠道 和机制 [本文由WWw.lw54.com提供，第 一论 文网进行论文代写和论文发表服务，欢迎光lw54.com 联系方式QQ 712086966]，使人民大众时刻能够了解和掌握自己所关心案件的进程，全程见证司法活动的公正性，如完善人民陪审制度，推广司法文书公开和庭审公开渠道，及时答疑解惑，澄清有关事实真相。使人民大众信服司法，扬威司法，依赖司法。
(三)提高法官水平。
法官是裁量权的最终行使者，其裁判结果是否令人信服，不仅仅是依法裁判，更是取决于其判决理由的充分性和逻辑严密性，民众主要通过判决理由对案件提出评判，所以法官需要具备良好的表达能力，向民众就裁判结果作出解释说明，而这最终要求法官具有较高的专业水平，能够站在法律思维的角度，向社会作出普遍接受性的发言。
中国的历史文化传统向来是情、理、法的并重结构，所以说，规制舆论影响刑事审判的任务仍艰巨曲折。
参考文献：
[1]周福兴.新时期“媒介审判”现象的深层机制[J].新闻窗，2009，(2)：18
[2]付松聚.我国“媒介审判”现象研究[D].河南：郑州大学，2009.
[3]魏永征.新闻传播法教程[M].北京：中国人民大学出版社，2006，209
sci论文是只发表在高水平国际SCI期刊上的论文。发表的sci论文数量、影响因子和高水平sci论文的数量是衡量科研人员、科研机构的重要评价指标。那么（泰杰生物）发表一篇SCI论文需要多少钱呢？SCI论文发表过程中需要收费的项目主要包括：版面费、SCI论文润色费用、纸质论文印刷费用、图件制作费用等。但是这些费用的收取都不是必须的，是根据您的选择来收取的。也就是说发表一篇SCI论文完全可以不花钱。SCI论文版面费是SCI论文发表过程中可能需要支付的最主要费用，它是近年来随着sci论文期刊的流行发展起来的。期刊是指读者可以免费下载论文的期刊，期刊的版面费由作者支付，这样可以提高论文的浏览量和引用量。SCI论文润色费是SCI论文发表过程中可能需要支付的另外一种费用。如果您的文章存在语言问题，被SCI期刊编辑或者审稿专家要求进行英文母语润色，则会需要支付SCI论文润色费。SCI论文润色的收费情况可以参考另外一篇文章《润色一篇sci文章大概多少钱？润色SCI论文是怎么收费的？》。一般润色一篇SCI论文需要收费1500元左右一次，如果您采取更高等级的服务费用会更多。部分SCI期刊也提供纸质版的SCI论文，以便于作者收藏和分享给自己的作品。如果您需要购买纸质版的SCI论文，则需要支付纸质论文印刷费用，一般约20美元左右一本。此外，如果您的SCI论文被选取被封面论文，则有可能需要制作一张精美的封面图。如果您找第三方公司来制作封面图的话则需要支付图件制作费，一般为3000到5000元一个图。综上所述，发表一篇SCI论文的费用最低是免费，最高约2万元人民币
网友您好，我来回答这个问题。首先sci是没有什么版面费和审稿费的，所以说正常途径是不需要花钱的，只需要按流程进行投稿即可。其次，如果是要是单纯花钱去买sci论文，最差的一篇也得个八万起步了。最后，希望您能发表成功。希望我的回答能够帮到你。
貌似是科研出版社旗下一本法学期刊吧，专门出法律相关的文章。看上面出版文章还挺多的，各个国家都有，应该还行。
需要。专硕毕业需要发表毕业论文。专业硕士的论文，必须强化应用导向，形式可以多种多样，鼓励采用调研报告、规划设计、产品开发案例分析、项目管理、文学艺术作品等多种形式。毕业论文是普通中等专业学校、高等专科学校、本科院校、高等教育自学考试本科及研究生学历专业教育学业的最后一个环节，为对本专业学生集中进行科学研究训练而要求学生在毕业前总结性独立作业、撰写的论文。
这是科研出版社的法律类英文期刊，接受关于各类法律问题的论文投稿，发表的论文能被知网学术和谷歌学术检索到。
The theory of criminal law of shallow understanding errors1. irrtumslehreLegal irrtumslehre, namely, refers to the illegality mistake for own behavior in law, whether what crime constitutes a crime shall be punished by, or what is wrong, is to oneself the legal nature of the action of meaning or misunderstandings. Legal irrtumslehre usually includes three conditions: (1) the actor's behavior in law does not constitute a crime, the offender and constitutes a crime for which imaginary guilty, (2) the behavior in law constitutes a crime and does not constitute a crime, the offender mistaken assumptions that innocent, (3) for his act constitutes a crime shall be convicted and punishment in light of the existing errors, misunderstanding or punishment. Due to the legal irrtumslehre, only to the behavior of the offender is not correct understanding of the legal assessment, and for their actions in fact correct understanding of the situation is still there, so its act constitutes a crime shall be investigated for criminal responsibility is and how it is not usually occurs.（1）Imaginary innocent treatment principleThe principles for imaginary innocence, whether it involves a deliberately elements. Foreign criminal law theory basically has the following kinds:1）Should know that don't speak, just for criminal facts have understanding. Canada criminal code article 19 regulation: "the ignorance of the law excuses and crime can be ShuZui reason." Motto: "Roman law and legal disclaimer" somehow also expressed a principle, namely: "in the crime as subjective FanYi established condition, not request to recognize his behavior of richtswitrig".2）Should know the reason, according to two: moral responsibility theory, personality responsibility theory. Moral responsibility theory emphasizes on the rationality of free will blame illegal conduct, is considered to be objective stance. 3）That said, the possible illegality of responsibility for deliberately, at least to the possibility of understanding illegality. While in China mainland, the introduction of the concept of crime has another concept -- social consciousness that harm to discuss richtswitrig already meaningless. Because the deliberate crime according to law condemn the illegality of the offender is not known, the law itself is not damaged, the law of the social consciousness is harm. Social harm consciousness is the essential contents of the crime, illegal consciousness is the legal form of social consciousness. Therefore, our country law more emphasis is on the rationality of essence, which is harmful to the society values. Just because of its social harmfulness, with a social moral evaluation colour, easier for people to grasp and observe. Therefore, the author thinks that, in general, the person need to recognize his behavior may be the result of inevitable or harmful to the society, and has already know. With intentionally But in fact, the forbidden by law and mass that is harmful to the society in our country nowadays the behavior under the constitution should be consistent, in other words, know the social harmfulness also know the possibility of illegal, but know the possibility of illegal is inevitable should also realize social harmfulness, both are unified. Therefore, it is generally thought that the law is no excuse, the reason of law does not exclude the misunderstanding in principle, but can be culpable for deliberately discretion. （2） Misunderstandings treatment principle. PunishmentWe might as well so the essence of blame for his due: the crime in the subjective should blame or blame, for the intent or negligence performance. If the offender because of misunderstanding that legal person feels very innocent, lack of this should blame or condemning sexual, from the fundamental measure, blame is absolutely not consider disclaimer. Especially in the modern society, the legal category SAN marino, legal entry in different fields and different levels of books, recognized, comprehend legal apparently endless and same, so the person of law and misunderstandings, not inexcusable. Now, both in theory and practice, the method not cling to forgive "seems to have in shake. Therefore, to a certain extent, can also think admits exceptions excusable is legal misunderstanding of criminal law is an important symbol of humanity. In addition, it was not in the act of which is prohibited by the laws and regulations, especially after a circumstance, should have knowledge of richtswitrig actor, constitute the understanding of deliberate point of view, with the attitude of this understanding, of course, that is not the illegality or by the simple statement actor. The author thinks that the only when the legal establishment of may, FangKeZu but intentionally.2. The fact mistakeThat mistake, is to determine its subjective behavior nature and the criminal responsibility of the relevant facts wrong understanding. From the wrong reasons and phenomenon of angles, generally known that there are several mistakes:（1） Object irrtumslehreThe object is known for errors, whether there is objectively error object. It includes actor in the implementation of the existing criminal behavior of the hazards for the object and actually does not exist, or for criminal object and actually does not exist, or infringe a criminal object and actually invaded another crime object. The object of objects is usually known errors caused by mistake, but the object of different social relationship reflects different. Evil doer of objects and actual expected in fact not only harm object does not agree, and in the nature of law is not consistent. Therefore, the object irrtumslehre may affect the form of sin, crime accomplishment, and may even attempted to influence the crime. For example, in view of the circumstances, not a thought before the enemy, and a party came to stick, afterwards just know the ox was wounded. A thought of damage is "people", and the actual wounded is "cow", do not belong to the same laws of the object. Similar situation and will generally be mistaken for drug trafficking items, Actor will stolen items in the theft of guns in stealing together. This object from the subjective errors, see, is a kind of mistake, From the objective, because the mistake crime to no avail, where the criminal attempted belongs.1）Object mistakeObjects can be generalized mistake, including object mistake to belong to the object know mistake is inevitable object irrtumslehre. These include, is known to be wrong object of legal property of the same object mistake and legal properties of different objects, namely the object irrtumslehre irrtumslehre. In order to distinguish with the object mistake here, the cognition to the same object only mean error between the different objects, namely the misunderstanding of the evil doer expected objects and actual harm to the object, but not in fact in the legal nature of the same situation. This object mistake again say things on purpose mistake not criminal responsibility. As a reserve, killing b shall be killed as b and c, do not affect a rap. This is the need to consider that a kill b behavior "mistake" cause others (c), belong to an intentional crime (b) "death", for the excess result, according to the results, which determine the ordinary mail of death was deliberately recognized for deliberately, to the death of the fault is propylene, identified as negligence, according to the intention or negligence of the general mark recognized FanYi or state of mind, not applicable rules of the mistake.2） Behavior irrtumslehreBehavior mainly includes two kind of mistake: first, the behavior nature irrtumslehre. That actor has to its social harm nature, such as understanding not imaginary defense. Behavior nature mistake might affect the form of sin, and may also affect crime. Second, the behavior tools (methods) irrtumslehre. That person to use when the conduct of tool (methods), which affects not correct understanding of harm results, behavior tools (methods) mistake can affect crime or attempted was founded, also can affect crime or belongs to the incident, a typical for murder on hazardous substances, because the drug failure and failed to kill people, can think method or tools for error doer of consciousness beyond reason not to succeed. And as actor see armour, second coming together, hence shot to play, but can't hit by the party and. Look, this is from the phenomenon of an object, or the final results for the mistake, but this error is based on the fact that the wrong doer identify offender is carefully identify to begin, can think recognize is accurate, errors in ChaWu itself. The solution to this situation, "said", its legal with qualitative and recognize wrong object is consistent, namely directly recognized as an intentional homicide accomplishment. The death of a person is directly intentionally to b, death is the indirect intentional, just for a to b is attempted, accomplished. Additionally, if in daily life because misidentification object and damage of consequences, the crime itself is not just any criminal negligence because of problems.3)Causality irrtumslehreCausality mistake, is on his behavior and harmful results of actual connection between errors. Generally include: first, not some harm result, as has happened actor. This generally constitute a crime. Second, has certain harm result, but not for actor or for his behavior is caused, and does not affect crime accomplishment. Third, really happened, the offender is aware of its behavior, but with the actual development between the harm to the process or a mistake, general to punish crime accomplishment. In theory, the offender is not only a crime, but continuous movement, this several continuous action is not a few crime, but a crime. In this sense, doesn't exist on the results of the sack.3.Legal irrtumslehre and facts mistake and proceduresDomestic scholars in fact know mistakes and errors between the issue legal representative views mainly include:（1）For own behavior whether in law constitutes a crime, criminal or what kind of criminal punishment shall be under the incorrect understanding is legal irrtumslehre for his behavior on the implementation of the incorrect understanding is the fact that mistake,（2）The objectivity of crime is a false understanding of crime, that mistake of objective facts have clear understanding, only to act in the evaluation of existing laws on the concept of law is not correct mistakes。（3）Actor known facts and actual fact don't agree is wrong, the person that judgment and objective law is law of illegal inconsistency errors.These ideas basically could in theory and legal irrtumslehre fact distinguish mistakes, it is important to emphasize that：1) With the conviction that the so-called irrelevant, as this mistake to hit each other, the shooting head caused the death of heart, without vision of research into our. 2) Study of the theory of error, error occurs when the purpose, but whether to intentionally resistance, reduce plots affected only the wrong cognition, natural sentencing nor will it into the error theory category. 3) This does not constitute a crime and actor for crime, and for their behavior in the criminal law on the crimes and how to apply for criminal punishment on such specific knowledge error, conviction according to law. Based on this, the author thinks that, at the fact that criminal law is only to know wrong doer of elements to know the so-called objective facts constituents of mistake is the fact that the legal irrtumslehre error refers to the legal action is illegal and the evaluation of the mistake. From the theory of facts and legal irrtumslehre error, but the problem is in the law, criminal elements to the facts and law closely combined circumstances (like some administrative crimes and economic crimes), or is in a fact itself contains certain laws of evaluation content, to distinguish with a mistake is the fact that mistake or legal wrong, is often difficult. If the property of his humanity and obscenity obscenity, administrative rules and regulations, JinYuOu, disrupt public until its precondition of the legitimacy of the public, and legal irrtumslehre facts wrong intertwined, and this is what we distinguish facts and legal irrtumslehre errors will solve the problem.In some cases, the defendant should know that because of the lack of knowledge, and not to the behavior of social harmfulness, so that the defendant is not "knowledge they will entail harmful consequences to society, and hope or allows such results" and deliberate crime, the burden of proof is only FanYi prosecution, in addition, prosecution without proof the defendant not normal, but normal mental and spiritual normal presumption defendant directly if the defendant that his spirit is not normal, it shall provide necessary evidence by himself to prove. Thus, the author, on legal irrtumslehre processing, can adopt the presumption of ways to handle. Which country presumption every normal citizens are known, unless the law can put forward defense "advantage prove" above, or the evidence rebut these presumption is established. From the efficiency of lawsuit, said the country is impossible to prove the defendant is known of the law.
貌似是科研出版社旗下一本法学期刊吧，专门出法律相关的文章。看上面出版文章还挺多的，各个国家都有，应该还行。
看了下，这个期刊2010年就见刊了，都十多年了，一直都有出刊，应该还不错吧，看看要求，如果满足要求还是可以投稿的。
是科研出版社旗下的一本期刊，法律类型。科研出版社近些年在中国学术界的名气打响了，和汉斯出版社貌似是一个集团运营。我身边很多做学术的同事知道这个出版社，虽然没在这本刊上发表过文章对这本期刊不太了解。但是有幸在Journal of Computer and Communications发表过，因为我是计算机领域的。编辑团队较给力，国人比较注重服务。服务不错。
The theory of criminal law of shallow understanding errors1. irrtumslehreLegal irrtumslehre, namely, refers to the illegality mistake for own behavior in law, whether what crime constitutes a crime shall be punished by, or what is wrong, is to oneself the legal nature of the action of meaning or misunderstandings. Legal irrtumslehre usually includes three conditions: (1) the actor's behavior in law does not constitute a crime, the offender and constitutes a crime for which imaginary guilty, (2) the behavior in law constitutes a crime and does not constitute a crime, the offender mistaken assumptions that innocent, (3) for his act constitutes a crime shall be convicted and punishment in light of the existing errors, misunderstanding or punishment. Due to the legal irrtumslehre, only to the behavior of the offender is not correct understanding of the legal assessment, and for their actions in fact correct understanding of the situation is still there, so its act constitutes a crime shall be investigated for criminal responsibility is and how it is not usually occurs.（1）Imaginary innocent treatment principleThe principles for imaginary innocence, whether it involves a deliberately elements. Foreign criminal law theory basically has the following kinds:1）Should know that don't speak, just for criminal facts have understanding. Canada criminal code article 19 regulation: "the ignorance of the law excuses and crime can be ShuZui reason." Motto: "Roman law and legal disclaimer" somehow also expressed a principle, namely: "in the crime as subjective FanYi established condition, not request to recognize his behavior of richtswitrig".2）Should know the reason, according to two: moral responsibility theory, personality responsibility theory. Moral responsibility theory emphasizes on the rationality of free will blame illegal conduct, is considered to be objective stance. 3）That said, the possible illegality of responsibility for deliberately, at least to the possibility of understanding illegality. While in China mainland, the introduction of the concept of crime has another concept -- social consciousness that harm to discuss richtswitrig already meaningless. Because the deliberate crime according to law condemn the illegality of the offender is not known, the law itself is not damaged, the law of the social consciousness is harm. Social harm consciousness is the essential contents of the crime, illegal consciousness is the legal form of social consciousness. Therefore, our country law more emphasis is on the rationality of essence, which is harmful to the society values. Just because of its social harmfulness, with a social moral evaluation colour, easier for people to grasp and observe. Therefore, the author thinks that, in general, the person need to recognize his behavior may be the result of inevitable or harmful to the society, and has already know. With intentionally But in fact, the forbidden by law and mass that is harmful to the society in our country nowadays the behavior under the constitution should be consistent, in other words, know the social harmfulness also know the possibility of illegal, but know the possibility of illegal is inevitable should also realize social harmfulness, both are unified. Therefore, it is generally thought that the law is no excuse, the reason of law does not exclude the misunderstanding in principle, but can be culpable for deliberately discretion. （2） Misunderstandings treatment principle. PunishmentWe might as well so the essence of blame for his due: the crime in the subjective should blame or blame, for the intent or negligence performance. If the offender because of misunderstanding that legal person feels very innocent, lack of this should blame or condemning sexual, from the fundamental measure, blame is absolutely not consider disclaimer. Especially in the modern society, the legal category SAN marino, legal entry in different fields and different levels of books, recognized, comprehend legal apparently endless and same, so the person of law and misunderstandings, not inexcusable. Now, both in theory and practice, the method not cling to forgive "seems to have in shake. Therefore, to a certain extent, can also think admits exceptions excusable is legal misunderstanding of criminal law is an important symbol of humanity. In addition, it was not in the act of which is prohibited by the laws and regulations, especially after a circumstance, should have knowledge of richtswitrig actor, constitute the understanding of deliberate point of view, with the attitude of this understanding, of course, that is not the illegality or by the simple statement actor. The author thinks that the only when the legal establishment of may, FangKeZu but intentionally.2. The fact mistakeThat mistake, is to determine its subjective behavior nature and the criminal responsibility of the relevant facts wrong understanding. From the wrong reasons and phenomenon of angles, generally known that there are several mistakes:（1） Object irrtumslehreThe object is known for errors, whether there is objectively error object. It includes actor in the implementation of the existing criminal behavior of the hazards for the object and actually does not exist, or for criminal object and actually does not exist, or infringe a criminal object and actually invaded another crime object. The object of objects is usually known errors caused by mistake, but the object of different social relationship reflects different. Evil doer of objects and actual expected in fact not only harm object does not agree, and in the nature of law is not consistent. Therefore, the object irrtumslehre may affect the form of sin, crime accomplishment, and may even attempted to influence the crime. For example, in view of the circumstances, not a thought before the enemy, and a party came to stick, afterwards just know the ox was wounded. A thought of damage is "people", and the actual wounded is "cow", do not belong to the same laws of the object. Similar situation and will generally be mistaken for drug trafficking items, Actor will stolen items in the theft of guns in stealing together. This object from the subjective errors, see, is a kind of mistake, From the objective, because the mistake crime to no avail, where the criminal attempted belongs.1）Object mistakeObjects can be generalized mistake, including object mistake to belong to the object know mistake is inevitable object irrtumslehre. These include, is known to be wrong object of legal property of the same object mistake and legal properties of different objects, namely the object irrtumslehre irrtumslehre. In order to distinguish with the object mistake here, the cognition to the same object only mean error between the different objects, namely the misunderstanding of the evil doer expected objects and actual harm to the object, but not in fact in the legal nature of the same situation. This object mistake again say things on purpose mistake not criminal responsibility. As a reserve, killing b shall be killed as b and c, do not affect a rap. This is the need to consider that a kill b behavior "mistake" cause others (c), belong to an intentional crime (b) "death", for the excess result, according to the results, which determine the ordinary mail of death was deliberately recognized for deliberately, to the death of the fault is propylene, identified as negligence, according to the intention or negligence of the general mark recognized FanYi or state of mind, not applicable rules of the mistake.2） Behavior irrtumslehreBehavior mainly includes two kind of mistake: first, the behavior nature irrtumslehre. That actor has to its social harm nature, such as understanding not imaginary defense. Behavior nature mistake might affect the form of sin, and may also affect crime. Second, the behavior tools (methods) irrtumslehre. That person to use when the conduct of tool (methods), which affects not correct understanding of harm results, behavior tools (methods) mistake can affect crime or attempted was founded, also can affect crime or belongs to the incident, a typical for murder on hazardous substances, because the drug failure and failed to kill people, can think method or tools for error doer of consciousness beyond reason not to succeed. And as actor see armour, second coming together, hence shot to play, but can't hit by the party and. Look, this is from the phenomenon of an object, or the final results for the mistake, but this error is based on the fact that the wrong doer identify offender is carefully identify to begin, can think recognize is accurate, errors in ChaWu itself. The solution to this situation, "said", its legal with qualitative and recognize wrong object is consistent, namely directly recognized as an intentional homicide accomplishment. The death of a person is directly intentionally to b, death is the indirect intentional, just for a to b is attempted, accomplished. Additionally, if in daily life because misidentification object and damage of consequences, the crime itself is not just any criminal negligence because of problems.3)Causality irrtumslehreCausality mistake, is on his behavior and harmful results of actual connection between errors. Generally include: first, not some harm result, as has happened actor. This generally constitute a crime. Second, has certain harm result, but not for actor or for his behavior is caused, and does not affect crime accomplishment. Third, really happened, the offender is aware of its behavior, but with the actual development between the harm to the process or a mistake, general to punish crime accomplishment. In theory, the offender is not only a crime, but continuous movement, this several continuous action is not a few crime, but a crime. In this sense, doesn't exist on the results of the sack.3.Legal irrtumslehre and facts mistake and proceduresDomestic scholars in fact know mistakes and errors between the issue legal representative views mainly include:（1）For own behavior whether in law constitutes a crime, criminal or what kind of criminal punishment shall be under the incorrect understanding is legal irrtumslehre for his behavior on the implementation of the incorrect understanding is the fact that mistake,（2）The objectivity of crime is a false understanding of crime, that mistake of objective facts have clear understanding, only to act in the evaluation of existing laws on the concept of law is not correct mistakes。（3）Actor known facts and actual fact don't agree is wrong, the person that judgment and objective law is law of illegal inconsistency errors.These ideas basically could in theory and legal irrtumslehre fact distinguish mistakes, it is important to emphasize that：1) With the conviction that the so-called irrelevant, as this mistake to hit each other, the shooting head caused the death of heart, without vision of research into our. 2) Study of the theory of error, error occurs when the purpose, but whether to intentionally resistance, reduce plots affected only the wrong cognition, natural sentencing nor will it into the error theory category. 3) This does not constitute a crime and actor for crime, and for their behavior in the criminal law on the crimes and how to apply for criminal punishment on such specific knowledge error, conviction according to law. Based on this, the author thinks that, at the fact that criminal law is only to know wrong doer of elements to know the so-called objective facts constituents of mistake is the fact that the legal irrtumslehre error refers to the legal action is illegal and the evaluation of the mistake. From the theory of facts and legal irrtumslehre error, but the problem is in the law, criminal elements to the facts and law closely combined circumstances (like some administrative crimes and economic crimes), or is in a fact itself contains certain laws of evaluation content, to distinguish with a mistake is the fact that mistake or legal wrong, is often difficult. If the property of his humanity and obscenity obscenity, administrative rules and regulations, JinYuOu, disrupt public until its precondition of the legitimacy of the public, and legal irrtumslehre facts wrong intertwined, and this is what we distinguish facts and legal irrtumslehre errors will solve the problem.In some cases, the defendant should know that because of the lack of knowledge, and not to the behavior of social harmfulness, so that the defendant is not "knowledge they will entail harmful consequences to society, and hope or allows such results" and deliberate crime, the burden of proof is only FanYi prosecution, in addition, prosecution without proof the defendant not normal, but normal mental and spiritual normal presumption defendant directly if the defendant that his spirit is not normal, it shall provide necessary evidence by himself to prove. Thus, the author, on legal irrtumslehre processing, can adopt the presumption of ways to handle. Which country presumption every normal citizens are known, unless the law can put forward defense "advantage prove" above, or the evidence rebut these presumption is established. From the efficiency of lawsuit, said the country is impossible to prove the defendant is known of the law.
我的网站，看一下网站文章题目列表就知道是否专业原创法律英语翻译网站2010年10月文章一览217 Foreign company与foreign-based company有何区别及foreign的翻译216谈法律（英语）文书中的标点符号（2）书名号的英译215“变更名称”中的“变更”可以译为alteration吗？214经典优秀恐怖片惊悚片推荐213女性电影推荐212优秀经典同志电影片推荐之女同志电影211转载资料库变更域名 网址 9月文章列表 转载文章一览2010年10月67常用法律英语词汇笺注（13）P-W 完66 《美国民事诉讼法译序》中的词汇翻译部分 转载65 日常及专业法律英语常用短句集锦 转载64 专利翻译63 怎样做中国的自由译者62如何阅读美国的法律引证61常见法律英语词汇笺注（9） 60常见法律英语词汇笺注（10）59 常见法律英语词汇（12）58 专利文献某些惯用语和句子的译法57被遗忘三十年的法律精英56“自由贸易区”该如何翻译55答陈老师有关“Civil Action”一问 54 first cousin once removed 的翻译 转载53社会呼唤高质量涉外法律翻译作品 -----小议法律翻译的标准 52论“民事法律行为”命名的谬误51美国证券法律蓝本对实务界、法律英语和翻译学的价值 转载资料库文章一览2010年9月共50篇原文地址： 50与法律有关的名人名言49从“翻译法律”到“法律翻译”———法律翻译主体“适格”论 节选 48英语法律文本中主要情态动词的作用及其翻译 47国际合同涉及的担保物权种种! 46法律英语证书(LEC)全国统一考试样题45论债的更新44法律文书翻译三步曲 43软件许可协议翻译1首部 42TRADOS新手必读（一） 转载41我国法律名称英译现状述评 申海平 40我的法律翻译之路 转载自 天涯社区39翻译市场准入之我见 作者 boffin 38天涯法律英语论战37《法律语言与翻译》创刊暨征稿启事36大陆法对英美法上LIEN制度的误解及LIEN的本意探源（上）转载35大陆法对英美法上LIEN制度的误解及LIEN的本意探源（下）转载34jury是裁判团，而不是陪审团 转载33如何阅读英文案例 转载322007～2008我国翻译服务领域现状浅析31创业板IPO存量发行法律制度研究 30一个句子结构的讨论（与IPO有关）29还是政府最大方——法律英语译审最低千字千元 不知都是哪些专家。正文无内容 链接见 国务院办公厅关于做好行政法规英文正式译本翻译、审定工作的通知27“拆迁”一词作为法律词语的英译问题（转）26第三届UIBE杯法律英语翻译大赛初赛试题25法律翻译的困难 转载24《中华人民共和国合同法》部分条款英语译文研究 转载23《现代知识产权法的演进：英国的历程（1760-1911年）》译跋22关于美国律师资格考试制度的考察报告 作者:吕宫思21西方“新东方”--美国纽约州律师速成60天小记（1） 转载20西方“新东方”--美国纽约州律师速成60天小记（2）转载19西方“新东方”--美国纽约州律师速成60天小记（3）转载18西方“新东方”--美国纽约州律师速成60天小记（4）转载17法律英语翻译招聘 2010年16常见法律英语词汇笺注（八）15常见法律英语词汇笺注（二）14用Trados的点滴经验13略论英美法律语言中的求同型近义词 杨颖浩12规范性法律文件名称英语翻译若干问题的思考 转11因特网在翻译中的妙用 作者 李长栓10with or without the passage of time该如何翻译什么意思9纽约律师考试各类资料小总 转载8《知识产权法的经济结构》译后记 转载7是“补偿”、“赔偿”还是“免责”？---浅谈indemnity一词的中文表述6法律英语(2) 作者：魏焕华(《英语世界》杂志)5法律英语（1）作者：魏焕华(《英语世界》杂志)4法律英语翻译之 “法人”英语译名的确定 转载3揭穿***法律英语培训班的(转载)2法律翻译人才招聘信息一览 2006年1法律英语论文一览 本文禁止转载（除非另有声明）本文来源于刘素林法律英语翻译 , 原文地址： 本人法律翻译新网站2010年9月文章一览转载资料库变更域名网址 欢迎各位浏览。210宋雷的《英汉法律用语大词典》，国内最好的法律词典？209我出的“思想道德修养与法律基础”试题A卷下208我出的“思想道德修养与法律基础”试题A卷上207老刘解读英文合同（4）合同首部之consideration206老刘解读英文合同（3）合同首部之witnesseth205delegation/delegate与novation/novate的区别204孙万彪《英汉法律翻译教程》笔记之一 assingnment/transfer 203孙万彪《英汉法律翻译教程》笔记 之二 breach and infringement 全202孙万彪《英汉法律翻译教程》笔记 之三 confidentiality 201孙万彪《英汉法律翻译教程》笔记 之四 definition and interpretation200孙万彪《英汉法律翻译教程》笔记之五 governing law and dispute resolution199孙万彪《英汉法律翻译教程》笔记 之六 第八章insurance198 做好法律英语翻译工作的前提 付费文档199 本站文章一览2010年8月共36篇197 你是否遇compensation就译“赔偿”？196 证券术语1 存量发行含义及其翻译195 陈世美雇凶杀妻——必要或可取的情况下neccessary or desirable194 谈《A序列优先股购买协议》中的一个句子的理解193 法庭口译资料下载192 一英文句子该如何理解和翻译的讨论191 翻译杂谈 两则190 我们该如何悼念189 挣钱不过是享受翻译乐趣的副产品 兼谈新学期计划188 与翻译有关的国家标准 下载 不定期更新187 法律金融证券英语翻译转载资料库已经开通网址 欢迎各位浏览。186 中国法律的篇章结构体系用语——立法法释义 本人法律翻译新网站2010年8月文章一览185 在某论坛对招募伙伴贴回复的回复184 法、法律、法案词义辨析及其英文翻译183 与专业者合作，人生一大快事182 优秀经典同志电影片推荐 之男同志电影181 the appeal is allowed, allowing the appeal 啥意思180 如果有一份54万字的业务放在你的面前——招募法律和金融英语翻译高手179 美国法律法规下载（不定期更新）附美国法典简介 178 非法律专业人士在翻译法律文书时易犯的错误177 美国2010年金融监管改革法目录翻译11—16编176 美国2010年金融监管改革法目录翻译第10编175 美国2010年金融监管改革法目录翻译8—9编174 成为有钱人的20种捷径（下）173 成为有钱人的20种捷径（上）172 美国2010年金融监管改革法目录翻译5—7编171 美国2010年金融监管改革法目录翻译3—4编170 美国2010年金融监管改革法目录翻译第1—2编169 法 律 英 语 课 程 设 计 初 探168 法律英语词汇翻译中存在的若干问题167 Queen’s Bench 女王/王座/后座/御座/皇座/皇家？法庭/法院？166 孙万彪 汉英法律翻译教程 下载165 代扣代缴车船税的翻译164 法律英语/翻译培训调查结果 付费文档163 王道庚《新编英汉法律翻译教程》中的all...not162 谈法律文书中“于”的用法161 从《李文说理》中的文字看国人中文水平之差160法律英语翻译吹毛求疵之3 当事人？当事方？缔约方？缔约人？（上）159 infee simple=轻易收取资财？158 “法院”和“法庭”是不同的157 从Nationwide Building Society的翻译看翻译常犯的错误——望文生义156 从贵州警察枪击两村民看法律语言分析的重要性155 法律英语/翻译 学海无涯 人生苦短154 “甲方乙方”该如何翻译153 纽约律师考试2008复习要点 下载152 本站文章一览2010年7月共25篇151法律英语翻译文章（3）“法人”英语译名的确定150 烟台旅游指南 本人法律翻译新网站2010年7月文章一览149 绿色建筑：生态 节能 减废 健康 图书推荐148 中英文合同起草审查写作方面的书籍推荐147 说下某英文合同的草拟水平146 The Office of Fair Trading 公平贸易局？公平交易局？145 给《南方周末》挑错144 美国金融改革监管法 全文下载143 翻译，法律文书存在问题的发现者142 出资、股份、股权、股本、股票的区别联系及英文翻译（2）出资（转让）的英文翻译 141 美国金融监管改革法相关资料下载140 出资、股份、股权、股本、股票的区别联系及英文翻译（1）出资（转让）139 北大没怎么——对《北大怎么了》一文的不同观点 138 老刘解读英文合同（2）英文合同的结构 概述137 法律英语翻译点评3 评《英语笔译实务二级》中的翻译136 孙万彪 英汉法律翻译教程 下载135 与投票有关的一些术语的英文翻译134 judgment-proof该如何翻译133 我的理想史——谨以此文献给在职业上找不着北的同学132 奥斯卡历届最佳影片一览131 法律英语翻译点评2 评《中国法律透视》中的翻译130 “还欠款*元”是啥意思（上）129 涉外法律函电英文写作范例 下载128 起诉书与起诉状的不同及其英文翻译127 谈juridical acts 的翻译126 经典优秀政治电影片推荐125 美国合同法简介系列（5）要约与承诺概述 之概念 本人法律翻译新网站文章一览2010年6月网站地址 124 站长简介与简历及对本人培训能力疑问的答复下略
O. J. Simpson murder case辛普森杀妻案The O. J. Simpson murder case has been described as the most publicized criminal trial in history,[1] in which O. J. Simpson, former American football star and actor, was brought to trial for the murder of his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ronald Goldman. Simpson was acquitted in 1995 after a lengthy trial, the longest jury trial in California history.[2]Simpson hired a high-profile defense team led by Johnnie Cochran and F. Lee Bailey. Los Angeles County believed it had a solid prosecution case, but Cochran created in the minds of the jury the belief that there was reasonable doubt about the DNA evidence (then a relatively new type of evidence in trials),[3] including that the blood-sample evidence had allegedly been mishandled by lab scientists and technicians.[4] Cochran and the defense team also alleged other misconduct by the Los Angeles Police Department. The televising of the lengthy trial riveted national attention on the dramatic case. By the end of the criminal trial, national surveys showed dramatic differences between most blacks and most whites in terms of their assessment of Simpson's guilt.[5]Later, both the Brown and Goldman families sued Simpson for damages in a civil trial, which has a lower standard of proof for determining responsibility.[citation needed] On February 5, 1997, the jury unanimously found there was a preponderance of evidence to find Simpson liable for damages in the wrongful death of Goldman and battery of Brown. In its conclusions, the jury effectively found Simpson liable for the death of his ex-wife and Ron Goldman.[6] On February 21, 2008, a Los Angeles court upheld a renewal of the civil judgment against him.这个案子很经典，上面的一段是wiki上的英文案例，你可以找一些关于这个的中文资料，然后选择一个角度（比如种族歧视与陪审团制度的矛盾、毒树之果原则、媒体和舆论与司法公正的矛盾等等），或者一篇参考的中文文章（很多中国的法律人也会研究这个案子，发表一些观点），自己写或者翻译一篇英文论文出来就是了。下面引用一段英文资料，有个人在提问，为什么法院在刑事诉讼中判决辛普森无罪，但是在民事诉讼中又判决他赔偿自己妻子死亡赔偿金。 Jeralyn Merritt对这个问题进行了简略的回答。我想你大一的论文，字数要求不会太多，所以参考一下他这段答复吧。如果字数不够就把上面wiki的资料加一些进去,简单的交待一下案情。Q. I am a high school government student, and I have a question that has been bothering me that my teacher refuses to answer. In the O.J. Simpson case I know that the state jury did not find him guilty on the charge of murder, but the federal court did on the charge of wrongful death. What is the difference and why were they able to do that? -- Geni A. O.J. Simpson was charged with first degree murder in the state court in California. The jury found him "Not Guilty." A "not guilty" verdict means the state failed to prove the charges "beyond a reasonable doubt", which is the standard of proof in all criminal prosecutions. Criminal cases are brought on behalf of the citizens of a particular state or federal district, not by the victims or their families.After O.J. Simpson was found not guilty in the criminal case, the families of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman sued him in the state (not federal) court in California for wrongfully causing their deaths. Civil lawsuits for wrongful death are tried for money damages, not to put the defendant in prison. Civil cases are brought in the name of individuals, not in the name of the State.Different evidence was introduced in the O.J. Simpson civil and criminal trials. For example, although O.J. Simpson denied it, evidence was presented in the civil trial that O.J. Simpson owned a pair of Bruno Magli shoes that matched shoeprints left at the murder scene.O.J. Simpson exercised his constitutional right against self-incrimination and chose not to testify in the criminal trial. All defendants in criminal cases have this right. In the civil trial, O.J. no longer had such a right because he had been found not guilty of murder and could not be tried again for it. He had to testify when the opposing side called him as a witness. Thus, the jury in the civil case got to hear O.J's testimony while the criminal jury did not.In the criminal case, the jury got to see that the glove left at the scene of the crime did not fit O.J. Simpson. This experiment was not repeated for the civil jury. The jury in the criminal trial got a far stronger portrayal of the problems with the DNA and other scientific evidence in the case, and the poor management of the crime scene, than did the civil jury. And the criminal jury got to hear the false testimony of Los Angeles police officer Mark Furman, who later admitted lying and pleaded guilty to perjury.Finally, the burden of proof in criminal and civil cases is different. In criminal cases, the standard is "proof beyond a reasonable doubt." There is also a presumption of innocence that stays with the defendant until and unless the jury returns a guilty verdict. In civil cases, the standard of proof is "by a preponderance of the evidence," which essentially means "more likely than not," or put another way, proof by 51% or more.The jury's verdict in the civil case was not that O.J. Simpson was guilty of murder, but that he was liable for (which essentially means responsible for causing) the deaths of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman.In light of the different evidence presented, burdens of proof and ultimate issues the juries were called upon to decide, the verdicts in the criminal and civil trials were not really all that inconsistent. -- Jeralyn Merritt
通常英语专业毕业从事法律工作的，一般都是做法律文件的翻译，如果同时有法律背景的，一般就是做法律文件英文版本的起草。所以，如果你没有法律教育背景，建议还是从“如何做好法律文件的翻译”的某一个题目去写。比如，法律文件翻译和一般文件翻译的不同之处什么的。。希望对你有帮助。
其实可以选择啦，如果是自己投稿到那种世界级的顶级期刊、或者中文核心期刊的话，就按照采纳答案来，这是标准答案！但是你是要评职称的话，就像采纳答案说的，委托那些正规的论文中介帮你最好了，别找那种只有网站没有实体公司的机构，那种十个有七个都是片子，找有实体公司的中介发表！我自己之前找过一个在网上输入"壹品优"再输入刊他们公司都可以，百度搜一搜就知道了。
本人总结了几点经验，希望对第一次发表sci论文的同学有用。 1、选题。相对来说应用性研究比基础研究难发表论文，而且发表论文的因子也较低，结合老板的课题，要选择机理性研究课题。确定好关键词，在各大检索系统中分析所选课题是不是国际研究前沿，发表的论文数量和质量。如果相关文献档次很低，那么你选择的课题可能发表好文论文的可能性较低。 2、设计。选好课题不要急于动手，先看中文文献，主要是博士论文和综述，了解关键术语和研究进展。收集英文文献，总结研究进展，选好切入点，设计实验一、实验二..........实验n，根据文献提前构架论文发表框架，后面做完实验，填好数据。如选择胚胎发育相关课题，研究G基因在胚胎发育过程中的作用，参考已发表的文献JHAHKS等基因在胚胎发育过程中的作用，看看别人是怎么做的，通过那些实验证明自己的推断，这些验证也是你必须要做的，根据实验条件和需要选择，验证实验越充分，设计越合理，发表论文越容易。 3、实验。建议研究生早进实验室，开题之前熟悉实验室环境和运行，帮助师兄/姐做实验，练好基本操作。实验过程中会遇到各种问题，仪器设备、试剂、操作程序，很烦！有条件的可以要求公司负责部分实验。如高通量测序技术，应用广泛，必须要公司处理，数据分析，公司负责把图表做好，就等着发表了，事半功倍。我找过好几家公司，但是都不专业，提出的修改意见都不是很理想，经过同事介绍，我的文章在辑文编译www.***.net修改的特别好，我的第一篇SCI论文被录用了，非常感谢他们对我的帮助！ 4、写作。第一次写论文难度很大，论文的结构、语言表达、数据分析、图表处理等等，相关帖子好多，大家可以搜搜。我要说的是论文框架（实验结果组成、论文的中心）写好后先找有经验的人看看，没问题再写引言和讨论，保证数据支持论文结论。有了结论就是论文的中心，全文围绕中心展开写。最后写好了再找人看看，语言还不过关的找论文润色公司修改。
如何发表sci论文？这是许多研究者关注的内容。目前，发表sci论文可以给国内作者带来很大的优势。然而，在国际期刊上发表论文是有难度的。发表sci论文都需要掌握一定的技巧。充分的准备才能使论文更顺利地发表，首先需要一篇高质量的论文。这也要求作者阅读大量的英语文学作品，并具有较高的英语水平。如果英文水平不够，你可以先用中文写论文，然后找专业机构翻译成英文，他们也会对论文进行润色，使论文达到投稿的水平。国际sci论文审稿人是不习惯中国式英语的，很多国内作者投稿也是因为语言问题而被拒稿，想要避免这种情况就需要早做准备。论文写好后都会寻找相关的sci刊物投稿，大家阅读相关文献时也会知道一些与自己研究领域相关的sci刊物，掌握其影响因子及相关期刊的名称非常重要。小编建议先发一些比较高质量的期刊论文，如果能被送审，得到一些修改意见，即使被拒，也可以发表一些影响因子较低的期刊。选好期刊后根据“Instructions for Authors”，修改自己文章的格式。虽然比较繁琐的事情，却也能修改格式。比如说：文章标题、作者、通讯方式。对于参考文献也有不同的安排方式。总体来说想要发表sci论文并不容易，建议各位国内作者尽早的咨询专业老师，结合你的论文内容投稿相符合的杂志期刊，这样往往通过率会高一些。
SCI作为代表国外科研界最高的科学期刊，审稿人都是对本领域有相当研究的知名的学者，审稿严格程度不言而喻。而如果我们能用专业的语言来投稿，相信不仅能让审稿人耳目一新，而且能增强论文的专业性，促使投稿的成功。文章内应尽量注意使用本专业的专业术语，而其来源最好是专业书籍或论文而不是网上的翻译软件，同时也要注意模仿本专业内惯有的表达方式和语法习惯。